-
European Strategy for Particle Physics -- Accelerator R&D Roadmap
Authors:
C. Adolphsen,
D. Angal-Kalinin,
T. Arndt,
M. Arnold,
R. Assmann,
B. Auchmann,
K. Aulenbacher,
A. Ballarino,
B. Baudouy,
P. Baudrenghien,
M. Benedikt,
S. Bentvelsen,
A. Blondel,
A. Bogacz,
F. Bossi,
L. Bottura,
S. Bousson,
O. Brüning,
R. Brinkmann,
M. Bruker,
O. Brunner,
P. N. Burrows,
G. Burt,
S. Calatroni,
K. Cassou
, et al. (111 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The 2020 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics emphasised the importance of an intensified and well-coordinated programme of accelerator R&D, supporting the design and delivery of future particle accelerators in a timely, affordable and sustainable way. This report sets out a roadmap for European accelerator R&D for the next five to ten years, covering five topical areas identified…
▽ More
The 2020 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics emphasised the importance of an intensified and well-coordinated programme of accelerator R&D, supporting the design and delivery of future particle accelerators in a timely, affordable and sustainable way. This report sets out a roadmap for European accelerator R&D for the next five to ten years, covering five topical areas identified in the Strategy update. The R&D objectives include: improvement of the performance and cost-performance of magnet and radio-frequency acceleration systems; investigations of the potential of laser / plasma acceleration and energy-recovery linac techniques; and development of new concepts for muon beams and muon colliders. The goal of the roadmap is to document the collective view of the field on the next steps for the R&D programme, and to provide the evidence base to support subsequent decisions on prioritisation, resourcing and implementation.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2022; v1 submitted 19 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Recent developments in LLRF and its controls at CERN Linac4
Authors:
Bartosz Bielawski,
Philippe Baudrenghien,
Robert Borner
Abstract:
At the end of the Large Hadron Collider's Run 2, CERN's Proton Injector Linac 2, commissioned in 1978, delivered its final beam in December 2018. For Run 3, from March 2021, a new H$^{-}$ will take over the role: Linac4. The machine has been producing test beams since 2013 and in 2016 it reached its design 160 MeV energy with 20 mA beam current. Since then several improvements have been made which…
▽ More
At the end of the Large Hadron Collider's Run 2, CERN's Proton Injector Linac 2, commissioned in 1978, delivered its final beam in December 2018. For Run 3, from March 2021, a new H$^{-}$ will take over the role: Linac4. The machine has been producing test beams since 2013 and in 2016 it reached its design 160 MeV energy with 20 mA beam current. Since then several improvements have been made which enhance the LLRF performance and stability. In this paper the structure of the machine and the control system are presented. Problems arising from different RF station types are described and our solutions explained, along with new features recently added to the LLRF. An Adaptive Feed Forward implemented as a flexible hybrid hardware-software solution is described, and first results of this application running on a laboratory test stand are presented. Addition of the set point modulation needed for longitudinal phase-space painting is discussed. Finally, software tools for automation of setting up, monitoring and operations are described. As the hardware and low-level software are still reaching maturity, these are only briefly introduced here.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2019; v1 submitted 27 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Prediction of Beam Losses during Crab Cavity Quenches at the HL-LHC
Authors:
Robert Apsimon,
Graeme Burt,
Amos Dexter,
Nick Shipman,
Philippe Baudrenghien,
Rama Calaga,
Alejandro Castilla,
Alick Macpherson,
Kyrre Ness Sjobak,
Andrea Santamaria Garcia,
Niall Stapley,
Androula Alekou,
Robert Appleby
Abstract:
Studies of the crab cavities at KEKB revealed that the RF phase could shift by up to 50o within ~50 us during a quench; while the cavity voltage is still at approximately 75% of its nominal amplitude. If such a failure were to occur on the HL-LHC crab cavities, it is likely that the machine would sustain substantial damage to the beam line and surrounding infrastructure due to uncontrolled beam lo…
▽ More
Studies of the crab cavities at KEKB revealed that the RF phase could shift by up to 50o within ~50 us during a quench; while the cavity voltage is still at approximately 75% of its nominal amplitude. If such a failure were to occur on the HL-LHC crab cavities, it is likely that the machine would sustain substantial damage to the beam line and surrounding infrastructure due to uncontrolled beam loss before the machine protection system could dump the beam. We have developed a low-level RF system model, including detuning mechanisms and beam loading, and use this to simulate the behaviour of a crab cavity during a quench, modeling the low-level RF system, detuning mechanisms and beam loading. We supplement this with measurement data of the actual RF response of the proof of principle Double-Quarter Wave Crab Cravity during a quench. Extrapolating these measurements to the HL-LHC, we show that Lorentz Force detuning is the dominant effect leading to phase shifts in the crab cavity during quenches; rather than pressure detuning which is expected to be dominant for the KEKB crab cavities. The total frequency shift for the HL-LHC crab cavities during quenches is expected to be about 460 Hz, leading to a phase shift of no more than 3o. The results of the quench model are read into a particle tracking simulation, SixTrack, and used to determine the effect of quenches on the HL-LHC beam. The quench model has been benchmarked against the KEKB experimental measurements. In this paper we present the results of the simulations on a crab cavity failure for HL-LHC as well as for the SPS and show that beam loss is negligible when using a realistic low-level RF response.
△ Less
Submitted 4 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
RF Systems
Authors:
P. Baudrenghien,
G. Burt,
R. Calaga,
O. Capatina,
W. Hofle,
E. Jensen,
A. Macpherson,
E. Montesinos,
A. Ratti,
E. Shaposhnikova
Abstract:
Chapter 4 in High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC). The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is one of the largest scientific instruments ever built. Since opening up a new energy frontier for exploration in 2010, it has gathered a global user community of about 7,000 scientists working in fundamental particle physics and the physics of hadronic matter at extreme temperature and density. To sustai…
▽ More
Chapter 4 in High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC). The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is one of the largest scientific instruments ever built. Since opening up a new energy frontier for exploration in 2010, it has gathered a global user community of about 7,000 scientists working in fundamental particle physics and the physics of hadronic matter at extreme temperature and density. To sustain and extend its discovery potential, the LHC will need a major upgrade in the 2020s. This will increase its luminosity (rate of collisions) by a factor of five beyond the original design value and the integrated luminosity (total collisions created) by a factor ten. The LHC is already a highly complex and exquisitely optimised machine so this upgrade must be carefully conceived and will require about ten years to implement. The new configuration, known as High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), will rely on a number of key innovations that push accelerator technology beyond its present limits. Among these are cutting-edge 11-12 tesla superconducting magnets, compact superconducting cavities for beam rotation with ultra-precise phase control, new technology and physical processes for beam collimation and 300 metre-long high-power superconducting links with negligible energy dissipation. The present document describes the technologies and components that will be used to realise the project and is intended to serve as the basis for the detailed engineering design of HL-LHC.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Synchronous Phase Shift at LHC
Authors:
J. F. Esteban Müller,
P. Baudrenghien,
G. Iadarola,
T. Mastoridis,
G. Papotti,
G. Rumolo,
E. Shaposhnikova,
D. Valuch
Abstract:
The electron cloud in vacuum pipes of accelerators of positively charged particle beams causes a beam energy loss which could be estimated from the synchronous phase. Measurements done with beams of 75 ns, 50 ns, and 25 ns bunch spacing in the LHC for some fills in 2010 and 2011 show that the average energy loss depends on the total beam intensity in the ring. Later measurements during the scrubbi…
▽ More
The electron cloud in vacuum pipes of accelerators of positively charged particle beams causes a beam energy loss which could be estimated from the synchronous phase. Measurements done with beams of 75 ns, 50 ns, and 25 ns bunch spacing in the LHC for some fills in 2010 and 2011 show that the average energy loss depends on the total beam intensity in the ring. Later measurements during the scrubbing run with 50 ns beams show the reduction of the electron cloud due to scrubbing. Finally, measurements of the individual bunch phase give us information about the electron cloud build-up inside the batch and from batch to batch.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
-
Low-level RF - Part I: Longitudinal dynamics and beam-based loops in synchrotrons
Authors:
P. Baudrenghien
Abstract:
The low-level RF system (LLRF) generates the drive sent to the high-power equipment. In synchrotrons, it uses signals from beam pick-ups (radial and longitudinal) to minimize the beam losses and provide a beam with reproducible parameters (intensity, bunch length, average momentum and momentum spread) for either the next accelerator or the physicists. This presentation is the first of three: it co…
▽ More
The low-level RF system (LLRF) generates the drive sent to the high-power equipment. In synchrotrons, it uses signals from beam pick-ups (radial and longitudinal) to minimize the beam losses and provide a beam with reproducible parameters (intensity, bunch length, average momentum and momentum spread) for either the next accelerator or the physicists. This presentation is the first of three: it considers synchrotrons in the lowintensity regime where the voltage in the RF cavity is not influenced by the beam. As the author is in charge of the LHC LLRF and currently commissioning it, much material is particularly relevant to hadron machines. A section is concerned with radiation dam** in lepton machines.
△ Less
Submitted 12 January, 2012;
originally announced January 2012.
