Showing 1–15 of 15 results for author: Balles, L

Choice of PEFT Technique in Continual Learning: Prompt Tuning is Not All You Need

Authors: Martin Wistuba, Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad, Lukas Balles, Giovanni Zappella

Abstract: Recent Continual Learning (CL) methods have combined pretrained Transformers with prompt tuning, a parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) technique. We argue that the choice of prompt tuning in prior works was an undefended and unablated decision, which has been uncritically adopted by subsequent research, but warrants further research to understand its implications. In this paper, we conduct this… ▽ More Recent Continual Learning (CL) methods have combined pretrained Transformers with prompt tuning, a parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) technique. We argue that the choice of prompt tuning in prior works was an undefended and unablated decision, which has been uncritically adopted by subsequent research, but warrants further research to understand its implications. In this paper, we conduct this research and find that the choice of prompt tuning as a PEFT method hurts the overall performance of the CL system. To illustrate this, we replace prompt tuning with LoRA in two state-of-the-art continual learning methods: Learning to Prompt and S-Prompts. These variants consistently achieve higher accuracy across a wide range of domain-incremental and class-incremental benchmarks, while being competitive in inference speed. Our work highlights a crucial argument: unexamined choices can hinder progress in the field, and rigorous ablations, such as the PEFT method, are required to drive meaningful adoption of CL techniques in real-world applications. △ Less

Submitted 5 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

A Negative Result on Gradient Matching for Selective Backprop

Authors: Lukas Balles, Cedric Archambeau, Giovanni Zappella

Abstract: With increasing scale in model and dataset size, the training of deep neural networks becomes a massive computational burden. One approach to speed up the training process is Selective Backprop. For this approach, we perform a forward pass to obtain a loss value for each data point in a minibatch. The backward pass is then restricted to a subset of that minibatch, prioritizing high-loss examples.… ▽ More With increasing scale in model and dataset size, the training of deep neural networks becomes a massive computational burden. One approach to speed up the training process is Selective Backprop. For this approach, we perform a forward pass to obtain a loss value for each data point in a minibatch. The backward pass is then restricted to a subset of that minibatch, prioritizing high-loss examples. We build on this approach, but seek to improve the subset selection mechanism by choosing the (weighted) subset which best matches the mean gradient over the entire minibatch. We use the gradients w.r.t. the model's last layer as a cheap proxy, resulting in virtually no overhead in addition to the forward pass. At the same time, for our experiments we add a simple random selection baseline which has been absent from prior work. Surprisingly, we find that both the loss-based as well as the gradient-matching strategy fail to consistently outperform the random baseline. △ Less

Submitted 8 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: Paper accepted at the ICBINB Workshop at NeurIPS 2023

Continual Learning with Low Rank Adaptation

Authors: Martin Wistuba, Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad, Lukas Balles, Giovanni Zappella

Abstract: Recent work using pretrained transformers has shown impressive performance when fine-tuned with data from the downstream problem of interest. However, they struggle to retain that performance when the data characteristics changes. In this paper, we focus on continual learning, where a pre-trained transformer is updated to perform well on new data, while retaining its performance on data it was pre… ▽ More Recent work using pretrained transformers has shown impressive performance when fine-tuned with data from the downstream problem of interest. However, they struggle to retain that performance when the data characteristics changes. In this paper, we focus on continual learning, where a pre-trained transformer is updated to perform well on new data, while retaining its performance on data it was previously trained on. Earlier works have tackled this primarily through methods inspired from prompt tuning. We question this choice, and investigate the applicability of Low Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to continual learning. On a range of domain-incremental learning benchmarks, our LoRA-based solution, CoLoR, yields state-of-the-art performance, while still being as parameter efficient as the prompt tuning based methods. △ Less

Submitted 29 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: Accepted at Workshop on Distribution Shifts (DistShift), NeurIPS 2023

Renate: A Library for Real-World Continual Learning

Authors: Martin Wistuba, Martin Ferianc, Lukas Balles, Cedric Archambeau, Giovanni Zappella

Abstract: Continual learning enables the incremental training of machine learning models on non-stationary data streams.While academic interest in the topic is high, there is little indication of the use of state-of-the-art continual learning algorithms in practical machine learning deployment. This paper presents Renate, a continual learning library designed to build real-world updating pipelines for PyTor… ▽ More Continual learning enables the incremental training of machine learning models on non-stationary data streams.While academic interest in the topic is high, there is little indication of the use of state-of-the-art continual learning algorithms in practical machine learning deployment. This paper presents Renate, a continual learning library designed to build real-world updating pipelines for PyTorch models. We discuss requirements for the use of continual learning algorithms in practice, from which we derive design principles for Renate. We give a high-level description of the library components and interfaces. Finally, we showcase the strengths of the library by presenting experimental results. Renate may be found at https://github.com/awslabs/renate. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: Paper accepted at the CLVision workshop at CVPR 2023

PASHA: Efficient HPO and NAS with Progressive Resource Allocation

Authors: Ondrej Bohdal, Lukas Balles, Martin Wistuba, Beyza Ermis, Cédric Archambeau, Giovanni Zappella

Abstract: Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) and neural architecture search (NAS) are methods of choice to obtain the best-in-class machine learning models, but in practice they can be costly to run. When models are trained on large datasets, tuning them with HPO or NAS rapidly becomes prohibitively expensive for practitioners, even when efficient multi-fidelity methods are employed. We propose an approach t… ▽ More Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) and neural architecture search (NAS) are methods of choice to obtain the best-in-class machine learning models, but in practice they can be costly to run. When models are trained on large datasets, tuning them with HPO or NAS rapidly becomes prohibitively expensive for practitioners, even when efficient multi-fidelity methods are employed. We propose an approach to tackle the challenge of tuning machine learning models trained on large datasets with limited computational resources. Our approach, named PASHA, extends ASHA and is able to dynamically allocate maximum resources for the tuning procedure depending on the need. The experimental comparison shows that PASHA identifies well-performing hyperparameter configurations and architectures while consuming significantly fewer computational resources than ASHA. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2023; v1 submitted 14 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: Accepted at ICLR 2023

Gradient-Matching Coresets for Rehearsal-Based Continual Learning

Authors: Lukas Balles, Giovanni Zappella, Cédric Archambeau

Abstract: The goal of continual learning (CL) is to efficiently update a machine learning model with new data without forgetting previously-learned knowledge. Most widely-used CL methods rely on a rehearsal memory of data points to be reused while training on new data. Curating such a rehearsal memory to maintain a small, informative subset of all the data seen so far is crucial to the success of these meth… ▽ More The goal of continual learning (CL) is to efficiently update a machine learning model with new data without forgetting previously-learned knowledge. Most widely-used CL methods rely on a rehearsal memory of data points to be reused while training on new data. Curating such a rehearsal memory to maintain a small, informative subset of all the data seen so far is crucial to the success of these methods. We devise a coreset selection method for rehearsal-based continual learning. Our method is based on the idea of gradient matching: The gradients induced by the coreset should match, as closely as possible, those induced by the original training dataset. Inspired by the neural tangent kernel theory, we perform this gradient matching across the model's initialization distribution, allowing us to extract a coreset without having to train the model first. We evaluate the method on a wide range of continual learning scenarios and demonstrate that it improves the performance of rehearsal-based CL methods compared to competing memory management strategies such as reservoir sampling. △ Less

Submitted 28 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: A short version of this paper has been presented at the NeurIPS '21 Workshop on Distribution Shifts

Gradient-matching coresets for continual learning

Authors: Lukas Balles, Giovanni Zappella, Cédric Archambeau

Abstract: We devise a coreset selection method based on the idea of gradient matching: The gradients induced by the coreset should match, as closely as possible, those induced by the original training dataset. We evaluate the method in the context of continual learning, where it can be used to curate a rehearsal memory. Our method performs strong competitors such as reservoir sampling across a range of memo… ▽ More We devise a coreset selection method based on the idea of gradient matching: The gradients induced by the coreset should match, as closely as possible, those induced by the original training dataset. We evaluate the method in the context of continual learning, where it can be used to curate a rehearsal memory. Our method performs strong competitors such as reservoir sampling across a range of memory sizes. △ Less

Submitted 9 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: Accepted at the NeurIPS '21 Workshop on Distribution Shifts

Self-Tuning Stochastic Optimization with Curvature-Aware Gradient Filtering

Authors: Ricky T. Q. Chen, Dami Choi, Lukas Balles, David Duvenaud, Philipp Hennig

Abstract: Standard first-order stochastic optimization algorithms base their updates solely on the average mini-batch gradient, and it has been shown that tracking additional quantities such as the curvature can help de-sensitize common hyperparameters. Based on this intuition, we explore the use of exact per-sample Hessian-vector products and gradients to construct optimizers that are self-tuning and hyper… ▽ More Standard first-order stochastic optimization algorithms base their updates solely on the average mini-batch gradient, and it has been shown that tracking additional quantities such as the curvature can help de-sensitize common hyperparameters. Based on this intuition, we explore the use of exact per-sample Hessian-vector products and gradients to construct optimizers that are self-tuning and hyperparameter-free. Based on a dynamics model of the gradient, we derive a process which leads to a curvature-corrected, noise-adaptive online gradient estimate. The smoothness of our updates makes it more amenable to simple step size selection schemes, which we also base off of our estimates quantities. We prove that our model-based procedure converges in the noisy quadratic setting. Though we do not see similar gains in deep learning tasks, we can match the performance of well-tuned optimizers and ultimately, this is an interesting step for constructing self-tuning optimizers. △ Less

Submitted 9 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

The Geometry of Sign Gradient Descent

Authors: Lukas Balles, Fabian Pedregosa, Nicolas Le Roux

Abstract: Sign-based optimization methods have become popular in machine learning due to their favorable communication cost in distributed optimization and their surprisingly good performance in neural network training. Furthermore, they are closely connected to so-called adaptive gradient methods like Adam. Recent works on signSGD have used a non-standard "separable smoothness" assumption, whereas some old… ▽ More Sign-based optimization methods have become popular in machine learning due to their favorable communication cost in distributed optimization and their surprisingly good performance in neural network training. Furthermore, they are closely connected to so-called adaptive gradient methods like Adam. Recent works on signSGD have used a non-standard "separable smoothness" assumption, whereas some older works study sign gradient descent as steepest descent with respect to the $\ell_\infty$-norm. In this work, we unify these existing results by showing a close connection between separable smoothness and $\ell_\infty$-smoothness and argue that the latter is the weaker and more natural assumption. We then proceed to study the smoothness constant with respect to the $\ell_\infty$-norm and thereby isolate geometric properties of the objective function which affect the performance of sign-based methods. In short, we find sign-based methods to be preferable over gradient descent if (i) the Hessian is to some degree concentrated on its diagonal, and (ii) its maximal eigenvalue is much larger than the average eigenvalue. Both properties are common in deep networks. △ Less

Submitted 19 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Limitations of the Empirical Fisher Approximation for Natural Gradient Descent

Authors: Frederik Kunstner, Lukas Balles, Philipp Hennig

Abstract: Natural gradient descent, which preconditions a gradient descent update with the Fisher information matrix of the underlying statistical model, is a way to capture partial second-order information. Several highly visible works have advocated an approximation known as the empirical Fisher, drawing connections between approximate second-order methods and heuristics like Adam. We dispute this argumen… ▽ More Natural gradient descent, which preconditions a gradient descent update with the Fisher information matrix of the underlying statistical model, is a way to capture partial second-order information. Several highly visible works have advocated an approximation known as the empirical Fisher, drawing connections between approximate second-order methods and heuristics like Adam. We dispute this argument by showing that the empirical Fisher---unlike the Fisher---does not generally capture second-order information. We further argue that the conditions under which the empirical Fisher approaches the Fisher (and the Hessian) are unlikely to be met in practice, and that, even on simple optimization problems, the pathologies of the empirical Fisher can have undesirable effects. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2020; v1 submitted 29 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: V3: Minor corrections (typographic errors)

DeepOBS: A Deep Learning Optimizer Benchmark Suite

Authors: Frank Schneider, Lukas Balles, Philipp Hennig

Abstract: Because the choice and tuning of the optimizer affects the speed, and ultimately the performance of deep learning, there is significant past and recent research in this area. Yet, perhaps surprisingly, there is no generally agreed-upon protocol for the quantitative and reproducible evaluation of optimization strategies for deep learning. We suggest routines and benchmarks for stochastic optimizati… ▽ More Because the choice and tuning of the optimizer affects the speed, and ultimately the performance of deep learning, there is significant past and recent research in this area. Yet, perhaps surprisingly, there is no generally agreed-upon protocol for the quantitative and reproducible evaluation of optimization strategies for deep learning. We suggest routines and benchmarks for stochastic optimization, with special focus on the unique aspects of deep learning, such as stochasticity, tunability and generalization. As the primary contribution, we present DeepOBS, a Python package of deep learning optimization benchmarks. The package addresses key challenges in the quantitative assessment of stochastic optimizers, and automates most steps of benchmarking. The library includes a wide and extensible set of ready-to-use realistic optimization problems, such as training Residual Networks for image classification on ImageNet or character-level language prediction models, as well as popular classics like MNIST and CIFAR-10. The package also provides realistic baseline results for the most popular optimizers on these test problems, ensuring a fair comparison to the competition when benchmarking new optimizers, and without having to run costly experiments. It comes with output back-ends that directly produce LaTeX code for inclusion in academic publications. It supports TensorFlow and is available open source. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: Accepted at ICLR 2019. 9 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables

Competitive Collaboration: Joint Unsupervised Learning of Depth, Camera Motion, Optical Flow and Motion Segmentation

Authors: Anurag Ranjan, Varun Jampani, Lukas Balles, Kihwan Kim, Deqing Sun, Jonas Wulff, Michael J. Black

Abstract: We address the unsupervised learning of several interconnected problems in low-level vision: single view depth prediction, camera motion estimation, optical flow, and segmentation of a video into the static scene and moving regions. Our key insight is that these four fundamental vision problems are coupled through geometric constraints. Consequently, learning to solve them together simplifies the… ▽ More We address the unsupervised learning of several interconnected problems in low-level vision: single view depth prediction, camera motion estimation, optical flow, and segmentation of a video into the static scene and moving regions. Our key insight is that these four fundamental vision problems are coupled through geometric constraints. Consequently, learning to solve them together simplifies the problem because the solutions can reinforce each other. We go beyond previous work by exploiting geometry more explicitly and segmenting the scene into static and moving regions. To that end, we introduce Competitive Collaboration, a framework that facilitates the coordinated training of multiple specialized neural networks to solve complex problems. Competitive Collaboration works much like expectation-maximization, but with neural networks that act as both competitors to explain pixels that correspond to static or moving regions, and as collaborators through a moderator that assigns pixels to be either static or independently moving. Our novel method integrates all these problems in a common framework and simultaneously reasons about the segmentation of the scene into moving objects and the static background, the camera motion, depth of the static scene structure, and the optical flow of moving objects. Our model is trained without any supervision and achieves state-of-the-art performance among joint unsupervised methods on all sub-problems. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2019; v1 submitted 24 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Comments: CVPR 2019

Dissecting Adam: The Sign, Magnitude and Variance of Stochastic Gradients

Authors: Lukas Balles, Philipp Hennig

Abstract: The ADAM optimizer is exceedingly popular in the deep learning community. Often it works very well, sometimes it doesn't. Why? We interpret ADAM as a combination of two aspects: for each weight, the update direction is determined by the sign of stochastic gradients, whereas the update magnitude is determined by an estimate of their relative variance. We disentangle these two aspects and analyze th… ▽ More The ADAM optimizer is exceedingly popular in the deep learning community. Often it works very well, sometimes it doesn't. Why? We interpret ADAM as a combination of two aspects: for each weight, the update direction is determined by the sign of stochastic gradients, whereas the update magnitude is determined by an estimate of their relative variance. We disentangle these two aspects and analyze them in isolation, gaining insight into the mechanisms underlying ADAM. This analysis also extends recent results on adverse effects of ADAM on generalization, isolating the sign aspect as the problematic one. Transferring the variance adaptation to SGD gives rise to a novel method, completing the practitioner's toolbox for problems where ADAM fails. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2020; v1 submitted 22 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: Presented at the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2018

Early Stop** without a Validation Set

Authors: Maren Mahsereci, Lukas Balles, Christoph Lassner, Philipp Hennig

Abstract: Early stop** is a widely used technique to prevent poor generalization performance when training an over-expressive model by means of gradient-based optimization. To find a good point to halt the optimizer, a common practice is to split the dataset into a training and a smaller validation set to obtain an ongoing estimate of the generalization performance. We propose a novel early stop** crite… ▽ More Early stop** is a widely used technique to prevent poor generalization performance when training an over-expressive model by means of gradient-based optimization. To find a good point to halt the optimizer, a common practice is to split the dataset into a training and a smaller validation set to obtain an ongoing estimate of the generalization performance. We propose a novel early stop** criterion based on fast-to-compute local statistics of the computed gradients and entirely removes the need for a held-out validation set. Our experiments show that this is a viable approach in the setting of least-squares and logistic regression, as well as neural networks. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2017; v1 submitted 28 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 16 pages, 10 figures

Coupling Adaptive Batch Sizes with Learning Rates

Authors: Lukas Balles, Javier Romero, Philipp Hennig

Abstract: Mini-batch stochastic gradient descent and variants thereof have become standard for large-scale empirical risk minimization like the training of neural networks. These methods are usually used with a constant batch size chosen by simple empirical inspection. The batch size significantly influences the behavior of the stochastic optimization algorithm, though, since it determines the variance of t… ▽ More Mini-batch stochastic gradient descent and variants thereof have become standard for large-scale empirical risk minimization like the training of neural networks. These methods are usually used with a constant batch size chosen by simple empirical inspection. The batch size significantly influences the behavior of the stochastic optimization algorithm, though, since it determines the variance of the gradient estimates. This variance also changes over the optimization process; when using a constant batch size, stability and convergence is thus often enforced by means of a (manually tuned) decreasing learning rate schedule. We propose a practical method for dynamic batch size adaptation. It estimates the variance of the stochastic gradients and adapts the batch size to decrease the variance proportionally to the value of the objective function, removing the need for the aforementioned learning rate decrease. In contrast to recent related work, our algorithm couples the batch size to the learning rate, directly reflecting the known relationship between the two. On popular image classification benchmarks, our batch size adaptation yields faster optimization convergence, while simultaneously simplifying learning rate tuning. A TensorFlow implementation is available. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2017; v1 submitted 15 December, 2016; originally announced December 2016.

Comments: Thirty-Third Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), 2017, (accepted)