English Prompts are Better for NLI-based Zero-Shot Emotion Classification than Target-Language Prompts
Authors:
Patrick Bareiß,
Roman Klinger,
Jeremy Barnes
Abstract:
Emotion classification in text is a challenging task due to the processes involved when interpreting a textual description of a potential emotion stimulus. In addition, the set of emotion categories is highly domain-specific. For instance, literature analysis might require the use of aesthetic emotions (e.g., finding something beautiful), and social media analysis could benefit from fine-grained s…
▽ More
Emotion classification in text is a challenging task due to the processes involved when interpreting a textual description of a potential emotion stimulus. In addition, the set of emotion categories is highly domain-specific. For instance, literature analysis might require the use of aesthetic emotions (e.g., finding something beautiful), and social media analysis could benefit from fine-grained sets (e.g., separating anger from annoyance) than only those that represent basic categories as they have been proposed by Paul Ekman (anger, disgust, fear, joy, surprise, sadness). This renders the task an interesting field for zero-shot classifications, in which the label set is not known at model development time. Unfortunately, most resources for emotion analysis are English, and therefore, most studies on emotion analysis have been performed in English, including those that involve prompting language models for text labels. This leaves us with a research gap that we address in this paper: In which language should we prompt for emotion labels on non-English texts? This is particularly of interest when we have access to a multilingual large language model, because we could request labels with English prompts even for non-English data. Our experiments with natural language inference-based language models show that it is consistently better to use English prompts even if the data is in a different language.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2024; v1 submitted 5 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
Code Generation Tools (Almost) for Free? A Study of Few-Shot, Pre-Trained Language Models on Code
Authors:
Patrick Bareiß,
Beatriz Souza,
Marcelo d'Amorim,
Michael Pradel
Abstract:
Few-shot learning with large-scale, pre-trained language models is a powerful way to answer questions about code, e.g., how to complete a given code example, or even generate code snippets from scratch. The success of these models raises the question whether they could serve as a basis for building a wide range code generation tools. Traditionally, such tools are built manually and separately for…
▽ More
Few-shot learning with large-scale, pre-trained language models is a powerful way to answer questions about code, e.g., how to complete a given code example, or even generate code snippets from scratch. The success of these models raises the question whether they could serve as a basis for building a wide range code generation tools. Traditionally, such tools are built manually and separately for each task. Instead, few-shot learning may allow to obtain different tools from a single pre-trained language model by simply providing a few examples or a natural language description of the expected tool behavior. This paper studies to what extent a state-of-the-art, pre-trained language model of code, Codex, may serve this purpose. We consider three code manipulation and code generation tasks targeted by a range of traditional tools: (i) code mutation; (ii) test oracle generation from natural language documentation; and (iii) test case generation. For each task, we compare few-shot learning to a manually built tool. Our results show that the model-based tools complement (code mutation), are on par (test oracle generation), or even outperform their respective traditionally built tool (test case generation), while imposing far less effort to develop them. By comparing the effectiveness of different variants of the model-based tools, we provide insights on how to design an appropriate input ("prompt") to the model and what influence the size of the model has. For example, we find that providing a small natural language description of the code generation task is an easy way to improve predictions. Overall, we conclude that few-shot language models are surprisingly effective, yet there is still more work to be done, such as exploring more diverse ways of prompting and tackling even more involved tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2022; v1 submitted 2 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
