Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Bansal, A K

Hierarchical Policy Learning is Sensitive to Goal Space Design

Authors: Zach Dwiel, Madhavun Candadai, Mariano Phielipp, Arjun K. Bansal

Abstract: Hierarchy in reinforcement learning agents allows for control at multiple time scales yielding improved sample efficiency, the ability to deal with long time horizons and transferability of sub-policies to tasks outside the training distribution. It is often implemented as a master policy providing goals to a sub-policy. Ideally, we would like the goal-spaces to be learned, however, properties of… ▽ More Hierarchy in reinforcement learning agents allows for control at multiple time scales yielding improved sample efficiency, the ability to deal with long time horizons and transferability of sub-policies to tasks outside the training distribution. It is often implemented as a master policy providing goals to a sub-policy. Ideally, we would like the goal-spaces to be learned, however, properties of optimal goal spaces still remain unknown and consequently there is no method yet to learn optimal goal spaces. Motivated by this, we systematically analyze how various modifications to the ground-truth goal-space affect learning in hierarchical models with the aim of identifying important properties of optimal goal spaces. Our results show that, while rotation of ground-truth goal spaces and noise had no effect, having additional unnecessary factors significantly impaired learning in hierarchical models. △ Less

Submitted 25 June, 2019; v1 submitted 4 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: Accepted to be presented at Task-Agnostic Reinforcement Learning (TARL) workshop at ICLR'19

Intel nGraph: An Intermediate Representation, Compiler, and Executor for Deep Learning

Authors: Scott Cyphers, Arjun K. Bansal, Anahita Bhiwandiwalla, Jayaram Bobba, Matthew Brookhart, Avijit Chakraborty, Will Constable, Christian Convey, Leona Cook, Omar Kanawi, Robert Kimball, Jason Knight, Nikolay Korovaiko, Varun Kumar, Yixing Lao, Christopher R. Lishka, Jaikrishnan Menon, Jennifer Myers, Sandeep Aswath Narayana, Adam Procter, Tristan J. Webb

Abstract: The Deep Learning (DL) community sees many novel topologies published each year. Achieving high performance on each new topology remains challenging, as each requires some level of manual effort. This issue is compounded by the proliferation of frameworks and hardware platforms. The current approach, which we call "direct optimization", requires deep changes within each framework to improve the tr… ▽ More The Deep Learning (DL) community sees many novel topologies published each year. Achieving high performance on each new topology remains challenging, as each requires some level of manual effort. This issue is compounded by the proliferation of frameworks and hardware platforms. The current approach, which we call "direct optimization", requires deep changes within each framework to improve the training performance for each hardware backend (CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, ASICs) and requires $\mathcal{O}(fp)$ effort; where $f$ is the number of frameworks and $p$ is the number of platforms. While optimized kernels for deep-learning primitives are provided via libraries like Intel Math Kernel Library for Deep Neural Networks (MKL-DNN), there are several compiler-inspired ways in which performance can be further optimized. Building on our experience creating neon (a fast deep learning library on GPUs), we developed Intel nGraph, a soon to be open-sourced C++ library to simplify the realization of optimized deep learning performance across frameworks and hardware platforms. Initially-supported frameworks include TensorFlow, MXNet, and Intel neon framework. Initial backends are Intel Architecture CPUs (CPU), the Intel(R) Nervana Neural Network Processor(R) (NNP), and NVIDIA GPUs. Currently supported compiler optimizations include efficient memory management and data layout abstraction. In this paper, we describe our overall architecture and its core components. In the future, we envision extending nGraph API support to a wider range of frameworks, hardware (including FPGAs and ASICs), and compiler optimizations (training versus inference optimizations, multi-node and multi-device scaling via efficient sub-graph partitioning, and HW-specific compounding of operations). △ Less

Submitted 29 January, 2018; v1 submitted 24 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

Flexpoint: An Adaptive Numerical Format for Efficient Training of Deep Neural Networks

Authors: Urs Köster, Tristan J. Webb, Xin Wang, Marcel Nassar, Arjun K. Bansal, William H. Constable, Oğuz H. Elibol, Scott Gray, Stewart Hall, Luke Hornof, Amir Khosrowshahi, Carey Kloss, Ruby J. Pai, Naveen Rao

Abstract: Deep neural networks are commonly developed and trained in 32-bit floating point format. Significant gains in performance and energy efficiency could be realized by training and inference in numerical formats optimized for deep learning. Despite advances in limited precision inference in recent years, training of neural networks in low bit-width remains a challenging problem. Here we present the F… ▽ More Deep neural networks are commonly developed and trained in 32-bit floating point format. Significant gains in performance and energy efficiency could be realized by training and inference in numerical formats optimized for deep learning. Despite advances in limited precision inference in recent years, training of neural networks in low bit-width remains a challenging problem. Here we present the Flexpoint data format, aiming at a complete replacement of 32-bit floating point format training and inference, designed to support modern deep network topologies without modifications. Flexpoint tensors have a shared exponent that is dynamically adjusted to minimize overflows and maximize available dynamic range. We validate Flexpoint by training AlexNet, a deep residual network and a generative adversarial network, using a simulator implemented with the neon deep learning framework. We demonstrate that 16-bit Flexpoint closely matches 32-bit floating point in training all three models, without any need for tuning of model hyperparameters. Our results suggest Flexpoint as a promising numerical format for future hardware for training and inference. △ Less

Submitted 2 December, 2017; v1 submitted 6 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Comments: 14 pages, 5 figures, accepted in Neural Information Processing Systems 2017

Unifying Geometric Features and Facial Action Units for Improved Performance of Facial Expression Analysis

Authors: Mehdi Ghayoumi, Arvind K Bansal

Abstract: Previous approaches to model and analyze facial expression analysis use three different techniques: facial action units, geometric features and graph based modelling. However, previous approaches have treated these technique separately. There is an interrelationship between these techniques. The facial expression analysis is significantly improved by utilizing these map**s between major geometri… ▽ More Previous approaches to model and analyze facial expression analysis use three different techniques: facial action units, geometric features and graph based modelling. However, previous approaches have treated these technique separately. There is an interrelationship between these techniques. The facial expression analysis is significantly improved by utilizing these map**s between major geometric features involved in facial expressions and the subset of facial action units whose presence or absence are unique to a facial expression. This paper combines dimension reduction techniques and image classification with search space pruning achieved by this unique subset of facial action units to significantly prune the search space. The performance results on the publicly facial expression database shows an improvement in performance by 70% over time while maintaining the emotion recognition correctness. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.

Comments: 8 pages, ISBN: 978-1-61804-285-9

Discovering Hidden Factors of Variation in Deep Networks

Authors: Brian Cheung, Jesse A. Livezey, Arjun K. Bansal, Bruno A. Olshausen

Abstract: Deep learning has enjoyed a great deal of success because of its ability to learn useful features for tasks such as classification. But there has been less exploration in learning the factors of variation apart from the classification signal. By augmenting autoencoders with simple regularization terms during training, we demonstrate that standard deep architectures can discover and explicitly repr… ▽ More Deep learning has enjoyed a great deal of success because of its ability to learn useful features for tasks such as classification. But there has been less exploration in learning the factors of variation apart from the classification signal. By augmenting autoencoders with simple regularization terms during training, we demonstrate that standard deep architectures can discover and explicitly represent factors of variation beyond those relevant for categorization. We introduce a cross-covariance penalty (XCov) as a method to disentangle factors like handwriting style for digits and subject identity in faces. We demonstrate this on the MNIST handwritten digit database, the Toronto Faces Database (TFD) and the Multi-PIE dataset by generating manipulated instances of the data. Furthermore, we demonstrate these deep networks can extrapolate `hidden' variation in the supervised signal. △ Less

Submitted 17 June, 2015; v1 submitted 19 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

Comments: Presented at International Conference on Learning Representations 2015 Workshop