-
Feedback and control systems for future linear colliders: White Paper for Snowmass 2021 Topical Group AF07-RF
Authors:
Daniele Filippetto,
Carlos Serrano,
Qiang Du,
Lawrence Doolittle,
Dan Wang,
Michalis Bachtis,
Pietro Musumeci,
Alexander Scheinker,
John Power,
Marco Bellaveglia,
Alessandro Gallo,
Luca Piersanti
Abstract:
Particle accelerators for high energy physics will generate TeV-scale particle beams in large, multi-Km size machines colliding high brightness beams at the interaction point [1-4]. The high luminosity in such machines is achieved by producing very small asymmetric beam size at the interaction point, with short durations to minimize beam-beam effects. Tuning energy, timing and position of the beam…
▽ More
Particle accelerators for high energy physics will generate TeV-scale particle beams in large, multi-Km size machines colliding high brightness beams at the interaction point [1-4]. The high luminosity in such machines is achieved by producing very small asymmetric beam size at the interaction point, with short durations to minimize beam-beam effects. Tuning energy, timing and position of the beam for optimal performance will require high-precision controls of amplitude and phase of high-frequency electromagnetic fields and real-time processing of complex algorithms. The stability of the colliding beams has a large impact on the collider's effective luminosity. Therefore, the technology readiness level of diagnostic and control systems will be a major consideration in the collider design. The technical requirements of such systems depend on the specifics of beam parameters, such as transverse and longitudinal dimensions, charge/pulse and beam pulse format, which are driven by the accelerating technology of choice. While feedback systems with single bunch position monitor resolution below 50 nm and latency <300 ns have been demonstrated in beam test facilities, many advanced collider concepts make use of higher repetition rates, brighter beams and higher accelerating frequencies, and will require better performance, up to 1-2 order of magnitude, demanding aggressive R&D to be able to deliver and maintain the targeted luminosity.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2022; v1 submitted 1 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Observation of the rare $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ decay from the combined analysis of CMS and LHCb data
Authors:
The CMS,
LHCb Collaborations,
:,
V. Khachatryan,
A. M. Sirunyan,
A. Tumasyan,
W. Adam,
T. Bergauer,
M. Dragicevic,
J. Erö,
M. Friedl,
R. Frühwirth,
V. M. Ghete,
C. Hartl,
N. Hörmann,
J. Hrubec,
M. Jeitler,
W. Kiesenhofer,
V. Knünz,
M. Krammer,
I. Krätschmer,
D. Liko,
I. Mikulec,
D. Rabady,
B. Rahbaran
, et al. (2807 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A joint measurement is presented of the branching fractions $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ and $B^0\toμ^+μ^-$ in proton-proton collisions at the LHC by the CMS and LHCb experiments. The data samples were collected in 2011 at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV, and in 2012 at 8 TeV. The combined analysis produces the first observation of the $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ decay, with a statistical significance exceeding six sta…
▽ More
A joint measurement is presented of the branching fractions $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ and $B^0\toμ^+μ^-$ in proton-proton collisions at the LHC by the CMS and LHCb experiments. The data samples were collected in 2011 at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV, and in 2012 at 8 TeV. The combined analysis produces the first observation of the $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ decay, with a statistical significance exceeding six standard deviations, and the best measurement of its branching fraction so far. Furthermore, evidence for the $B^0\toμ^+μ^-$ decay is obtained with a statistical significance of three standard deviations. The branching fraction measurements are statistically compatible with SM predictions and impose stringent constraints on several theories beyond the SM.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2015; v1 submitted 17 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
-
First Look at the Physics Case of TLEP
Authors:
M. Bicer,
H. Duran Yildiz,
I. Yildiz,
G. Coignet,
M. Delmastro,
T. Alexopoulos,
C. Grojean,
S. Antusch,
T. Sen,
H. -J. He,
K. Potamianos,
S. Haug,
A. Moreno,
A. Heister,
V. Sanz,
G. Gomez-Ceballos,
M. Klute,
M. Zanetti,
L. -T. Wang,
M. Dam,
C. Boehm,
N. Glover,
F. Krauss,
A. Lenz,
M. Syphers
, et al. (106 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The discovery by the ATLAS and CMS experiments of a new boson with mass around 125 GeV and with measured properties compatible with those of a Standard-Model Higgs boson, coupled with the absence of discoveries of phenomena beyond the Standard Model at the TeV scale, has triggered interest in ideas for future Higgs factories. A new circular e+e- collider hosted in a 80 to 100 km tunnel, TLEP, is a…
▽ More
The discovery by the ATLAS and CMS experiments of a new boson with mass around 125 GeV and with measured properties compatible with those of a Standard-Model Higgs boson, coupled with the absence of discoveries of phenomena beyond the Standard Model at the TeV scale, has triggered interest in ideas for future Higgs factories. A new circular e+e- collider hosted in a 80 to 100 km tunnel, TLEP, is among the most attractive solutions proposed so far. It has a clean experimental environment, produces high luminosity for top-quark, Higgs boson, W and Z studies, accommodates multiple detectors, and can reach energies up to the t-tbar threshold and beyond. It will enable measurements of the Higgs boson properties and of Electroweak Symmetry-Breaking (EWSB) parameters with unequalled precision, offering exploration of physics beyond the Standard Model in the multi-TeV range. Moreover, being the natural precursor of the VHE-LHC, a 100 TeV hadron machine in the same tunnel, it builds up a long-term vision for particle physics. Altogether, the combination of TLEP and the VHE-LHC offers, for a great cost effectiveness, the best precision and the best search reach of all options presently on the market. This paper presents a first appraisal of the salient features of the TLEP physics potential, to serve as a baseline for a more extensive design study.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2013; v1 submitted 28 August, 2013;
originally announced August 2013.
