-
Adiabatic energy change in the inner heliosheath: How does it affect the distribution of pickup protons and energetic neutral atom fluxes?
Authors:
I. I. Baliukin,
V. V. Izmodenov,
D. B. Alexashov
Abstract:
The hydrogen atoms penetrate the heliosphere from the local interstellar medium, and while being ionized, they form the population of pickup protons. The distribution of pickup protons is modified by the adiabatic heating (cooling) induced by the solar wind plasma compression (expansion). In this study, we emphasize the importance of the adiabatic energy change in the inner heliosheath that is usu…
▽ More
The hydrogen atoms penetrate the heliosphere from the local interstellar medium, and while being ionized, they form the population of pickup protons. The distribution of pickup protons is modified by the adiabatic heating (cooling) induced by the solar wind plasma compression (expansion). In this study, we emphasize the importance of the adiabatic energy change in the inner heliosheath that is usually either neglected or considered improperly. The effect of this process on the energy and spatial distributions of pickup protons and energetic neutral atoms (ENAs), which originate in the charge exchange of pickup protons, has been investigated and quantified using a kinetic model. The model employs the global distributions of plasma and hydrogen atoms in the heliosphere from the simulations of a kinetic-magnetohydrodynamic model of solar wind interaction with the local interstellar medium. The findings indicate that the adiabatic energy change is responsible for the broadening of the pickup proton velocity distribution and the significant enhancement of ENA fluxes (up to $\sim$5 and $\sim$20 times in the upwind and downwind directions at energies $\sim$1-2 keV for an observer at 1 au). It sheds light on the role of adiabatic energy change in explaining the discrepancies between the ENA flux observations and the results of numerical simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Backscattered solar Lyman-alpha emission as a tool for the heliospheric boundary exploration
Authors:
I. Baliukin,
J. L. Bertaux,
M. Bzowski,
V. Izmodenov,
R. Lallement,
E. Provornikova,
E. Quemerais
Abstract:
This review summarizes our current understanding of the outer heliosphere and local interstellar medium (LISM) inferred from observations and modeling of interplanetary Lyman-$α$ emission. The emission is produced by solar Lyman-alpha photons (121.567 nm) backscattered by interstellar H atoms inflowing to the heliosphere from the LISM. Studies of Lyman-alpha radiation determined the parameters of…
▽ More
This review summarizes our current understanding of the outer heliosphere and local interstellar medium (LISM) inferred from observations and modeling of interplanetary Lyman-$α$ emission. The emission is produced by solar Lyman-alpha photons (121.567 nm) backscattered by interstellar H atoms inflowing to the heliosphere from the LISM. Studies of Lyman-alpha radiation determined the parameters of interstellar hydrogen within a few astronomical units from the Sun. The interstellar hydrogen atoms appeared to be decelerated, heated, and shifted compared to the helium atoms. The detected deceleration and heating proved the existence of secondary hydrogen atoms created near the heliopause. This finding supports the discovery of a Hydrogen Wall beyond the heliosphere consisting of heated hydrogen observed in HST/GHRS Lyman-alpha absorption spectra toward nearby stars. The shift of the interstellar hydrogen bulk velocity was the first observational evidence of the global heliosphere asymmetry confirmed later by Voyager in situ measurements. SOHO/SWAN all-sky maps of the backscattered Lyman-alpha intensity identified variations of the solar wind mass flux with heliolatitude and time. In particular, two maxima at mid-latitudes were discovered during solar activity maximum, which Ulysses missed due to its specific trajectory. Finally, Voyager/UVS and New Horizons/Alice UV spectrographs discovered extra-heliospheric Lyman-alpha emission. We review these scientific breakthroughs, outline open science questions, and discuss potential future heliospheric Lyman-alpha experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
First comparison of composite 0.52-55 keV ENA spectra observed by IBEX and Cassini/INCA with simulated ENAs inferred by proton hybrid simulations downstream of the termination shock
Authors:
Matina Gkioulidou,
M. Opher,
M. Kornbleuth,
K. Dialynas,
J. Giacalone,
J. D. Richardson,
G. P. Zank,
S. A. Fuselier,
D. G. Mitchell,
S. M. Krimigis,
E. Roussos,
I. Baliukin
Abstract:
We present a first comparison of Energetic Neutral Atom (ENA) heliosheath measurements, remotely sensed by the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) mission and the Ion and Neutral Camera (INCA) on the Cassini mission, with modeled ENA inferred from interstellar pickup protons that have been accelerated at the termination shock, using hybrid simulations. The observed ENA intensities are an average…
▽ More
We present a first comparison of Energetic Neutral Atom (ENA) heliosheath measurements, remotely sensed by the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) mission and the Ion and Neutral Camera (INCA) on the Cassini mission, with modeled ENA inferred from interstellar pickup protons that have been accelerated at the termination shock, using hybrid simulations. The observed ENA intensities are an average value over the time period from 2009 to the end of 2012, along the Voyager 2 trajectory. The hybrid simulations parameters for the solar wind, interstellar pickup ions (PUIs), and magnetic field upstream of the termination shock, where Voyager 2 crossed, are based on observations. We report an energy dependent discrepancy between observed and simulated ENA fluxes, with the observed ENA fluxes, being consistently higher than the simulated ones, and discuss possible causes of this discrepancy.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Energetic pickup proton population downstream of the termination shock as revealed by the IBEX-Hi data
Authors:
I. I. Baliukin,
V. V. Izmodenov,
D. B. Alexashov
Abstract:
The pickup protons originate as a result of the ionization of hydrogen atoms in the supersonic solar wind, forming the suprathermal component of protons in the heliosphere. While picked by the heliospheric magnetic field and convected into the heliosheath, the pickup protons may suffer the stochastic acceleration by the solar wind turbulence in the region from the Sun up to the heliospheric termin…
▽ More
The pickup protons originate as a result of the ionization of hydrogen atoms in the supersonic solar wind, forming the suprathermal component of protons in the heliosphere. While picked by the heliospheric magnetic field and convected into the heliosheath, the pickup protons may suffer the stochastic acceleration by the solar wind turbulence in the region from the Sun up to the heliospheric termination shock, where they can also experience the shock-drift acceleration or the reflection from the cross-shock potential. These processes create a high-energy "tail" in the pickup ion energy distribution. The properties of this energetic pickup proton population are still not well-defined, despite they are vital for the models to simulate energetic neutral atom fluxes. We have considered two scenarios for pickup proton velocity distribution downstream of the heliospheric termination shock (filled shell with energetic power-law "tail" and bi-Maxwellian). Based on the numerical kinetic model and observations of the energetic neutral atom fluxes from the inner heliosheath by the IBEX-Hi instrument, we have characterized the pickup proton distribution and provided estimations on the properties of the energetic pickup proton population downstream of the termination shock.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Signature of a heliotail organized by the solar magnetic field and the role of non-ideal processes in modeled IBEX ENA maps: a comparison of the BU and Moscow MHD models
Authors:
M. Kornbleuth,
M. Opher,
I. Baliukin,
M. A. Dayeh,
E. Zirnstein,
M. Gkioulidou,
K. Dialynas,
A. Galli,
J. D. Richardson,
V. Izmodenov,
G. P. Zank,
S. Fuselier
Abstract:
Energetic neutral atom (ENA) models typically require post-processing routines to convert the distributions of plasma and H atoms into ENA maps. Here we investigate how two different kinetic-MHD models of the heliosphere (the BU and Moscow models) manifest in modeled ENA maps using the same prescription and how they compare with Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) observations. Both MHD models t…
▽ More
Energetic neutral atom (ENA) models typically require post-processing routines to convert the distributions of plasma and H atoms into ENA maps. Here we investigate how two different kinetic-MHD models of the heliosphere (the BU and Moscow models) manifest in modeled ENA maps using the same prescription and how they compare with Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) observations. Both MHD models treat the solar wind as a single-ion plasma for protons, which include thermal solar wind ions, pick-up ions (PUIs), and electrons. Our ENA prescription partitions the plasma into three distinct ion populations (thermal solar wind, PUIs transmitted and ones energized at the termination shock) and models the populations with Maxwellian distributions. Both kinetic-MHD heliospheric models produce a heliotail with heliosheath plasma organized by the solar magnetic field into two distinct north and south columns that become lobes of high mass flux flowing down the heliotail, though in the BU model the ISM flows between the two lobes at distances in the heliotail larger than 300 AU. While our prescription produces similar ENA maps for the two different plasma and H atom solutions at the IBEX-Hi energy range (0.5 - 6 keV), the modeled ENA maps require a scaling factor of ~2 to be in agreement with the data. This problem is present in other ENA models with the Maxwellian approximation of multiple ion species and indicates that a higher neutral density or some acceleration of PUIs in the heliosheath is required.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
The development of a split-tail heliosphere and the role of non-ideal processes: a comparison of the BU and Moscow models
Authors:
M. Kornbleuth,
M. Opher,
I. Baliukin,
M. Gkioulidou,
J. D. Richardson,
G. P. Zank,
A. T. Michael,
G. Toth,
V. Tenishev,
V. Izmodenov,
D. Alexashov,
S. Fuselier,
J. F. Drake,
K. Dialynas
Abstract:
Global models of the heliosphere are critical tools used in the interpretation of heliospheric observations. There are several three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) heliospheric models that rely on different strategies and assumptions. Until now only one paper has compared global heliosphere models, but without magnetic field effects. We compare the results of two different MHD models, the B…
▽ More
Global models of the heliosphere are critical tools used in the interpretation of heliospheric observations. There are several three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) heliospheric models that rely on different strategies and assumptions. Until now only one paper has compared global heliosphere models, but without magnetic field effects. We compare the results of two different MHD models, the BU and Moscow models. Both models use identical boundary conditions to compare how different numerical approaches and physical assumptions contribute to the heliospheric solution. Based on the different numerical treatments of discontinuities, the BU model allows for the presence of magnetic reconnection, while the Moscow model does not. Both models predict collimation of the solar outflow in the heliosheath by the solar magnetic field and produce a split-tail where the solar magnetic field confines the charged solar particles into distinct north and south columns that become lobes. In the BU model, the ISM flows between the two lobes at large distances due to MHD instabilities and reconnection. Reconnection in the BU model at the port flank affects the dra** of the interstellar magnetic field in the immediate vicinity of the heliopause. Different dra** in the models cause different ISM pressures, yielding different heliosheath thicknesses and boundary locations, with the largest effects at high latitudes. The BU model heliosheath is 15% thinner and the heliopause is 7% more inwards at the north pole relative to the Moscow model. These differences in the two plasma solutions may manifest themselves in energetic neutral atom measurements of the heliosphere.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Heliospheric Energetic Neutral Atoms: Non-stationary Modeling and Comparison with IBEX-Hi data
Authors:
I. I. Baliukin,
V. V. Izmodenov,
D. B. Alexashov
Abstract:
The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) has been measuring fluxes of the Energetic Neutral Atoms (ENAs) using the IBEX-Hi (0.3 -- 6 keV) instrument since 2008. We have developed a numerical time-depended code to calculate globally distributed flux (GDF) of hydrogen ENAs employing both 1) 3D kinetic-MHD model of the global heliosphere and 2) reconstruction of atom trajectories from 1 au, where th…
▽ More
The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) has been measuring fluxes of the Energetic Neutral Atoms (ENAs) using the IBEX-Hi (0.3 -- 6 keV) instrument since 2008. We have developed a numerical time-depended code to calculate globally distributed flux (GDF) of hydrogen ENAs employing both 1) 3D kinetic-MHD model of the global heliosphere and 2) reconstruction of atom trajectories from 1 au, where they are observed by IBEX, to the point of their origin in the inner heliosheath (IHS). The key factor in the simulation is a detailed kinetic consideration of the pickup ions (PUIs), the supra-thermal component of protons in the heliosphere, which is "parental" to the ENAs and originates in the region of the supersonic solar wind being picked by the heliospheric magnetic field. As a result of our study, we have concluded that (1) the developed model is able to reproduce the geometry of the multi-lobe structure seen in the IBEX-Hi GDF maps, (2) the GDF is extremely sensitive to the form of the velocity distribution function of PUIs in the IHS, and the accounting for the existence of an additional energetic population of PUIs is essential to explain the data, (3) despite a relatively good agreement, there are some quantitative differences between the model calculations and IBEX-Hi data. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
