Showing 1–49 of 49 results for author: Bürkner, P

posteriordb: Testing, Benchmarking and Develo** Bayesian Inference Algorithms

Authors: Måns Magnusson, Jakob Torgander, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Lu Zhang, Bob Carpenter, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: The generality and robustness of inference algorithms is critical to the success of widely used probabilistic programming languages such as Stan, PyMC, Pyro, and Turing.jl. When designing a new general-purpose inference algorithm, whether it involves Monte Carlo sampling or variational approximation, the fundamental problem arises in evaluating its accuracy and efficiency across a range of represe… ▽ More The generality and robustness of inference algorithms is critical to the success of widely used probabilistic programming languages such as Stan, PyMC, Pyro, and Turing.jl. When designing a new general-purpose inference algorithm, whether it involves Monte Carlo sampling or variational approximation, the fundamental problem arises in evaluating its accuracy and efficiency across a range of representative target models. To solve this problem, we propose posteriordb, a database of models and data sets defining target densities along with reference Monte Carlo draws. We further provide a guide to the best practices in using posteriordb for model evaluation and comparison. To provide a wide range of realistic target densities, posteriordb currently comprises 120 representative models and has been instrumental in develo** several general inference algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 6 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Detecting Model Misspecification in Amortized Bayesian Inference with Neural Networks: An Extended Investigation

Authors: Marvin Schmitt, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Ullrich Köthe, Stefan T. Radev

Abstract: Recent advances in probabilistic deep learning enable efficient amortized Bayesian inference in settings where the likelihood function is only implicitly defined by a simulation program (simulation-based inference; SBI). But how faithful is such inference if the simulation represents reality somewhat inaccurately, that is, if the true system behavior at test time deviates from the one seen during… ▽ More Recent advances in probabilistic deep learning enable efficient amortized Bayesian inference in settings where the likelihood function is only implicitly defined by a simulation program (simulation-based inference; SBI). But how faithful is such inference if the simulation represents reality somewhat inaccurately, that is, if the true system behavior at test time deviates from the one seen during training? We conceptualize the types of such model misspecification arising in SBI and systematically investigate how the performance of neural posterior approximators gradually deteriorates as a consequence, making inference results less and less trustworthy. To notify users about this problem, we propose a new misspecification measure that can be trained in an unsupervised fashion (i.e., without training data from the true distribution) and reliably detects model misspecification at test time. Our experiments clearly demonstrate the utility of our new measure both on toy examples with an analytical ground-truth and on representative scientific tasks in cell biology, cognitive decision making, disease outbreak dynamics, and computer vision. We show how the proposed misspecification test warns users about suspicious outputs, raises an alarm when predictions are not trustworthy, and guides model designers in their search for better simulators. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2024; v1 submitted 5 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: Extended version of the conference paper https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54605-1_35. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2112.08866

Gaussian distributional structural equation models: A framework for modeling latent heteroscedasticity

Authors: Luna Fazio, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: Accounting for the complexity of psychological theories requires methods that can predict not only changes in the means of latent variables -- such as personality factors, creativity, or intelligence -- but also changes in their variances. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is the framework of choice for analyzing complex relationships among latent variables, but current methods do not allow model… ▽ More Accounting for the complexity of psychological theories requires methods that can predict not only changes in the means of latent variables -- such as personality factors, creativity, or intelligence -- but also changes in their variances. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is the framework of choice for analyzing complex relationships among latent variables, but current methods do not allow modeling latent variances as a function of other latent variables. In this paper, we develop a Bayesian framework for Gaussian distributional SEM which overcomes this limitation. We validate our framework using extensive simulations, which demonstrate that the new models produce reliable statistical inference and can be computed with sufficient efficiency for practical everyday use. We illustrate our framework's applicability in a real-world case study that addresses a substantive hypothesis from personality psychology. △ Less

Submitted 22 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 30 pages, 13 figures

DGP-LVM: Derivative Gaussian process latent variable model

Authors: Soham Mukherjee, Manfred Claassen, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: We develop a framework for derivative Gaussian process latent variable models (DGP-LVM) that can handle multi-dimensional output data using modified derivative covariance functions. The modifications account for complexities in the underlying data generating process such as scaled derivatives, varying information across multiple output dimensions as well as interactions between outputs. Further, o… ▽ More We develop a framework for derivative Gaussian process latent variable models (DGP-LVM) that can handle multi-dimensional output data using modified derivative covariance functions. The modifications account for complexities in the underlying data generating process such as scaled derivatives, varying information across multiple output dimensions as well as interactions between outputs. Further, our framework provides uncertainty estimates for each latent variable samples using Bayesian inference. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that latent variable estimation accuracy can be drastically increased by including derivative information due to our proposed covariance function modifications. The developments are motivated by a concrete biological research problem involving the estimation of the unobserved cellular ordering from single-cell RNA (scRNA) sequencing data for gene expression and its corresponding derivative information known as RNA velocity. Since the RNA velocity is only an estimate of the exact derivative information, the derivative covariance functions need to account for potential scale differences. In a real-world case study, we illustrate the application of DGP-LVMs to such scRNA sequencing data. While motivated by this biological problem, our framework is generally applicable to all kinds of latent variable estimation problems involving derivative information irrespective of the field of study. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 22 pages, 13 figures

The Simplex Projection: Lossless Visualization of 4D Compositional Data on a 2D Canvas

Authors: Marvin Schmitt, Yuga Hikida, Stefan T Radev, Filip Sadlo, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: The simplex projection expands the capabilities of simplex plots (also known as ternary plots) to achieve a lossless visualization of 4D compositional data on a 2D canvas. Previously, this was only possible for 3D compositional data. We demonstrate how our approach can be applied to individual data points, point clouds, and continuous probability density functions on simplices. While we showcase o… ▽ More The simplex projection expands the capabilities of simplex plots (also known as ternary plots) to achieve a lossless visualization of 4D compositional data on a 2D canvas. Previously, this was only possible for 3D compositional data. We demonstrate how our approach can be applied to individual data points, point clouds, and continuous probability density functions on simplices. While we showcase our visualization technique specifically for 4D compositional data, we offer rigorous proofs that support its extension to compositional data of any (finite) dimensionality. △ Less

Submitted 17 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

ActionDiffusion: An Action-aware Diffusion Model for Procedure Planning in Instructional Videos

Authors: Lei Shi, Paul Bürkner, Andreas Bulling

Abstract: We present ActionDiffusion -- a novel diffusion model for procedure planning in instructional videos that is the first to take temporal inter-dependencies between actions into account in a diffusion model for procedure planning. This approach is in stark contrast to existing methods that fail to exploit the rich information content available in the particular order in which actions are performed.… ▽ More We present ActionDiffusion -- a novel diffusion model for procedure planning in instructional videos that is the first to take temporal inter-dependencies between actions into account in a diffusion model for procedure planning. This approach is in stark contrast to existing methods that fail to exploit the rich information content available in the particular order in which actions are performed. Our method unifies the learning of temporal dependencies between actions and denoising of the action plan in the diffusion process by projecting the action information into the noise space. This is achieved 1) by adding action embeddings in the noise masks in the noise-adding phase and 2) by introducing an attention mechanism in the noise prediction network to learn the correlations between different action steps. We report extensive experiments on three instructional video benchmark datasets (CrossTask, Coin, and NIV) and show that our method outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods on all metrics on CrossTask and NIV and all metrics except accuracy on Coin dataset. We show that by adding action embeddings into the noise mask the diffusion model can better learn action temporal dependencies and increase the performances on procedure planning. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: Submitted to IROS 2024

Generalized Decomposition Priors on R2

Authors: Javier Enrique Aguilar, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: The adoption of continuous shrinkage priors in high-dimensional linear models has gained momentum, driven by their theoretical and practical advantages. One of these shrinkage priors is the R2D2 prior, which comes with intuitive hyperparameters and well understood theoretical properties. The core idea is to specify a prior on the percentage of explained variance $R^2$ and to conduct a Dirichlet de… ▽ More The adoption of continuous shrinkage priors in high-dimensional linear models has gained momentum, driven by their theoretical and practical advantages. One of these shrinkage priors is the R2D2 prior, which comes with intuitive hyperparameters and well understood theoretical properties. The core idea is to specify a prior on the percentage of explained variance $R^2$ and to conduct a Dirichlet decomposition to distribute the explained variance among all the regression terms of the model. Due to the properties of the Dirichlet distribution, the competition among variance components tends to gravitate towards negative dependence structures, fully determined by the individual components' means. Yet, in reality, specific coefficients or groups may compete differently for the total variability than the Dirichlet would allow for. In this work we address this limitation by proposing a generalization of the R2D2 prior, which we term the Generalized Decomposition R2 (GDR2) prior. Our new prior provides great flexibility in expressing dependency structures as well as enhanced shrinkage properties. Specifically, we explore the capabilities of variance decomposition via logistic normal distributions. Through extensive simulations and real-world case studies, we demonstrate that GDR2 priors yield strongly improved out-of-sample predictive performance and parameter recovery compared to R2D2 priors with similar hyper-parameter choices. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: 31 pages, 12 figures

Consistency Models for Scalable and Fast Simulation-Based Inference

Authors: Marvin Schmitt, Valentin Pratz, Ullrich Köthe, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Stefan T Radev

Abstract: Simulation-based inference (SBI) is constantly in search of more expressive algorithms for accurately inferring the parameters of complex models from noisy data. We present consistency models for neural posterior estimation (CMPE), a new free-form conditional sampler for scalable, fast, and amortized SBI with generative neural networks. CMPE combines the advantages of normalizing flows and flow ma… ▽ More Simulation-based inference (SBI) is constantly in search of more expressive algorithms for accurately inferring the parameters of complex models from noisy data. We present consistency models for neural posterior estimation (CMPE), a new free-form conditional sampler for scalable, fast, and amortized SBI with generative neural networks. CMPE combines the advantages of normalizing flows and flow matching methods into a single generative architecture: It essentially distills a continuous probability flow and enables rapid few-shot inference with an unconstrained architecture that can be tailored to the structure of the estimation problem. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that CMPE not only outperforms current state-of-the-art algorithms on three hard low-dimensional problems but also achieves competitive performance in a high-dimensional Bayesian denoising experiment and in estimating a computationally demanding multi-scale model of tumor spheroid growth. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2024; v1 submitted 8 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation in Surrogate-based Bayesian Inference

Authors: Philipp Reiser, Javier Enrique Aguilar, Anneli Guthke, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: Surrogate models are statistical or conceptual approximations for more complex simulation models. In this context, it is crucial to propagate the uncertainty induced by limited simulation budget and surrogate approximation error to predictions, inference, and subsequent decision-relevant quantities. However, quantifying and then propagating the uncertainty of surrogates is usually limited to speci… ▽ More Surrogate models are statistical or conceptual approximations for more complex simulation models. In this context, it is crucial to propagate the uncertainty induced by limited simulation budget and surrogate approximation error to predictions, inference, and subsequent decision-relevant quantities. However, quantifying and then propagating the uncertainty of surrogates is usually limited to special analytic cases or is otherwise computationally very expensive. In this paper, we propose a framework enabling a scalable, Bayesian approach to surrogate modeling with thorough uncertainty quantification, propagation, and validation. Specifically, we present three methods for Bayesian inference with surrogate models given measurement data. This is a task where the propagation of surrogate uncertainty is especially relevant, because failing to account for it may lead to biased and/or overconfident estimates of the parameters of interest. We showcase our approach in two detailed case studies for both linear and nonlinear modeling scenarios. Uncertainty propagation in surrogate models enables more reliable and safe approximation of expensive simulators and will therefore be useful in various fields of applications. △ Less

Submitted 8 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Fuse It or Lose It: Deep Fusion for Multimodal Simulation-Based Inference

Authors: Marvin Schmitt, Stefan T. Radev, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: We present multimodal neural posterior estimation (MultiNPE), a method to integrate heterogeneous data from different sources in simulation-based inference with neural networks. Inspired by advances in deep fusion learning, it empowers researchers to analyze data from different domains and infer the parameters of complex mathematical models with increased accuracy. We formulate multimodal fusion a… ▽ More We present multimodal neural posterior estimation (MultiNPE), a method to integrate heterogeneous data from different sources in simulation-based inference with neural networks. Inspired by advances in deep fusion learning, it empowers researchers to analyze data from different domains and infer the parameters of complex mathematical models with increased accuracy. We formulate multimodal fusion approaches for \hbox{MultiNPE} (early, late, hybrid) and evaluate their performance in three challenging experiments. MultiNPE not only outperforms single-source baselines on a reference task, but also achieves superior inference on scientific models from neuroscience and cardiology. We systematically investigate the impact of partially missing data on the different fusion strategies. Across our experiments, late and hybrid fusion techniques emerge as the methods of choice for practical applications of multimodal simulation-based inference. △ Less

Submitted 26 February, 2024; v1 submitted 17 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Posterior accuracy and calibration under misspecification in Bayesian generalized linear models

Authors: Maximilian Scholz, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: Generalized linear models (GLMs) are popular for data-analysis in almost all quantitative sciences, but the choice of likelihood family and link function is often difficult. This motivates the search for likelihoods and links that minimize the impact of potential misspecification. We perform a large-scale simulation study on double-bounded and lower-bounded response data where we systematically va… ▽ More Generalized linear models (GLMs) are popular for data-analysis in almost all quantitative sciences, but the choice of likelihood family and link function is often difficult. This motivates the search for likelihoods and links that minimize the impact of potential misspecification. We perform a large-scale simulation study on double-bounded and lower-bounded response data where we systematically vary both true and assumed likelihoods and links. In contrast to previous studies, we also study posterior calibration and uncertainty metrics in addition to point-estimate accuracy. Our results indicate that certain likelihoods and links can be remarkably robust to misspecification, performing almost on par with their respective true counterparts. Additionally, normal likelihood models with identity link (i.e., linear regression) often achieve calibration comparable to the more structurally faithful alternatives, at least in the studied scenarios. On the basis of our findings, we provide practical suggestions for robust likelihood and link choices in GLMs. △ Less

Submitted 15 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2210.06927

Sensitivity-Aware Amortized Bayesian Inference

Authors: Lasse Elsemüller, Hans Olischläger, Marvin Schmitt, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Ullrich Köthe, Stefan T. Radev

Abstract: Sensitivity analyses reveal the influence of various modeling choices on the outcomes of statistical analyses. While theoretically appealing, they are overwhelmingly inefficient for complex Bayesian models. In this work, we propose sensitivity-aware amortized Bayesian inference (SA-ABI), a multifaceted approach to efficiently integrate sensitivity analyses into simulation-based inference with neur… ▽ More Sensitivity analyses reveal the influence of various modeling choices on the outcomes of statistical analyses. While theoretically appealing, they are overwhelmingly inefficient for complex Bayesian models. In this work, we propose sensitivity-aware amortized Bayesian inference (SA-ABI), a multifaceted approach to efficiently integrate sensitivity analyses into simulation-based inference with neural networks. First, we utilize weight sharing to encode the structural similarities between alternative likelihood and prior specifications in the training process with minimal computational overhead. Second, we leverage the rapid inference of neural networks to assess sensitivity to data perturbations and preprocessing steps. In contrast to most other Bayesian approaches, both steps circumvent the costly bottleneck of refitting the model for each choice of likelihood, prior, or data set. Finally, we propose to use deep ensembles to detect sensitivity arising from unreliable approximation (e.g., due to model misspecification). We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in applied modeling problems, ranging from disease outbreak dynamics and global warming thresholds to human decision-making. Our results support sensitivity-aware inference as a default choice for amortized Bayesian workflows, automatically providing modelers with insights into otherwise hidden dimensions. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2024; v1 submitted 17 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Leveraging Self-Consistency for Data-Efficient Amortized Bayesian Inference

Authors: Marvin Schmitt, Desi R. Ivanova, Daniel Habermann, Ullrich Köthe, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Stefan T. Radev

Abstract: We propose a method to improve the efficiency and accuracy of amortized Bayesian inference by leveraging universal symmetries in the joint probabilistic model of parameters and data. In a nutshell, we invert Bayes' theorem and estimate the marginal likelihood based on approximate representations of the joint model. Upon perfect approximation, the marginal likelihood is constant across all paramete… ▽ More We propose a method to improve the efficiency and accuracy of amortized Bayesian inference by leveraging universal symmetries in the joint probabilistic model of parameters and data. In a nutshell, we invert Bayes' theorem and estimate the marginal likelihood based on approximate representations of the joint model. Upon perfect approximation, the marginal likelihood is constant across all parameter values by definition. However, errors in approximate inference lead to undesirable variance in the marginal likelihood estimates across different parameter values. We penalize violations of this symmetry with a \textit{self-consistency loss} which significantly improves the quality of approximate inference in low data regimes and can be used to augment the training of popular neural density estimators. We apply our method to a number of synthetic problems and realistic scientific models, discovering notable advantages in the context of both neural posterior and likelihood approximation. △ Less

Submitted 26 February, 2024; v1 submitted 6 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: previously published as an extended abstract at NeurIPS UniReps 2023

Inferring Human Intentions from Predicted Action Probabilities

Authors: Lei Shi, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Andreas Bulling

Abstract: Predicting the next action that a human is most likely to perform is key to human-AI collaboration and has consequently attracted increasing research interests in recent years. An important factor for next action prediction are human intentions: If the AI agent knows the intention it can predict future actions and plan collaboration more effectively. Existing Bayesian methods for this task struggl… ▽ More Predicting the next action that a human is most likely to perform is key to human-AI collaboration and has consequently attracted increasing research interests in recent years. An important factor for next action prediction are human intentions: If the AI agent knows the intention it can predict future actions and plan collaboration more effectively. Existing Bayesian methods for this task struggle with complex visual input while deep neural network (DNN) based methods do not provide uncertainty quantifications. In this work we combine both approaches for the first time and show that the predicted next action probabilities contain information that can be used to infer the underlying intention. We propose a two-step approach to human intention prediction: While a DNN predicts the probabilities of the next action, MCMC-based Bayesian inference is used to infer the underlying intention from these predictions. This approach not only allows for independent design of the DNN architecture but also the subsequently fast, design-independent inference of human intentions. We evaluate our method using a series of experiments on the Watch-And-Help (WAH) and a keyboard and mouse interaction dataset. Our results show that our approach can accurately predict human intentions from observed actions and the implicit information contained in next action probabilities. Furthermore, we show that our approach can predict the correct intention even if only few actions have been observed. △ Less

Submitted 25 March, 2024; v1 submitted 23 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: Accepted by Workshop on Theory of Mind in Human-AI Interaction at CHI 2024

Simulation-Based Prior Knowledge Elicitation for Parametric Bayesian Models

Authors: Florence Bockting, Stefan T. Radev, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: A central characteristic of Bayesian statistics is the ability to consistently incorporate prior knowledge into various modeling processes. In this paper, we focus on translating domain expert knowledge into corresponding prior distributions over model parameters, a process known as prior elicitation. Expert knowledge can manifest itself in diverse formats, including information about raw data, su… ▽ More A central characteristic of Bayesian statistics is the ability to consistently incorporate prior knowledge into various modeling processes. In this paper, we focus on translating domain expert knowledge into corresponding prior distributions over model parameters, a process known as prior elicitation. Expert knowledge can manifest itself in diverse formats, including information about raw data, summary statistics, or model parameters. A major challenge for existing elicitation methods is how to effectively utilize all of these different formats in order to formulate prior distributions that align with the expert's expectations, regardless of the model structure. To address these challenges, we develop a simulation-based elicitation method that can learn the hyperparameters of potentially any parametric prior distribution from a wide spectrum of expert knowledge using stochastic gradient descent. We validate the effectiveness and robustness of our elicitation method in four representative case studies covering linear models, generalized linear models, and hierarchical models. Our results support the claim that our method is largely independent of the underlying model structure and adaptable to various elicitation techniques, including quantile-based, moment-based, and histogram-based methods. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2024; v1 submitted 22 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

BayesFlow: Amortized Bayesian Workflows With Neural Networks

Authors: Stefan T Radev, Marvin Schmitt, Lukas Schumacher, Lasse Elsemüller, Valentin Pratz, Yannik Schälte, Ullrich Köthe, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: Modern Bayesian inference involves a mixture of computational techniques for estimating, validating, and drawing conclusions from probabilistic models as part of principled workflows for data analysis. Typical problems in Bayesian workflows are the approximation of intractable posterior distributions for diverse model types and the comparison of competing models of the same process in terms of the… ▽ More Modern Bayesian inference involves a mixture of computational techniques for estimating, validating, and drawing conclusions from probabilistic models as part of principled workflows for data analysis. Typical problems in Bayesian workflows are the approximation of intractable posterior distributions for diverse model types and the comparison of competing models of the same process in terms of their complexity and predictive performance. This manuscript introduces the Python library BayesFlow for simulation-based training of established neural network architectures for amortized data compression and inference. Amortized Bayesian inference, as implemented in BayesFlow, enables users to train custom neural networks on model simulations and re-use these networks for any subsequent application of the models. Since the trained networks can perform inference almost instantaneously, the upfront neural network training is quickly amortized. △ Less

Submitted 10 July, 2023; v1 submitted 28 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

JANA: Jointly Amortized Neural Approximation of Complex Bayesian Models

Authors: Stefan T. Radev, Marvin Schmitt, Valentin Pratz, Umberto Picchini, Ullrich Köthe, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: This work proposes ``jointly amortized neural approximation'' (JANA) of intractable likelihood functions and posterior densities arising in Bayesian surrogate modeling and simulation-based inference. We train three complementary networks in an end-to-end fashion: 1) a summary network to compress individual data points, sets, or time series into informative embedding vectors; 2) a posterior network… ▽ More This work proposes ``jointly amortized neural approximation'' (JANA) of intractable likelihood functions and posterior densities arising in Bayesian surrogate modeling and simulation-based inference. We train three complementary networks in an end-to-end fashion: 1) a summary network to compress individual data points, sets, or time series into informative embedding vectors; 2) a posterior network to learn an amortized approximate posterior; and 3) a likelihood network to learn an amortized approximate likelihood. Their interaction opens a new route to amortized marginal likelihood and posterior predictive estimation -- two important ingredients of Bayesian workflows that are often too expensive for standard methods. We benchmark the fidelity of JANA on a variety of simulation models against state-of-the-art Bayesian methods and propose a powerful and interpretable diagnostic for joint calibration. In addition, we investigate the ability of recurrent likelihood networks to emulate complex time series models without resorting to hand-crafted summary statistics. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2023; v1 submitted 17 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

A Deep Learning Method for Comparing Bayesian Hierarchical Models

Authors: Lasse Elsemüller, Martin Schnuerch, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Stefan T. Radev

Abstract: Bayesian model comparison (BMC) offers a principled approach for assessing the relative merits of competing computational models and propagating uncertainty into model selection decisions. However, BMC is often intractable for the popular class of hierarchical models due to their high-dimensional nested parameter structure. To address this intractability, we propose a deep learning method for perf… ▽ More Bayesian model comparison (BMC) offers a principled approach for assessing the relative merits of competing computational models and propagating uncertainty into model selection decisions. However, BMC is often intractable for the popular class of hierarchical models due to their high-dimensional nested parameter structure. To address this intractability, we propose a deep learning method for performing BMC on any set of hierarchical models which can be instantiated as probabilistic programs. Since our method enables amortized inference, it allows efficient re-estimation of posterior model probabilities and fast performance validation prior to any real-data application. In a series of extensive validation studies, we benchmark the performance of our method against the state-of-the-art bridge sampling method and demonstrate excellent amortized inference across all BMC settings. We then showcase our method by comparing four hierarchical evidence accumulation models that have previously been deemed intractable for BMC due to partly implicit likelihoods. Additionally, we demonstrate how transfer learning can be leveraged to enhance training efficiency. We provide reproducible code for all analyses and an open-source implementation of our method. △ Less

Submitted 23 November, 2023; v1 submitted 27 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Neural Superstatistics for Bayesian Estimation of Dynamic Cognitive Models

Authors: Lukas Schumacher, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Andreas Voss, Ullrich Köthe, Stefan T. Radev

Abstract: Mathematical models of cognition are often memoryless and ignore potential fluctuations of their parameters. However, human cognition is inherently dynamic. Thus, we propose to augment mechanistic cognitive models with a temporal dimension and estimate the resulting dynamics from a superstatistics perspective. Such a model entails a hierarchy between a low-level observation model and a high-level… ▽ More Mathematical models of cognition are often memoryless and ignore potential fluctuations of their parameters. However, human cognition is inherently dynamic. Thus, we propose to augment mechanistic cognitive models with a temporal dimension and estimate the resulting dynamics from a superstatistics perspective. Such a model entails a hierarchy between a low-level observation model and a high-level transition model. The observation model describes the local behavior of a system, and the transition model specifies how the parameters of the observation model evolve over time. To overcome the estimation challenges resulting from the complexity of superstatistical models, we develop and validate a simulation-based deep learning method for Bayesian inference, which can recover both time-varying and time-invariant parameters. We first benchmark our method against two existing frameworks capable of estimating time-varying parameters. We then apply our method to fit a dynamic version of the diffusion decision model to long time series of human response times data. Our results show that the deep learning approach is very efficient in capturing the temporal dynamics of the model. Furthermore, we show that the erroneous assumption of static or homogeneous parameters will hide important temporal information. △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2023; v1 submitted 23 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Optimal design of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-test

Authors: Paul-Christian Bürkner, Philipp Doebler, Heinz Holling

Abstract: In scientific research, many hypotheses relate to the comparison of two independent groups. Usually, it is of interest to use a design (i.e., the allocation of sample sizes $m$ and $n$ for fixed $N = m + n$) that maximizes the power of the applied statistical test. It is known that the two-sample t-tests for homogeneous and heterogeneous variances may lose substantial power when variances are uneq… ▽ More In scientific research, many hypotheses relate to the comparison of two independent groups. Usually, it is of interest to use a design (i.e., the allocation of sample sizes $m$ and $n$ for fixed $N = m + n$) that maximizes the power of the applied statistical test. It is known that the two-sample t-tests for homogeneous and heterogeneous variances may lose substantial power when variances are unequal but equally large samples are used. We demonstrate that this is not the case for the non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-test, whose application in biometrical research fields is motivated by two examples from cancer research. We prove the optimality of the design $m = n$ in case of symmetric and identically shaped distributions using normal approximations and show that this design generally offers power only negligibly lower than the optimal design for a wide range of distributions. Please cite this paper as published in the Biometrical Journal (https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201600022). △ Less

Submitted 22 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Testing for Publication Bias in Diagnostic Meta-Analysis: A Simulation Study

Authors: Paul-Christian Bürkner, Philipp Doebler

Abstract: The present study investigates the performance of several statistical tests to detect publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis by means of simulation. While bivariate models should be used to pool data from primary studies in diagnostic meta-analysis, univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy are preferable for the purpose of detecting publication bias. In contrast to earlier research, which… ▽ More The present study investigates the performance of several statistical tests to detect publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis by means of simulation. While bivariate models should be used to pool data from primary studies in diagnostic meta-analysis, univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy are preferable for the purpose of detecting publication bias. In contrast to earlier research, which focused solely on the diagnostic odds ratio or its logarithm ($\lnω$), the tests are combined with four different univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy. For each combination of test and univariate measure, both type I error rate and statistical power are examined under diverse conditions. The results indicate that tests based on linear regression or rank correlation cannot be recommended in diagnostic meta-analysis, because type I error rates are either inflated or power is too low, irrespective of the applied univariate measure. In contrast, the combination of trim and fill and $\lnω$ has non-inflated or only slightly inflated type I error rates and medium to high power, even under extreme circumstances (at least when the number of studies per meta-analysis is large enough). Therefore, we recommend the application of trim and fill combined with $\lnω$ to detect funnel plot asymmetry in diagnostic meta-analysis. Please cite this paper as published in Statistics in Medicine (https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6177). △ Less

Submitted 22 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2002.04775 by other authors

Simulation-Based Calibration Checking for Bayesian Computation: The Choice of Test Quantities Shapes Sensitivity

Authors: Martin Modrák, Angie H. Moon, Shinyoung Kim, Paul Bürkner, Niko Huurre, Kateřina Faltejsková, Andrew Gelman, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: Simulation-based calibration checking (SBC) is a practical method to validate computationally-derived posterior distributions or their approximations. In this paper, we introduce a new variant of SBC to alleviate several known problems. Our variant allows the user to in principle detect any possible issue with the posterior, while previously reported implementations could never detect large classe… ▽ More Simulation-based calibration checking (SBC) is a practical method to validate computationally-derived posterior distributions or their approximations. In this paper, we introduce a new variant of SBC to alleviate several known problems. Our variant allows the user to in principle detect any possible issue with the posterior, while previously reported implementations could never detect large classes of problems including when the posterior is equal to the prior. This is made possible by including additional data-dependent test quantities when running SBC. We argue and demonstrate that the joint likelihood of the data is an especially useful test quantity. Some other types of test quantities and their theoretical and practical benefits are also investigated. We provide theoretical analysis of SBC, thereby providing a more complete understanding of the underlying statistical mechanisms. We also bring attention to a relatively common mistake in the literature and clarify the difference between SBC and checks based on the data-averaged posterior. We support our recommendations with numerical case studies on a multivariate normal example and a case study in implementing an ordered simplex data type for use with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. The SBC variant introduced in this paper is implemented in the $\mathtt{SBC}$ R package. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2023; v1 submitted 4 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 50 pages, 11 figures, upcoming in Bayesian Analysis

Estimating the Contamination Factor's Distribution in Unsupervised Anomaly Detection

Authors: Lorenzo Perini, Paul Buerkner, Arto Klami

Abstract: Anomaly detection methods identify examples that do not follow the expected behaviour, typically in an unsupervised fashion, by assigning real-valued anomaly scores to the examples based on various heuristics. These scores need to be transformed into actual predictions by thresholding, so that the proportion of examples marked as anomalies equals the expected proportion of anomalies, called contam… ▽ More Anomaly detection methods identify examples that do not follow the expected behaviour, typically in an unsupervised fashion, by assigning real-valued anomaly scores to the examples based on various heuristics. These scores need to be transformed into actual predictions by thresholding, so that the proportion of examples marked as anomalies equals the expected proportion of anomalies, called contamination factor. Unfortunately, there are no good methods for estimating the contamination factor itself. We address this need from a Bayesian perspective, introducing a method for estimating the posterior distribution of the contamination factor of a given unlabeled dataset. We leverage on outputs of several anomaly detectors as a representation that already captures the basic notion of anomalousness and estimate the contamination using a specific mixture formulation. Empirically on 22 datasets, we show that the estimated distribution is well-calibrated and that setting the threshold using the posterior mean improves the anomaly detectors' performance over several alternative methods. All code is publicly available for full reproducibility. △ Less

Submitted 17 October, 2023; v1 submitted 19 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Meta-Uncertainty in Bayesian Model Comparison

Authors: Marvin Schmitt, Stefan T. Radev, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: Bayesian model comparison (BMC) offers a principled probabilistic approach to study and rank competing models. In standard BMC, we construct a discrete probability distribution over the set of possible models, conditional on the observed data of interest. These posterior model probabilities (PMPs) are measures of uncertainty, but -- when derived from a finite number of observations -- are also unc… ▽ More Bayesian model comparison (BMC) offers a principled probabilistic approach to study and rank competing models. In standard BMC, we construct a discrete probability distribution over the set of possible models, conditional on the observed data of interest. These posterior model probabilities (PMPs) are measures of uncertainty, but -- when derived from a finite number of observations -- are also uncertain themselves. In this paper, we conceptualize distinct levels of uncertainty which arise in BMC. We explore a fully probabilistic framework for quantifying meta-uncertainty, resulting in an applied method to enhance any BMC workflow. Drawing on both Bayesian and frequentist techniques, we represent the uncertainty over the uncertain PMPs via meta-models which combine simulated and observed data into a predictive distribution for PMPs on new data. We demonstrate the utility of the proposed method in the context of conjugate Bayesian regression, likelihood-based inference with Markov chain Monte Carlo, and simulation-based inference with neural networks. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2023; v1 submitted 13 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: accepted at AISTATS 2023

Prediction can be safely used as a proxy for explanation in causally consistent Bayesian generalized linear models

Authors: Maximilian Scholz, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: Bayesian modeling provides a principled approach to quantifying uncertainty in model parameters and model structure and has seen a surge of applications in recent years. Within the context of a Bayesian workflow, we are concerned with model selection for the purpose of finding models that best explain the data, that is, help us understand the underlying data generating process. Since we rarely hav… ▽ More Bayesian modeling provides a principled approach to quantifying uncertainty in model parameters and model structure and has seen a surge of applications in recent years. Within the context of a Bayesian workflow, we are concerned with model selection for the purpose of finding models that best explain the data, that is, help us understand the underlying data generating process. Since we rarely have access to the true process, all we are left with during real-world analyses is incomplete causal knowledge from sources outside of the current data and model predictions of said data. This leads to the important question of when the use of prediction as a proxy for explanation for the purpose of model selection is valid. We approach this question by means of large-scale simulations of Bayesian generalized linear models where we investigate various causal and statistical misspecifications. Our results indicate that the use of prediction as proxy for explanation is valid and safe only when the models under consideration are sufficiently consistent with the underlying causal structure of the true data generating process. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2024; v1 submitted 13 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Some models are useful, but how do we know which ones? Towards a unified Bayesian model taxonomy

Authors: Paul-Christian Bürkner, Maximilian Scholz, Stefan T. Radev

Abstract: Probabilistic (Bayesian) modeling has experienced a surge of applications in almost all quantitative sciences and industrial areas. This development is driven by a combination of several factors, including better probabilistic estimation algorithms, flexible software, increased computing power, and a growing awareness of the benefits of probabilistic learning. However, a principled Bayesian model… ▽ More Probabilistic (Bayesian) modeling has experienced a surge of applications in almost all quantitative sciences and industrial areas. This development is driven by a combination of several factors, including better probabilistic estimation algorithms, flexible software, increased computing power, and a growing awareness of the benefits of probabilistic learning. However, a principled Bayesian model building workflow is far from complete and many challenges remain. To aid future research and applications of a principled Bayesian workflow, we ask and provide answers for what we perceive as two fundamental questions of Bayesian modeling, namely (a) "What actually is a Bayesian model?" and (b) "What makes a good Bayesian model?". As an answer to the first question, we propose the PAD model taxonomy that defines four basic kinds of Bayesian models, each representing some combination of the assumed joint distribution of all (known or unknown) variables (P), a posterior approximator (A), and training data (D). As an answer to the second question, we propose ten utility dimensions according to which we can evaluate Bayesian models holistically, namely, (1) causal consistency, (2) parameter recoverability, (3) predictive performance, (4) fairness, (5) structural faithfulness, (6) parsimony, (7) interpretability, (8) convergence, (9) estimation speed, and (10) robustness. Further, we propose two example utility decision trees that describe hierarchies and trade-offs between utilities depending on the inferential goals that drive model building and testing. △ Less

Submitted 25 September, 2023; v1 submitted 6 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Intuitive Joint Priors for Bayesian Linear Multilevel Models: The R2D2M2 prior

Authors: Javier Enrique Aguilar, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: The training of high-dimensional regression models on comparably sparse data is an important yet complicated topic, especially when there are many more model parameters than observations in the data. From a Bayesian perspective, inference in such cases can be achieved with the help of shrinkage prior distributions, at least for generalized linear models. However, real-world data usually possess mu… ▽ More The training of high-dimensional regression models on comparably sparse data is an important yet complicated topic, especially when there are many more model parameters than observations in the data. From a Bayesian perspective, inference in such cases can be achieved with the help of shrinkage prior distributions, at least for generalized linear models. However, real-world data usually possess multilevel structures, such as repeated measurements or natural grou**s of individuals, which existing shrinkage priors are not built to deal with. We generalize and extend one of these priors, the R2D2 prior by Zhang et al. (2020), to linear multilevel models leading to what we call the R2D2M2 prior. The proposed prior enables both local and global shrinkage of the model parameters. It comes with interpretable hyperparameters, which we show to be intrinsically related to vital properties of the prior, such as rates of concentration around the origin, tail behavior, and amount of shrinkage the prior exerts. We offer guidelines on how to select the prior's hyperparameters by deriving shrinkage factors and measuring the effective number of non-zero model coefficients. Hence, the user can readily evaluate and interpret the amount of shrinkage implied by a specific choice of hyperparameters. Finally, we perform extensive experiments on simulated and real data, showing that our inference procedure for the prior is well calibrated, has desirable global and local regularization properties and enables the reliable and interpretable estimation of much more complex Bayesian multilevel models than was previously possible. △ Less

Submitted 11 June, 2023; v1 submitted 15 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 61 pages, 21 figures, 9 tables

A fully Bayesian sparse polynomial chaos expansion approach with joint priors on the coefficients and global selection of terms

Authors: Paul-Christian Bürkner, Ilja Kröker, Sergey Oladyshkin, Wolfgang Nowak

Abstract: Polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) is a versatile tool widely used in uncertainty quantification and machine learning, but its successful application depends strongly on the accuracy and reliability of the resulting PCE-based response surface. High accuracy typically requires high polynomial degrees, demanding many training points especially in high-dimensional problems through the curse of dimensio… ▽ More Polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) is a versatile tool widely used in uncertainty quantification and machine learning, but its successful application depends strongly on the accuracy and reliability of the resulting PCE-based response surface. High accuracy typically requires high polynomial degrees, demanding many training points especially in high-dimensional problems through the curse of dimensionality. So-called sparse PCE concepts work with a much smaller selection of basis polynomials compared to conventional PCE approaches and can overcome the curse of dimensionality very efficiently, but have to pay specific attention to their strategies of choosing training points. Furthermore, the approximation error resembles an uncertainty that most existing PCE-based methods do not estimate. In this study, we develop and evaluate a fully Bayesian approach to establish the PCE representation via joint shrinkage priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo. The suggested Bayesian PCE model directly aims to solve the two challenges named above: achieving a sparse PCE representation and estimating uncertainty of the PCE itself. The embedded Bayesian regularizing via the joint shrinkage prior allows using higher polynomial degrees for given training points due to its ability to handle underdetermined situations, where the number of considered PCE coefficients could be much larger than the number of available training points. We also explore multiple variable selection methods to construct sparse PCE expansions based on the established Bayesian representations, while globally selecting the most meaningful orthonormal polynomials given the available training data. We demonstrate the advantages of our Bayesian PCE and the corresponding sparsity-inducing methods on several benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 13 January, 2023; v1 submitted 12 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Detecting Model Misspecification in Amortized Bayesian Inference with Neural Networks

Authors: Marvin Schmitt, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Ullrich Köthe, Stefan T. Radev

Abstract: Neural density estimators have proven remarkably powerful in performing efficient simulation-based Bayesian inference in various research domains. In particular, the BayesFlow framework uses a two-step approach to enable amortized parameter estimation in settings where the likelihood function is implicitly defined by a simulation program. But how faithful is such inference when simulations are poo… ▽ More Neural density estimators have proven remarkably powerful in performing efficient simulation-based Bayesian inference in various research domains. In particular, the BayesFlow framework uses a two-step approach to enable amortized parameter estimation in settings where the likelihood function is implicitly defined by a simulation program. But how faithful is such inference when simulations are poor representations of reality? In this paper, we conceptualize the types of model misspecification arising in simulation-based inference and systematically investigate the performance of the BayesFlow framework under these misspecifications. We propose an augmented optimization objective which imposes a probabilistic structure on the latent data space and utilize maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to detect potentially catastrophic misspecifications during inference undermining the validity of the obtained results. We verify our detection criterion on a number of artificial and realistic misspecifications, ranging from toy conjugate models to complex models of decision making and disease outbreak dynamics applied to real data. Further, we show that posterior inference errors increase as a function of the distance between the true data-generating distribution and the typical set of simulations in the latent summary space. Thus, we demonstrate the dual utility of MMD as a method for detecting model misspecification and as a proxy for verifying the faithfulness of amortized Bayesian inference. △ Less

Submitted 8 November, 2022; v1 submitted 16 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Prior knowledge elicitation: The past, present, and future

Authors: Petrus Mikkola, Osvaldo A. Martin, Suyog Chandramouli, Marcelo Hartmann, Oriol Abril Pla, Owen Thomas, Henri Pesonen, Jukka Corander, Aki Vehtari, Samuel Kaski, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Arto Klami

Abstract: Specification of the prior distribution for a Bayesian model is a central part of the Bayesian workflow for data analysis, but it is often difficult even for statistical experts. In principle, prior elicitation transforms domain knowledge of various kinds into well-defined prior distributions, and offers a solution to the prior specification problem. In practice, however, we are still fairly far f… ▽ More Specification of the prior distribution for a Bayesian model is a central part of the Bayesian workflow for data analysis, but it is often difficult even for statistical experts. In principle, prior elicitation transforms domain knowledge of various kinds into well-defined prior distributions, and offers a solution to the prior specification problem. In practice, however, we are still fairly far from having usable prior elicitation tools that could significantly influence the way we build probabilistic models in academia and industry. We lack elicitation methods that integrate well into the Bayesian workflow and perform elicitation efficiently in terms of costs of time and effort. We even lack a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding different facets of the prior elicitation problem. Why are we not widely using prior elicitation? We analyse the state of the art by identifying a range of key aspects of prior knowledge elicitation, from properties of the modelling task and the nature of the priors to the form of interaction with the expert. The existing prior elicitation literature is reviewed and categorized in these terms. This allows recognizing under-studied directions in prior elicitation research, finally leading to a proposal of several new avenues to improve prior elicitation methodology. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2023; v1 submitted 1 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 69 pages, 1 figure

Latent space projection predictive inference

Authors: Alejandro Catalina, Paul Bürkner, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: Given a reference model that includes all the available variables, projection predictive inference replaces its posterior with a constrained projection including only a subset of all variables. We extend projection predictive inference to enable computationally efficient variable and structure selection in models outside the exponential family. By adopting a latent space projection predictive pers… ▽ More Given a reference model that includes all the available variables, projection predictive inference replaces its posterior with a constrained projection including only a subset of all variables. We extend projection predictive inference to enable computationally efficient variable and structure selection in models outside the exponential family. By adopting a latent space projection predictive perspective we are able to: 1) propose a unified and general framework to do variable selection in complex models while fully honouring the original model structure, 2) properly identify relevant structure and retain posterior uncertainties from the original model, and 3) provide an improved approach also for non-Gaussian models in the exponential family. We demonstrate the superior performance of our approach by thoroughly testing and comparing it against popular variable selection approaches in a wide range of settings, including realistic data sets. Our results show that our approach successfully recovers relevant terms and model structure in complex models, selecting less variables than competing approaches for realistic datasets. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Detecting and diagnosing prior and likelihood sensitivity with power-scaling

Authors: Noa Kallioinen, Topi Paananen, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: Determining the sensitivity of the posterior to perturbations of the prior and likelihood is an important part of the Bayesian workflow. We introduce a practical and computationally efficient sensitivity analysis approach using importance sampling to estimate properties of posteriors resulting from power-scaling the prior or likelihood. On this basis, we suggest a diagnostic that can indicate the… ▽ More Determining the sensitivity of the posterior to perturbations of the prior and likelihood is an important part of the Bayesian workflow. We introduce a practical and computationally efficient sensitivity analysis approach using importance sampling to estimate properties of posteriors resulting from power-scaling the prior or likelihood. On this basis, we suggest a diagnostic that can indicate the presence of prior-data conflict or likelihood noninformativity and discuss limitations to this power-scaling approach. The approach can be easily included in Bayesian workflows with minimal effort by the model builder and we present an implementation in our new R package priorsense. We further demonstrate the workflow on case studies of real data using models varying in complexity from simple linear models to Gaussian process models. △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 2023; v1 submitted 29 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 31 pages, 15 (+5 suppl) figures

Graphical Test for Discrete Uniformity and its Applications in Goodness of Fit Evaluation and Multiple Sample Comparison

Authors: Teemu Säilynoja, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: Assessing goodness of fit to a given distribution plays an important role in computational statistics. The Probability integral transformation (PIT) can be used to convert the question of whether a given sample originates from a reference distribution into a problem of testing for uniformity. We present new simulation and optimization based methods to obtain simultaneous confidence bands for the w… ▽ More Assessing goodness of fit to a given distribution plays an important role in computational statistics. The Probability integral transformation (PIT) can be used to convert the question of whether a given sample originates from a reference distribution into a problem of testing for uniformity. We present new simulation and optimization based methods to obtain simultaneous confidence bands for the whole empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) of the PIT values under the assumption of uniformity. Simultaneous confidence bands correspond to such confidence intervals at each point that jointly satisfy a desired coverage. These methods can also be applied in cases where the reference distribution is represented only by a finite sample. The confidence bands provide an intuitive ECDF-based graphical test for uniformity, which also provides useful information on the quality of the discrepancy. We further extend the simulation and optimization methods to determine simultaneous confidence bands for testing whether multiple samples come from the same underlying distribution. This multiple sample comparison test is especially useful in Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics. We provide numerical experiments to assess the properties of the tests using both simulated and real world data and give recommendations on their practical application in computational statistics workflows. △ Less

Submitted 17 November, 2021; v1 submitted 18 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Workflow Techniques for the Robust Use of Bayes Factors

Authors: Daniel J. Schad, Bruno Nicenboim, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Michael Betancourt, Shravan Vasishth

Abstract: Inferences about hypotheses are ubiquitous in the cognitive sciences. Bayes factors provide one general way to compare different hypotheses by their compatibility with the observed data. Those quantifications can then also be used to choose between hypotheses. While Bayes factors provide an immediate approach to hypothesis testing, they are highly sensitive to details of the data/model assumptions… ▽ More Inferences about hypotheses are ubiquitous in the cognitive sciences. Bayes factors provide one general way to compare different hypotheses by their compatibility with the observed data. Those quantifications can then also be used to choose between hypotheses. While Bayes factors provide an immediate approach to hypothesis testing, they are highly sensitive to details of the data/model assumptions. Moreover it's not clear how straightforwardly this approach can be implemented in practice, and in particular how sensitive it is to the details of the computational implementation. Here, we investigate these questions for Bayes factor analyses in the cognitive sciences. We explain the statistics underlying Bayes factors as a tool for Bayesian inferences and discuss that utility functions are needed for principled decisions on hypotheses. Next, we study how Bayes factors misbehave under different conditions. This includes a study of errors in the estimation of Bayes factors. Importantly, it is unknown whether Bayes factor estimates based on bridge sampling are unbiased for complex analyses. We are the first to use simulation-based calibration as a tool to test the accuracy of Bayes factor estimates. Moreover, we study how stable Bayes factors are against different MCMC draws. We moreover study how Bayes factors depend on variation in the data. We also look at variability of decisions based on Bayes factors and how to optimize decisions using a utility function. We outline a Bayes factor workflow that researchers can use to study whether Bayes factors are robust for their individual analysis, and we illustrate this workflow using an example from the cognitive sciences. We hope that this study will provide a workflow to test the strengths and limitations of Bayes factors as a way to quantify evidence in support of scientific hypotheses. Reproducible code is available from https://osf.io/y354c/. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2021; v1 submitted 15 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Bayesian Workflow

Authors: Andrew Gelman, Aki Vehtari, Daniel Simpson, Charles C. Margossian, Bob Carpenter, Yuling Yao, Lauren Kennedy, Jonah Gabry, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Martin Modrák

Abstract: The Bayesian approach to data analysis provides a powerful way to handle uncertainty in all observations, model parameters, and model structure using probability theory. Probabilistic programming languages make it easier to specify and fit Bayesian models, but this still leaves us with many options regarding constructing, evaluating, and using these models, along with many remaining challenges in… ▽ More The Bayesian approach to data analysis provides a powerful way to handle uncertainty in all observations, model parameters, and model structure using probability theory. Probabilistic programming languages make it easier to specify and fit Bayesian models, but this still leaves us with many options regarding constructing, evaluating, and using these models, along with many remaining challenges in computation. Using Bayesian inference to solve real-world problems requires not only statistical skills, subject matter knowledge, and programming, but also awareness of the decisions made in the process of data analysis. All of these aspects can be understood as part of a tangled workflow of applied Bayesian statistics. Beyond inference, the workflow also includes iterative model building, model checking, validation and troubleshooting of computational problems, model understanding, and model comparison. We review all these aspects of workflow in the context of several examples, kee** in mind that in practice we will be fitting many models for any given problem, even if only a subset of them will ultimately be relevant for our conclusions. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: 77 pages, 35 figures

Projection Predictive Inference for Generalized Linear and Additive Multilevel Models

Authors: Alejandro Catalina, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: Projection predictive inference is a decision theoretic Bayesian approach that decouples model estimation from decision making. Given a reference model previously built including all variables present in the data, projection predictive inference projects its posterior onto a constrained space of a subset of variables. Variable selection is then performed by sequentially adding relevant variables u… ▽ More Projection predictive inference is a decision theoretic Bayesian approach that decouples model estimation from decision making. Given a reference model previously built including all variables present in the data, projection predictive inference projects its posterior onto a constrained space of a subset of variables. Variable selection is then performed by sequentially adding relevant variables until predictive performance is satisfactory. Previously, projection predictive inference has been demonstrated only for generalized linear models (GLMs) and Gaussian processes (GPs) where it showed superior performance to competing variable selection procedures. In this work, we extend projection predictive inference to support variable and structure selection for generalized linear multilevel models (GLMMs) and generalized additive multilevel models (GAMMs). Our simulative and real-word experiments demonstrate that our method can drastically reduce the model complexity required to reach reference predictive performance and achieve good frequency properties. △ Less

Submitted 14 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Amortized Bayesian Inference for Models of Cognition

Authors: Stefan T. Radev, Andreas Voss, Eva Marie Wieschen, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: As models of cognition grow in complexity and number of parameters, Bayesian inference with standard methods can become intractable, especially when the data-generating model is of unknown analytic form. Recent advances in simulation-based inference using specialized neural network architectures circumvent many previous problems of approximate Bayesian computation. Moreover, due to the properties… ▽ More As models of cognition grow in complexity and number of parameters, Bayesian inference with standard methods can become intractable, especially when the data-generating model is of unknown analytic form. Recent advances in simulation-based inference using specialized neural network architectures circumvent many previous problems of approximate Bayesian computation. Moreover, due to the properties of these special neural network estimators, the effort of training the networks via simulations amortizes over subsequent evaluations which can re-use the same network for multiple datasets and across multiple researchers. However, these methods have been largely underutilized in cognitive science and psychology so far, even though they are well suited for tackling a wide variety of modeling problems. With this work, we provide a general introduction to amortized Bayesian parameter estimation and model comparison and demonstrate the applicability of the proposed methods on a well-known class of intractable response-time models. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2020; v1 submitted 8 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Group Heterogeneity Assessment for Multilevel Models

Authors: Topi Paananen, Alejandro Catalina, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: Many data sets contain an inherent multilevel structure, for example, because of repeated measurements of the same observational units. Taking this structure into account is critical for the accuracy and calibration of any statistical analysis performed on such data. However, the large number of possible model configurations hinders the use of multilevel models in practice. In this work, we propos… ▽ More Many data sets contain an inherent multilevel structure, for example, because of repeated measurements of the same observational units. Taking this structure into account is critical for the accuracy and calibration of any statistical analysis performed on such data. However, the large number of possible model configurations hinders the use of multilevel models in practice. In this work, we propose a flexible framework for efficiently assessing differences between the levels of given grou** variables in the data. The assessed group heterogeneity is valuable in choosing the relevant group coefficients to consider in a multilevel model. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that the framework can reliably identify relevant multilevel components in both simulated and real data sets. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Using reference models in variable selection

Authors: Federico Pavone, Juho Piironen, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: Variable selection, or more generally, model reduction is an important aspect of the statistical workflow aiming to provide insights from data. In this paper, we discuss and demonstrate the benefits of using a reference model in variable selection. A reference model acts as a noise-filter on the target variable by modeling its data generating mechanism. As a result, using the reference model predi… ▽ More Variable selection, or more generally, model reduction is an important aspect of the statistical workflow aiming to provide insights from data. In this paper, we discuss and demonstrate the benefits of using a reference model in variable selection. A reference model acts as a noise-filter on the target variable by modeling its data generating mechanism. As a result, using the reference model predictions in the model selection procedure reduces the variability and improves stability leading to improved model selection performance. Assuming that a Bayesian reference model describes the true distribution of future data well, the theoretically preferred usage of the reference model is to project its predictive distribution to a reduced model leading to projection predictive variable selection approach. Alternatively, reference models may also be used in an ad-hoc manner in combination with common variable selection methods. In several numerical experiments, we investigate the performance of the projective prediction approach as well as alternative variable selection methods with and without reference models. Our results indicate that the use of reference models generally translates into better and more stable variable selection. Additionally, we demonstrate that the projection predictive approach shows superior performance as compared to alternative variable selection methods independently of whether or not they use reference models. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Practical Hilbert space approximate Bayesian Gaussian processes for probabilistic programming

Authors: Gabriel Riutort-Mayol, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Michael R. Andersen, Arno Solin, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: Gaussian processes are powerful non-parametric probabilistic models for stochastic functions. However, the direct implementation entails a complexity that is computationally intractable when the number of observations is large, especially when estimated with fully Bayesian methods such as Markov chain Monte Carlo. In this paper, we focus on a low-rank approximate Bayesian Gaussian processes, based… ▽ More Gaussian processes are powerful non-parametric probabilistic models for stochastic functions. However, the direct implementation entails a complexity that is computationally intractable when the number of observations is large, especially when estimated with fully Bayesian methods such as Markov chain Monte Carlo. In this paper, we focus on a low-rank approximate Bayesian Gaussian processes, based on a basis function approximation via Laplace eigenfunctions for stationary covariance functions. The main contribution of this paper is a detailed analysis of the performance, and practical recommendations for how to select the number of basis functions and the boundary factor. Intuitive visualizations and recommendations, make it easier for users to improve approximation accuracy and computational performance. We also propose diagnostics for checking that the number of basis functions and the boundary factor are adequate given the data. The approach is simple and exhibits an attractive computational complexity due to its linear structure, and it is easy to implement in probabilistic programming frameworks. Several illustrative examples of the performance and applicability of the method in the probabilistic programming language Stan are presented together with the underlying Stan model code. △ Less

Submitted 22 March, 2022; v1 submitted 23 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: 27 pages, 18 figures

Amortized Bayesian model comparison with evidential deep learning

Authors: Stefan T. Radev, Marco D'Alessandro, Ulf K. Mertens, Andreas Voss, Ullrich Köthe, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: Comparing competing mathematical models of complex natural processes is a shared goal among many branches of science. The Bayesian probabilistic framework offers a principled way to perform model comparison and extract useful metrics for guiding decisions. However, many interesting models are intractable with standard Bayesian methods, as they lack a closed-form likelihood function or the likeliho… ▽ More Comparing competing mathematical models of complex natural processes is a shared goal among many branches of science. The Bayesian probabilistic framework offers a principled way to perform model comparison and extract useful metrics for guiding decisions. However, many interesting models are intractable with standard Bayesian methods, as they lack a closed-form likelihood function or the likelihood is computationally too expensive to evaluate. With this work, we propose a novel method for performing Bayesian model comparison using specialized deep learning architectures. Our method is purely simulation-based and circumvents the step of explicitly fitting all alternative models under consideration to each observed dataset. Moreover, it requires no hand-crafted summary statistics of the data and is designed to amortize the cost of simulation over multiple models and observable datasets. This makes the method particularly effective in scenarios where model fit needs to be assessed for a large number of datasets, so that per-dataset inference is practically infeasible.Finally, we propose a novel way to measure epistemic uncertainty in model comparison problems. We demonstrate the utility of our method on toy examples and simulated data from non-trivial models from cognitive science and single-cell neuroscience. We show that our method achieves excellent results in terms of accuracy, calibration, and efficiency across the examples considered in this work. We argue that our framework can enhance and enrich model-based analysis and inference in many fields dealing with computational models of natural processes. We further argue that the proposed measure of epistemic uncertainty provides a unique proxy to quantify absolute evidence even in a framework which assumes that the true data-generating model is within a finite set of candidate models. △ Less

Submitted 2 March, 2021; v1 submitted 22 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Flexible Prior Elicitation via the Prior Predictive Distribution

Authors: Marcelo Hartmann, Georgi Agiashvili, Paul Bürkner, Arto Klami

Abstract: The prior distribution for the unknown model parameters plays a crucial role in the process of statistical inference based on Bayesian methods. However, specifying suitable priors is often difficult even when detailed prior knowledge is available in principle. The challenge is to express quantitative information in the form of a probability distribution. Prior elicitation addresses this question b… ▽ More The prior distribution for the unknown model parameters plays a crucial role in the process of statistical inference based on Bayesian methods. However, specifying suitable priors is often difficult even when detailed prior knowledge is available in principle. The challenge is to express quantitative information in the form of a probability distribution. Prior elicitation addresses this question by extracting subjective information from an expert and transforming it into a valid prior. Most existing methods, however, require information to be provided on the unobservable parameters, whose effect on the data generating process is often complicated and hard to understand. We propose an alternative approach that only requires knowledge about the observable outcomes - knowledge which is often much easier for experts to provide. Building upon a principled statistical framework, our approach utilizes the prior predictive distribution implied by the model to automatically transform experts judgements about plausible outcome values to suitable priors on the parameters. We also provide computational strategies to perform inference and guidelines to facilitate practical use. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2020; v1 submitted 23 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: 24 pages, 3 figures, conference submission

Implicitly Adaptive Importance Sampling

Authors: Topi Paananen, Juho Piironen, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: Adaptive importance sampling is a class of techniques for finding good proposal distributions for importance sampling. Often the proposal distributions are standard probability distributions whose parameters are adapted based on the mismatch between the current proposal and a target distribution. In this work, we present an implicit adaptive importance sampling method that applies to complicated d… ▽ More Adaptive importance sampling is a class of techniques for finding good proposal distributions for importance sampling. Often the proposal distributions are standard probability distributions whose parameters are adapted based on the mismatch between the current proposal and a target distribution. In this work, we present an implicit adaptive importance sampling method that applies to complicated distributions which are not available in closed form. The method iteratively matches the moments of a set of Monte Carlo draws to weighted moments based on importance weights. We apply the method to Bayesian leave-one-out cross-validation and show that it performs better than many existing parametric adaptive importance sampling methods while being computationally inexpensive. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2020; v1 submitted 20 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: Major revision: More comparisons to adaptive importance sampling with parametric distributions

Journal ref: Stat Comput 31, 16 (2021)

Bayesian Item Response Modeling in R with brms and Stan

Authors: Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: Item Response Theory (IRT) is widely applied in the human sciences to model persons' responses on a set of items measuring one or more latent constructs. While several R packages have been developed that implement IRT models, they tend to be restricted to respective prespecified classes of models. Further, most implementations are frequentist while the availability of Bayesian methods remains comp… ▽ More Item Response Theory (IRT) is widely applied in the human sciences to model persons' responses on a set of items measuring one or more latent constructs. While several R packages have been developed that implement IRT models, they tend to be restricted to respective prespecified classes of models. Further, most implementations are frequentist while the availability of Bayesian methods remains comparably limited. We demonstrate how to use the R package brms together with the probabilistic programming language Stan to specify and fit a wide range of Bayesian IRT models using flexible and intuitive multilevel formula syntax. Further, item and person parameters can be related in both a linear or non-linear manner. Various distributions for categorical, ordinal, and continuous responses are supported. Users may even define their own custom response distribution for use in the presented framework. Common IRT model classes that can be specified natively in the presented framework include 1PL and 2PL logistic models optionally also containing guessing parameters, graded response and partial credit ordinal models, as well as drift diffusion models of response times coupled with binary decisions. Posterior distributions of item and person parameters can be conveniently extracted and post-processed. Model fit can be evaluated and compared using Bayes factors and efficient cross-validation procedures. △ Less

Submitted 1 February, 2020; v1 submitted 23 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: 54 pages, 16 figures, 3 tables

Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: An improved $\widehat{R}$ for assessing convergence of MCMC

Authors: Aki Vehtari, Andrew Gelman, Daniel Simpson, Bob Carpenter, Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: Markov chain Monte Carlo is a key computational tool in Bayesian statistics, but it can be challenging to monitor the convergence of an iterative stochastic algorithm. In this paper we show that the convergence diagnostic $\widehat{R}$ of Gelman and Rubin (1992) has serious flaws. Traditional $\widehat{R}$ will fail to correctly diagnose convergence failures when the chain has a heavy tail or when… ▽ More Markov chain Monte Carlo is a key computational tool in Bayesian statistics, but it can be challenging to monitor the convergence of an iterative stochastic algorithm. In this paper we show that the convergence diagnostic $\widehat{R}$ of Gelman and Rubin (1992) has serious flaws. Traditional $\widehat{R}$ will fail to correctly diagnose convergence failures when the chain has a heavy tail or when the variance varies across the chains. In this paper we propose an alternative rank-based diagnostic that fixes these problems. We also introduce a collection of quantile-based local efficiency measures, along with a practical approach for computing Monte Carlo error estimates for quantiles. We suggest that common trace plots should be replaced with rank plots from multiple chains. Finally, we give recommendations for how these methods should be used in practice. △ Less

Submitted 22 June, 2021; v1 submitted 19 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: Two small fixes. Published in Bayesian analysis https://doi.org/10.1214/20-BA1221

Approximate leave-future-out cross-validation for Bayesian time series models

Authors: Paul-Christian Bürkner, Jonah Gabry, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: One of the common goals of time series analysis is to use the observed series to inform predictions for future observations. In the absence of any actual new data to predict, cross-validation can be used to estimate a model's future predictive accuracy, for instance, for the purpose of model comparison or selection. Exact cross-validation for Bayesian models is often computationally expensive, but… ▽ More One of the common goals of time series analysis is to use the observed series to inform predictions for future observations. In the absence of any actual new data to predict, cross-validation can be used to estimate a model's future predictive accuracy, for instance, for the purpose of model comparison or selection. Exact cross-validation for Bayesian models is often computationally expensive, but approximate cross-validation methods have been developed, most notably methods for leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV). If the actual prediction task is to predict the future given the past, LOO-CV provides an overly optimistic estimate because the information from future observations is available to influence predictions of the past. To properly account for the time series structure, we can use leave-future-out cross-validation (LFO-CV). Like exact LOO-CV, exact LFO-CV requires refitting the model many times to different subsets of the data. Using Pareto smoothed importance sampling, we propose a method for approximating exact LFO-CV that drastically reduces the computational costs while also providing informative diagnostics about the quality of the approximation. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2020; v1 submitted 17 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Comments: 28 pages, 15 figures, 2 tables

Journal ref: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (2020)

Efficient leave-one-out cross-validation for Bayesian non-factorized normal and Student-t models

Authors: Paul-Christian Bürkner, Jonah Gabry, Aki Vehtari

Abstract: Cross-validation can be used to measure a model's predictive accuracy for the purpose of model comparison, averaging, or selection. Standard leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) requires that the observation model can be factorized into simple terms, but a lot of important models in temporal and spatial statistics do not have this property or are inefficient or unstable when forced into a facto… ▽ More Cross-validation can be used to measure a model's predictive accuracy for the purpose of model comparison, averaging, or selection. Standard leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) requires that the observation model can be factorized into simple terms, but a lot of important models in temporal and spatial statistics do not have this property or are inefficient or unstable when forced into a factorized form. We derive how to efficiently compute and validate both exact and approximate LOO-CV for any Bayesian non-factorized model with a multivariate normal or Student-t distribution on the outcome values. We demonstrate the method using lagged simultaneously autoregressive (SAR) models as a case study. △ Less

Submitted 1 October, 2020; v1 submitted 24 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: 18 pages, 3 figures

Journal ref: Computational Statistics, 2020

Optimal Designs for the Generalized Partial Credit Model

Authors: Paul-Christian Bürkner, Rainer Schwabe, Heinz Holling

Abstract: Analyzing ordinal data becomes increasingly important in psychology, especially in the context of item response theory. The generalized partial credit model (GPCM) is probably the most widely used ordinal model and finds application in many large scale educational assessment studies such as PISA. In the present paper, optimal test designs are investigated for estimating persons' abilities with the… ▽ More Analyzing ordinal data becomes increasingly important in psychology, especially in the context of item response theory. The generalized partial credit model (GPCM) is probably the most widely used ordinal model and finds application in many large scale educational assessment studies such as PISA. In the present paper, optimal test designs are investigated for estimating persons' abilities with the GPCM for calibrated tests when item parameters are known from previous studies. We will derive that local optimality may be achieved by assigning non-zero probability only to the first and last category independently of a person's ability. That is, when using such a design, the GPCM reduces to the dichotomous 2PL model. Since locally optimal designs require the true ability to be known, we consider alternative Bayesian design criteria using weight distributions over the ability parameter space. For symmetric weight distributions, we derive necessary conditions for the optimal one-point design of two response categories to be Bayes optimal. Furthermore, we discuss examples of common symmetric weight distributions and investigate, in which cases the necessary conditions are also sufficient. Since the 2PL model is a special case of the GPCM, all of these results hold for the 2PL model as well. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2018; v1 submitted 17 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms

Authors: Paul-Christian Bürkner

Abstract: The brms package allows R users to easily specify a wide range of Bayesian single-level and multilevel models, which are fitted with the probabilistic programming language Stan behind the scenes. Several response distributions are supported, of which all parameters (e.g., location, scale, and shape) can be predicted at the same time thus allowing for distributional regression. Non-linear relations… ▽ More The brms package allows R users to easily specify a wide range of Bayesian single-level and multilevel models, which are fitted with the probabilistic programming language Stan behind the scenes. Several response distributions are supported, of which all parameters (e.g., location, scale, and shape) can be predicted at the same time thus allowing for distributional regression. Non-linear relationships may be specified using non-linear predictor terms or semi-parametric approaches such as splines or Gaussian processes. To make all of these modeling options possible in a multilevel framework, brms provides an intuitive and powerful formula syntax, which extends the well known formula syntax of lme4. The purpose of the present paper is to introduce this syntax in detail and to demonstrate its usefulness with four examples, each showing other relevant aspects of the syntax. △ Less

Submitted 15 October, 2017; v1 submitted 31 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.