-
Ultraviolet-ozone treatment: an effective method for fine-tuning optical and electrical properties of suspended and substrate-supported MoS2
Authors:
Fahrettin Sarcan,
Alex J. Armstrong,
Yusuf K. Bostan,
Esra Kus,
Keith McKenna,
Ayse Erol,
Yue Wang
Abstract:
Ultraviolet-ozone (UV-O3) treatment is a simple but effective technique for surface cleaning, surface sterilization, do** and oxidation, and is applicable to a wide range of materials. In this study, we investigated how UV-O3 treatment affects the optical and electrical properties of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), with and without the presence of a dielectric substrate. We performed detailed photo…
▽ More
Ultraviolet-ozone (UV-O3) treatment is a simple but effective technique for surface cleaning, surface sterilization, do** and oxidation, and is applicable to a wide range of materials. In this study, we investigated how UV-O3 treatment affects the optical and electrical properties of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), with and without the presence of a dielectric substrate. We performed detailed photoluminescence (PL) measurements on 1-7 layers of MoS2 with up to 8 minutes of UV-O3 exposure. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out to provide insight into oxygen-MoS2 interaction mechanisms. Our results showed that the influence of UV-O3 treatment on PL depends on whether the substrate is present, as well as the number of layers. The PL intensity of the substrate-supported MoS2 decreased dramatically with the increase of UV-O3 treatment time and was fully quenched after 8 mins. However, the PL intensity of the suspended flakes was less affected. 4 minutes of UV-O3 exposure was found to be optimal to produce p-type MoS2, while maintaining above 80% of the PL intensity and the emission wavelength, compared to pristine flakes (intrinsically n-type). Our electrical measurements showed that UV-O3 treatment for more than 6 minutes not only caused a reduction in the electron density but also deteriorated the hole-dominated transport. It is revealed that the substrate plays a critical role in the manipulation of the electrical and optical properties of MoS2, which should be considered in future device fabrication and applications.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Advice on describing Bayesian analysis of neutron and X-ray reflectometry
Authors:
Andrew R. McCluskey,
Andrew J. Caruana,
Christy J. Kinane,
Alexander J. Armstrong,
Tom Arnold,
Joshaniel F. K. Cooper,
David L. Cortie,
Arwel V. Hughes,
Jean-François Moulin,
Andrew R. J. Nelson,
Wojciech Potrzebowski,
Vladimir Straostin
Abstract:
Driven by the availability of modern software and hardware, Bayesian analysis is becoming more popular in neutron and X-ray reflectometry analysis. The understandability and replicability of these analyses may be harmed by inconsistencies in how the probability distributions central to Bayesian methods are represented in the literature. Herein, we provide advice on how to report the results of Bay…
▽ More
Driven by the availability of modern software and hardware, Bayesian analysis is becoming more popular in neutron and X-ray reflectometry analysis. The understandability and replicability of these analyses may be harmed by inconsistencies in how the probability distributions central to Bayesian methods are represented in the literature. Herein, we provide advice on how to report the results of Bayesian analysis as applied to neutron and X-ray reflectometry. This includes the clear reporting of initial starting conditions, the prior probabilities, and results of any analysis, and the posterior probabilities that are the Bayesian equivalent of the error bar, to enable replicability and improve understanding. We believe that this advice, grounded in our experience working in the field, will enable greater analytical reproducibility among the reflectometry community, as well as improve the quality and usability of results.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2023; v1 submitted 21 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Time Delay Interferometry with Moving Spacecraft Arrays
Authors:
Massimo Tinto,
Frank B. Estabrook,
adn J. W. Armstrong
Abstract:
Space-borne interferometric gravitational wave detectors, sensitive in the low-frequency (millihertz) band, will fly in the next decade. In these detectors the spacecraft-to-spacecraft light-travel-times will necessarily be unequal, time-varying, and (due to aberration) have different time delays on up- and down-links. Reduction of data from moving interferometric laser arrays in solar orbit wil…
▽ More
Space-borne interferometric gravitational wave detectors, sensitive in the low-frequency (millihertz) band, will fly in the next decade. In these detectors the spacecraft-to-spacecraft light-travel-times will necessarily be unequal, time-varying, and (due to aberration) have different time delays on up- and down-links. Reduction of data from moving interferometric laser arrays in solar orbit will in fact encounter non-symmetric up- and downlink light time differences that are about 100 times larger than has previously been recognized. The time-delay interferometry (TDI) technique uses knowledge of these delays to cancel the otherwise dominant laser phase noise and yields a variety of data combinations sensitive to gravitational waves. Under the assumption that the (different) up- and downlink time delays are constant, we derive the TDI expressions for those combinations that rely only on four inter-spacecraft phase measurements. We then turn to the general problem that encompasses time-dependence of the light-travel times along the laser links. By introducing a set of non-commuting time-delay operators, we show that there exists a quite general procedure for deriving generalized TDI combinations that account for the effects of time-dependence of the arms. By applying our approach we are able to re-derive the ``flex-free'' expression for the unequal-arm Michelson combinations $X_1$, first presented in \cite{STEA}, and obtain the generalized expressions for the TDI combinations called Relay, Beacon, Monitor, and Symmetric Sagnac.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2004; v1 submitted 3 October, 2003;
originally announced October 2003.
