-
An application of machine learning techniques to galaxy cluster mass estimation using the MACSIS simulations
Authors:
Thomas J. Armitage,
Scott T. Kay,
David J. Barnes
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) techniques, in particular supervised regression algorithms, are a promising new way to use multiple observables to predict a cluster's mass or other key features. To investigate this approach we use the \textsc{MACSIS} sample of simulated hydrodynamical galaxy clusters to train a variety of ML models, mimicking different datasets. We find that compared to predicting the clust…
▽ More
Machine learning (ML) techniques, in particular supervised regression algorithms, are a promising new way to use multiple observables to predict a cluster's mass or other key features. To investigate this approach we use the \textsc{MACSIS} sample of simulated hydrodynamical galaxy clusters to train a variety of ML models, mimicking different datasets. We find that compared to predicting the cluster mass from the $σ-M$ relation, the scatter in the predicted-to-true mass ratio is reduced by a factor of 4, from $0.130\pm0.004$ dex (${\simeq} 35$ per cent) to $0.031 \pm 0.001$ dex (${\simeq} 7$ per cent) when using the same, interloper contaminated, spectroscopic galaxy sample. Interestingly, omitting line-of-sight galaxy velocities from the training set has no effect on the scatter when the galaxies are taken from within $r_{200c}$. We also train ML models to reproduce estimated masses derived from mock X-ray and weak lensing analyses. While the weak lensing masses can be recovered with a similar scatter to that when training on the true mass, the hydrostatic mass suffers from significantly higher scatter of ${\simeq} 0.13$ dex (${\simeq} 35$ per cent). Training models using dark matter only simulations does not significantly increase the scatter in predicted cluster mass compared to training on simulated clusters with hydrodynamics. In summary, we find ML techniques to offer a powerful method to predict masses for large samples of clusters, a vital requirement for cosmological analysis with future surveys.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
The Cluster-EAGLE project: a comparison of dynamical mass estimators using simulated clusters
Authors:
Thomas J. Armitage,
Scott T. Kay,
David J. Barnes,
Yannick M. Bahé,
Claudio Dalla Vecchia
Abstract:
Forthcoming large-scale spectroscopic surveys will soon provide data on thousands of galaxy clusters. It is important that the systematics of the various mass estimation techniques are well understood and calibrated. We compare three different dynamical mass estimators using the C-EAGLE galaxy clusters, a set of high resolution simulations with resolved galaxies a median total mass,…
▽ More
Forthcoming large-scale spectroscopic surveys will soon provide data on thousands of galaxy clusters. It is important that the systematics of the various mass estimation techniques are well understood and calibrated. We compare three different dynamical mass estimators using the C-EAGLE galaxy clusters, a set of high resolution simulations with resolved galaxies a median total mass, $M_{200c} = 10^{14.7} \, \mathrm{M_\odot}$. We quantify the bias and scatter of the Jeans, virial, and caustic mass estimators using all galaxies with a stellar mass $M_*> 10^9 \, \mathrm{M_\odot}$, both in the ideal 3D case and in the more realistic projected case. On average we find our mass estimates are unbiased, though relative to the true mass within $r_{200c}$ the scatter is large with a range of $0.09$ - $0.15$ dex. We see a slight increase in the scatter when projecting the clusters. Selecting galaxies using the same criteria, we find no significant difference in the mass bias or scatter when comparing results from hydrodynamical and dark matter only simulations. However, selecting galaxies by stellar mass reduces the bias compared to selecting by total mass. Comparing X-ray derived hydrostatic and dynamical masses, the former are ${\sim} 30$ per cent lower. We find a slight dependence between substructure, measured using two different metrics, and mass bias. In conclusion, we find that dynamical mass estimators, when averaged together, are unbiased with a scatter of $0.11 \pm 0.02$ dex when including interloper galaxies and with no prior knowledge of $r_{200c}$.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2018; v1 submitted 5 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
The Cluster-EAGLE project: velocity bias and the velocity dispersion - mass relation of cluster galaxies
Authors:
Thomas Joshua Armitage,
David. J. Barnes,
Scott. T. Kay,
Yannick M. Bahé,
Claudio Dalla Vecchia,
Robert A. Crain,
Tom Theuns
Abstract:
We use the Cluster-EAGLE simulations to explore the velocity bias introduced when using galaxies, rather than dark matter particles, to estimate the velocity dispersion of a galaxy cluster, a property known to be tightly correlated with cluster mass. The simulations consist of 30 clusters spanning a mass range $14.0 \le \log_{10}(M_{\rm 200c}/\mathrm{M_\odot}) \le 15.4$, with their sophisticated s…
▽ More
We use the Cluster-EAGLE simulations to explore the velocity bias introduced when using galaxies, rather than dark matter particles, to estimate the velocity dispersion of a galaxy cluster, a property known to be tightly correlated with cluster mass. The simulations consist of 30 clusters spanning a mass range $14.0 \le \log_{10}(M_{\rm 200c}/\mathrm{M_\odot}) \le 15.4$, with their sophisticated sub-grid physics modelling and high numerical resolution (sub-kpc gravitational softening) making them ideal for this purpose. We find that selecting galaxies by their total mass results in a velocity dispersion that is 5-10 per cent higher than the dark matter particles. However, selecting galaxies by their stellar mass results in an almost unbiased ($<5$ per cent) estimator of the velocity dispersion. This result holds out to $z=1.5$ and is relatively insensitive to the choice of cluster aperture, varying by less than 5 per cent between $r_{\rm 500c}$ and $r_{\rm 200m}$. We show that the velocity bias is a function of the time spent by a galaxy inside the cluster environment. Selecting galaxies by their total mass results in a larger bias because a larger fraction of objects have only recently entered the cluster and these have a velocity bias above unity. Galaxies that entered more than $4 \, \mathrm{Gyr}$ ago become progressively colder with time, as expected from dynamical friction. We conclude that velocity bias should not be a major issue when estimating cluster masses from kinematic methods.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2017; v1 submitted 1 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
