Predicting Swarm Equatorial Plasma Bubbles via Machine Learning and Shapley Values
Authors:
S. A. Reddy,
C. Forsyth,
A. Aruliah,
A. Smith,
J. Bortnik,
E. Aa,
D. O. Kataria,
G. Lewis
Abstract:
In this study we present AI Prediction of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (APE), a machine learning model that can accurately predict the Ionospheric Bubble Index (IBI) on the Swarm spacecraft. IBI is a correlation ($R^2$) between perturbations in plasma density and the magnetic field, whose source can be Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (EPBs). EPBs have been studied for a number of years, but their day-to-da…
▽ More
In this study we present AI Prediction of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (APE), a machine learning model that can accurately predict the Ionospheric Bubble Index (IBI) on the Swarm spacecraft. IBI is a correlation ($R^2$) between perturbations in plasma density and the magnetic field, whose source can be Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (EPBs). EPBs have been studied for a number of years, but their day-to-day variability has made predicting them a considerable challenge. We build an ensemble machine learning model to predict IBI. We use data from 2014-22 at a resolution of 1sec, and transform it from a time-series into a 6-dimensional space with a corresponding EPB $R^2$ (0-1) acting as the label. APE performs well across all metrics, exhibiting a skill, association and root mean squared error score of 0.96, 0.98 and 0.08 respectively. The model performs best post-sunset, in the American/Atlantic sector, around the equinoxes, and when solar activity is high. This is promising because EPBs are most likely to occur during these periods. Shapley values reveal that F10.7 is the most important feature in driving the predictions, whereas latitude is the least. The analysis also examines the relationship between the features, which reveals new insights into EPB climatology. Finally, the selection of the features means that APE could be expanded to forecasting EPBs following additional investigations into their onset.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2023; v1 submitted 27 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
Best Practices for Scientific Computing
Authors:
Greg Wilson,
D. A. Aruliah,
C. Titus Brown,
Neil P. Chue Hong,
Matt Davis,
Richard T. Guy,
Steven H. D. Haddock,
Katy Huff,
Ian M. Mitchell,
Mark Plumbley,
Ben Waugh,
Ethan P. White,
Paul Wilson
Abstract:
Scientists spend an increasing amount of time building and using software. However, most scientists are never taught how to do this efficiently. As a result, many are unaware of tools and practices that would allow them to write more reliable and maintainable code with less effort. We describe a set of best practices for scientific software development that have solid foundations in research and e…
▽ More
Scientists spend an increasing amount of time building and using software. However, most scientists are never taught how to do this efficiently. As a result, many are unaware of tools and practices that would allow them to write more reliable and maintainable code with less effort. We describe a set of best practices for scientific software development that have solid foundations in research and experience, and that improve scientists' productivity and the reliability of their software.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2013; v1 submitted 30 September, 2012;
originally announced October 2012.
