-
A causal inference approach of monosynapses from spike trains
Authors:
Zach Saccomano,
Sam Mckenzie,
Horacio Rotstein,
Asohan Amarasingham
Abstract:
Neuroscientists have worked on the problem of estimating synaptic properties, such as connectivity and strength, from simultaneously recorded spike trains since the 1960s. Recent years have seen renewed interest in the problem, coinciding with rapid advances in the technology of high-density neural recordings and optogenetics, which can be used to calibrate causal hypotheses about functional conne…
▽ More
Neuroscientists have worked on the problem of estimating synaptic properties, such as connectivity and strength, from simultaneously recorded spike trains since the 1960s. Recent years have seen renewed interest in the problem, coinciding with rapid advances in the technology of high-density neural recordings and optogenetics, which can be used to calibrate causal hypotheses about functional connectivity. Here, a rigorous causal inference framework for pairwise excitatory and inhibitory monosynaptic effects between spike trains is developed. Causal interactions are identified by separating spike interactions in pairwise spike trains by their timescales. Fast algorithms for computing accurate estimates of associated quantities are also developed. Through the lens of this framework, the link between biophysical parameters and statistical definitions of causality between spike trains is examined across a spectrum of dynamical systems simulations. In an idealized setting, we demonstrate a correspondence between the synaptic causal metric developed here and the probabilities of causation developed by Tian and Pearl. Since the probabilities of causation are derived under distinct assumptions and include data from experimental randomization, this opens up the possibility of testing the synaptic inference framework's assumptions with juxtacellular or optogenetic stimulation. We simulate such an experiment with a biophysically detailed channelrhodopsin model and show that randomization is not achieved; strong confounding persists even with strong stimulations. A principal goal is to ask how carefully articulated causal assumptions might better inform the design of neural stimulation experiments and, in turn, support experimental tests of those assumptions.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Short-term Temporal Dependency Detection under Heterogeneous Event Dynamic with Hawkes Processes
Authors:
Yu Chen,
Fengpei Li,
Anderson Schneider,
Yuriy Nevmyvaka,
Asohan Amarasingham,
Henry Lam
Abstract:
Many event sequence data exhibit mutually exciting or inhibiting patterns. Reliable detection of such temporal dependency is crucial for scientific investigation. The de facto model is the Multivariate Hawkes Process (MHP), whose impact function naturally encodes a causal structure in Granger causality. However, the vast majority of existing methods use direct or nonlinear transform of standard MH…
▽ More
Many event sequence data exhibit mutually exciting or inhibiting patterns. Reliable detection of such temporal dependency is crucial for scientific investigation. The de facto model is the Multivariate Hawkes Process (MHP), whose impact function naturally encodes a causal structure in Granger causality. However, the vast majority of existing methods use direct or nonlinear transform of standard MHP intensity with constant baseline, inconsistent with real-world data. Under irregular and unknown heterogeneous intensity, capturing temporal dependency is hard as one struggles to distinguish the effect of mutual interaction from that of intensity fluctuation. In this paper, we address the short-term temporal dependency detection issue. We show the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for cross-impact from MHP has an error that can not be eliminated but may be reduced by order of magnitude, using heterogeneous intensity not of the target HP but of the interacting HP. Then we proposed a robust and computationally-efficient method modified from MLE that does not rely on the prior estimation of the heterogeneous intensity and is thus applicable in a data-limited regime (e.g., few-shot, no repeated observations). Extensive experiments on various datasets show that our method outperforms existing ones by notable margins, with highlighted novel applications in neuroscience.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
On the role of theory and modeling in neuroscience
Authors:
Daniel Levenstein,
Veronica A. Alvarez,
Asohan Amarasingham,
Habiba Azab,
Zhe Sage Chen,
Richard C. Gerkin,
Andrea Hasenstaub,
Ramakrishnan Iyer,
Renaud B. Jolivet,
Sarah Marzen,
Joseph D. Monaco,
Astrid A. Prinz,
Salma Quraishi,
Fidel Santamaria,
Sabyasachi Shivkumar,
Matthew F. Singh,
Roger Traub,
Horacio G. Rotstein,
Farzan Nadim,
A. David Redish
Abstract:
In recent years, the field of neuroscience has gone through rapid experimental advances and a significant increase in the use of quantitative and computational methods. This growth has created a need for clearer analyses of the theory and modeling approaches used in the field. This issue is particularly complex in neuroscience because the field studies phenomena across a wide range of scales and o…
▽ More
In recent years, the field of neuroscience has gone through rapid experimental advances and a significant increase in the use of quantitative and computational methods. This growth has created a need for clearer analyses of the theory and modeling approaches used in the field. This issue is particularly complex in neuroscience because the field studies phenomena across a wide range of scales and often requires consideration of these phenomena at varying degrees of abstraction, from precise biophysical interactions to the computations they implement. We argue that a pragmatic perspective of science, in which descriptive, mechanistic, and normative approaches each play a distinct role in defining and bridging levels of abstraction will facilitate neuroscientific practice. This analysis leads to methodological suggestions, including selecting a level of abstraction that is appropriate for a given problem, identifying transfer functions to connect models and data, and the use of models themselves as a form of experiment.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2022; v1 submitted 30 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Monosynaptic inference via finely-timed spikes
Authors:
Jonathan Platkiewicz,
Zachary Saccomano,
Sam McKenzie,
Daniel English,
Asohan Amarasingham
Abstract:
Observations of finely-timed spike relationships in population recordings have been used to support partial reconstruction of neural microcircuit diagrams. In this approach, fine-timescale components of paired spike train interactions are isolated and subsequently attributed to synaptic parameters. Recent perturbation studies strengthen the case for such an inference, yet the complete set of measu…
▽ More
Observations of finely-timed spike relationships in population recordings have been used to support partial reconstruction of neural microcircuit diagrams. In this approach, fine-timescale components of paired spike train interactions are isolated and subsequently attributed to synaptic parameters. Recent perturbation studies strengthen the case for such an inference, yet the complete set of measurements needed to calibrate statistical models are unavailable. To address this gap, we study features of pairwise spiking in a large-scale in vivo dataset where presynaptic neurons were explicitly decoupled from network activity by juxtacellular stimulation. We then construct biophysical models of paired spike trains to reproduce the observed phenomenology of in vivo monosynaptic interactions, including both fine-timescale spike-spike correlations and firing irregularity. A key characteristic of these models is that the paired neurons are coupled by rapidly-fluctuating background inputs. We quantify a monosynapse's causal effect by comparing the postsynaptic train with its counterfactual, when the monosynapse is removed. Subsequently, we develop statistical techniques for estimating this causal effect from the pre- and post-synaptic spike trains. A particular focus is the justification and application of a nonparametric separation of timescale principle to implement synaptic inference. Using simulated data generated from the biophysical models, we characterize the regimes in which the estimators accurately identify the monosynaptic effect. A secondary goal is to initiate a critical exploration of neurostatistical assumptions in terms of biophysical mechanisms, particularly with regards to the challenging but arguably fundamental issue of fast, unobservable nonstationarities in background dynamics.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2020; v1 submitted 18 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Conditional Modeling and the Jitter Method of Spike Re-sampling: Supplement
Authors:
Asohan Amarasingham,
Matthew T. Harrison,
Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos,
Stuart Geman
Abstract:
This technical report accompanies the manuscript "Conditional Modeling and the Jitter Method of Spike Re-sampling." It contains further details, comments, references, and equations concerning various simulations and data analyses presented in that manuscript, as well as a self-contained Mathematical Appendix that provides a formal treatment of jitter-based spike re-sampling methods.
This technical report accompanies the manuscript "Conditional Modeling and the Jitter Method of Spike Re-sampling." It contains further details, comments, references, and equations concerning various simulations and data analyses presented in that manuscript, as well as a self-contained Mathematical Appendix that provides a formal treatment of jitter-based spike re-sampling methods.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2011;
originally announced November 2011.
