-
Is Registering Raw Tagged-MR Enough for Strain Estimation in the Era of Deep Learning?
Authors:
Zhangxing Bian,
Ahmed Alshareef,
Shuwen Wei,
Junyu Chen,
Yuli Wang,
Jonghye Woo,
Dzung L. Pham,
Jiachen Zhuo,
Aaron Carass,
Jerry L. Prince
Abstract:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging with tagging (tMRI) has long been utilized for quantifying tissue motion and strain during deformation. However, a phenomenon known as tag fading, a gradual decrease in tag visibility over time, often complicates post-processing. The first contribution of this study is to model tag fading by considering the interplay between $T_1$ relaxation and the repeated application…
▽ More
Magnetic Resonance Imaging with tagging (tMRI) has long been utilized for quantifying tissue motion and strain during deformation. However, a phenomenon known as tag fading, a gradual decrease in tag visibility over time, often complicates post-processing. The first contribution of this study is to model tag fading by considering the interplay between $T_1$ relaxation and the repeated application of radio frequency (RF) pulses during serial imaging sequences. This is a factor that has been overlooked in prior research on tMRI post-processing. Further, we have observed an emerging trend of utilizing raw tagged MRI within a deep learning-based (DL) registration framework for motion estimation. In this work, we evaluate and analyze the impact of commonly used image similarity objectives in training DL registrations on raw tMRI. This is then compared with the Harmonic Phase-based approach, a traditional approach which is claimed to be robust to tag fading. Our findings, derived from both simulated images and an actual phantom scan, reveal the limitations of various similarity losses in raw tMRI and emphasize caution in registration tasks where image intensity changes over time.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Data-driven Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Human Head Models
Authors:
Kshitiz Upadhyay,
Dimitris G. Giovanis,
Ahmed Alshareef,
Andrew K. Knutsen,
Curtis L. Johnson,
Aaron Carass,
Philip V. Bayly,
Michael D. Shields,
K. T. Ramesh
Abstract:
Computational models of the human head are promising tools for estimating the impact-induced response of brain, and thus play an important role in the prediction of traumatic brain injury. Modern biofidelic head model simulations are associated with very high computational cost, and high-dimensional inputs and outputs, which limits the applicability of traditional uncertainty quantification (UQ) m…
▽ More
Computational models of the human head are promising tools for estimating the impact-induced response of brain, and thus play an important role in the prediction of traumatic brain injury. Modern biofidelic head model simulations are associated with very high computational cost, and high-dimensional inputs and outputs, which limits the applicability of traditional uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods on these systems. In this study, a two-stage, data-driven manifold learning-based framework is proposed for UQ of computational head models. This framework is demonstrated on a 2D subject-specific head model, where the goal is to quantify uncertainty in the simulated strain fields (i.e., output), given variability in the material properties of different brain substructures (i.e., input). In the first stage, a data-driven method based on multi-dimensional Gaussian kernel-density estimation and diffusion maps is used to generate realizations of the input random vector directly from the available data. Computational simulations of a small number of realizations provide input-output pairs for training data-driven surrogate models in the second stage. The surrogate models employ nonlinear dimensionality reduction using Grassmannian diffusion maps, Gaussian process regression to create a low-cost map** between the input random vector and the reduced solution space, and geometric harmonics models for map** between the reduced space and the Grassmann manifold. It is demonstrated that the surrogate models provide highly accurate approximations of the computational model while significantly reducing the computational cost. Monte Carlo simulations of the surrogate models are used for uncertainty propagation. UQ of strain fields highlight significant spatial variation in model uncertainty, and reveal key differences in uncertainty among commonly used strain-based brain injury predictor variables.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2022; v1 submitted 29 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Simulation, Model Checking, and Execution of Activity Models
Authors:
Abdurrahman Alshareef,
Hessam S. Sarjoughian
Abstract:
This paper presents our findings for using activity modeling for simulation (validation), model checking (verification), and execution purposes. Each is needed to tackle system complexity and further research into behavioral modeling. We argue different models implicate different understandings and expectations. We emphasize some distinctions with demonstrations using the Discrete Event System Spe…
▽ More
This paper presents our findings for using activity modeling for simulation (validation), model checking (verification), and execution purposes. Each is needed to tackle system complexity and further research into behavioral modeling. We argue different models implicate different understandings and expectations. We emphasize some distinctions with demonstrations using the Discrete Event System Specification with an exemplary model. In particular, the continuous-time base in models helps observe some inherent limitations and strengths in acquiring each capability. The temporal characterization of input, output, and state, or the lack thereof, is at the core of develo** behavioral specifications. We use DEVS to arrive at the capability of validating simulations for activity models. We use Constrained-DEVS for the verification of activity models. We show how some executions can be derived, whether from the specification itself or with considerations for simulation and model checking.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Abstraction and Symbolic Execution of Deep Neural Networks with Bayesian Approximation of Hidden Features
Authors:
Nicolas Berthier,
Amany Alshareef,
James Sharp,
Sven Schewe,
Xiaowei Huang
Abstract:
Intensive research has been conducted on the verification and validation of deep neural networks (DNNs), aiming to understand if, and how, DNNs can be applied to safety critical applications. However, existing verification and validation techniques are limited by their scalability, over both the size of the DNN and the size of the dataset. In this paper, we propose a novel abstraction method which…
▽ More
Intensive research has been conducted on the verification and validation of deep neural networks (DNNs), aiming to understand if, and how, DNNs can be applied to safety critical applications. However, existing verification and validation techniques are limited by their scalability, over both the size of the DNN and the size of the dataset. In this paper, we propose a novel abstraction method which abstracts a DNN and a dataset into a Bayesian network (BN). We make use of dimensionality reduction techniques to identify hidden features that have been learned by hidden layers of the DNN, and associate each hidden feature with a node of the BN. On this BN, we can conduct probabilistic inference to understand the behaviours of the DNN processing data. More importantly, we can derive a runtime monitoring approach to detect in operational time rare inputs and covariate shift of the input data. We can also adapt existing structural coverage-guided testing techniques (i.e., based on low-level elements of the DNN such as neurons), in order to generate test cases that better exercise hidden features. We implement and evaluate the BN abstraction technique using our DeepConcolic tool available at https://github.com/TrustAI/DeepConcolic.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
