Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment: A Systematic Review for Clarifications, Framework, and Future Directions
Authors:
Hua Shen,
Tiffany Knearem,
Reshmi Ghosh,
Kenan Alkiek,
Kundan Krishna,
Yachuan Liu,
Ziqiao Ma,
Savvas Petridis,
Yi-Hao Peng,
Li Qiwei,
Sushrita Rakshit,
Chenglei Si,
Yutong Xie,
Jeffrey P. Bigham,
Frank Bentley,
Joyce Chai,
Zachary Lipton,
Qiaozhu Mei,
Rada Mihalcea,
Michael Terry,
Diyi Yang,
Meredith Ringel Morris,
Paul Resnick,
David Jurgens
Abstract:
Recent advancements in general-purpose AI have highlighted the importance of guiding AI systems towards the intended goals, ethical principles, and values of individuals and groups, a concept broadly recognized as alignment. However, the lack of clarified definitions and scopes of human-AI alignment poses a significant obstacle, hampering collaborative efforts across research domains to achieve th…
▽ More
Recent advancements in general-purpose AI have highlighted the importance of guiding AI systems towards the intended goals, ethical principles, and values of individuals and groups, a concept broadly recognized as alignment. However, the lack of clarified definitions and scopes of human-AI alignment poses a significant obstacle, hampering collaborative efforts across research domains to achieve this alignment. In particular, ML- and philosophy-oriented alignment research often views AI alignment as a static, unidirectional process (i.e., aiming to ensure that AI systems' objectives match humans) rather than an ongoing, mutual alignment problem [429]. This perspective largely neglects the long-term interaction and dynamic changes of alignment. To understand these gaps, we introduce a systematic review of over 400 papers published between 2019 and January 2024, spanning multiple domains such as Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML), and others. We characterize, define and scope human-AI alignment. From this, we present a conceptual framework of "Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment" to organize the literature from a human-centered perspective. This framework encompasses both 1) conventional studies of aligning AI to humans that ensures AI produces the intended outcomes determined by humans, and 2) a proposed concept of aligning humans to AI, which aims to help individuals and society adjust to AI advancements both cognitively and behaviorally. Additionally, we articulate the key findings derived from literature analysis, including discussions about human values, interaction techniques, and evaluations. To pave the way for future studies, we envision three key challenges for future directions and propose examples of potential future solutions.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2024; v1 submitted 13 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Three Hours a Day: Understanding Current Teen Practices of Smartphone Application Use
Authors:
Frank Bentley,
Karen Church,
Beverly Harrison,
Kent Lyons,
Matthew Rafalow
Abstract:
Teens are using mobile devices for an increasing number of activities. Smartphones and a variety of mobile apps for communication, entertainment, and productivity have become an integral part of their lives. This mobile phone use has evolved rapidly as technology has changed and thus studies from even 2 or 3 years ago may not reflect new patterns and practices as smartphones have become more sophi…
▽ More
Teens are using mobile devices for an increasing number of activities. Smartphones and a variety of mobile apps for communication, entertainment, and productivity have become an integral part of their lives. This mobile phone use has evolved rapidly as technology has changed and thus studies from even 2 or 3 years ago may not reflect new patterns and practices as smartphones have become more sophisticated. In order to understand current teen's practices around smartphone use, we conducted a two week, mixed-methods study with 14 diverse teens. Through voicemail diaries, interviews, and real world usage data from a logging application installed on their smartphones, we developed an understanding of the types of apps used by teens, when they use these apps, and their reasons for using specific apps in particular situations. We found that the teens in our study used their smartphones for an average of almost 3 hours per day and that two-thirds of all app use involved interacting with an average of almost 10 distinct communications applications. From our study data, we highlight key implications for the design of future mobile apps or services, specifically new social and communications-related applications that allow teens to maintain desired levels of privacy and permanence on the content that they share.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
