-
PreprintMatch: a tool for preprint publication detection applied to analyze global inequities in scientific publishing
Authors:
Peter Eckmann,
Anita Bandrowski
Abstract:
Preprints, versions of scientific manuscripts that precede peer review, are growing in popularity. They offer an opportunity to democratize and accelerate research, as they have no publication costs or a lengthy peer review process. Preprints are often later published in peer-reviewed venues, but these publications and the original preprints are frequently not linked in any way. To this end, we de…
▽ More
Preprints, versions of scientific manuscripts that precede peer review, are growing in popularity. They offer an opportunity to democratize and accelerate research, as they have no publication costs or a lengthy peer review process. Preprints are often later published in peer-reviewed venues, but these publications and the original preprints are frequently not linked in any way. To this end, we developed a tool, PreprintMatch, to find matches between preprints and their corresponding published papers, if they exist. This tool outperforms existing techniques to match preprints and papers, both on matching performance and speed. PreprintMatch was applied to search for matches between preprints (from bioRxiv and medRxiv), and PubMed. The preliminary nature of preprints offers a unique perspective into scientific projects at a relatively early stage, and with better matching between preprint and paper, we explored questions related to research inequity. We found that preprints from low income countries are published as peer-reviewed papers at a lower rate than high income countries (39.6\% and 61.1\%, respectively), and our data is consistent with previous work that cite a lack of resources, lack of stability, and policy choices to explain this discrepancy. Preprints from low income countries were also found to be published quicker (178 vs 203 days) and with less title, abstract, and author similarity to the published version compared to high income countries. Low income countries add more authors from the preprint to the published version than high income countries (0.42 authors vs 0.32, respectively), a practice that is significantly more frequent in China compared to similar countries. Finally, we find that some publishers publish work with authors from lower income countries more frequently than others. PreprintMatch is available at \url{https://github.com/PeterEckmann1/preprint-match}.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Nine Best Practices for Research Software Registries and Repositories: A Concise Guide
Authors:
Task Force on Best Practices for Software Registries,
:,
Alain Monteil,
Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran,
Alexandros Ioannidis,
Alice Allen,
Allen Lee,
Anita Bandrowski,
Bruce E. Wilson,
Bryce Mecum,
Cai Fan Du,
Carly Robinson,
Daniel Garijo,
Daniel S. Katz,
David Long,
Genevieve Milliken,
Hervé Ménager,
Jessica Hausman,
Jurriaan H. Spaaks,
Katrina Fenlon,
Kristin Vanderbilt,
Lorraine Hwang,
Lynn Davis,
Martin Fenner,
Michael R. Crusoe
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientific software registries and repositories serve various roles in their respective disciplines. These resources improve software discoverability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods that might otherwise be lost over time, thereby supporting research reproducibility and replicability. However, develo** these r…
▽ More
Scientific software registries and repositories serve various roles in their respective disciplines. These resources improve software discoverability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods that might otherwise be lost over time, thereby supporting research reproducibility and replicability. However, develo** these resources takes effort, and few guidelines are available to help prospective creators of registries and repositories. To address this need, we present a set of nine best practices that can help managers define the scope, practices, and rules that govern individual registries and repositories. These best practices were distilled from the experiences of the creators of existing resources, convened by a Task Force of the FORCE11 Software Citation Implementation Working Group during the years 2019-2020. We believe that putting in place specific policies such as those presented here will help scientific software registries and repositories better serve their users and their disciplines.
△ Less
Submitted 24 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Antibody Watch: Text Mining Antibody Specificity from the Literature
Authors:
Chun-Nan Hsu,
Chia-Hui Chang,
Thamolwan Poopradubsil,
Amanda Lo,
Karen A. William,
Ko-Wei Lin,
Anita Bandrowski,
Ibrahim Burak Ozyurt,
Jeffrey S. Grethe,
Maryann E. Martone
Abstract:
Antibodies are widely used reagents to test for expression of proteins and other antigens. However, they might not always reliably produce results when they do not specifically bind to the target proteins that their providers designed them for, leading to unreliable research results. While many proposals have been developed to deal with the problem of antibody specificity, it is still challenging…
▽ More
Antibodies are widely used reagents to test for expression of proteins and other antigens. However, they might not always reliably produce results when they do not specifically bind to the target proteins that their providers designed them for, leading to unreliable research results. While many proposals have been developed to deal with the problem of antibody specificity, it is still challenging to cover the millions of antibodies that are available to researchers. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of automatically generating alerts to users of problematic antibodies by extracting statements about antibody specificity reported in the literature. The extracted alerts can be used to construct an "Antibody Watch" knowledge base containing supporting statements of problematic antibodies. We developed a deep neural network system and tested its performance with a corpus of more than two thousand articles that reported uses of antibodies. We divided the problem into two tasks. Given an input article, the first task is to identify snippets about antibody specificity and classify if the snippets report that any antibody exhibits non-specificity, and thus is problematic. The second task is to link each of these snippets to one or more antibodies mentioned in the snippet. The experimental evaluation shows that our system can accurately perform both classification and linking tasks with weighted F-scores over 0.925 and 0.923, respectively, and 0.914 overall when combined to complete the joint task. We leveraged Research Resource Identifiers (RRID) to precisely identify antibodies linked to the extracted specificity snippets. The result shows that it is feasible to construct a reliable knowledge base about problematic antibodies by text mining.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2020; v1 submitted 5 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
