Showing 1–23 of 23 results for author: Bajcsy, A

Conformalized Teleoperation: Confidently Map** Human Inputs to High-Dimensional Robot Actions

Authors: Michelle Zhao, Reid Simmons, Henny Admoni, Andrea Bajcsy

Abstract: Assistive robotic arms often have more degrees-of-freedom than a human teleoperator can control with a low-dimensional input, like a joystick. To overcome this challenge, existing approaches use data-driven methods to learn a map** from low-dimensional human inputs to high-dimensional robot actions. However, determining if such a black-box map** can confidently infer a user's intended high-dim… ▽ More Assistive robotic arms often have more degrees-of-freedom than a human teleoperator can control with a low-dimensional input, like a joystick. To overcome this challenge, existing approaches use data-driven methods to learn a map** from low-dimensional human inputs to high-dimensional robot actions. However, determining if such a black-box map** can confidently infer a user's intended high-dimensional action from low-dimensional inputs remains an open problem. Our key idea is to adapt the assistive map at training time to additionally estimate high-dimensional action quantiles, and then calibrate these quantiles via rigorous uncertainty quantification methods. Specifically, we leverage adaptive conformal prediction which adjusts the intervals over time, reducing the uncertainty bounds when the map** is performant and increasing the bounds when the map** consistently mis-predicts. Furthermore, we propose an uncertainty-interval-based mechanism for detecting high-uncertainty user inputs and robot states. We evaluate the efficacy of our proposed approach in a 2D assistive navigation task and two 7DOF Kinova Jaco tasks involving assistive cup gras** and goal reaching. Our findings demonstrate that conformalized assistive teleoperation manages to detect (but not differentiate between) high uncertainty induced by diverse preferences and induced by low-precision trajectories in the map**'s training dataset. On the whole, we see this work as a key step towards enabling robots to quantify their own uncertainty and proactively seek intervention when needed. △ Less

Submitted 10 July, 2024; v1 submitted 11 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Human-AI Safety: A Descendant of Generative AI and Control Systems Safety

Authors: Andrea Bajcsy, Jaime F. Fisac

Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is interacting with people at an unprecedented scale, offering new avenues for immense positive impact, but also raising widespread concerns around the potential for individual and societal harm. Today, the predominant paradigm for human--AI safety focuses on fine-tuning the generative model's outputs to better agree with human-provided examples or feedback. In reality… ▽ More Artificial intelligence (AI) is interacting with people at an unprecedented scale, offering new avenues for immense positive impact, but also raising widespread concerns around the potential for individual and societal harm. Today, the predominant paradigm for human--AI safety focuses on fine-tuning the generative model's outputs to better agree with human-provided examples or feedback. In reality, however, the consequences of an AI model's outputs cannot be determined in isolation: they are tightly entangled with the responses and behavior of human users over time. In this paper, we distill key complementary lessons from AI safety and control systems safety, highlighting open challenges as well as key synergies between both fields. We then argue that meaningful safety assurances for advanced AI technologies require reasoning about how the feedback loop formed by AI outputs and human behavior may drive the interaction towards different outcomes. To this end, we introduce a unifying formalism to capture dynamic, safety-critical human--AI interactions and propose a concrete technical roadmap towards next-generation human-centered AI safety. △ Less

Submitted 22 June, 2024; v1 submitted 15 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Revised version with refined exposition and technical details. 12 pages + references, 5 figures

ACM Class: I.2

A General Calibrated Regret Metric for Detecting and Mitigating Human-Robot Interaction Failures

Authors: Kensuke Nakamura, Ran Tian, Andrea Bajcsy

Abstract: Robot decision-making increasingly relies on expressive data-driven human prediction models when operating around people. While these models are known to suffer from prediction errors in out-of-distribution interactions, not all prediction errors equally impact downstream robot performance. We identify that the mathematical notion of regret precisely characterizes the degree to which incorrect pre… ▽ More Robot decision-making increasingly relies on expressive data-driven human prediction models when operating around people. While these models are known to suffer from prediction errors in out-of-distribution interactions, not all prediction errors equally impact downstream robot performance. We identify that the mathematical notion of regret precisely characterizes the degree to which incorrect predictions of future interaction outcomes degraded closed-loop robot performance. However, canonical regret measures can be poorly calibrated across diverse deployment interactions. We derive a calibrated regret metric that evaluates the quality of robot decisions in probability space rather than reward space. With this transformation, our metric removes the need for explicit reward functions to calculate the robot's regret, enables fairer comparison of interaction anomalies across disparate deployment contexts, and facilitates targeted dataset construction of "system-level" prediction failures. We experimentally quantify the value of this high-regret interaction data for aiding the robot in improving its downstream decision-making. In a suite of closed-loop autonomous driving simulations, we find that fine-tuning ego-conditioned behavior predictors exclusively on high-regret human-robot interaction data can improve the robot's overall re-deployment performance with significantly (77%) less data. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2024; v1 submitted 7 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: 6 figures, 4 tables

Intent Demonstration in General-Sum Dynamic Games via Iterative Linear-Quadratic Approximations

Authors: **gqi Li, Anand Siththaranjan, Somayeh Sojoudi, Claire Tomlin, Andrea Bajcsy

Abstract: Autonomous agents should be able to coordinate with other agents without knowing their intents ahead of time. While prior work has studied how agents can gather information about the intent of others, in this work we study the inverse problem: how agents can demonstrate their intent to others, within the framework of general-sum dynamic games. We first present a model of this intent demonstration… ▽ More Autonomous agents should be able to coordinate with other agents without knowing their intents ahead of time. While prior work has studied how agents can gather information about the intent of others, in this work we study the inverse problem: how agents can demonstrate their intent to others, within the framework of general-sum dynamic games. We first present a model of this intent demonstration problem and then propose an algorithm that enables an agent to trade off their task performance and intent demonstration to improve the overall system's performance. To scale to continuous states and action spaces as well as to nonlinear dynamics and costs, our algorithm leverages linear-quadratic approximations with an efficient intent teaching guarantee. Our empirical results show that intent demonstration accelerates other agents' learning and enables the demonstrating agent to balance task performance with intent expression. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: Under review by L4DC 2024

Adaptive Human Trajectory Prediction via Latent Corridors

Authors: Neerja Thakkar, Karttikeya Mangalam, Andrea Bajcsy, Jitendra Malik

Abstract: Human trajectory prediction is typically posed as a zero-shot generalization problem: a predictor is learnt on a dataset of human motion in training scenes, and then deployed on unseen test scenes. While this paradigm has yielded tremendous progress, it fundamentally assumes that trends in human behavior within the deployment scene are constant over time. As such, current prediction models are una… ▽ More Human trajectory prediction is typically posed as a zero-shot generalization problem: a predictor is learnt on a dataset of human motion in training scenes, and then deployed on unseen test scenes. While this paradigm has yielded tremendous progress, it fundamentally assumes that trends in human behavior within the deployment scene are constant over time. As such, current prediction models are unable to adapt to scene-specific transient human behaviors, such as crowds temporarily gathering to see buskers, pedestrians hurrying through the rain and avoiding puddles, or a protest breaking out. We formalize the problem of scene-specific adaptive trajectory prediction and propose a new adaptation approach inspired by prompt tuning called latent corridors. By augmenting the input of any pre-trained human trajectory predictor with learnable image prompts, the predictor can improve in the deployment scene by inferring trends from extremely small amounts of new data (e.g., 2 humans observed for 30 seconds). With less than 0.1% additional model parameters, we see up to 23.9% ADE improvement in MOTSynth simulated data and 16.4% ADE in MOT and Wildtrack real pedestrian data. Qualitatively, we observe that latent corridors imbue predictors with an awareness of scene geometry and scene-specific human behaviors that non-adaptive predictors struggle to capture. The project website can be found at https://neerja.me/atp_latent_corridors/. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2024; v1 submitted 11 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: Accepted to ECCV 2024. Project website can be found at https://neerja.me/atp_latent_corridors/

What Matters to You? Towards Visual Representation Alignment for Robot Learning

Authors: Ran Tian, Chenfeng Xu, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Jitendra Malik, Andrea Bajcsy

Abstract: When operating in service of people, robots need to optimize rewards aligned with end-user preferences. Since robots will rely on raw perceptual inputs like RGB images, their rewards will inevitably use visual representations. Recently there has been excitement in using representations from pre-trained visual models, but key to making these work in robotics is fine-tuning, which is typically done… ▽ More When operating in service of people, robots need to optimize rewards aligned with end-user preferences. Since robots will rely on raw perceptual inputs like RGB images, their rewards will inevitably use visual representations. Recently there has been excitement in using representations from pre-trained visual models, but key to making these work in robotics is fine-tuning, which is typically done via proxy tasks like dynamics prediction or enforcing temporal cycle-consistency. However, all these proxy tasks bypass the human's input on what matters to them, exacerbating spurious correlations and ultimately leading to robot behaviors that are misaligned with user preferences. In this work, we propose that robots should leverage human feedback to align their visual representations with the end-user and disentangle what matters for the task. We propose Representation-Aligned Preference-based Learning (RAPL), a method for solving the visual representation alignment problem and visual reward learning problem through the lens of preference-based learning and optimal transport. Across experiments in X-MAGICAL and in robotic manipulation, we find that RAPL's reward consistently generates preferred robot behaviors with high sample efficiency, and shows strong zero-shot generalization when the visual representation is learned from a different embodiment than the robot's. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2024; v1 submitted 11 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Conformal Decision Theory: Safe Autonomous Decisions from Imperfect Predictions

Authors: Jordan Lekeufack, Anastasios N. Angelopoulos, Andrea Bajcsy, Michael I. Jordan, Jitendra Malik

Abstract: We introduce Conformal Decision Theory, a framework for producing safe autonomous decisions despite imperfect machine learning predictions. Examples of such decisions are ubiquitous, from robot planning algorithms that rely on pedestrian predictions, to calibrating autonomous manufacturing to exhibit high throughput and low error, to the choice of trusting a nominal policy versus switching to a sa… ▽ More We introduce Conformal Decision Theory, a framework for producing safe autonomous decisions despite imperfect machine learning predictions. Examples of such decisions are ubiquitous, from robot planning algorithms that rely on pedestrian predictions, to calibrating autonomous manufacturing to exhibit high throughput and low error, to the choice of trusting a nominal policy versus switching to a safe backup policy at run-time. The decisions produced by our algorithms are safe in the sense that they come with provable statistical guarantees of having low risk without any assumptions on the world model whatsoever; the observations need not be I.I.D. and can even be adversarial. The theory extends results from conformal prediction to calibrate decisions directly, without requiring the construction of prediction sets. Experiments demonstrate the utility of our approach in robot motion planning around humans, automated stock trading, and robot manufacturing. △ Less

Submitted 2 May, 2024; v1 submitted 9 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures

Deception Game: Closing the Safety-Learning Loop in Interactive Robot Autonomy

Authors: Haimin Hu, Zixu Zhang, Kensuke Nakamura, Andrea Bajcsy, Jaime F. Fisac

Abstract: An outstanding challenge for the widespread deployment of robotic systems like autonomous vehicles is ensuring safe interaction with humans without sacrificing performance. Existing safety methods often neglect the robot's ability to learn and adapt at runtime, leading to overly conservative behavior. This paper proposes a new closed-loop paradigm for synthesizing safe control policies that explic… ▽ More An outstanding challenge for the widespread deployment of robotic systems like autonomous vehicles is ensuring safe interaction with humans without sacrificing performance. Existing safety methods often neglect the robot's ability to learn and adapt at runtime, leading to overly conservative behavior. This paper proposes a new closed-loop paradigm for synthesizing safe control policies that explicitly account for the robot's evolving uncertainty and its ability to quickly respond to future scenarios as they arise, by jointly considering the physical dynamics and the robot's learning algorithm. We leverage adversarial reinforcement learning for tractable safety analysis under high-dimensional learning dynamics and demonstrate our framework's ability to work with both Bayesian belief propagation and implicit learning through large pre-trained neural trajectory predictors. △ Less

Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 3 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: Conference on Robot Learning 2023

Learning Vision-based Pursuit-Evasion Robot Policies

Authors: Andrea Bajcsy, Antonio Loquercio, Ashish Kumar, Jitendra Malik

Abstract: Learning strategic robot behavior -- like that required in pursuit-evasion interactions -- under real-world constraints is extremely challenging. It requires exploiting the dynamics of the interaction, and planning through both physical state and latent intent uncertainty. In this paper, we transform this intractable problem into a supervised learning problem, where a fully-observable robot policy… ▽ More Learning strategic robot behavior -- like that required in pursuit-evasion interactions -- under real-world constraints is extremely challenging. It requires exploiting the dynamics of the interaction, and planning through both physical state and latent intent uncertainty. In this paper, we transform this intractable problem into a supervised learning problem, where a fully-observable robot policy generates supervision for a partially-observable one. We find that the quality of the supervision signal for the partially-observable pursuer policy depends on two key factors: the balance of diversity and optimality of the evader's behavior and the strength of the modeling assumptions in the fully-observable policy. We deploy our policy on a physical quadruped robot with an RGB-D camera on pursuit-evasion interactions in the wild. Despite all the challenges, the sensing constraints bring about creativity: the robot is pushed to gather information when uncertain, predict intent from noisy measurements, and anticipate in order to intercept. Project webpage: https://abajcsy.github.io/vision-based-pursuit/ △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: Includes Supplementary. Project webpage at https://abajcsy.github.io/vision-based-pursuit/

StROL: Stabilized and Robust Online Learning from Humans

Authors: Shaunak A. Mehta, Forrest Meng, Andrea Bajcsy, Dylan P. Losey

Abstract: Robots often need to learn the human's reward function online, during the current interaction. This real-time learning requires fast but approximate learning rules: when the human's behavior is noisy or suboptimal, current approximations can result in unstable robot learning. Accordingly, in this paper we seek to enhance the robustness and convergence properties of gradient descent learning rules… ▽ More Robots often need to learn the human's reward function online, during the current interaction. This real-time learning requires fast but approximate learning rules: when the human's behavior is noisy or suboptimal, current approximations can result in unstable robot learning. Accordingly, in this paper we seek to enhance the robustness and convergence properties of gradient descent learning rules when inferring the human's reward parameters. We model the robot's learning algorithm as a dynamical system over the human preference parameters, where the human's true (but unknown) preferences are the equilibrium point. This enables us to perform Lyapunov stability analysis to derive the conditions under which the robot's learning dynamics converge. Our proposed algorithm (StROL) uses these conditions to learn robust-by-design learning rules: given the original learning dynamics, StROL outputs a modified learning rule that now converges to the human's true parameters under a larger set of human inputs. In practice, these autonomously generated learning rules can correctly infer what the human is trying to convey, even when the human is noisy, biased, and suboptimal. Across simulations and a user study we find that StROL results in a more accurate estimate and less regret than state-of-the-art approaches for online reward learning. See videos and code here: https://github.com/VT-Collab/StROL_RAL △ Less

Submitted 4 January, 2024; v1 submitted 18 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Contingency Games for Multi-Agent Interaction

Authors: Lasse Peters, Andrea Bajcsy, Chih-Yuan Chiu, David Fridovich-Keil, Forrest Laine, Laura Ferranti, Javier Alonso-Mora

Abstract: Contingency planning, wherein an agent generates a set of possible plans conditioned on the outcome of an uncertain event, is an increasingly popular way for robots to act under uncertainty. In this work we take a game-theoretic perspective on contingency planning, tailored to multi-agent scenarios in which a robot's actions impact the decisions of other agents and vice versa. The resulting contin… ▽ More Contingency planning, wherein an agent generates a set of possible plans conditioned on the outcome of an uncertain event, is an increasingly popular way for robots to act under uncertainty. In this work we take a game-theoretic perspective on contingency planning, tailored to multi-agent scenarios in which a robot's actions impact the decisions of other agents and vice versa. The resulting contingency game allows the robot to efficiently interact with other agents by generating strategic motion plans conditioned on multiple possible intents for other actors in the scene. Contingency games are parameterized via a scalar variable which represents a future time when intent uncertainty will be resolved. By estimating this parameter online, we construct a game-theoretic motion planner that adapts to changing beliefs while anticipating future certainty. We show that existing variants of game-theoretic planning under uncertainty are readily obtained as special cases of contingency games. Through a series of simulated autonomous driving scenarios, we demonstrate that contingency games close the gap between certainty-equivalent games that commit to a single hypothesis and non-contingent multi-hypothesis games that do not account for future uncertainty reduction. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2023; v1 submitted 11 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Towards Modeling and Influencing the Dynamics of Human Learning

Authors: Ran Tian, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Anca Dragan, Andrea Bajcsy

Abstract: Humans have internal models of robots (like their physical capabilities), the world (like what will happen next), and their tasks (like a preferred goal). However, human internal models are not always perfect: for example, it is easy to underestimate a robot's inertia. Nevertheless, these models change and improve over time as humans gather more experience. Interestingly, robot actions influence w… ▽ More Humans have internal models of robots (like their physical capabilities), the world (like what will happen next), and their tasks (like a preferred goal). However, human internal models are not always perfect: for example, it is easy to underestimate a robot's inertia. Nevertheless, these models change and improve over time as humans gather more experience. Interestingly, robot actions influence what this experience is, and therefore influence how people's internal models change. In this work we take a step towards enabling robots to understand the influence they have, leverage it to better assist people, and help human models more quickly align with reality. Our key idea is to model the human's learning as a nonlinear dynamical system which evolves the human's internal model given new observations. We formulate a novel optimization problem to infer the human's learning dynamics from demonstrations that naturally exhibit human learning. We then formalize how robots can influence human learning by embedding the human's learning dynamics model into the robot planning problem. Although our formulations provide concrete problem statements, they are intractable to solve in full generality. We contribute an approximation that sacrifices the complexity of the human internal models we can represent, but enables robots to learn the nonlinear dynamics of these internal models. We evaluate our inference and planning methods in a suite of simulated environments and an in-person user study, where a 7DOF robotic arm teaches participants to be better teleoperators. While influencing human learning remains an open problem, our results demonstrate that this influence is possible and can be helpful in real human-robot interaction. △ Less

Submitted 2 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: 18th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2023

Towards Robots that Influence Humans over Long-Term Interaction

Authors: Shahabedin Sagheb, Ye-Ji Mun, Neema Ahmadian, Benjamin A. Christie, Andrea Bajcsy, Katherine Driggs-Campbell, Dylan P. Losey

Abstract: When humans interact with robots influence is inevitable. Consider an autonomous car driving near a human: the speed and steering of the autonomous car will affect how the human drives. Prior works have developed frameworks that enable robots to influence humans towards desired behaviors. But while these approaches are effective in the short-term (i.e., the first few human-robot interactions), her… ▽ More When humans interact with robots influence is inevitable. Consider an autonomous car driving near a human: the speed and steering of the autonomous car will affect how the human drives. Prior works have developed frameworks that enable robots to influence humans towards desired behaviors. But while these approaches are effective in the short-term (i.e., the first few human-robot interactions), here we explore long-term influence (i.e., repeated interactions between the same human and robot). Our central insight is that humans are dynamic: people adapt to robots, and behaviors which are influential now may fall short once the human learns to anticipate the robot's actions. With this insight, we experimentally demonstrate that a prevalent game-theoretic formalism for generating influential robot behaviors becomes less effective over repeated interactions. Next, we propose three modifications to Stackelberg games that make the robot's policy both influential and unpredictable. We finally test these modifications across simulations and user studies: our results suggest that robots which purposely make their actions harder to anticipate are better able to maintain influence over long-term interaction. See videos here: https://youtu.be/ydO83cgjZ2Q △ Less

Submitted 5 September, 2023; v1 submitted 21 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Safety Assurances for Human-Robot Interaction via Confidence-aware Game-theoretic Human Models

Authors: Ran Tian, Liting Sun, Andrea Bajcsy, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Anca D. Dragan

Abstract: An outstanding challenge with safety methods for human-robot interaction is reducing their conservatism while maintaining robustness to variations in human behavior. In this work, we propose that robots use confidence-aware game-theoretic models of human behavior when assessing the safety of a human-robot interaction. By treating the influence between the human and robot as well as the human's rat… ▽ More An outstanding challenge with safety methods for human-robot interaction is reducing their conservatism while maintaining robustness to variations in human behavior. In this work, we propose that robots use confidence-aware game-theoretic models of human behavior when assessing the safety of a human-robot interaction. By treating the influence between the human and robot as well as the human's rationality as unobserved latent states, we succinctly infer the degree to which a human is following the game-theoretic interaction model. We leverage this model to restrict the set of feasible human controls during safety verification, enabling the robot to confidently modulate the conservatism of its safety monitor online. Evaluations in simulated human-robot scenarios and ablation studies demonstrate that imbuing safety monitors with confidence-aware game-theoretic models enables both safe and efficient human-robot interaction. Moreover, evaluations with real traffic data show that our safety monitor is less conservative than traditional safety methods in real human driving scenarios. △ Less

Submitted 30 October, 2021; v1 submitted 29 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Towards Data-Driven Synthesis of Autonomous Vehicle Safety Concepts

Authors: Karen Leung, Andrea Bajcsy, Edward Schmerling, Marco Pavone

Abstract: As safety-critical autonomous vehicles (AVs) will soon become pervasive in our society, a number of safety concepts for trusted AV deployment have recently been proposed throughout industry and academia. Yet, achieving consensus on an appropriate safety concept is still an elusive task. In this paper, we advocate for the use of Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability as a unifying mathematical framework… ▽ More As safety-critical autonomous vehicles (AVs) will soon become pervasive in our society, a number of safety concepts for trusted AV deployment have recently been proposed throughout industry and academia. Yet, achieving consensus on an appropriate safety concept is still an elusive task. In this paper, we advocate for the use of Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability as a unifying mathematical framework for comparing existing safety concepts, and through elements of this framework propose ways to tailor safety concepts (and thus expand their applicability) to scenarios with implicit expectations on agent behavior in a data-driven fashion. Specifically, we show that (i) existing predominant safety concepts can be embedded in the HJ reachability framework, thereby enabling a common language for comparing and contrasting modeling assumptions, and (ii) HJ reachability can serve as an inductive bias to effectively reason, in a learning context, about two critical, yet often overlooked aspects of safety: responsibility and context-dependency. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2022; v1 submitted 29 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Physical Interaction as Communication: Learning Robot Objectives Online from Human Corrections

Authors: Dylan P. Losey, Andrea Bajcsy, Marcia K. O'Malley, Anca D. Dragan

Abstract: When a robot performs a task next to a human, physical interaction is inevitable: the human might push, pull, twist, or guide the robot. The state-of-the-art treats these interactions as disturbances that the robot should reject or avoid. At best, these robots respond safely while the human interacts; but after the human lets go, these robots simply return to their original behavior. We recognize… ▽ More When a robot performs a task next to a human, physical interaction is inevitable: the human might push, pull, twist, or guide the robot. The state-of-the-art treats these interactions as disturbances that the robot should reject or avoid. At best, these robots respond safely while the human interacts; but after the human lets go, these robots simply return to their original behavior. We recognize that physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) is often intentional -- the human intervenes on purpose because the robot is not doing the task correctly. In this paper, we argue that when pHRI is intentional it is also informative: the robot can leverage interactions to learn how it should complete the rest of its current task even after the person lets go. We formalize pHRI as a dynamical system, where the human has in mind an objective function they want the robot to optimize, but the robot does not get direct access to the parameters of this objective -- they are internal to the human. Within our proposed framework human interactions become observations about the true objective. We introduce approximations to learn from and respond to pHRI in real-time. We recognize that not all human corrections are perfect: often users interact with the robot noisily, and so we improve the efficiency of robot learning from pHRI by reducing unintended learning. Finally, we conduct simulations and user studies on a robotic manipulator to compare our proposed approach to the state-of-the-art. Our results indicate that learning from pHRI leads to better task performance and improved human satisfaction. △ Less

Submitted 5 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Analyzing Human Models that Adapt Online

Authors: Andrea Bajcsy, Anand Siththaranjan, Claire J. Tomlin, Anca D. Dragan

Abstract: Predictive human models often need to adapt their parameters online from human data. This raises previously ignored safety-related questions for robots relying on these models such as what the model could learn online and how quickly could it learn it. For instance, when will the robot have a confident estimate in a nearby human's goal? Or, what parameter initializations guarantee that the robot c… ▽ More Predictive human models often need to adapt their parameters online from human data. This raises previously ignored safety-related questions for robots relying on these models such as what the model could learn online and how quickly could it learn it. For instance, when will the robot have a confident estimate in a nearby human's goal? Or, what parameter initializations guarantee that the robot can learn the human's preferences in a finite number of observations? To answer such analysis questions, our key idea is to model the robot's learning algorithm as a dynamical system where the state is the current model parameter estimate and the control is the human data the robot observes. This enables us to leverage tools from reachability analysis and optimal control to compute the set of hypotheses the robot could learn in finite time, as well as the worst and best-case time it takes to learn them. We demonstrate the utility of our analysis tool in four human-robot domains, including autonomous driving and indoor navigation. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2021; v1 submitted 9 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: ICRA 2021

Quantifying Hypothesis Space Misspecification in Learning from Human-Robot Demonstrations and Physical Corrections

Authors: Andreea Bobu, Andrea Bajcsy, Jaime F. Fisac, Sampada Deglurkar, Anca D. Dragan

Abstract: Human input has enabled autonomous systems to improve their capabilities and achieve complex behaviors that are otherwise challenging to generate automatically. Recent work focuses on how robots can use such input - like demonstrations or corrections - to learn intended objectives. These techniques assume that the human's desired objective already exists within the robot's hypothesis space. In rea… ▽ More Human input has enabled autonomous systems to improve their capabilities and achieve complex behaviors that are otherwise challenging to generate automatically. Recent work focuses on how robots can use such input - like demonstrations or corrections - to learn intended objectives. These techniques assume that the human's desired objective already exists within the robot's hypothesis space. In reality, this assumption is often inaccurate: there will always be situations where the person might care about aspects of the task that the robot does not know about. Without this knowledge, the robot cannot infer the correct objective. Hence, when the robot's hypothesis space is misspecified, even methods that keep track of uncertainty over the objective fail because they reason about which hypothesis might be correct, and not whether any of the hypotheses are correct. In this paper, we posit that the robot should reason explicitly about how well it can explain human inputs given its hypothesis space and use that situational confidence to inform how it should incorporate human input. We demonstrate our method on a 7 degree-of-freedom robot manipulator in learning from two important types of human input: demonstrations of manipulation tasks, and physical corrections during the robot's task execution. △ Less

Submitted 28 February, 2020; v1 submitted 3 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: 20 pages. 12 figures, 1 table. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2020

A Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability-Based Framework for Predicting and Analyzing Human Motion for Safe Planning

Authors: Somil Bansal, Andrea Bajcsy, Ellis Ratner, Anca D. Dragan, Claire J. Tomlin

Abstract: Real-world autonomous systems often employ probabilistic predictive models of human behavior during planning to reason about their future motion. Since accurately modeling human behavior a priori is challenging, such models are often parameterized, enabling the robot to adapt predictions based on observations by maintaining a distribution over the model parameters. Although this enables data and p… ▽ More Real-world autonomous systems often employ probabilistic predictive models of human behavior during planning to reason about their future motion. Since accurately modeling human behavior a priori is challenging, such models are often parameterized, enabling the robot to adapt predictions based on observations by maintaining a distribution over the model parameters. Although this enables data and priors to improve the human model, observation models are difficult to specify and priors may be incorrect, leading to erroneous state predictions that can degrade the safety of the robot motion plan. In this work, we seek to design a predictor which is more robust to misspecified models and priors, but can still leverage human behavioral data online to reduce conservatism in a safe way. To do this, we cast human motion prediction as a Hamilton-Jacobi reachability problem in the joint state space of the human and the belief over the model parameters. We construct a new continuous-time dynamical system, where the inputs are the observations of human behavior, and the dynamics include how the belief over the model parameters change. The results of this reachability computation enable us to both analyze the effect of incorrect priors on future predictions in continuous state and time, as well as to make predictions of the human state in the future. We compare our approach to the worst-case forward reachable set and a stochastic predictor which uses Bayesian inference and produces full future state distributions. Our comparisons in simulation and in hardware demonstrate how our framework can enable robust planning while not being overly conservative, even when the human model is inaccurate. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2020; v1 submitted 29 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

An Efficient Reachability-Based Framework for Provably Safe Autonomous Navigation in Unknown Environments

Authors: Andrea Bajcsy, Somil Bansal, Eli Bronstein, Varun Tolani, Claire J. Tomlin

Abstract: Real-world autonomous vehicles often operate in a priori unknown environments. Since most of these systems are safety-critical, it is important to ensure they operate safely in the face of environment uncertainty, such as unseen obstacles. Current safety analysis tools enable autonomous systems to reason about safety given full information about the state of the environment a priori. However, thes… ▽ More Real-world autonomous vehicles often operate in a priori unknown environments. Since most of these systems are safety-critical, it is important to ensure they operate safely in the face of environment uncertainty, such as unseen obstacles. Current safety analysis tools enable autonomous systems to reason about safety given full information about the state of the environment a priori. However, these tools do not scale well to scenarios where the environment is being sensed in real time, such as during navigation tasks. In this work, we propose a novel, real-time safety analysis method based on Hamilton-Jacobi reachability that provides strong safety guarantees despite environment uncertainty. Our safety method is planner-agnostic and provides guarantees for a variety of map** sensors. We demonstrate our approach in simulation and in hardware to provide safety guarantees around a state-of-the-art vision-based, learning-based planner. △ Less

Submitted 1 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

A Scalable Framework For Real-Time Multi-Robot, Multi-Human Collision Avoidance

Authors: Andrea Bajcsy, Sylvia L. Herbert, David Fridovich-Keil, Jaime F. Fisac, Sampada Deglurkar, Anca D. Dragan, Claire J. Tomlin

Abstract: Robust motion planning is a well-studied problem in the robotics literature, yet current algorithms struggle to operate scalably and safely in the presence of other moving agents, such as humans. This paper introduces a novel framework for robot navigation that accounts for high-order system dynamics and maintains safety in the presence of external disturbances, other robots, and non-deterministic… ▽ More Robust motion planning is a well-studied problem in the robotics literature, yet current algorithms struggle to operate scalably and safely in the presence of other moving agents, such as humans. This paper introduces a novel framework for robot navigation that accounts for high-order system dynamics and maintains safety in the presence of external disturbances, other robots, and non-deterministic intentional agents. Our approach precomputes a tracking error margin for each robot, generates confidence-aware human motion predictions, and coordinates multiple robots with a sequential priority ordering, effectively enabling scalable safe trajectory planning and execution. We demonstrate our approach in hardware with two robots and two humans. We also showcase our work's scalability in a larger simulation. △ Less

Submitted 14 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Learning under Misspecified Objective Spaces

Authors: Andreea Bobu, Andrea Bajcsy, Jaime F. Fisac, Anca D. Dragan

Abstract: Learning robot objective functions from human input has become increasingly important, but state-of-the-art techniques assume that the human's desired objective lies within the robot's hypothesis space. When this is not true, even methods that keep track of uncertainty over the objective fail because they reason about which hypothesis might be correct, and not whether any of the hypotheses are cor… ▽ More Learning robot objective functions from human input has become increasingly important, but state-of-the-art techniques assume that the human's desired objective lies within the robot's hypothesis space. When this is not true, even methods that keep track of uncertainty over the objective fail because they reason about which hypothesis might be correct, and not whether any of the hypotheses are correct. We focus specifically on learning from physical human corrections during the robot's task execution, where not having a rich enough hypothesis space leads to the robot updating its objective in ways that the person did not actually intend. We observe that such corrections appear irrelevant to the robot, because they are not the best way of achieving any of the candidate objectives. Instead of naively trusting and learning from every human interaction, we propose robots learn conservatively by reasoning in real time about how relevant the human's correction is for the robot's hypothesis space. We test our inference method in an experiment with human interaction data, and demonstrate that this alleviates unintended learning in an in-person user study with a 7DoF robot manipulator. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2018; v1 submitted 11 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2018

Probabilistically Safe Robot Planning with Confidence-Based Human Predictions

Authors: Jaime F. Fisac, Andrea Bajcsy, Sylvia L. Herbert, David Fridovich-Keil, Steven Wang, Claire J. Tomlin, Anca D. Dragan

Abstract: In order to safely operate around humans, robots can employ predictive models of human motion. Unfortunately, these models cannot capture the full complexity of human behavior and necessarily introduce simplifying assumptions. As a result, predictions may degrade whenever the observed human behavior departs from the assumed structure, which can have negative implications for safety. In this paper,… ▽ More In order to safely operate around humans, robots can employ predictive models of human motion. Unfortunately, these models cannot capture the full complexity of human behavior and necessarily introduce simplifying assumptions. As a result, predictions may degrade whenever the observed human behavior departs from the assumed structure, which can have negative implications for safety. In this paper, we observe that how "rational" human actions appear under a particular model can be viewed as an indicator of that model's ability to describe the human's current motion. By reasoning about this model confidence in a real-time Bayesian framework, we show that the robot can very quickly modulate its predictions to become more uncertain when the model performs poorly. Building on recent work in provably-safe trajectory planning, we leverage these confidence-aware human motion predictions to generate assured autonomous robot motion. Our new analysis combines worst-case tracking error guarantees for the physical robot with probabilistic time-varying human predictions, yielding a quantitative, probabilistic safety certificate. We demonstrate our approach with a quadcopter navigating around a human. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Comments: Robotics Science and Systems (RSS) 2018