-
Heterogeneous robot teams with unified perception and autonomy: How Team CSIRO Data61 tied for the top score at the DARPA Subterranean Challenge
Authors:
Navinda Kottege,
Jason Williams,
Brendan Tidd,
Fletcher Talbot,
Ryan Steindl,
Mark Cox,
Dennis Frousheger,
Thomas Hines,
Alex Pitt,
Benjamin Tam,
Brett Wood,
Lauren Hanson,
Katrina Lo Surdo,
Thomas Molnar,
Matt Wildie,
Kazys Stepanas,
Gavin Catt,
Lachlan Tychsen-Smith,
Dean Penfold,
Leslie Overs,
Milad Ramezani,
Kasra Khosoussi,
Farid Kendoul,
Glenn Wagner,
Duncan Palmer
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The DARPA Subterranean Challenge was designed for competitors to develop and deploy teams of autonomous robots to explore difficult unknown underground environments. Categorised in to human-made tunnels, underground urban infrastructure and natural caves, each of these subdomains had many challenging elements for robot perception, locomotion, navigation and autonomy. These included degraded wirele…
▽ More
The DARPA Subterranean Challenge was designed for competitors to develop and deploy teams of autonomous robots to explore difficult unknown underground environments. Categorised in to human-made tunnels, underground urban infrastructure and natural caves, each of these subdomains had many challenging elements for robot perception, locomotion, navigation and autonomy. These included degraded wireless communication, poor visibility due to smoke, narrow passages and doorways, clutter, uneven ground, slippery and loose terrain, stairs, ledges, overhangs, drip** water, and dynamic obstacles that move to block paths among others. In the Final Event of this challenge held in September 2021, the course consisted of all three subdomains. The task was for the robot team to perform a scavenger hunt for a number of pre-defined artefacts within a limited time frame. Only one human supervisor was allowed to communicate with the robots once they were in the course. Points were scored when accurate detections and their locations were communicated back to the scoring server. A total of 8 teams competed in the finals held at the Mega Cavern in Louisville, KY, USA. This article describes the systems deployed by Team CSIRO Data61 that tied for the top score and won second place at the event.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Toward Ethical Robotic Behavior in Human-Robot Interaction Scenarios
Authors:
Shengkang Chen,
Vidullan Surendran,
Alan R. Wagner,
Jason Borenstein,
Ronald C. Arkin
Abstract:
This paper describes current progress on develo** an ethical architecture for robots that are designed to follow human ethical decision-making processes. We surveyed both regular adults (folks) and ethics experts (experts) on what they consider to be ethical behavior in two specific scenarios: pill-sorting with an older adult and game playing with a child. A key goal of the surveys is to better…
▽ More
This paper describes current progress on develo** an ethical architecture for robots that are designed to follow human ethical decision-making processes. We surveyed both regular adults (folks) and ethics experts (experts) on what they consider to be ethical behavior in two specific scenarios: pill-sorting with an older adult and game playing with a child. A key goal of the surveys is to better understand human ethical decision-making. In the first survey, folk responses were based on the subject's ethical choices ("folk morality"); in the second survey, expert responses were based on the expert's application of different formal ethical frameworks to each scenario. We observed that most of the formal ethical frameworks we included in the survey (Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, Ethics of Care and Virtue Ethics) and "folk morality" were conservative toward deception in the high-risk task with an older adult when both the adult and the child had significant performance deficiencies.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Heterogeneous Ground and Air Platforms, Homogeneous Sensing: Team CSIRO Data61's Approach to the DARPA Subterranean Challenge
Authors:
Nicolas Hudson,
Fletcher Talbot,
Mark Cox,
Jason Williams,
Thomas Hines,
Alex Pitt,
Brett Wood,
Dennis Frousheger,
Katrina Lo Surdo,
Thomas Molnar,
Ryan Steindl,
Matt Wildie,
Inkyu Sa,
Navinda Kottege,
Kazys Stepanas,
Emili Hernandez,
Gavin Catt,
William Docherty,
Brendan Tidd,
Benjamin Tam,
Simon Murrell,
Mitchell Bessell,
Lauren Hanson,
Lachlan Tychsen-Smith,
Hajime Suzuki
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Heterogeneous teams of robots, leveraging a balance between autonomy and human interaction, bring powerful capabilities to the problem of exploring dangerous, unstructured subterranean environments. Here we describe the solution developed by Team CSIRO Data61, consisting of CSIRO, Emesent and Georgia Tech, during the DARPA Subterranean Challenge. These presented systems were fielded in the Tunnel…
▽ More
Heterogeneous teams of robots, leveraging a balance between autonomy and human interaction, bring powerful capabilities to the problem of exploring dangerous, unstructured subterranean environments. Here we describe the solution developed by Team CSIRO Data61, consisting of CSIRO, Emesent and Georgia Tech, during the DARPA Subterranean Challenge. These presented systems were fielded in the Tunnel Circuit in August 2019, the Urban Circuit in February 2020, and in our own Cave event, conducted in September 2020. A unique capability of the fielded team is the homogeneous sensing of the platforms utilised, which is leveraged to obtain a decentralised multi-agent SLAM solution on each platform (both ground agents and UAVs) using peer-to-peer communications. This enabled a shift in focus from constructing a pervasive communications network to relying on multi-agent autonomy, motivated by experiences in early circuit events. These experiences also showed the surprising capability of rugged tracked platforms for challenging terrain, which in turn led to the heterogeneous team structure based on a BIA5 OzBot Titan ground robot and an Emesent Hovermap UAV, supplemented by smaller tracked or legged ground robots. The ground agents use a common CatPack perception module, which allowed reuse of the perception and autonomy stack across all ground agents with minimal adaptation.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Toward a Science of Autonomy for Physical Systems: Defense
Authors:
Ronald C. Arkin,
Gaurav S. Sukhatme
Abstract:
Militaries around the world have long been cognizant of the potential benefits associated with autonomous systems both in the conduct of warfare and in its prevention. This has lead to the declaration by some that this technology will lead to a fundamental change in the ways in which war is conducted, i.e., a revolution in military affairs (RMA) not unlike gunpowder, the long bow, the rifled bulle…
▽ More
Militaries around the world have long been cognizant of the potential benefits associated with autonomous systems both in the conduct of warfare and in its prevention. This has lead to the declaration by some that this technology will lead to a fundamental change in the ways in which war is conducted, i.e., a revolution in military affairs (RMA) not unlike gunpowder, the long bow, the rifled bullet, the aircraft carrier, etc. Indeed the United States has created roadmaps for robotics with ever-increasing autonomous capability that span almost 40 years. These systems span air, sea, sea surface, littoral, ground and subterranean environments. There are serious societal and ethical concerns associated with the deployment of this technology that remain unaddressed. How can sufficient protection be afforded noncombatants? What about civilian blowback, where this technology may end up being used in policing operations against domestic groups? How can we protect the fundamental human rights of all involved? Considerable discussion is being conducted at an international level, including at the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) over the past two years, debating if and how such systems, particularly lethal platforms should be banned or regulated.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
