Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler VI: Planet Sample from Q1-Q16 (47 Months)
Authors:
F. Mullally,
Jeffrey L. Coughlin,
Susan E. Thompson,
Jason Rowe,
Christopher Burke,
David W. Latham,
Natalie M. Batalha,
Stephen T. Bryson,
Jessie Christiansen,
Christopher E. Henze,
Aviv Ofir,
Billy Quarles,
Avi Shporer,
Vincent Van Eylen,
Christa Van Laerhoven,
Yash Shah,
Angie Wolfgang,
W. J. Chaplin,
Ji-Wei Xie,
Rachel Akeson,
Vic Argabright,
Eric Bachtell,
Thomas Barclay William J. Borucki,
Douglas A. Caldwell,
Jennifer R. Campbell
, et al. (34 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
\We present the sixth catalog of Kepler candidate planets based on nearly 4 years of high precision photometry. This catalog builds on the legacy of previous catalogs released by the Kepler project and includes 1493 new Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) of which 554 are planet candidates, and 131 of these candidates have best fit radii <1.5 R_earth. This brings the total number of KOIs and planet…
▽ More
\We present the sixth catalog of Kepler candidate planets based on nearly 4 years of high precision photometry. This catalog builds on the legacy of previous catalogs released by the Kepler project and includes 1493 new Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) of which 554 are planet candidates, and 131 of these candidates have best fit radii <1.5 R_earth. This brings the total number of KOIs and planet candidates to 7305 and 4173 respectively. We suspect that many of these new candidates at the low signal-to-noise limit may be false alarms created by instrumental noise, and discuss our efforts to identify such objects. We re-evaluate all previously published KOIs with orbital periods of >50 days to provide a consistently vetted sample that can be used to improve planet occurrence rate calculations. We discuss the performance of our planet detection algorithms, and the consistency of our vetting products. The full catalog is publicly available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
Instrument Performance in Kepler's First Months
Authors:
Douglas A. Caldwell,
Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak,
Jeffrey E. Van Cleve,
Jon M. Jenkins,
Paul R. Gazis,
Vic S. Argabright,
Eric E. Bachtell,
Edward W. Dunham,
John C. Geary,
Ronald L. Gilliland,
Hema Chandrasekaran,
Jie Li,
Peter Tenenbaum,
Hayley Wu,
William J. Borucki,
Stephen T. Bryson,
Jessie L. Dotson,
Michael R. Haas,
David G. Koch
Abstract:
The Kepler Mission relies on precise differential photometry to detect the 80 parts per million (ppm) signal from an Earth-Sun equivalent transit. Such precision requires superb instrument stability on time scales up to ~2 days and systematic error removal to better than 20 ppm. To this end, the spacecraft and photometer underwent 67 days of commissioning, which included several data sets taken…
▽ More
The Kepler Mission relies on precise differential photometry to detect the 80 parts per million (ppm) signal from an Earth-Sun equivalent transit. Such precision requires superb instrument stability on time scales up to ~2 days and systematic error removal to better than 20 ppm. To this end, the spacecraft and photometer underwent 67 days of commissioning, which included several data sets taken to characterize the photometer performance. Because Kepler has no shutter, we took a series of dark images prior to the dust cover ejection, from which we measured the bias levels, dark current, and read noise. These basic detector properties are essentially unchanged from ground-based tests, indicating that the photometer is working as expected. Several image artifacts have proven more complex than when observed during ground testing, as a result of their interactions with starlight and the greater thermal stability in flight, which causes the temperature-dependent artifact variations to be on the timescales of transits. Because of Kepler's unprecedented sensitivity and stability, we have also seen several unexpected systematics that affect photometric precision. We are using the first 43 days of science data to characterize these effects and to develop detection and mitigation methods that will be implemented in the calibration pipeline. Based on early testing, we expect to attain Kepler's planned photometric precision over 80%-90% of the field of view.
△ Less
Submitted 1 January, 2010;
originally announced January 2010.
