The Dark Energy Camera
Authors:
B. Flaugher,
H. T. Diehl,
K. Honscheid,
T. M. C. Abbott,
O. Alvarez,
R. Angstadt,
J. T. Annis,
M. Antonik,
O. Ballester,
L. Beaufore,
G. M. Bernstein,
R. A. Bernstein,
B. Bigelow,
M. Bonati,
D. Boprie,
D. Brooks,
E. J. Buckley-Geer,
J. Campa,
L. Cardiel-Sas,
F. J. Castander,
J. Castilla,
H. Cease,
J. M. Cela-Ruiz,
S. Chappa,
E. Chi
, et al. (93 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Dark Energy Camera is a new imager with a 2.2-degree diameter field of view mounted at the prime focus of the Victor M. Blanco 4-meter telescope on Cerro Tololo near La Serena, Chile. The camera was designed and constructed by the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, and meets or exceeds the stringent requirements designed for the wide-field and supernova surveys for which the collaboration uses…
▽ More
The Dark Energy Camera is a new imager with a 2.2-degree diameter field of view mounted at the prime focus of the Victor M. Blanco 4-meter telescope on Cerro Tololo near La Serena, Chile. The camera was designed and constructed by the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, and meets or exceeds the stringent requirements designed for the wide-field and supernova surveys for which the collaboration uses it. The camera consists of a five element optical corrector, seven filters, a shutter with a 60 cm aperture, and a CCD focal plane of 250 micron thick fully-depleted CCDs cooled inside a vacuum Dewar. The 570 Mpixel focal plane comprises 62 2kx4k CCDs for imaging and 12 2kx2k CCDs for guiding and focus. The CCDs have 15 microns x15 microns pixels with a plate scale of 0.263 arc sec per pixel. A hexapod system provides state-of-the-art focus and alignment capability. The camera is read out in 20 seconds with 6-9 electrons readout noise. This paper provides a technical description of the camera's engineering, construction, installation, and current status.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
The impact of camera optical alignments on weak lensing measures for the Dark Energy Survey
Authors:
Michelle L. Antonik,
David J. Bacon,
Sarah Bridle,
Peter Doel,
David Brooks,
Sue Worswick,
Gary Bernstein,
Rebecca Bernstein,
Darren DePoy,
Brenna Flaugher,
Joshua A. Frieman,
Michael Gladders,
Gaston Gutierrez,
Bhuvnesh Jain,
Michael Jarvis,
Stephen M. Kent,
Ofer Lahav,
Aaron Roodman,
Alistair R. Walker
Abstract:
Telescope Point Spread Function (PSF) quality is critical for realising the potential of cosmic weak lensing observations to constrain dark energy and test General Relativity. In this paper we use quantitative weak gravitational lensing measures to inform the precision of lens optical alignment, with specific reference to the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We compute optics spot diagrams and calculate…
▽ More
Telescope Point Spread Function (PSF) quality is critical for realising the potential of cosmic weak lensing observations to constrain dark energy and test General Relativity. In this paper we use quantitative weak gravitational lensing measures to inform the precision of lens optical alignment, with specific reference to the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We compute optics spot diagrams and calculate the shear and flexion of the PSF as a function of position on the focal plane. For perfect optical alignment we verify the high quality of the DES optical design, finding a maximum PSF contribution to the weak lensing shear of 0.04 near the edge of the focal plane. However this can be increased by a factor of approximately three if the lenses are only just aligned within their maximum specified tolerances. We calculate the E and B-mode shear and flexion variance as a function of de-centre or tilt of each lens in turn. We find tilt accuracy to be a few times more important than de-centre, depending on the lens considered. Finally we consider the compound effect of de-centre and tilt of multiple lenses simultaneously, by sampling from a plausible range of values of each parameter. We find that the compound effect can be around twice as detrimental as when considering any one lens alone. Furthermore, this combined effect changes the conclusions about which lens is most important to align accurately. For DES, the tilt of the first two lenses is the most important.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2012;
originally announced June 2012.
