-
Data-Aware Hybrid Tableaux
Authors:
Carlos Areces,
Valentin Cassano,
Raul Fervari
Abstract:
Labelled tableaux have been a traditional approach to define satisfiability checking procedures for Modal Logics. In many cases, they can also be used to obtained tight complexity bounds and lead to efficient implementations of reasoning tools. More recently, it has been shown that the expressive power provided by the operators characterizing Hybrid Logics (nominals and satisfiability modalities)…
▽ More
Labelled tableaux have been a traditional approach to define satisfiability checking procedures for Modal Logics. In many cases, they can also be used to obtained tight complexity bounds and lead to efficient implementations of reasoning tools. More recently, it has been shown that the expressive power provided by the operators characterizing Hybrid Logics (nominals and satisfiability modalities) can be used to internalize labels, leading to well-behaved inference procedures for fairly expressive logics. The resulting procedures are attractive because they do not use external mechanisms outside the language of the logic at hand, and have good logical and computational properties.
Lately, many proof systems based on Hybrid Logic have been investigated, in particular related to Modal Logics featuring some form of data comparison.
In this paper, we introduce an internalized tableaux calculus for XPath, arguably one of the most prominent approaches for querying semistructured data. More precisely, we define data-aware tableaux for XPath featuring data comparison operators and enriched with nominals and the satisfiability modalities from Hybrid Logic. We prove that the calculus is sound, complete and terminating. Moreover, we show that tableaux can be constructed in polynomial space, without compromising completeness, establishing in this way that the satisfiability problem for the considered logic is PSPACE-complete. Finally, we explore different extensions of the calculus, in particular to handle data trees and other frame classes.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
How Easy it is to Know How: An Upper Bound for the Satisfiability Problem
Authors:
Carlos Areces,
Valentin Cassano,
Raul Fervari,
Pablo Castro,
Andres Saravia
Abstract:
We investigate the complexity of the satisfiability problem for a modal logic expressing `knowing how' assertions, related to an agent's abilities to achieve a certain goal. We take one of the most standard semantics for this kind of logics based on linear plans. Our main result is a proof that checking satisfiability of a `knowing how' formula can be done in $Σ_2^P$. The algorithm we present reli…
▽ More
We investigate the complexity of the satisfiability problem for a modal logic expressing `knowing how' assertions, related to an agent's abilities to achieve a certain goal. We take one of the most standard semantics for this kind of logics based on linear plans. Our main result is a proof that checking satisfiability of a `knowing how' formula can be done in $Σ_2^P$. The algorithm we present relies on eliminating nested modalities in a formula, and then performing multiple calls to a satisfiability checking oracle for propositional logic.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Uncertainty-Based Knowing How Logic
Authors:
Carlos Areces,
Raul Fervari,
Andrés R. Saravia,
Fernando R. Velázquez-Quesada
Abstract:
We introduce a novel semantics for a multi-agent epistemic operator of knowing how, based on an indistinguishability relation between plans. Our proposal is, arguably, closer to the standard presentation of knowing that modalities in classical epistemic logic. We study the relationship between this new semantics and previous approaches, showing that our setting is general enough to capture them. W…
▽ More
We introduce a novel semantics for a multi-agent epistemic operator of knowing how, based on an indistinguishability relation between plans. Our proposal is, arguably, closer to the standard presentation of knowing that modalities in classical epistemic logic. We study the relationship between this new semantics and previous approaches, showing that our setting is general enough to capture them. We also study the logical properties of the new semantics. First, we define a sound and complete axiomatization. Second, we define a suitable notion of bisimulation and prove correspondence theorems. Finally, we investigate the computational complexity of the model checking and satisfiability problems for the new logic.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Uncertainty-Based Semantics for Multi-Agent Knowing How Logics
Authors:
Carlos Areces,
Raul Fervari,
Andrés R. Saravia,
Fernando R. Velázquez-Quesada
Abstract:
We introduce a new semantics for a multi-agent epistemic operator of knowing how, based on an indistinguishability relation between plans. Our proposal is, arguably, closer to the standard presentation of knowing that modalities in classical epistemic logic. We study the relationship between this semantics and previous approaches, showing that our setting is general enough to capture them. We als…
▽ More
We introduce a new semantics for a multi-agent epistemic operator of knowing how, based on an indistinguishability relation between plans. Our proposal is, arguably, closer to the standard presentation of knowing that modalities in classical epistemic logic. We study the relationship between this semantics and previous approaches, showing that our setting is general enough to capture them. We also define a sound and complete axiomatization, and investigate the computational complexity of its model checking and satisfiability problems.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Axiomatizing Hybrid XPath with Data
Authors:
Carlos Areces,
Raul Fervari
Abstract:
In this paper we introduce sound and strongly complete axiomatizations for XPath with data constraints extended with hybrid operators. First, we present HXPath=, a multi-modal version of XPath with data, extended with nominals and the hybrid operator @. Then, we introduce an axiomatic system for HXPath=, and we prove it is strongly complete with respect to the class of abstract data models, i.e.,…
▽ More
In this paper we introduce sound and strongly complete axiomatizations for XPath with data constraints extended with hybrid operators. First, we present HXPath=, a multi-modal version of XPath with data, extended with nominals and the hybrid operator @. Then, we introduce an axiomatic system for HXPath=, and we prove it is strongly complete with respect to the class of abstract data models, i.e., data models in which data values are abstracted as equivalence relations. We prove a general completeness result similar to the one presented in, e.g., [BtC06], that ensures that certain extensions of the axiomatic system we introduce are also complete. The axiomatic systems that can be obtained in this way cover a large family of hybrid XPath languages over different classes of frames, for which we present concrete examples. In addition, we investigate axiomatizations over the class of tree models, structures widely used in practice. We show that a strongly complete, finitary, first-order axiomatization of hybrid XPath over trees does not exist, and we propose two alternatives to deal with this issue. We finally introduce filtrations to investigate the status of decidability of the satisfiability problem for these languages.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2021; v1 submitted 31 March, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
An Algebraic Approach for Action Based Default Reasoning
Authors:
Pablo F. Castro,
Valentin Cassano,
Raul Fervari,
Carlos Areces
Abstract:
Often, we assume that an action is permitted simply because it is not explicitly forbidden; or, similarly, that an action is forbidden simply because it is not explicitly permitted. This kind of assumptions appear, e.g., in autonomous computing systems where decisions must be taken in the presence of an incomplete set of norms regulating a particular scenario. Combining default and deontic reasoni…
▽ More
Often, we assume that an action is permitted simply because it is not explicitly forbidden; or, similarly, that an action is forbidden simply because it is not explicitly permitted. This kind of assumptions appear, e.g., in autonomous computing systems where decisions must be taken in the presence of an incomplete set of norms regulating a particular scenario. Combining default and deontic reasoning over actions allows us to formally reason about such assumptions. With this in mind, we propose a logical formalism for default reasoning over a deontic action logic. The novelty of our approach is twofold. First, our formalism for default reasoning deals with actions and action operators, and it is based on the deontic action logic originally proposed by Segerberg. Second, inspired by Segerberg's approach, we use tools coming from the theory of Boolean Algebra. These tools allow us to extend Segerberg's algebraic completeness result to the setting of Default Logics.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
The Complexity of Definability by Open First-Order Formulas
Authors:
Carlos Areces,
Miguel Campercholi,
Daniel Penazzi,
Pablo Ventura
Abstract:
In this article we formally define and investigate the computational complexity of the Definability Problem for open first-order formulas (i.e., quantifier free first-order formulas) with equality. Given a logic $\mathbf{\mathcal{L}}$, the $\mathbf{\mathcal{L}}$-Definability Problem for finite structures takes as input a finite structure $\mathbf{A}$ and a target relation $T$ over the domain of…
▽ More
In this article we formally define and investigate the computational complexity of the Definability Problem for open first-order formulas (i.e., quantifier free first-order formulas) with equality. Given a logic $\mathbf{\mathcal{L}}$, the $\mathbf{\mathcal{L}}$-Definability Problem for finite structures takes as input a finite structure $\mathbf{A}$ and a target relation $T$ over the domain of $\mathbf{A}$, and determines whether there is a formula of $\mathbf{\mathcal{L}}$ whose interpretation in $\mathbf{A}$ coincides with $T$. We show that the complexity of this problem for open first-order formulas (open definability, for short) is coNP-complete. We also investigate the parametric complexity of the problem, and prove that if the size and the arity of the target relation $T$ are taken as parameters then open definability is $\mathrm{coW}[1]$-complete for every vocabulary $τ$ with at least one, at least binary, relation.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Relation-Changing Logics as Fragments of Hybrid Logics
Authors:
Carlos Areces,
Raul Fervari,
Guillaume Hoffmann,
Mauricio Martel
Abstract:
Relation-changing modal logics are extensions of the basic modal logic that allow changes to the accessibility relation of a model during the evaluation of a formula. In particular, they are equipped with dynamic modalities that are able to delete, add, and swap edges in the model, both locally and globally. We provide translations from these logics to hybrid logic along with an implementation. I…
▽ More
Relation-changing modal logics are extensions of the basic modal logic that allow changes to the accessibility relation of a model during the evaluation of a formula. In particular, they are equipped with dynamic modalities that are able to delete, add, and swap edges in the model, both locally and globally. We provide translations from these logics to hybrid logic along with an implementation. In general, these logics are undecidable, but we use our translations to identify decidable fragments. We also compare the expressive power of relation-changing modal logics with hybrid logics.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
The Lattice of Congruences of a Finite Line Frame
Authors:
Carlos Areces,
Miguel Campercholi,
Daniel Penazzi,
Pedro Sánchez Terraf
Abstract:
Let $\mathbf{F}=\left\langle F,R\right\rangle $ be a finite Kripke frame. A congruence of $\mathbf{F}$ is a bisimulation of $\mathbf{F}$ that is also an equivalence relation on F. The set of all congruences of $\mathbf{F}$ is a lattice under the inclusion ordering. In this article we investigate this lattice in the case that $\mathbf{F}$ is a finite line frame. We give concrete descriptions of the…
▽ More
Let $\mathbf{F}=\left\langle F,R\right\rangle $ be a finite Kripke frame. A congruence of $\mathbf{F}$ is a bisimulation of $\mathbf{F}$ that is also an equivalence relation on F. The set of all congruences of $\mathbf{F}$ is a lattice under the inclusion ordering. In this article we investigate this lattice in the case that $\mathbf{F}$ is a finite line frame. We give concrete descriptions of the join and meet of two congruences with a nontrivial upper bound. Through these descriptions we show that for every nontrivial congruence $ρ$, the interval $[\mathrm{Id_{F},ρ]}$ embeds into the lattice of divisors of a suitable positive integer. We also prove that any two congruences with a nontrivial upper bound permute.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2017; v1 submitted 7 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
-
Symmetries in Modal Logics
Authors:
Carlos Areces,
Guillaume Hoffmann,
Ezequiel Orbe
Abstract:
We generalize the notion of symmetries of propositional formulas in conjunctive normal form to modal formulas. Our framework uses the coinductive models and, hence, the results apply to a wide class of modal logics including, for example, hybrid logics. Our main result shows that the symmetries of a modal formula preserve entailment.
We generalize the notion of symmetries of propositional formulas in conjunctive normal form to modal formulas. Our framework uses the coinductive models and, hence, the results apply to a wide class of modal logics including, for example, hybrid logics. Our main result shows that the symmetries of a modal formula preserve entailment.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
-
The Question of Expressiveness in the Generation of Referring Expressions
Authors:
Carlos Areces,
Santiago Figueira,
Daniel Gorín
Abstract:
We study the problem of generating referring expressions modulo different notions of expressive power. We define the notion of $\+L$-referring expression, for a formal language $\+L$ equipped with a semantics in terms of relational models. We show that the approach is independent of the particular algorithm used to generate the referring expression by providing examples using the frameworks of \ci…
▽ More
We study the problem of generating referring expressions modulo different notions of expressive power. We define the notion of $\+L$-referring expression, for a formal language $\+L$ equipped with a semantics in terms of relational models. We show that the approach is independent of the particular algorithm used to generate the referring expression by providing examples using the frameworks of \cite{AKS08} and \cite{Krahmer2003}. We provide some new complexity bounds, discuss the issue of the length of the generated descriptions, and propose ways in which the two approaches can be combined.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2010;
originally announced June 2010.
