-
arXiv:1810.11321 [pdf, ps, other]
Comments on Penrose inequality with angular momentum for outermost apparent horizons
Abstract: In a recent work we have proved a weaker version of the Penrose inequality with angular momentum, in axially symmetric space-times, for a compact and connected minimal surface. In this previous work we use the monotonicity of Geroch energy on 2-surfaces along the inverse mean curvature flow and we obtain a lower bound for the ADM mass in terms of the area, the angular momentun and a particular mea… ▽ More
Submitted 21 February, 2020; v1 submitted 24 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.
Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1708.04646
-
arXiv:1708.04646 [pdf, ps, other]
Penrose-like inequality with angular momentum for minimal surfaces
Abstract: In axially symmetric spacetimes the Penrose inequality can be strengthened to include angular momentum. We prove a version of this inequality for minimal surfaces, more precisely, a lower bound for the ADM mass in terms of the area of a minimal surface, the angular momentum and a particular measure of the surface size. We consider axially symmetric and asymptotically flat initial data, and use the… ▽ More
Submitted 25 January, 2018; v1 submitted 15 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.
Journal ref: Class. Quantum Grav. 35(4), 2018, 045018
-
Size, angular momentum and mass for objects
Abstract: We obtain a geometrical inequality involving the ADM mass, the angular momentum and the size of an ordinary, axially symmetric object. We use the monotonicity of the Geroch quasi-local energy on 2-surfaces along the inverse mean curvature flow. We also compute numerical examples to test the robustness of our hypotheses and results
Submitted 1 June, 2017; v1 submitted 27 December, 2016; originally announced December 2016.
Comments: 27 pages, 5 figures
Journal ref: Class.Quant.Grav. 34 (2017) no.12, 125011
-
The inequality between size and charge in spherical symmetry
Abstract: We prove that for a spherically symmetric charged body two times the radius is always strictly greater than the charge of the body. We also prove that this inequality is sharp. Finally, we discuss the physical implications of this geometrical inequality and present numerical examples that illustrate this theorem.
Submitted 22 December, 2015; v1 submitted 13 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.
Comments: 34 pages, 10 figures. Added references. New example in section 3.3
Journal ref: Phys. Rev. D 93, 044055 (2016)