-
A Comparative Study of Sensitivity Computations in ESDIRK-Based Optimal Control Problems
Authors:
Anders Hilmar Damm Andersen,
John Bagterp Jørgensen
Abstract:
In this paper, we compare the impact of iterated and direct approaches to sensitivity computation in fixed-step explicit singly diagonally-implicit Runge-Kutta (ESDIRK) methods when applied to optimal control problems (OCPs). We use the principle of internal numerical differentiation (IND) strictly for the iterated approach, i.e., reusing the iteration matrix factorizations, the number of Newton-t…
▽ More
In this paper, we compare the impact of iterated and direct approaches to sensitivity computation in fixed-step explicit singly diagonally-implicit Runge-Kutta (ESDIRK) methods when applied to optimal control problems (OCPs). We use the principle of internal numerical differentiation (IND) strictly for the iterated approach, i.e., reusing the iteration matrix factorizations, the number of Newton-type iterations, and Newton iterates, to compute the sensitivities. The direct method computes the sensitivities without using the Newton schemes. We compare the impact of the iterated and direct sensitivity computations in OCPs for the quadruple tank system. We benchmark the iterated and direct approaches with a base case. This base case is an OCP that applies an ESDIRK method that refactorizes the iteration matrix in every Newton iteration and uses a direct approach for sensitivity computations. In these OCPs, we vary the number of integration steps between control intervals and we evaluate the performance based on the number of SQP and QPs iterations, KKT violations, and the total number of function evaluations, Jacobian updates, and iteration matrix factorizations. The results indicate that the iterated approach outperforms the direct approach but yields similar performance to the base case.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Software principles and concepts applied in the implementation of cyber-physical systems for real-time advanced process control
Authors:
Anders H. D. Andersen,
Zhanhao Zhang,
Steen Hørsholt,
Tobias K. S. Ritschel,
John Bagterp Jørgensen
Abstract:
Cyber-physical systems (CPSs) for real-time advanced process control (RT-APC) are a class of control systems using network communication to control industrial processes. In this paper, we use simple examples to describe the software principles and concepts used in the implementation of such systems. The key software principles are 1) shared data in the form of a database, files, or shared memory,…
▽ More
Cyber-physical systems (CPSs) for real-time advanced process control (RT-APC) are a class of control systems using network communication to control industrial processes. In this paper, we use simple examples to describe the software principles and concepts used in the implementation of such systems. The key software principles are 1) shared data in the form of a database, files, or shared memory, 2) timers and threads for concurrent periodic execution of tasks, and 3) network communication between the control system and the process, and communication between the control system and the internet, e.g., the cloud to enable remote monitoring and commands. We show how to implement such systems for Linux operating systems applying the C programming language and we also comment on the implementation using the Python programming language. Finally, we present a complete simulation experiment using a real-time simulator.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2023; v1 submitted 27 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Model-based control algorithms for the quadruple tank system: An experimental comparison
Authors:
Anders H. D. Andersen,
Tobias K. S. Ritschel,
Steen Hørsholt,
Jakob Kjøbsted Huusom,
John Bagterp Jørgensen
Abstract:
We compare the performance of proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control, linear model predictive control (LMPC), and nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) for a physical setup of the quadruple tank system (QTS). We estimate the parameters in a continuous-discrete time stochastic nonlinear model for the QTS using a prediction-error-method based on the measured process data and a maximum li…
▽ More
We compare the performance of proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control, linear model predictive control (LMPC), and nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) for a physical setup of the quadruple tank system (QTS). We estimate the parameters in a continuous-discrete time stochastic nonlinear model for the QTS using a prediction-error-method based on the measured process data and a maximum likelihood (ML) criterion. In the NMPC algorithm, we use this identified continuous-discrete time stochastic nonlinear model. The LMPC algorithm is based on a linearization of this nonlinear model. We tune the PID controller using Skogestad's IMC tuning rules using a transfer function representation of the linearized model. Norms of the observed tracking errors and the rate of change of the manipulated variables are used to compare the performance of the control algorithms. The LMPC and NMPC perform better than the PID controller for a predefined time-varying setpoint trajectory. The LMPC and NMPC algorithms have similar performance.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
