Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Aust, F

Fair coins tend to land on the same side they started: Evidence from 350,757 flips

Authors: František Bartoš, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Henrik R. Godmann, Amir Sahrani, David Klein Leunk, Pierre Y. Gui, David Voss, Kaleem Ullah, Malte J. Zoubek, Franziska Nippold, Frederik Aust, Felipe F. Vieira, Chris-Gabriel Islam, Anton J. Zoubek, Sara Shabani, Jonas Petter, Ingeborg B. Roos, Adam Finnemann, Aaron B. Lob, Madlen F. Hoffstadt, Jason Nak, Jill de Ron, Koen Derks, Karoline Huth, Sjoerd Terpstra , et al. (25 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Many people have flipped coins but few have stopped to ponder the statistical and physical intricacies of the process. In a preregistered study we collected $350{,}757$ coin flips to test the counterintuitive prediction from a physics model of human coin tossing developed by Diaconis, Holmes, and Montgomery (DHM; 2007). The model asserts that when people flip an ordinary coin, it tends to land on… ▽ More Many people have flipped coins but few have stopped to ponder the statistical and physical intricacies of the process. In a preregistered study we collected $350{,}757$ coin flips to test the counterintuitive prediction from a physics model of human coin tossing developed by Diaconis, Holmes, and Montgomery (DHM; 2007). The model asserts that when people flip an ordinary coin, it tends to land on the same side it started -- DHM estimated the probability of a same-side outcome to be about 51%. Our data lend strong support to this precise prediction: the coins landed on the same side more often than not, $\text{Pr}(\text{same side}) = 0.508$, 95% credible interval (CI) [$0.506$, $0.509$], $\text{BF}_{\text{same-side bias}} = 2359$. Furthermore, the data revealed considerable between-people variation in the degree of this same-side bias. Our data also confirmed the generic prediction that when people flip an ordinary coin -- with the initial side-up randomly determined -- it is equally likely to land heads or tails: $\text{Pr}(\text{heads}) = 0.500$, 95% CI [$0.498$, $0.502$], $\text{BF}_{\text{heads-tails bias}} = 0.182$. Furthermore, this lack of heads-tails bias does not appear to vary across coins. Additional exploratory analyses revealed that the within-people same-side bias decreased as more coins were flipped, an effect that is consistent with the possibility that practice makes people flip coins in a less wobbly fashion. Our data therefore provide strong evidence that when some (but not all) people flip a fair coin, it tends to land on the same side it started. Our data provide compelling statistical support for the DHM physics model of coin tossing. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2024; v1 submitted 6 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Power priors for replication studies

Authors: Samuel Pawel, Frederik Aust, Leonhard Held, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Abstract: The ongoing replication crisis in science has increased interest in the methodology of replication studies. We propose a novel Bayesian analysis approach using power priors: The likelihood of the original study's data is raised to the power of $α$, and then used as the prior distribution in the analysis of the replication data. Posterior distribution and Bayes factor hypothesis tests related to th… ▽ More The ongoing replication crisis in science has increased interest in the methodology of replication studies. We propose a novel Bayesian analysis approach using power priors: The likelihood of the original study's data is raised to the power of $α$, and then used as the prior distribution in the analysis of the replication data. Posterior distribution and Bayes factor hypothesis tests related to the power parameter $α$ quantify the degree of compatibility between the original and replication study. Inferences for other parameters, such as effect sizes, dynamically borrow information from the original study. The degree of borrowing depends on the conflict between the two studies. The practical value of the approach is illustrated on data from three replication studies, and the connection to hierarchical modeling approaches explored. We generalize the known connection between normal power priors and normal hierarchical models for fixed parameters and show that normal power prior inferences with a beta prior on the power parameter $α$ align with normal hierarchical model inferences using a generalized beta prior on the relative heterogeneity variance $I^2$. The connection illustrates that power prior modeling is unnatural from the perspective of hierarchical modeling since it corresponds to specifying priors on a relative rather than an absolute heterogeneity scale. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2023; v1 submitted 29 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Journal ref: TEST, 2023

Normalized power priors always discount historical data

Authors: Samuel Pawel, Frederik Aust, Leonhard Held, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Abstract: Power priors are used for incorporating historical data in Bayesian analyses by taking the likelihood of the historical data raised to the power $α$ as the prior distribution for the model parameters. The power parameter $α$ is typically unknown and assigned a prior distribution, most commonly a beta distribution. Here, we give a novel theoretical result on the resulting marginal posterior distrib… ▽ More Power priors are used for incorporating historical data in Bayesian analyses by taking the likelihood of the historical data raised to the power $α$ as the prior distribution for the model parameters. The power parameter $α$ is typically unknown and assigned a prior distribution, most commonly a beta distribution. Here, we give a novel theoretical result on the resulting marginal posterior distribution of $α$ in case of the the normal and binomial model. Counterintuitively, when the current data perfectly mirror the historical data and the sample sizes from both data sets become arbitrarily large, the marginal posterior of $α$ does not converge to a point mass at $α= 1$ but approaches a distribution that hardly differs from the prior. The result implies that a complete pooling of historical and current data is impossible if a power prior with beta prior for $α$ is used. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2023; v1 submitted 9 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Journal ref: Stat, 2023, 12(1), e591

Informed Bayesian survival analysis

Authors: František Bartoš, Frederik Aust, Julia M. Haaf

Abstract: We overview Bayesian estimation, hypothesis testing, and model-averaging and illustrate how they benefit parametric survival analysis. We contrast the Bayesian framework to the currently dominant frequentist approach and highlight advantages, such as seamless incorporation of historical data, continuous monitoring of evidence, and incorporating uncertainty about the true data generating process. W… ▽ More We overview Bayesian estimation, hypothesis testing, and model-averaging and illustrate how they benefit parametric survival analysis. We contrast the Bayesian framework to the currently dominant frequentist approach and highlight advantages, such as seamless incorporation of historical data, continuous monitoring of evidence, and incorporating uncertainty about the true data generating process. We illustrate the application of the Bayesian approaches on an example data set from a colon cancer trial. We compare the Bayesian parametric survival analysis and frequentist models with AIC/BIC model selection in fixed-n and sequential designs with a simulation study. In the example data set, the Bayesian framework provided evidence for the absence of a positive treatment effect on disease-free survival in patients with resected colon cancer. Furthermore, the Bayesian sequential analysis would have terminated the trial 10.3 months earlier than the standard frequentist analysis. In a simulation study with sequential designs, the Bayesian framework on average reached a decision in almost half the time required by the frequentist counterparts, while maintaining the same power, and an appropriate false-positive rate. Under model misspecification, the Bayesian framework resulted in higher false-negative rate compared to the frequentist counterparts, which resulted in a higher proportion of undecided trials. In fixed-n designs, the Bayesian framework showed slightly higher power, slightly elevated error rates, and lower bias and RMSE when estimating treatment effects in small samples. We have made the analytic approach readily available in RoBSA R package. The outlined Bayesian framework provides several benefits when applied to parametric survival analyses. It uses data more efficiently, is capable of greatly shortening the length of clinical trials, and provides a richer set of inferences. △ Less

Submitted 11 September, 2022; v1 submitted 15 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Journal ref: BMC Med Res Methodol 22, 238 (2022)

Magnetic phases for two $t_{2g}$ holes with spin-orbit coupling and crystal field

Authors: Pascal Strobel, Friedemann Aust, Maria Daghofer

Abstract: We investigate two holes in the the $t_{2g}$ levels of a square-lattice Mott insulator with strong spin-orbit coupling. Exact diagonalization of a spin-orbital model valid at strong onsite interactions, but arbitrary spin-orbit coupling and crystal field is complemented by an effective triplon model (valid for strong spin-orbit coupling) and by a semiclassical variant of the model. We provide the… ▽ More We investigate two holes in the the $t_{2g}$ levels of a square-lattice Mott insulator with strong spin-orbit coupling. Exact diagonalization of a spin-orbital model valid at strong onsite interactions, but arbitrary spin-orbit coupling and crystal field is complemented by an effective triplon model (valid for strong spin-orbit coupling) and by a semiclassical variant of the model. We provide the magnetic phase diagram depending on crystal field and spin-orbit coupling, which largely agrees for the semiclassical and quantum models, as well as excitation spectra characterizing the various phases. △ Less

Submitted 10 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: 12 pages, 12 figures

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. B 104, 115148 (2021)

Nontrivial Triplon Topology and Triplon Liquid in Kitaev-Heisenberg-type Excitonic Magnets

Authors: Pavel S. Anisimov, Friedemann Aust, Giniyat Khaliullin, Maria Daghofer

Abstract: The combination of strong spin-orbit coupling and correlations, e.g. in ruthenates and iridates, has been proposed as a means to realize quantum materials with nontrivial topological properties. We discuss here Mott insulators where onsite spin-orbit coupling favors a local $J_{\textrm{tot}}=0$ singlet ground state. We investigate excitations into a low-lying triplet, triplons, and find them to ac… ▽ More The combination of strong spin-orbit coupling and correlations, e.g. in ruthenates and iridates, has been proposed as a means to realize quantum materials with nontrivial topological properties. We discuss here Mott insulators where onsite spin-orbit coupling favors a local $J_{\textrm{tot}}=0$ singlet ground state. We investigate excitations into a low-lying triplet, triplons, and find them to acquire nontrivial band topology in a magnetic field. We also comment on magnetic states resulting from triplon condensation, where we find, in addition to the same ordered phases known from the $J_{\textrm{tot}}=\tfrac{1}{2}$ Kitaev-Heisenberg model, a triplon liquid taking the parameter space of Kitaev's spin liquid. △ Less

Submitted 30 April, 2019; v1 submitted 3 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 177201 (2019)