-
solar: A solar thermal power plant simulator for blackbox optimization benchmarking
Authors:
Nicolau Andrés-Thió,
Charles Audet,
Miguel Diago,
Aimen E. Gheribi,
Sébastien Le Digabel,
Xavier Lebeuf,
Mathieu Lemyre Garneau,
Christophe Tribes
Abstract:
This work introduces solar, a collection of ten optimization problem instances for benchmarking blackbox optimization solvers. The instances present different design aspects of a concentrated solar power plant simulated by blackbox numerical models. The type of variables (discrete or continuous), dimensionality, and number and types of constraints (including hidden constraints) differ across insta…
▽ More
This work introduces solar, a collection of ten optimization problem instances for benchmarking blackbox optimization solvers. The instances present different design aspects of a concentrated solar power plant simulated by blackbox numerical models. The type of variables (discrete or continuous), dimensionality, and number and types of constraints (including hidden constraints) differ across instances. Some are deterministic, others are stochastic with possibilities to execute several replications to control stochasticity. Most instances offer variable fidelity surrogates, two are biobjective and one is unconstrained. The solar plant model takes into account various subsystems: a heliostats field, a central cavity receiver (the receiver), a molten salt thermal energy storage, a steam generator and an idealized power block. Several numerical methods are implemented throughout the solar code and most of the executions are time-consuming. Great care was applied to guarantee reproducibility across platforms. The solar tool encompasses most of the characteristics that can be found in industrial and real-life blackbox optimization problems, all in an open-source and stand-alone code.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Characterising harmful data sources when constructing multi-fidelity surrogate models
Authors:
Nicolau Andrés-Thió,
Mario Andrés Muñoz,
Kate Smith-Miles
Abstract:
Surrogate modelling techniques have seen growing attention in recent years when applied to both modelling and optimisation of industrial design problems. These techniques are highly relevant when assessing the performance of a particular design carries a high cost, as the overall cost can be mitigated via the construction of a model to be queried in lieu of the available high-cost source. The cons…
▽ More
Surrogate modelling techniques have seen growing attention in recent years when applied to both modelling and optimisation of industrial design problems. These techniques are highly relevant when assessing the performance of a particular design carries a high cost, as the overall cost can be mitigated via the construction of a model to be queried in lieu of the available high-cost source. The construction of these models can sometimes employ other sources of information which are both cheaper and less accurate. The existence of these sources however poses the question of which sources should be used when constructing a model. Recent studies have attempted to characterise harmful data sources to guide practitioners in choosing when to ignore a certain source. These studies have done so in a synthetic setting, characterising sources using a large amount of data that is not available in practice. Some of these studies have also been shown to potentially suffer from bias in the benchmarks used in the analysis. In this study, we present a characterisation of harmful low-fidelity sources using only the limited data available to train a surrogate model. We employ recently developed benchmark filtering techniques to conduct a bias-free assessment, providing objectively varied benchmark suites of different sizes for future research. Analysing one of these benchmark suites with the technique known as Instance Space Analysis, we provide an intuitive visualisation of when a low-fidelity source should be used and use this analysis to provide guidelines that can be used in an applied industrial setting.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
CT dose reduction factors in the thousands using X-ray phase contrast
Authors:
Marcus J. Kitchen,
Genevieve A. Buckley,
Timur E. Gureyev,
Megan J. Wallace,
Nico Andres-Thio,
Kentaro Uesugi,
Naoto Yagi,
Stuart B. Hooper,
.
Abstract:
Phase-contrast X-ray imaging can improve the visibility of weakly absorbing objects (e.g. soft tissues) by an order of magnitude or more compared to conventional radiographs. Previously, it has been shown that combining phase retrieval with computed tomography (CT) can increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by up to two orders of magnitude over conventional CT at the same radiation dose, without…
▽ More
Phase-contrast X-ray imaging can improve the visibility of weakly absorbing objects (e.g. soft tissues) by an order of magnitude or more compared to conventional radiographs. Previously, it has been shown that combining phase retrieval with computed tomography (CT) can increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by up to two orders of magnitude over conventional CT at the same radiation dose, without loss of image quality. Our experiments reveal that as radiation dose decreases, the relative improvement in SNR increases. We discovered this enhancement can be traded for a reduction in dose greater than the square of the gain in SNR. Upon reducing the dose 300 fold, the phase-retrieved SNR was still almost 10 times larger than the absorption contrast data. This reveals the potential for dose reduction factors in the tens of thousands without loss in image quality, which would have a profound impact on medical and industrial imaging applications.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
