Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Barthels, H

MOM: Matrix Operations in MLIR

Authors: Lorenzo Chelini, Henrik Barthels, Paolo Bientinesi, Marcin Copik, Tobias Grosser, Daniele G. Spampinato

Abstract: Modern research in code generators for dense linear algebra computations has shown the ability to produce optimized code with a performance which compares and often exceeds the one of state-of-the-art implementations by domain experts. However, the underlying infrastructure is often developed in isolation making the interconnection of logically combinable systems complicated if not impossible. In… ▽ More Modern research in code generators for dense linear algebra computations has shown the ability to produce optimized code with a performance which compares and often exceeds the one of state-of-the-art implementations by domain experts. However, the underlying infrastructure is often developed in isolation making the interconnection of logically combinable systems complicated if not impossible. In this paper, we propose to leverage MLIR as a unifying compiler infrastructure for the optimization of dense linear algebra operations. We propose a new MLIR dialect for expressing linear algebraic computations including matrix properties to enable high-level algorithmic transformations. The integration of this new dialect in MLIR enables end-to-end compilation of matrix computations via conversion to existing lower-level dialects already provided by the framework. △ Less

Submitted 22 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 3 pages, 1 figure, 1 table, and 3 listings. Short paper presented at 12th International Workshop on Polyhedral Compilation Techniques (IMPACT 22)

Fireiron: A Scheduling Language for High-Performance Linear Algebra on GPUs

Authors: Bastian Hagedorn, Archibald Samuel Elliott, Henrik Barthels, Rastislav Bodik, Vinod Grover

Abstract: Achieving high-performance GPU kernels requires optimizing algorithm implementations to the targeted GPU architecture. It is of utmost importance to fully use the compute and memory hierarchy, as well as available specialised hardware. Currently, vendor libraries like cuBLAS and cuDNN provide the best performing implementations of GPU algorithms. However the task of the library programmer is incre… ▽ More Achieving high-performance GPU kernels requires optimizing algorithm implementations to the targeted GPU architecture. It is of utmost importance to fully use the compute and memory hierarchy, as well as available specialised hardware. Currently, vendor libraries like cuBLAS and cuDNN provide the best performing implementations of GPU algorithms. However the task of the library programmer is incredibly challenging: for each provided algorithm, high-performance implementations have to be developed for all commonly used architectures, input sizes, and different storage formats. These implementations are generally provided as optimized assembly code because performance-critical architectural features are only exposed at this level. This prevents reuse between different implementations of even the same algorithm, as simple differences can have major effects on low-level implementation details. In this paper we introduce Fireiron, a DSL and compiler which allows the specification of high-performance GPU implementations as compositions of simple and reusable building blocks. We show how to use Fireiron to optimize matrix multiplication implementations, achieving performance matching hand-coded CUDA kernels, even when using specialised hardware such as NIVIDA Tensor Cores, and outperforming state-of-the-art implementations provided by cuBLAS by more than 2x. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Linnea: Automatic Generation of Efficient Linear Algebra Programs

Authors: Henrik Barthels, Christos Psarras, Paolo Bientinesi

Abstract: The translation of linear algebra computations into efficient sequences of library calls is a non-trivial task that requires expertise in both linear algebra and high-performance computing. Almost all high-level languages and libraries for matrix computations (e.g., Matlab, Eigen) internally use optimized kernels such as those provided by BLAS and LAPACK; however, their translation algorithms are… ▽ More The translation of linear algebra computations into efficient sequences of library calls is a non-trivial task that requires expertise in both linear algebra and high-performance computing. Almost all high-level languages and libraries for matrix computations (e.g., Matlab, Eigen) internally use optimized kernels such as those provided by BLAS and LAPACK; however, their translation algorithms are often too simplistic and thus lead to a suboptimal use of said kernels, resulting in significant performance losses. In order to combine the productivity offered by high-level languages, and the performance of low-level kernels, we are develo** Linnea, a code generator for linear algebra problems. As input, Linnea takes a high-level description of a linear algebra problem; as output, it returns an efficient sequence of calls to high-performance kernels. Linnea uses a custom best-first search algorithm to find a first solution in less than a second, and increasingly better solutions when given more time. In 125 test problems, the code generated by Linnea almost always outperforms Matlab, Julia, Eigen and Armadillo, with speedups up to and exceeding 10x. △ Less

Submitted 30 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Comments: Extended version of arXiv:1907.02778

The Linear Algebra Map** Problem. Current state of linear algebra languages and libraries

Authors: Christos Psarras, Henrik Barthels, Paolo Bientinesi

Abstract: We observe a disconnect between the developers and the end users of linear algebra libraries. On the one hand, the numerical linear algebra and the high-performance communities invest significant effort in the development and optimization of highly sophisticated numerical kernels and libraries, aiming at the maximum exploitation of both the properties of the input matrices, and the architectural f… ▽ More We observe a disconnect between the developers and the end users of linear algebra libraries. On the one hand, the numerical linear algebra and the high-performance communities invest significant effort in the development and optimization of highly sophisticated numerical kernels and libraries, aiming at the maximum exploitation of both the properties of the input matrices, and the architectural features of the target computing platform. On the other hand, end users are progressively less likely to go through the error-prone and time consuming process of directly using said libraries by writing their code in C or Fortran; instead, languages and libraries such as Matlab, Julia, Eigen and Armadillo, which offer a higher level of abstraction, are becoming more and more popular. Users are given the opportunity to code matrix computations with a syntax that closely resembles the mathematical description; it is then a compiler or an interpreter that internally maps the input program to lower level kernels, as provided by libraries such as BLAS and LAPACK. Unfortunately, our experience suggests that in terms of performance, this translation is typically vastly suboptimal. In this paper, we first introduce the Linear Algebra Map** Problem, and then investigate how effectively a benchmark of test problems is solved by popular high-level programming languages. Specifically, we consider Matlab, Octave, Julia, R, Armadillo (C++), Eigen (C++), and NumPy (Python); the benchmark is meant to test both standard compiler optimizations such as common subexpression elimination and loop-invariant code motion, as well as linear algebra specific optimizations such as optimal parenthesization of a matrix product and kernel selection for matrices with properties. The aim of this study is to give concrete guidelines for the development of languages and libraries that support linear algebra computations. △ Less

Submitted 5 September, 2021; v1 submitted 21 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Automatic Generation of Efficient Linear Algebra Programs

Authors: Henrik Barthels, Christos Psarras, Paolo Bientinesi

Abstract: The level of abstraction at which application experts reason about linear algebra computations and the level of abstraction used by developers of high-performance numerical linear algebra libraries do not match. The former is conveniently captured by high-level languages and libraries such as Matlab and Eigen, while the latter expresses the kernels included in the BLAS and LAPACK libraries. Unfort… ▽ More The level of abstraction at which application experts reason about linear algebra computations and the level of abstraction used by developers of high-performance numerical linear algebra libraries do not match. The former is conveniently captured by high-level languages and libraries such as Matlab and Eigen, while the latter expresses the kernels included in the BLAS and LAPACK libraries. Unfortunately, the translation from a high-level computation to an efficient sequence of kernels is a task, far from trivial, that requires extensive knowledge of both linear algebra and high-performance computing. Internally, almost all high-level languages and libraries use efficient kernels; however, the translation algorithms are too simplistic and thus lead to a suboptimal use of said kernels, with significant performance losses. In order to both achieve the productivity that comes with high-level languages, and make use of the efficiency of low level kernels, we are develo** Linnea, a code generator for linear algebra problems. As input, Linnea takes a high-level description of a linear algebra problem and produces as output an efficient sequence of calls to high-performance kernels. In 25 application problems, the code generated by Linnea always outperforms Matlab, Julia, Eigen and Armadillo, with speedups up to and exceeding 10x. △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2020; v1 submitted 5 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Journal ref: Proceedings of the Platform for Advanced Scientific Computing Conference (2020) 1-11

The Generalized Matrix Chain Algorithm

Authors: Henrik Barthels, Marcin Copik, Paolo Bientinesi

Abstract: In this paper, we present a generalized version of the matrix chain algorithm to generate efficient code for linear algebra problems, a task for which human experts often invest days or even weeks of works. The standard matrix chain problem consists in finding the parenthesization of a matrix product $M := A_1 A_2 \cdots A_n$ that minimizes the number of scalar operations. In practical application… ▽ More In this paper, we present a generalized version of the matrix chain algorithm to generate efficient code for linear algebra problems, a task for which human experts often invest days or even weeks of works. The standard matrix chain problem consists in finding the parenthesization of a matrix product $M := A_1 A_2 \cdots A_n$ that minimizes the number of scalar operations. In practical applications, however, one frequently encounters more complicated expressions, involving transposition, inversion, and matrix properties. Indeed, the computation of such expressions relies on a set of computational kernels that offer functionality well beyond the simple matrix product. The challenge then shifts from finding an optimal parenthesization to finding an optimal map** of the input expression to the available kernels. Furthermore, it is often the case that a solution based on the minimization of scalar operations does not result in the optimal solution in terms of execution time. In our experiments, the generated code outperforms other libraries and languages on average by a factor of about 9. The motivation for this work comes from the fact that---despite great advances in the development of compilers---the task of map** linear algebra problems to optimized kernels is still to be done manually. In order to relieve the user from this complex task, new techniques for the compilation of linear algebra expressions have to be developed. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Journal ref: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, Vienna, Austria, February 24-28, 2018

MatchPy: A Pattern Matching Library

Authors: Manuel Krebber, Henrik Barthels, Paolo Bientinesi

Abstract: Pattern matching is a powerful tool for symbolic computations, based on the well-defined theory of term rewriting systems. Application domains include algebraic expressions, abstract syntax trees, and XML and JSON data. Unfortunately, no lightweight implementation of pattern matching as general and flexible as Mathematica exists for Python Mathics,MacroPy,patterns,PyPatt. Therefore, we created the… ▽ More Pattern matching is a powerful tool for symbolic computations, based on the well-defined theory of term rewriting systems. Application domains include algebraic expressions, abstract syntax trees, and XML and JSON data. Unfortunately, no lightweight implementation of pattern matching as general and flexible as Mathematica exists for Python Mathics,MacroPy,patterns,PyPatt. Therefore, we created the open source module MatchPy which offers similar pattern matching functionality in Python using a novel algorithm which finds matches for large pattern sets more efficiently by exploiting similarities between patterns. △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1710.00077

Efficient Pattern Matching in Python

Authors: Manuel Krebber, Henrik Barthels, Paolo Bientinesi

Abstract: Pattern matching is a powerful tool for symbolic computations. Applications include term rewriting systems, as well as the manipulation of symbolic expressions, abstract syntax trees, and XML and JSON data. It also allows for an intuitive description of algorithms in the form of rewrite rules. We present the open source Python module MatchPy, which offers functionality and expressiveness similar t… ▽ More Pattern matching is a powerful tool for symbolic computations. Applications include term rewriting systems, as well as the manipulation of symbolic expressions, abstract syntax trees, and XML and JSON data. It also allows for an intuitive description of algorithms in the form of rewrite rules. We present the open source Python module MatchPy, which offers functionality and expressiveness similar to the pattern matching in Mathematica. In particular, it includes syntactic pattern matching, as well as matching for commutative and/or associative functions, sequence variables, and matching with constraints. MatchPy uses new and improved algorithms to efficiently find matches for large pattern sets by exploiting similarities between patterns. The performance of MatchPy is investigated on several real-world problems. △ Less

Submitted 29 September, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Systematic Generation of Algorithms for Iterative Methods

Authors: Henrik Barthels

Abstract: The FLAME methodology makes it possible to derive provably correct algorithms from a formal description of a linear algebra problem. So far, the methodology has been successfully used to automate the derivation of direct algorithms such as the Cholesky decomposition and the solution of Sylvester equations. In this thesis, we present an extension of the FLAME methodology to tackle iterative methods… ▽ More The FLAME methodology makes it possible to derive provably correct algorithms from a formal description of a linear algebra problem. So far, the methodology has been successfully used to automate the derivation of direct algorithms such as the Cholesky decomposition and the solution of Sylvester equations. In this thesis, we present an extension of the FLAME methodology to tackle iterative methods such as Conjugate Gradient. As a starting point, we use a formal description of the iterative method in matrix form. The result is a family of provably correct pseudocode algorithms. We argue that all the intermediate steps are sufficiently systematic to be fully automated. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2018; v1 submitted 1 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: Master's Thesis

The Matrix Chain Algorithm to Compile Linear Algebra Expressions

Authors: Henrik Barthels, Paolo Bientinesi

Abstract: The matrix chain problem consists in finding the parenthesization of a matrix product $M := A_1 A_2 \cdots A_n$ that minimizes the number of scalar operations. In practical applications, however, one frequently encounters more complicated scenarios, where expressions involve transposition, inversion, matrices with given properties, and sequences. The computation of such expressions makes use of a… ▽ More The matrix chain problem consists in finding the parenthesization of a matrix product $M := A_1 A_2 \cdots A_n$ that minimizes the number of scalar operations. In practical applications, however, one frequently encounters more complicated scenarios, where expressions involve transposition, inversion, matrices with given properties, and sequences. The computation of such expressions makes use of a set of computational kernels that offer functionality well beyond the simple matrix product. The challenge then shifts from finding an optimal parenthesization to finding an optimal map** of the input expression to the available kernels. Furthermore, it is often the case that a solution based on the minimization of scalar operations does not result in the optimal solution in terms of execution time, and/or might be numerically unstable. In this paper, we introduce a number of generalizations of the matrix chain problem--including kernels, properties, sequences, and cost functions--and present corresponding algorithmic solutions. The motivation for this work comes from the fact that--despite great advances in the development of compilers--the task of map** linear algebra problems to optimized kernels is still to be done manually. In order to relieve the user from this complex task, new techniques for the compilation of linear algebra expressions have to be developed. △ Less

Submitted 17 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Comments: DSLDI 2016