Showing 1–1 of 1 results for author: Azevedo, S A F

Predicting BN analogue of 8-16-4 graphyne: \textit{In silico} insights into its structural, electronic, optical, and thermal transport properties

Authors: Isaac M. Félix, Jessé M. Pontes, Djardiel S. Gomes, Thiago B. G. Guerra, Sérgio A. F. Azevedo, Leonardo D. Machado, Lídia C. Gomes, Raphael M. Tromer

Abstract: The boron nitride (BN) analogue of 8-16-4 graphyne, termed SBNyne, is proposed for the first time. Its physical properties were explored using first-principles calculations and classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Thermal stability assessments reveal that SBNyne maintains structural integrity up to 1000 K. We found that SBNyne exhibits a wide indirect bandgap of 4.58 eV using HSE06 and 3… ▽ More The boron nitride (BN) analogue of 8-16-4 graphyne, termed SBNyne, is proposed for the first time. Its physical properties were explored using first-principles calculations and classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Thermal stability assessments reveal that SBNyne maintains structural integrity up to 1000 K. We found that SBNyne exhibits a wide indirect bandgap of 4.58 eV using HSE06 and 3.20 eV using PBE. It displays strong optical absorption in the ultraviolet region while remaining transparent in the infrared and visible regions. Additionally, SBNyne exhibits significantly lower thermal conductivity compared to h-BN. Phonon spectrum analysis indicates that out-of-plane phonons predominantly contribute to the vibrational density of states only at very low frequencies, explaining its low thermal conductivity. These findings expand the knowledge of BN-based 2D materials and open new avenues for their design and advanced technological applications. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2024; v1 submitted 19 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: We have reviewed the thermal stability calculation and found that the SBNyne structure is metastable and undergoes a transition to a new phase. We are currently investigating this new phase, and to avoid misunderstandings, we need to remove the preprint