Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Baum, T E
-
Inferring neural dynamics during burst suppression using a neurophysiology-inspired switching state-space model
Authors:
Gabriel Schamberg,
Sourish Chakravarty,
Taylor E. Baum,
Emery N. Brown
Abstract:
Burst suppression is an electroencephalography (EEG) pattern associated with profoundly inactivated brain states characterized by cerebral metabolic depression. Its distinctive feature is alternation between short temporal segments of near-isoelectric inactivity (suppressions) and relatively high-voltage activity (bursts). Prior modeling studies suggest that burst-suppression EEG is a manifestatio…
▽ More
Burst suppression is an electroencephalography (EEG) pattern associated with profoundly inactivated brain states characterized by cerebral metabolic depression. Its distinctive feature is alternation between short temporal segments of near-isoelectric inactivity (suppressions) and relatively high-voltage activity (bursts). Prior modeling studies suggest that burst-suppression EEG is a manifestation of two alternating brain states associated with consumption (during a burst) and production (during a suppression) of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). This finding motivates us to infer latent states characterizing alternating brain states and underlying ATP kinetics from instantaneous power of multichannel EEG using a switching state-space model. Our model assumes Gaussian distributed data as a broadcast network manifestation of one of two global brain states. The two brain states are allowed to stochastically alternate with transition probabilities that depend on the instantaneous ATP level, which evolves according to first-order kinetics. The rate constants governing the ATP kinetics are allowed to vary as first-order autoregressive processes. Our latent state estimates are determined from data using a sequential Monte Carlo algorithm. Our neurophysiology-informed model not only provides unsupervised segmentation of multi-channel burst-suppression EEG but can also generate additional insights on the level of brain inactivation during anesthesia.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Constructing a control-ready model of EEG signal during general anesthesia in humans
Authors:
John H. Abel,
Marcus A. Badgeley,
Taylor E. Baum,
Sourish Chakravarty,
Patrick L. Purdon,
Emery N. Brown
Abstract:
Significant effort toward the automation of general anesthesia has been made in the past decade. One open challenge is in the development of control-ready patient models for closed-loop anesthesia delivery. Standard depth-of-anesthesia tracking does not readily capture inter-individual differences in response to anesthetics, especially those due to age, and does not aim to predict a relationship b…
▽ More
Significant effort toward the automation of general anesthesia has been made in the past decade. One open challenge is in the development of control-ready patient models for closed-loop anesthesia delivery. Standard depth-of-anesthesia tracking does not readily capture inter-individual differences in response to anesthetics, especially those due to age, and does not aim to predict a relationship between a control input (infused anesthetic dose) and system state (commonly, a function of electroencephalography (EEG) signal). In this work, we developed a control-ready patient model for closed-loop propofol-induced anesthesia using data recorded during a clinical study of EEG during general anesthesia in ten healthy volunteers. We used principal component analysis to identify the low-dimensional state-space in which EEG signal evolves during anesthesia delivery. We parameterized the response of the EEG signal to changes in propofol target-site concentration using logistic models. We note that inter-individual differences in anesthetic sensitivity may be captured by varying a constant cofactor of the predicted effect-site concentration. We linked the EEG dose-response with the control input using a pharmacokinetic model. Finally, we present a simple nonlinear model predictive control in silico demonstration of how such a closed-loop system would work.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
