-
The influence of ionized gas kinematics on HII galaxies. The cases of Tol 1004-296 and Tol 0957-278
Authors:
Henri Plana,
Vitor G. Alves,
Maiara S. Carvalho
Abstract:
Blue Compact Galaxies (BCGs), also known as \HII\ galaxies, are dwarf, star-forming objects with relatively simple dynamics, which allows for the investigation of star formation mechanisms in a cleaner manner compared to late-type objects. In this study, we have examined various characteristics of the interstellar medium, in connection with the kinematics and dynamics of ionized gas, in Tol 1004-2…
▽ More
Blue Compact Galaxies (BCGs), also known as \HII\ galaxies, are dwarf, star-forming objects with relatively simple dynamics, which allows for the investigation of star formation mechanisms in a cleaner manner compared to late-type objects. In this study, we have examined various characteristics of the interstellar medium, in connection with the kinematics and dynamics of ionized gas, in Tol 1004-296 and Tol 0957-278. These two objects were observed using the SOAR Integral Field Spectrometer (SIFS) attached to the Southern Observatory for Astrophysical Research (SOAR). Both galaxies were observed with two gratings: one with medium resolution for monochromatic and abundance maps, and another with high resolution for kinematics and profile analysis. Additionally, we conducted an analysis on the velocity and velocity dispersion maps using intensity-velocity dispersion (I - $σ$) and velocity-velocity dispersion (Vr - $σ$) diagrams. Neither object exhibits a rotation pattern, and only Tol 1004-296 shows a velocity gradient between the two principal knots. However, the study reveals the significant role played by velocity dispersion in the star formation process. Specifically, we identified a relationship between monochromatic intensity, metallicity, and velocity dispersion, where high emission corresponds to low metallicity and low velocity dispersion. Tol 1004-296, in particular, exhibits a distinctive linear high velocity dispersion pattern between the two main knots, suggesting that both star formation sites are pushing the gas in opposite directions.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Quantitative assessment of dosimetric effect of using alternative OAR delineations in treatment planning as functions of delineations, setup uncertainty and planning techniques using an alternative truth assessment method
Authors:
M. N. H. Rashad,
Abishek Karki,
Jason Czak,
Victor Gabriel Alves,
Hamidreza Nourzadeh,
Wook** Choi,
Jeffrey V Siebers
Abstract:
Purpose: This study aims to quantify the variation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) and normal tissue complication probability(NTCP) metrics for head-and-neck (HN) cancer patients when alternative organ-at-risk(OAR) delineations are used for treatment planning and for treatment plan evaluation. We particularly focus on the effects of daily patient positioning/setup variations(SV) in relation to trea…
▽ More
Purpose: This study aims to quantify the variation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) and normal tissue complication probability(NTCP) metrics for head-and-neck (HN) cancer patients when alternative organ-at-risk(OAR) delineations are used for treatment planning and for treatment plan evaluation. We particularly focus on the effects of daily patient positioning/setup variations(SV) in relation to treatment technique and delineation variability.
Materials and Methods: We generated two-arc VMAT, 5-beam IMRT, and 9-beam IMRT treatment plans for a cohort of 209 HN patients. These plans incorporated five different OAR delineation sets, including manual and four automated algorithms. Each treatment plan was assessed under various simulated per-fraction patient setup uncertainties, evaluating the potential clinical impacts through DVH and NTCP metrics.
Results: The study demonstrates that increasing SV generally reduces differences in DVH metrics between alternative delineations. However, in contrast, differences in NTCP metrics tend to increase with higher setup variability. This pattern is observed consistently across different treatment plans and delineator combinations, illustrating the intricate relationship between SV and delineation accuracy. Additionally, the need for delineation accuracy in treatment planning is shown to be case-specific and dependent on factors beyond geometric variations.
Conclusions: The findings highlight the necessity for comprehensive Quality Assurance programs in radiotherapy, incorporating both dosimetric impact analysis and geometric variation assessment to ensure optimal delineation quality. The study emphasizes the complex dynamics of treatment planning in radiotherapy, advocating for personalized, case-specific strategies in clinical practice to enhance patient care quality and efficacy in the face of varying SV and delineation accuracies.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines
Authors:
Aaron Babier,
Rafid Mahmood,
Binghao Zhang,
Victor G. L. Alves,
Ana Maria Barragán-Montero,
Joel Beaudry,
Carlos E. Cardenas,
Yankui Chang,
Zijie Chen,
Jaehee Chun,
Kelly Diaz,
Harold David Eraso,
Erik Faustmann,
Sibaji Gaj,
Skylar Gay,
Mary Gronberg,
Bingqi Guo,
Junjun He,
Gerd Heilemann,
Sanchit Hira,
Yuliang Huang,
Fuxin Ji,
Dashan Jiang,
Jean Carlo Jimenez Giraldo,
Hoyeon Lee
, et al. (34 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We establish an open framework for develo** plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiotherapy. Our framework includes reference plans for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer and high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four optimization mode…
▽ More
We establish an open framework for develo** plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiotherapy. Our framework includes reference plans for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer and high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four optimization models to form 76 unique KBP pipelines that generated 7600 plans. The predictions and plans were compared to the reference plans via: dose score, which is the average mean absolute voxel-by-voxel difference in dose a model achieved; the deviation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) criterion; and the frequency of clinical planning criteria satisfaction. We also performed a theoretical investigation to justify our dose mimicking models. The range in rank order correlation of the dose score between predictions and their KBP pipelines was 0.50 to 0.62, which indicates that the quality of the predictions is generally positively correlated with the quality of the plans. Additionally, compared to the input predictions, the KBP-generated plans performed significantly better (P<0.05; one-sided Wilcoxon test) on 18 of 23 DVH criteria. Similarly, each optimization model generated plans that satisfied a higher percentage of criteria than the reference plans. Lastly, our theoretical investigation demonstrated that the dose mimicking models generated plans that are also optimal for a conventional planning model. This was the largest international effort to date for evaluating the combination of KBP prediction and optimization models. In the interest of reproducibility, our data and code is freely available at https://github.com/ababier/open-kbp-opt.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Gross patient error detection via cine transmission dosimetry
Authors:
Nguyen Phuong Dang,
Victor Gabriel Leandro Alves,
Mahmoud Ahmed,
Jeffrey Siebers
Abstract:
$\textbf{Purpose:}$ To quantify the effectiveness of EPID-based cine transmission dosimetry to detect gross patient anatomic errors. $\textbf{Method and Materials:}…
▽ More
$\textbf{Purpose:}$ To quantify the effectiveness of EPID-based cine transmission dosimetry to detect gross patient anatomic errors. $\textbf{Method and Materials:}$ EPID image frames resulting from fluence transmitted through multiple patients anatomies are simulated for 100 msec delivery intervals for hypothetical 6 MV VMAT deliveries. Frames simulated through 10 head-and-neck CTs and 19 prostate CTs with and without 1-3 mm shift and 1-3 degree rotations were used to quantify expected in-tolerance clinical setup variations. Per-frame analysis methods to determine if simulated gross errors of (a) 10-20 mm patient miss alignment offsets and (b) 15-20 degree patient rotations could be reliably distinguished from the above baseline variations. For the prostate image sets, frames simulated through the reference CT are intercompared with (c) frames through 8-13 different CT's for the same patient to quantify expected inter-treatment frame variation. ROC analysis of per-frame error discrimination based upon (i) frame image differences, (ii) frame histogram comparisons, (iii) image feature matching, and (iv) image distance were used to quantify error detectability. $\textbf{Results:}$ Each error detection method was able to distinguish gross patient miss-alignment and gross rotations from in-tolerance levels for both H&N and prostate datasets. The image distance algorithm is the best method based on AUC. $\textbf{Conclusion:}$ In-field gross error detection was possible for gross patient miss-alignments and incorrect patients. For prostate cases, the methods used were able to distinguish different patients from daily patient variations.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
DeepDoseNet: A Deep Learning model for 3D Dose Prediction in Radiation Therapy
Authors:
Mumtaz Hussain Soomro,
Victor Gabriel Leandro Alves,
Hamidreza Nourzadeh,
Jeffrey V. Siebers
Abstract:
The DeepDoseNet 3D dose prediction model based on ResNet and Dilated DenseNet is proposed. The 340 head-and-neck datasets from the 2020 AAPM OpenKBP challenge were utilized, with 200 for training, 40 for validation, and 100 for testing. Structures include 56Gy, 63Gy, 70Gy PTVs, and brainstem, spinal cord, right parotid, left parotid, larynx, esophagus, and mandible OARs. Mean squared error (MSE) l…
▽ More
The DeepDoseNet 3D dose prediction model based on ResNet and Dilated DenseNet is proposed. The 340 head-and-neck datasets from the 2020 AAPM OpenKBP challenge were utilized, with 200 for training, 40 for validation, and 100 for testing. Structures include 56Gy, 63Gy, 70Gy PTVs, and brainstem, spinal cord, right parotid, left parotid, larynx, esophagus, and mandible OARs. Mean squared error (MSE) loss, mean absolute error (MAE) loss, and MAE plus dose-volume histogram (DVH) based loss functions were investigated. Each model's performance was compared using a 3D dose score, $\bar{S_{D}}$, (mean absolute difference between ground truth and predicted 3D dose distributions) and a DVH score, $\bar{S_{DVH}}$ (mean absolute difference between ground truth and predicted dose-volume metrics).Furthermore, DVH metrics Mean[Gy] and D0.1cc [Gy] for OARs and D99%, D95%, D1% for PTVs were computed. DeepDoseNet with the MAE plus DVH-based loss function had the best dose score performance of the OpenKBP entries. MAE+DVH model had the lowest prediction error (P<0.0001, Wilcoxon test) on validation and test datasets (validation: $\bar{S_{D}}$=2.3Gy, $\bar{S_{DVH}}$=1.9Gy; test: $\bar{S_{D}}$=2.0Gy, $\bar{S_{DVH}}$=1.6Gy) followed by the MAE model (validation: $\bar{S_{D}}$=3.6Gy, $\bar{S_{DVH}}$=2.4Gy; test: $\bar{S_{D}}$=3.5Gy, $\bar{S_{DVH}}$=2.3Gy). The MSE model had the highest prediction error (validation: $\bar{S_{D}}$=3.7Gy, $\bar{S_{DVH}}$=3.2Gy; test: $\bar{S_{D}}$=3.6Gy, $\bar{S_{DVH}}$=3.0Gy). No significant difference was found among models in terms of Mean [Gy], but the MAE+DVH model significantly outperformed the MAE and MSE models in terms of D0.1cc[Gy], particularly for mandible and parotids on both validation (P<0.01) and test (P<0.0001) datasets. MAE+DVH outperformed (P<0.0001) in terms of D99%, D95%, D1% for targets. MAE+DVH reduced $\bar{S_{D}}$ by ~60% and $\bar{S_{DVH}}$ by ~70%.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
OARnet: Automated organs-at-risk delineation in Head and Neck CT images
Authors:
Mumtaz Hussain Soomro,
Hamidreza Nourzadeh,
Victor Gabriel Leandro Alves,
Wook** Choi,
Jeffrey V. Siebers
Abstract:
A 3D deep learning model (OARnet) is developed and used to delineate 28 H&N OARs on CT images. OARnet utilizes a densely connected network to detect the OAR bounding-box, then delineates the OAR within the box. It reuses information from any layer to subsequent layers and uses skip connections to combine information from different dense block levels to progressively improve delineation accuracy. T…
▽ More
A 3D deep learning model (OARnet) is developed and used to delineate 28 H&N OARs on CT images. OARnet utilizes a densely connected network to detect the OAR bounding-box, then delineates the OAR within the box. It reuses information from any layer to subsequent layers and uses skip connections to combine information from different dense block levels to progressively improve delineation accuracy. Training uses up to 28 expert manual delineated (MD) OARs from 165 CTs. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) with respect to MD is assessed for 70 other CTs. Mean, maximum, and root-mean-square dose differences with respect to MD are assessed for 56 of the 70 CTs. OARnet is compared with UaNet, AnatomyNet, and Multi-Atlas Segmentation (MAS). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests using 95% confidence intervals are used to assess significance. Wilcoxon signed ranked tests show that, compared with UaNet, OARnet improves (p<0.05) the DSC (23/28 OARs) and HD95 (17/28). OARnet outperforms both AnatomyNet and MAS for DSC (28/28) and HD95 (27/28). Compared with UaNet, OARnet improves median DSC up to 0.05 and HD95 up to 1.5mm. Compared with AnatomyNet and MAS, OARnet improves median (DSC, HD95) by up to (0.08, 2.7mm) and (0.17, 6.3mm). Dosimetrically, OARnet outperforms UaNet (Dmax 7/28; Dmean 10/28), AnatomyNet (Dmax 21/28; Dmean 24/28), and MAS (Dmax 22/28; Dmean 21/28). The DenseNet architecture is optimized using a hybrid approach that performs OAR-specific bounding box detection followed by feature recognition. Compared with other auto-delineation methods, OARnet is better than or equal to UaNet for all but one geometric (Temporal Lobe L, HD95) and one dosimetric (Eye L, mean dose) endpoint for the 28 H&N OARs, and is better than or equal to both AnatomyNet and MAS for all OARs.
△ Less
Submitted 23 November, 2021; v1 submitted 31 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
