Tuning to non-veridical features in attention and perceptual decision-making
Authors:
Stefanie I. Becker,
Zachary Hamblin-Frohman,
Hongfeng Xia,
Zeguo Qiu
Abstract:
When searching for a lost item, we tune attention to the known properties of the object. Previously, it was believed that attention is tuned to the veridical attributes of the search target (e.g., orange), or an attribute that is slightly shifted away from irrelevant features towards a value that can more optimally distinguish the target from the distractors (e.g., red-orange; optimal tuning). How…
▽ More
When searching for a lost item, we tune attention to the known properties of the object. Previously, it was believed that attention is tuned to the veridical attributes of the search target (e.g., orange), or an attribute that is slightly shifted away from irrelevant features towards a value that can more optimally distinguish the target from the distractors (e.g., red-orange; optimal tuning). However, recent studies showed that attention is often tuned to the relative feature of the search target (e.g., redder), so that all items that match the relative features of the target equally attract attention (e.g., all redder items; relational account). Optimal tuning was shown to occur only at a later stage of identifying the target. However, the evidence for this division mainly relied on eye tracking studies that assessed the first eye movements. The present study tested whether this division can also be observed when the task is completed with covert attention and without moving the eyes. We used the N2pc in the EEG of participants to assess covert attention, and found comparable results: Attention was initially tuned to the relative colour of the target, as shown by a significantly larger N2pc to relatively matching distractors than a target-coloured distractor. However, in the response accuracies, a slightly shifted, "optimal" distractor interfered most strongly with target identification. These results confirm that early (covert) attention is tuned to the relative properties of an item, in line with the relational account, while later decision-making processes may be biased to optimal features.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
The progression of visual search in multiple item displays: First relational, then feature-based
Authors:
Zachary Hamblin-Frohman,
Koralalage Don Raveen Amarasekera,
Stefanie I. Becker
Abstract:
It is well-known that visual attention can be tuned in a context-dependent manner to elementary features, such as searching for all redder items or the reddest item, supporting a relational theory of visual attention. However, in previous studies, the conditions were often conducive for relational search, allowing successfully selecting the target relationally on 50% of trials or more. Moreover, t…
▽ More
It is well-known that visual attention can be tuned in a context-dependent manner to elementary features, such as searching for all redder items or the reddest item, supporting a relational theory of visual attention. However, in previous studies, the conditions were often conducive for relational search, allowing successfully selecting the target relationally on 50% of trials or more. Moreover, the search displays were often only sparsely populated and presented repeatedly, rendering it possible that relational search was based on context learning and not spontaneous. The present study tested the shape of the attentional tuning function in 36-item search displays, when the target never had a maximal feature value (e.g., was never the reddest or yellowest item), and when only the target colour but not the context colour was known. The first fixations on a trial showed that these displays still reliably evoked relational search, even when participants had no advance information about the context and no on-task training. Context learning further strengthened relational tuning on subsequent trials, but was not necessary for relational search. Analysing the progression of visual search within a singe trial showed that attention is first guided to the relationally maximal item (e.g., reddest), then the next-maximal (e.g., next-reddest) item, and so forth, before attention can hone in on target-matching features. In sum, the results support two tenets of the relational account, that information about the dominant feature in a display can be rapidly extracted and used to guide attention to the relatively best-matching features.
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
