Showing 1–32 of 32 results for author: Alomar, A

Insights from the Field: Exploring Students' Perspectives on Bad Unit Testing Practices

Authors: Anthony Peruma, Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Wajdi Aljedaani, Christian D. Newman, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer

Abstract: Educating students about software testing practices is integral to the curricula of many computer science-related courses and typically involves students writing unit tests. Similar to production/source code, students might inadvertently deviate from established unit testing best practices, and introduce problematic code, referred to as test smells, into their test suites. Given the extensive cata… ▽ More Educating students about software testing practices is integral to the curricula of many computer science-related courses and typically involves students writing unit tests. Similar to production/source code, students might inadvertently deviate from established unit testing best practices, and introduce problematic code, referred to as test smells, into their test suites. Given the extensive catalog of test smells, it becomes challenging for students to identify test smells in their code, especially for those who lack experience with testing practices. In this experience report, we aim to increase students' awareness of bad unit testing practices, and detail the outcomes of having 184 students from three higher educational institutes utilize an IDE plugin to automatically detect test smells in their code. Our findings show that while students report on the plugin's usefulness in learning about and detecting test smells, they also identify specific test smells that they consider harmless. We anticipate that our findings will support academia in refining course curricula on unit testing and enabling educators to support students with code review strategies of test code. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: Accepted at: 2024 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 (ITiCSE 2024)

AntiCopyPaster 2.0: Whitebox just-in-time code duplicates extraction

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Benjamin Knobloch, Thomas Kain, Christopher Kalish, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni

Abstract: AntiCopyPaster is an IntelliJ IDEA plugin, implemented to detect and refactor duplicate code interactively as soon as a duplicate is introduced. The plugin only recommends the extraction of a duplicate when it is worth it. In contrast to current Extract Method refactoring approaches, our tool seamlessly integrates with the developer's workflow and actively provides recommendations for refactorings… ▽ More AntiCopyPaster is an IntelliJ IDEA plugin, implemented to detect and refactor duplicate code interactively as soon as a duplicate is introduced. The plugin only recommends the extraction of a duplicate when it is worth it. In contrast to current Extract Method refactoring approaches, our tool seamlessly integrates with the developer's workflow and actively provides recommendations for refactorings. This work extends our tool to allow developers to customize the detection rules, i.e., metrics, based on their needs and preferences. The plugin and its source code are publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/refactorings/anti-copy-paster. The demonstration video can be found on YouTube: https://youtu.be/ Y1sbfpds2Ms. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

How to Refactor this Code? An Exploratory Study on Developer-ChatGPT Refactoring Conversations

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Anushkrishna Venkatakrishnan, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Christian D. Newman, Ali Ouni

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs), like ChatGPT, have gained widespread popularity and usage in various software engineering tasks, including refactoring, testing, code review, and program comprehension. Despite recent studies delving into refactoring documentation in commit messages, issues, and code review, little is known about how developers articulate their refactoring needs when interacting with… ▽ More Large Language Models (LLMs), like ChatGPT, have gained widespread popularity and usage in various software engineering tasks, including refactoring, testing, code review, and program comprehension. Despite recent studies delving into refactoring documentation in commit messages, issues, and code review, little is known about how developers articulate their refactoring needs when interacting with ChatGPT. In this paper, our goal is to explore conversations between developers and ChatGPT related to refactoring to better understand how developers identify areas for improvement in code and how ChatGPT addresses developers' needs. Our approach relies on text mining refactoring-related conversations from 17,913 ChatGPT prompts and responses, and investigating developers' explicit refactoring intention. Our results reveal that (1) developer-ChatGPT conversations commonly involve generic and specific terms/phrases; (2) developers often make generic refactoring requests, while ChatGPT typically includes the refactoring intention; and (3) various learning settings when prompting ChatGPT in the context of refactoring. We envision that our findings contribute to a broader understanding of the collaboration between developers and AI models, in the context of code refactoring, with implications for model improvement, tool development, and best practices in software engineering. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Behind the Intent of Extract Method Refactoring: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni

Abstract: Code refactoring is widely recognized as an essential software engineering practice to improve the understandability and maintainability of the source code. The Extract Method refactoring is considered as "Swiss army knife" of refactorings, as developers often apply it to improve their code quality. In recent years, several studies attempted to recommend Extract Method refactorings allowing the co… ▽ More Code refactoring is widely recognized as an essential software engineering practice to improve the understandability and maintainability of the source code. The Extract Method refactoring is considered as "Swiss army knife" of refactorings, as developers often apply it to improve their code quality. In recent years, several studies attempted to recommend Extract Method refactorings allowing the collection, analysis, and revelation of actionable data-driven insights about refactoring practices within software projects. In this paper, we aim at reviewing the current body of knowledge on existing Extract Method refactoring research and explore their limitations and potential improvement opportunities for future research efforts. Hence, researchers and practitioners begin to be aware of the state-of-the-art and identify new research opportunities in this context. We review the body of knowledge related to Extract Method refactoring in the form of a systematic literature review (SLR). After compiling an initial pool of 1,367 papers, we conducted a systematic selection and our final pool included 83 primary studies. We define three sets of research questions and systematically develop and refine a classification schema based on several criteria including their methodology, applicability, and degree of automation. The results construct a catalog of 83 Extract Method approaches indicating that several techniques have been proposed in the literature. Our results show that: (i) 38.6% of Extract Method refactoring studies primarily focus on addressing code clones; (ii) Several of the Extract Method tools incorporate the developer's involvement in the decision-making process when applying the method extraction, and (iii) the existing benchmarks are heterogeneous and do not contain the same type of information, making standardizing them for the purpose of benchmarking difficult. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Automating Source Code Refactoring in the Classroom

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni

Abstract: Refactoring is the practice of improving software quality without altering its external behavior. Developers intuitively refactor their code for multiple purposes, such as improving program comprehension, reducing code complexity, dealing with technical debt, and removing code smells. However, no prior studies have exposed the students to an experience of the process of antipatterns detection and… ▽ More Refactoring is the practice of improving software quality without altering its external behavior. Developers intuitively refactor their code for multiple purposes, such as improving program comprehension, reducing code complexity, dealing with technical debt, and removing code smells. However, no prior studies have exposed the students to an experience of the process of antipatterns detection and refactoring correction, and provided students with toolset to practice it. To understand and increase the awareness of refactoring concepts, in this paper, we aim to reflect on our experience with teaching refactoring and how it helps students become more aware of bad programming practices and the importance of correcting them via refactoring. This paper discusses the results of an experiment in the classroom that involved carrying out various refactoring activities for the purpose of removing antipatterns using JDeodorant, an Eclipse plugin that supports antipatterns detection and refactoring. The results of the quantitative and qualitative analysis with 171 students show that students tend to appreciate the idea of learning refactoring and are satisfied with various aspects of the JDeodorant plugin's operation. Through this experiment, refactoring can turn into a vital part of the computing educational plan. We envision our findings enabling educators to support students with refactoring tools tuned towards safer and trustworthy refactoring. △ Less

Submitted 5 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

State of Refactoring Adoption: Better Understanding Developer Perception of Refactoring

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar

Abstract: We aim to explore how developers document their refactoring activities during the software life cycle. We call such activity Self-Affirmed Refactoring (SAR), which indicates developers' documentation of their refactoring activities. SAR is crucial in understanding various aspects of refactoring, including the motivation, procedure, and consequences of the performed code change. After that, we prop… ▽ More We aim to explore how developers document their refactoring activities during the software life cycle. We call such activity Self-Affirmed Refactoring (SAR), which indicates developers' documentation of their refactoring activities. SAR is crucial in understanding various aspects of refactoring, including the motivation, procedure, and consequences of the performed code change. After that, we propose an approach to identify whether a commit describes developer-related refactoring events to classify them according to the refactoring common quality improvement categories. To complement this goal, we aim to reveal insights into how reviewers decide to accept or reject a submitted refactoring request and what makes such a review challenging.Our SAR taxonomy and model can work with refactoring detectors to report any early inconsistency between refactoring types and their documentation. They can serve as a solid background for various empirical investigations. Our survey with code reviewers has revealed several difficulties related to understanding the refactoring intent and implications on the functional and non-functional aspects of the software. In light of our findings from the industrial case study, we recommended a procedure to properly document refactoring activities, as part of our survey feedback. △ Less

Submitted 9 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2010.13890, arXiv:2102.05201, arXiv:2009.09279

SAMoSSA: Multivariate Singular Spectrum Analysis with Stochastic Autoregressive Noise

Authors: Abdullah Alomar, Munther Dahleh, Sean Mann, Devavrat Shah

Abstract: The well-established practice of time series analysis involves estimating deterministic, non-stationary trend and seasonality components followed by learning the residual stochastic, stationary components. Recently, it has been shown that one can learn the deterministic non-stationary components accurately using multivariate Singular Spectrum Analysis (mSSA) in the absence of a correlated stationa… ▽ More The well-established practice of time series analysis involves estimating deterministic, non-stationary trend and seasonality components followed by learning the residual stochastic, stationary components. Recently, it has been shown that one can learn the deterministic non-stationary components accurately using multivariate Singular Spectrum Analysis (mSSA) in the absence of a correlated stationary component; meanwhile, in the absence of deterministic non-stationary components, the Autoregressive (AR) stationary component can also be learnt readily, e.g. via Ordinary Least Squares (OLS). However, a theoretical underpinning of multi-stage learning algorithms involving both deterministic and stationary components has been absent in the literature despite its pervasiveness. We resolve this open question by establishing desirable theoretical guarantees for a natural two-stage algorithm, where mSSA is first applied to estimate the non-stationary components despite the presence of a correlated stationary AR component, which is subsequently learned from the residual time series. We provide a finite-sample forecasting consistency bound for the proposed algorithm, SAMoSSA, which is data-driven and thus requires minimal parameter tuning. To establish theoretical guarantees, we overcome three hurdles: (i) we characterize the spectra of Page matrices of stable AR processes, thus extending the analysis of mSSA; (ii) we extend the analysis of AR process identification in the presence of arbitrary bounded perturbations; (iii) we characterize the out-of-sample or forecasting error, as opposed to solely considering model identification. Through representative empirical studies, we validate the superior performance of SAMoSSA compared to existing baselines. Notably, SAMoSSA's ability to account for AR noise structure yields improvements ranging from 5% to 37% across various benchmark datasets. △ Less

Submitted 26 November, 2023; v1 submitted 25 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

On the Use of Static Analysis to Engage Students with Software Quality Improvement: An Experience with PMD

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Salma Abdullah AlOmar, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer

Abstract: Static analysis tools are frequently used to scan the source code and detect deviations from the project coding guidelines. Given their importance, linters are often introduced to classrooms to educate students on how to detect and potentially avoid these code anti-patterns. However, little is known about their effectiveness in raising students awareness, given that these linters tend to generate… ▽ More Static analysis tools are frequently used to scan the source code and detect deviations from the project coding guidelines. Given their importance, linters are often introduced to classrooms to educate students on how to detect and potentially avoid these code anti-patterns. However, little is known about their effectiveness in raising students awareness, given that these linters tend to generate a large number of false positives. To increase the awareness of potential coding issues that violate coding standards, in this paper, we aim to reflect on our experience with teaching the use of static analysis for the purpose of evaluating its effectiveness in hel** students with respect to improving software quality. This paper discusses the results of an experiment in the classroom over a period of 3 academic semesters, involving 65 submissions that carried out code review activity of 690 rules using PMD. The results of the quantitative and qualitative analysis shows that the presence of a set of PMD quality issues influence the acceptance or rejection of the issues, design, and best practices-related categories that take a longer time to be resolved, and students acknowledge the potential of using static analysis tools during code review. Through this experiment, code review can turn into a vital part of the educational computing plan. We envision our findings enabling educators to support students with code review strategies to raise students awareness about static analysis tools and scaffolding their coding skills. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2023; v1 submitted 10 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Just-in-Time Code Duplicates Extraction

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Anton Ivanov, Zarina Kurbatova, Yaroslav Golubev, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni, Timofey Bryksin, Le Nguyen, Amit Kini, Aditya Thakur

Abstract: Refactoring is a critical task in software maintenance, and is usually performed to enforce better design and coding practices, while co** with design defects. The Extract Method refactoring is widely used for merging duplicate code fragments into a single new method. Several studies attempted to recommend Extract Method refactoring opportunities using different techniques, including program sli… ▽ More Refactoring is a critical task in software maintenance, and is usually performed to enforce better design and coding practices, while co** with design defects. The Extract Method refactoring is widely used for merging duplicate code fragments into a single new method. Several studies attempted to recommend Extract Method refactoring opportunities using different techniques, including program slicing, program dependency graph analysis, change history analysis, structural similarity, and feature extraction. However, irrespective of the method, most of the existing approaches interfere with the developer's workflow: they require the developer to stop coding and analyze the suggested opportunities, and also consider all refactoring suggestions in the entire project without focusing on the development context. To increase the adoption of the Extract Method refactoring, in this paper, we aim to investigate the effectiveness of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for its recommendation while maintaining the workflow of the developer. The proposed approach relies on mining prior applied Extract Method refactorings and extracting their features to train a deep learning classifier that detects them in the user's code. We implemented our approach as a plugin for IntelliJ IDEA called AntiCopyPaster. To develop our approach, we trained and evaluated various popular models on a dataset of 18,942 code fragments from 13 Open Source Apache projects. The results show that the best model is the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which recommends appropriate Extract Method refactorings with an F-measure of 0.82. We also conducted a qualitative study with 72 developers to evaluate the usefulness of the developed plugin. The results show that developers tend to appreciate the idea of the approach and are satisfied with various aspects of the plugin's operation. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: 32 pages, 9 figures

Parallel Automatic History Matching Algorithm Using Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Omar S. Alolayan, Abdullah O. Alomar, John R. Williams

Abstract: Reformulating the history matching problem from a least-square mathematical optimization problem into a Markov Decision Process introduces a method in which reinforcement learning can be utilized to solve the problem. This method provides a mechanism where an artificial deep neural network agent can interact with the reservoir simulator and find multiple different solutions to the problem. Such fo… ▽ More Reformulating the history matching problem from a least-square mathematical optimization problem into a Markov Decision Process introduces a method in which reinforcement learning can be utilized to solve the problem. This method provides a mechanism where an artificial deep neural network agent can interact with the reservoir simulator and find multiple different solutions to the problem. Such formulation allows for solving the problem in parallel by launching multiple concurrent environments enabling the agent to learn simultaneously from all the environments at once, achieving significant speed up. △ Less

Submitted 23 December, 2022; v1 submitted 14 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Finding the Needle in a Haystack: On the Automatic Identification of Accessibility User Reviews

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Wajdi Aljedaani, Murtaza Tamjeed, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Yasmine N. Elglaly

Abstract: In recent years, mobile accessibility has become an important trend with the goal of allowing all users the possibility of using any app without many limitations. User reviews include insights that are useful for app evolution. However, with the increase in the amount of received reviews, manually analyzing them is tedious and time-consuming, especially when searching for accessibility reviews. Th… ▽ More In recent years, mobile accessibility has become an important trend with the goal of allowing all users the possibility of using any app without many limitations. User reviews include insights that are useful for app evolution. However, with the increase in the amount of received reviews, manually analyzing them is tedious and time-consuming, especially when searching for accessibility reviews. The goal of this paper is to support the automated identification of accessibility in user reviews, to help technology professionals in prioritizing their handling, and thus, creating more inclusive apps. Particularly, we design a model that takes as input accessibility user reviews, learns their keyword-based features, in order to make a binary decision, for a given review, on whether it is about accessibility or not. The model is evaluated using a total of 5,326 mobile app reviews. The findings show that (1) our model can accurately identify accessibility reviews, outperforming two baselines, namely keyword-based detector and a random classifier; (2) our model achieves an accuracy of 85% with relatively small training dataset; however, the accuracy improves as we increase the size of the training dataset. △ Less

Submitted 18 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Code Review Practices for Refactoring Changes: An Empirical Study on OpenStack

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Moataz Chouchen, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni

Abstract: Modern code review is a widely used technique employed in both industrial and open-source projects to improve software quality, share knowledge, and ensure adherence to coding standards and guidelines. During code review, developers may discuss refactoring activities before merging code changes in the code base. To date, code review has been extensively studied to explore its general challenges, b… ▽ More Modern code review is a widely used technique employed in both industrial and open-source projects to improve software quality, share knowledge, and ensure adherence to coding standards and guidelines. During code review, developers may discuss refactoring activities before merging code changes in the code base. To date, code review has been extensively studied to explore its general challenges, best practices and outcomes, and socio-technical aspects. However, little is known about how refactoring is being reviewed and what developers care about when they review refactored code. Hence, in this work, we present a quantitative and qualitative study to understand what are the main criteria developers rely on to develop a decision about accepting or rejecting a submitted refactored code, and what makes this process challenging. Through a case study of 11,010 refactoring and non-refactoring reviews spread across OpenStack open-source projects, we find that refactoring-related code reviews take significantly longer to be resolved in terms of code review efforts. Moreover, upon performing a thematic analysis on a significant sample of the refactoring code review discussions, we built a comprehensive taxonomy consisting of 28 refactoring review criteria. We envision our findings reaffirming the necessity of develo** accurate and efficient tools and techniques that can assist developers in the review process in the presence of refactorings. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

An Exploratory Study on Refactoring Documentation in Issues Handling

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Anthony Peruma, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Christian D. Newman, Ali Ouni

Abstract: Understanding the practice of refactoring documentation is of paramount importance in academia and industry. Issue tracking systems are used by most software projects enabling developers, quality assurance, managers, and users to submit feature requests and other tasks such as bug fixing and code review. Although recent studies explored how to document refactoring in commit messages, little is kno… ▽ More Understanding the practice of refactoring documentation is of paramount importance in academia and industry. Issue tracking systems are used by most software projects enabling developers, quality assurance, managers, and users to submit feature requests and other tasks such as bug fixing and code review. Although recent studies explored how to document refactoring in commit messages, little is known about how developers describe their refactoring needs in issues. In this study, we aim at exploring developer-reported refactoring changes in issues to better understand what developers consider to be problematic in their code and how they handle it. Our approach relies on text mining 45,477 refactoring-related issues and identifying refactoring patterns from a diverse corpus of 77 Java projects by investigating issues associated with 15,833 refactoring operations and developers' explicit refactoring intention. Our results show that (1) developers mostly use move refactoring related terms/phrases to target refactoring-related issues; and (2) developers tend to explicitly mention the improvement of specific quality attributes and focus on duplicate code removal. We envision our findings enabling tool builders to support developers with automated documentation of refactoring changes in issues. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Refactoring Debt: Myth or Reality? An Exploratory Study on the Relationship Between Technical Debt and Refactoring

Authors: Anthony Peruma, Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Christian D. Newman, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni

Abstract: To meet project timelines or budget constraints, developers intentionally deviate from writing optimal code to feasible code in what is known as incurring Technical Debt (TD). Furthermore, as part of planning their correction, developers document these deficiencies as comments in the code (i.e., self-admitted technical debt or SATD). As a means of improving source code quality, developers often ap… ▽ More To meet project timelines or budget constraints, developers intentionally deviate from writing optimal code to feasible code in what is known as incurring Technical Debt (TD). Furthermore, as part of planning their correction, developers document these deficiencies as comments in the code (i.e., self-admitted technical debt or SATD). As a means of improving source code quality, developers often apply a series of refactoring operations to their codebase. In this study, we explore developers repaying this debt through refactoring operations by examining occurrences of SATD removal in the code of 76 open-source Java systems. Our findings show that TD payment usually occurs with refactoring activities and developers refactor their code to remove TD for specific reasons. We envision our findings supporting vendors in providing tools to better support developers in the automatic repayment of technical debt. △ Less

Submitted 10 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: This study has been accepted for publication at: The 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2022)

CausalSim: A Causal Framework for Unbiased Trace-Driven Simulation

Authors: Abdullah Alomar, Pouya Hamadanian, Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Anish Agarwal, Mohammad Alizadeh, Devavrat Shah

Abstract: We present CausalSim, a causal framework for unbiased trace-driven simulation. Current trace-driven simulators assume that the interventions being simulated (e.g., a new algorithm) would not affect the validity of the traces. However, real-world traces are often biased by the choices algorithms make during trace collection, and hence replaying traces under an intervention may lead to incorrect res… ▽ More We present CausalSim, a causal framework for unbiased trace-driven simulation. Current trace-driven simulators assume that the interventions being simulated (e.g., a new algorithm) would not affect the validity of the traces. However, real-world traces are often biased by the choices algorithms make during trace collection, and hence replaying traces under an intervention may lead to incorrect results. CausalSim addresses this challenge by learning a causal model of the system dynamics and latent factors capturing the underlying system conditions during trace collection. It learns these models using an initial randomized control trial (RCT) under a fixed set of algorithms, and then applies them to remove biases from trace data when simulating new algorithms. Key to CausalSim is map** unbiased trace-driven simulation to a tensor completion problem with extremely sparse observations. By exploiting a basic distributional invariance property present in RCT data, CausalSim enables a novel tensor completion method despite the sparsity of observations. Our extensive evaluation of CausalSim on both real and synthetic datasets, including more than ten months of real data from the Puffer video streaming system shows it improves simulation accuracy, reducing errors by 53% and 61% on average compared to expert-designed and supervised learning baselines. Moreover, CausalSim provides markedly different insights about ABR algorithms compared to the biased baseline simulator, which we validate with a real deployment. △ Less

Submitted 5 May, 2023; v1 submitted 5 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Comments: NSDI'23 Best Paper Award

Journal ref: 20th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (2023) 1115--1147

AntiCopyPaster: Extracting Code Duplicates As Soon As They Are Introduced in the IDE

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Anton Ivanov, Zarina Kurbatova, Yaroslav Golubev, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni, Timofey Bryksin, Le Nguyen, Amit Kini, Aditya Thakur

Abstract: We developed a plugin for IntelliJ IDEA called AntiCopyPaster, which tracks the pasting of code fragments inside the IDE and suggests the appropriate Extract Method refactoring to combat the propagation of duplicates. Unlike the existing approaches, our tool is integrated with the developer's workflow, and pro-actively recommends refactorings. Since not all code fragments need to be extracted, we… ▽ More We developed a plugin for IntelliJ IDEA called AntiCopyPaster, which tracks the pasting of code fragments inside the IDE and suggests the appropriate Extract Method refactoring to combat the propagation of duplicates. Unlike the existing approaches, our tool is integrated with the developer's workflow, and pro-actively recommends refactorings. Since not all code fragments need to be extracted, we develop a classification model to make this decision. When a developer copies and pastes a code fragment, the plugin searches for duplicates in the currently opened file, waits for a short period of time to allow the developer to edit the code, and finally inferences the refactoring decision based on a number of features. Our experimental study on a large dataset of 18,942 code fragments mined from 13 Apache projects shows that AntiCopyPaster correctly recommends Extract Method refactorings with an F-score of 0.82. Furthermore, our survey of 59 developers reflects their satisfaction with the developed plugin's operation. The plugin and its source code are publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/JetBrains-Research/anti-copy-paster. The demonstration video can be found on YouTube: https://youtu.be/_wwHg-qFjJY. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2022; v1 submitted 30 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 4 pages, 3 figures

On the Documentation of Refactoring Types

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Jiaqian Liu, Kenneth Addo, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Christian Newman, Ali Ouni, Zhe Yu

Abstract: Commit messages are the atomic level of software documentation. They provide a natural language description of the code change and its purpose. Messages are critical for software maintenance and program comprehension. Unlike documenting feature updates and bug fixes, little is known about how developers document their refactoring activities. Developers can perform multiple refactoring operations,… ▽ More Commit messages are the atomic level of software documentation. They provide a natural language description of the code change and its purpose. Messages are critical for software maintenance and program comprehension. Unlike documenting feature updates and bug fixes, little is known about how developers document their refactoring activities. Developers can perform multiple refactoring operations, including moving methods, extracting classes, for various reasons. Yet, there is no systematic study that analyzes the extent to which the documentation of refactoring accurately describes the refactoring operations performed at the source code level. Therefore, this paper challenges the ability of refactoring documentation to adequately predict the refactoring types, performed at the commit level. Our analysis relies on the text mining of commit messages to extract the corresponding features that better represent each class. The extraction of text patterns, specific to each refactoring allows the design of a model that verifies the consistency of these patterns with their corresponding refactoring. Such verification process can be achieved via automatically predicting the method-level type of refactoring being applied, namely Extract Method, Inline Method, Move Method, Pull-up Method, Push-down Method, and Rename Method. We compared various classifiers, and a baseline keyword-based approach, in terms of their prediction performance, using a dataset of 5,004 commits. Our main findings show that the complexity of refactoring type prediction varies from one type to another. Rename method and Extract method were found to be the best documented refactoring activities, while Pull-up Method and Push-down Method were the hardest to be identified via textual descriptions. Such findings bring the attention of developers to the necessity of paying more attention to the documentation of these types. △ Less

Submitted 2 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2009.09279

Refactoring for Reuse: An Empirical Study

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Tianjia Wang, Vaibhavi Raut, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Christian Newman, Ali Ouni

Abstract: Refactoring is the de-facto practice to optimize software health. While several studies propose refactoring strategies to optimize software design through applying design patterns and removing design defects, little is known about how developers actually refactor their code to improve its reuse. Therefore, we extract, from 1,828 open-source projects, a set of refactorings that were intended to imp… ▽ More Refactoring is the de-facto practice to optimize software health. While several studies propose refactoring strategies to optimize software design through applying design patterns and removing design defects, little is known about how developers actually refactor their code to improve its reuse. Therefore, we extract, from 1,828 open-source projects, a set of refactorings that were intended to improve the software reusability. We analyze the impact of reusability refactorings on the state-of-the-art reusability metrics, and we compare the distribution of reusability refactoring types, with the distribution of the remaining mainstream refactorings. Overall, we found that the distribution of refactoring types, applied in the context of reusability, is different from the distribution of refactoring types in mainstream development. In the refactorings performed to improve reusability, source files are subject to more design-level types of refactorings. Reusability refactorings significantly impact, high-level code elements, such as packages, classes, and methods, while typical refactorings, impact all code elements, including identifiers, and parameters. These findings provide practical insights into the current practice of refactoring in the context of code reuse involving the act of refactoring. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

How Do I Refactor This? An Empirical Study on Refactoring Trends and Topics in Stack Overflow

Authors: Anthony Peruma, Steven Simmons, Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Christian D. Newman, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni

Abstract: An essential part of software maintenance and evolution, refactoring is performed by developers, regardless of technology or domain, to improve the internal quality of the system, and reduce its technical debt. However, choosing the appropriate refactoring strategy is not always straightforward, resulting in developers seeking assistance. Although research in refactoring is well-established, with… ▽ More An essential part of software maintenance and evolution, refactoring is performed by developers, regardless of technology or domain, to improve the internal quality of the system, and reduce its technical debt. However, choosing the appropriate refactoring strategy is not always straightforward, resulting in developers seeking assistance. Although research in refactoring is well-established, with several studies altering between the detection of refactoring opportunities and the recommendation of appropriate code changes, little is known about their adoption in practice. Analyzing the perception of developers is critical to understand better what developers consider to be problematic in their code and how they handle it. Additionally, there is a need for bridging the gap between refactoring, as research, and its adoption in practice, by extracting common refactoring intents that are more suitable for what developers face in reality. In this study, we analyze refactoring discussions on Stack Overflow through a series of quantitative and qualitative experiments. Our results show that Stack Overflow is utilized by a diverse set of developers for refactoring assistance for a variety of technologies. Our observations show five areas that developers typically require help with refactoring -- Code Optimization, Tools and IDEs, Architecture and Design Patterns, Unit Testing, and Database. We envision our findings better bridge the support between traditional (or academic) aspects of refactoring and their real-world applicability, including better tool support. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: Part of a collection: Collective Knowledge in Software Engineering ISSN: 1382-3256 (Print) 1573-7616 (Online)

Journal ref: Empir Software Eng 27, 11 (2022)

Behind the Scenes: On the Relationship Between Developer Experience and Refactoring

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Anthony Peruma, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Christian D. Newman, Ali Ouni

Abstract: Refactoring is widely recognized as one of the efficient techniques to manage technical debt and maintain a healthy software project through enforcing best design practices or co** with design defects. Previous refactoring surveys have shown that code refactoring activities are mainly executed by developers who have sufficient knowledge of the system's design and disposing of leadership roles in… ▽ More Refactoring is widely recognized as one of the efficient techniques to manage technical debt and maintain a healthy software project through enforcing best design practices or co** with design defects. Previous refactoring surveys have shown that code refactoring activities are mainly executed by developers who have sufficient knowledge of the system's design and disposing of leadership roles in their development teams. However, these surveys were mainly limited to specific projects and companies. In this paper, we explore the generalizability of the previous results by analyzing 800 open-source projects. We mine their refactoring activities, and we identify their corresponding contributors. Then, we associate an experience score to each contributor in order to test various hypotheses related to whether developers with higher scores tend to 1) perform a higher number of refactoring operations 2) exhibit different motivations behind their refactoring, and 3) better document their refactoring activity. We found that (1) although refactoring is not restricted to a subset of developers, those with higher contribution scores tend to perform more refactorings than others; (2) while there is no correlation between experience and motivation behind refactoring, top contributed developers are found to perform a wider variety of refactoring operations, regardless of their complexity; and (3) top contributed developer tend to document less their refactoring activity. Our qualitative analysis of three randomly sampled projects shows that the developers who are responsible for the majority of refactoring activities are typically in advanced positions in their development teams, demonstrating their extensive knowledge of the design of the systems they contribute to. △ Less

Submitted 22 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

One Thousand and One Stories: A Large-Scale Survey of Software Refactoring

Authors: Yaroslav Golubev, Zarina Kurbatova, Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Timofey Bryksin, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer

Abstract: Despite the availability of refactoring as a feature in popular IDEs, recent studies revealed that developers are reluctant to use them, and still prefer the manual refactoring of their code. At JetBrains, our goal is to fully support refactoring features in IntelliJ-based IDEs and improve their adoption in practice. Therefore, we start by raising the following main questions. How exactly do peopl… ▽ More Despite the availability of refactoring as a feature in popular IDEs, recent studies revealed that developers are reluctant to use them, and still prefer the manual refactoring of their code. At JetBrains, our goal is to fully support refactoring features in IntelliJ-based IDEs and improve their adoption in practice. Therefore, we start by raising the following main questions. How exactly do people refactor code? What refactorings are the most popular? Why do some developers tend not to use convenient IDE refactoring tools? In this paper, we investigate the raised questions through the design and implementation of a survey targeting 1,183 users of IntelliJ-based IDEs. Our quantitative and qualitative analysis of the survey results shows that almost two-thirds of developers spend more than one hour in a single session refactoring their code; that refactoring types vary greatly in popularity; and that a lot of developers would like to know more about IDE refactoring features but lack the means to do so. These results serve us internally to support the next generation of refactoring features, as well as can help our research community to establish new directions in the refactoring usability research. △ Less

Submitted 16 July, 2021; v1 submitted 15 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 11 pages, 7 figures

SATDBailiff- Mining and Tracking Self-Admitted Technical Debt

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Ben Christians, Mihal Busho, Ahmed Hamad AlKhalid, Ali Ouni, Christian Newman, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer

Abstract: Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) is a metaphorical concept to describe the self-documented addition of technical debt to a software project in the form of source code comments. SATD can linger in projects and degrade source-code quality, but it can also be more visible than unintentionally added or undocumented technical debt. Understanding the implications of adding SATD to a software project… ▽ More Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) is a metaphorical concept to describe the self-documented addition of technical debt to a software project in the form of source code comments. SATD can linger in projects and degrade source-code quality, but it can also be more visible than unintentionally added or undocumented technical debt. Understanding the implications of adding SATD to a software project is important because developers can benefit from a better understanding of the quality trade-offs they are making. However, empirical studies, analyzing the survivability and removal of SATD comments, are challenged by potential code changes or SATD comment updates that may interfere with properly tracking their appearance, existence, and removal. In this paper, we propose SATDBailiff, a tool that uses an existing state-of-the-art SATD detection tool, to identify SATD in method comments, then properly track their lifespan. SATDBailiff is given as input links to open source projects, and its output is a list of all identified SATDs, and for each detected SATD, SATDBailiff reports all its associated changes, including any updates to its text, all the way to reporting its removal. The goal of SATDBailiff is to aid researchers and practitioners in better tracking SATDs instances and providing them with a reliable tool that can be easily extended. SATDBailiff was validated using a dataset of previously detected and manually validated SATD instances. SATDBailiff is publicly available as an open-source, along with the manual analysis of SATD instances associated with its validation, on the project website △ Less

Submitted 30 June, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

On Preserving the Behavior in Software Refactoring: A Systematic Map** Study

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Christian Newman, Ali Ouni

Abstract: Context: Refactoring is the art of modifying the design of a system without altering its behavior. The idea is to reorganize variables, classes and methods to facilitate their future adaptations and comprehension. As the concept of behavior preservation is fundamental for refactoring, several studies, using formal verification, language transformation and dynamic analysis, have been proposed to mo… ▽ More Context: Refactoring is the art of modifying the design of a system without altering its behavior. The idea is to reorganize variables, classes and methods to facilitate their future adaptations and comprehension. As the concept of behavior preservation is fundamental for refactoring, several studies, using formal verification, language transformation and dynamic analysis, have been proposed to monitor the execution of refactoring operations and their impact on the program semantics. However, there is no existing study that examines the available behavior preservation strategies for each refactoring operation. Objective: This paper identifies behavior preservation approaches in the research literature. Method: We conduct, in this paper, a systematic map** study, to capture all existing behavior preservation approaches that we classify based on several criteria including their methodology, applicability, and their degree of automation. Results: The results indicate that several behavior preservation approaches have been proposed in the literature. The approaches vary between using formalisms and techniques, develo** automatic refactoring safety tools, and performing a manual analysis of the source code. Conclusion: Our taxonomy reveals that there exist some types of refactoring operations whose behavior preservation is under-researched. Our classification also indicates that several possible strategies can be combined to better detect any violation of the program semantics. △ Less

Submitted 21 July, 2021; v1 submitted 25 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Using Grammar Patterns to Interpret Test Method Name Evolution

Authors: Anthony Peruma, Emily Hu, Jiajun Chen, Eman Abdullah Alomar, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Christian D. Newman

Abstract: It is good practice to name test methods such that they are comprehensible to developers; they must be written in such a way that their purpose and functionality are clear to those who will maintain them. Unfortunately, there is little automated support for writing or maintaining the names of test methods. This can lead to inconsistent and low-quality test names and increase the maintenance cost o… ▽ More It is good practice to name test methods such that they are comprehensible to developers; they must be written in such a way that their purpose and functionality are clear to those who will maintain them. Unfortunately, there is little automated support for writing or maintaining the names of test methods. This can lead to inconsistent and low-quality test names and increase the maintenance cost of supporting these methods. Due to this risk, it is essential to help developers in maintaining their test method names over time. In this paper, we use grammar patterns, and how they relate to test method behavior, to understand test naming practices. This data will be used to support an automated tool for maintaining test names. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

PerSim: Data-Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning with Heterogeneous Agents via Personalized Simulators

Authors: Anish Agarwal, Abdullah Alomar, Varkey Alumootil, Devavrat Shah, Dennis Shen, Zhi Xu, Cindy Yang

Abstract: We consider offline reinforcement learning (RL) with heterogeneous agents under severe data scarcity, i.e., we only observe a single historical trajectory for every agent under an unknown, potentially sub-optimal policy. We find that the performance of state-of-the-art offline and model-based RL methods degrade significantly given such limited data availability, even for commonly perceived "solved… ▽ More We consider offline reinforcement learning (RL) with heterogeneous agents under severe data scarcity, i.e., we only observe a single historical trajectory for every agent under an unknown, potentially sub-optimal policy. We find that the performance of state-of-the-art offline and model-based RL methods degrade significantly given such limited data availability, even for commonly perceived "solved" benchmark settings such as "MountainCar" and "CartPole". To address this challenge, we propose PerSim, a model-based offline RL approach which first learns a personalized simulator for each agent by collectively using the historical trajectories across all agents, prior to learning a policy. We do so by positing that the transition dynamics across agents can be represented as a latent function of latent factors associated with agents, states, and actions; subsequently, we theoretically establish that this function is well-approximated by a "low-rank" decomposition of separable agent, state, and action latent functions. This representation suggests a simple, regularized neural network architecture to effectively learn the transition dynamics per agent, even with scarce, offline data. We perform extensive experiments across several benchmark environments and RL methods. The consistent improvement of our approach, measured in terms of both state dynamics prediction and eventual reward, confirms the efficacy of our framework in leveraging limited historical data to simultaneously learn personalized policies across agents. △ Less

Submitted 10 November, 2021; v1 submitted 13 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Refactoring Practices in the Context of Modern Code Review: An Industrial Case Study at Xerox

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Hussein AlRubaye, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni, Marouane Kessentini

Abstract: Modern code review is a common and essential practice employed in both industrial and open-source projects to improve software quality, share knowledge, and ensure conformance with coding standards. During code review, developers may inspect and discuss various changes including refactoring activities before merging code changes in the codebase. To date, code review has been extensively studied to… ▽ More Modern code review is a common and essential practice employed in both industrial and open-source projects to improve software quality, share knowledge, and ensure conformance with coding standards. During code review, developers may inspect and discuss various changes including refactoring activities before merging code changes in the codebase. To date, code review has been extensively studied to explore its general challenges, best practices and outcomes, and socio-technical aspects. However, little is known about how refactoring activities are being reviewed, perceived, and practiced. This study aims to reveal insights into how reviewers develop a decision about accepting or rejecting a submitted refactoring request, and what makes such review challenging. We present an industrial case study with 24 professional developers at Xerox. Particularly, we study the motivations, documentation practices, challenges, verification, and implications of refactoring activities during code review. Our study delivers several important findings. Our results report the lack of a proper procedure to follow by developers when documenting their refactorings for review. Our survey with reviewers has also revealed several difficulties related to understanding the refactoring intent and implications on the functional and non-functional aspects of the software. In light of our findings, we recommended a procedure to properly document refactoring activities, as part of our survey feedback. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

How We Refactor and How We Document it? On the Use of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms to Classify Refactoring Documentation

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Anthony Peruma, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Christian Newman, Ali Ouni, Marouane Kessentini

Abstract: Refactoring is the art of improving the design of a system without altering its external behavior. Refactoring has become a well established and disciplined software engineering practice that has attracted a significant amount of research presuming that refactoring is primarily motivated by the need to improve system structures. However, recent studies have shown that developers may incorporate re… ▽ More Refactoring is the art of improving the design of a system without altering its external behavior. Refactoring has become a well established and disciplined software engineering practice that has attracted a significant amount of research presuming that refactoring is primarily motivated by the need to improve system structures. However, recent studies have shown that developers may incorporate refactorings in other development activities that go beyond improving the design. Unfortunately, these studies are limited to developer interviews and a reduced set of projects. To cope with the above-mentioned limitations, we aim to better understand what motivates developers to apply refactoring by mining and classifying a large set of 111,884 commits containing refactorings, extracted from 800 Java projects. We trained a multi-class classifier to categorize these commits into 3 categories, namely, Internal QA, External QA, and Code Smell Resolution, along with the traditional BugFix and Functional categories. This classification challenges the original definition of refactoring, being exclusive to improving the design and fixing code smells. Further, to better understand our classification results, we analyzed commit messages to extract textual patterns that developers regularly use to describe their refactorings. The results show that (1) fixing code smells is not the main driver for developers to refactoring their codebases. Refactoring is solicited for a wide variety of reasons, going beyond its traditional definition; (2) the distribution of refactorings differs between production and test files; (3) developers use several patterns to purposefully target refactoring; (4) the textual patterns, extracted from commit messages, provide better coverage for how developers document their refactorings. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Journal ref: Expert Systems with Applications. 167 (2021) 114176

Toward the Automatic Classification of Self-Affirmed Refactoring

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni

Abstract: The concept of Self-Affirmed Refactoring (SAR) was introduced to explore how developers document their refactoring activities in commit messages, i.e., developers' explicit documentation of refactoring operations intentionally introduced during a code change. In our previous study, we have manually identified refactoring patterns and defined three main common quality improvement categories, includ… ▽ More The concept of Self-Affirmed Refactoring (SAR) was introduced to explore how developers document their refactoring activities in commit messages, i.e., developers' explicit documentation of refactoring operations intentionally introduced during a code change. In our previous study, we have manually identified refactoring patterns and defined three main common quality improvement categories, including internal quality attributes, external quality attributes, and code smells, by only considering refactoring-related commits. However, this approach heavily depends on the manual inspection of commit messages. In this paper, we propose a two-step approach to first identify whether a commit describes developer-related refactoring events, then to classify it according to the refactoring common quality improvement categories. Specifically, we combine the N-Gram TF-IDF feature selection with binary and multiclass classifiers to build a new model to automate the classification of refactorings based on their quality improvement categories. We challenge our model using a total of 2,867 commit messages extracted from well-engineered open-source Java projects. Our findings show that (1) our model is able to accurately classify SAR commits, outperforming the pattern-based and random classifier approaches, and allowing the discovery of 40 more relevant SAR patterns, and (2) our model reaches an F-measure of up to 90% even with a relatively small training dataset. △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

On Multivariate Singular Spectrum Analysis and its Variants

Authors: Anish Agarwal, Abdullah Alomar, Devavrat Shah

Abstract: We introduce and analyze a variant of multivariate singular spectrum analysis (mSSA), a popular time series method to impute and forecast a multivariate time series. Under a spatio-temporal factor model we introduce, given $N$ time series and $T$ observations per time series, we establish prediction mean-squared-error for both imputation and out-of-sample forecasting effectively scale as… ▽ More We introduce and analyze a variant of multivariate singular spectrum analysis (mSSA), a popular time series method to impute and forecast a multivariate time series. Under a spatio-temporal factor model we introduce, given $N$ time series and $T$ observations per time series, we establish prediction mean-squared-error for both imputation and out-of-sample forecasting effectively scale as $1 / \sqrt{\min(N, T )T}$. This is an improvement over: (i) $1 /\sqrt{T}$ error scaling of SSA, the restriction of mSSA to a univariate time series; (ii) $1/\min(N, T)$ error scaling for matrix estimation methods which do not exploit temporal structure in the data. The spatio-temporal model we introduce includes any finite sum and products of: harmonics, polynomials, differentiable periodic functions, and Holder continuous functions. Our out-of-sample forecasting result could be of independent interest for online learning under a spatio-temporal factor model. Empirically, on benchmark datasets, our variant of mSSA performs competitively with state-of-the-art neural-network time series methods (e.g. DeepAR, LSTM) and significantly outperforms classical methods such as vector autoregression (VAR). Finally, we propose extensions of mSSA: (i) a variant to estimate time-varying variance of a time series; (ii) a tensor variant which has better sample complexity for certain regimes of $N$ and $T$. △ Less

Submitted 19 June, 2022; v1 submitted 23 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Two Burning Questions on COVID-19: Did shutting down the economy help? Can we (partially) reopen the economy without risking the second wave?

Authors: Anish Agarwal, Abdullah Alomar, Arnab Sarker, Devavrat Shah, Dennis Shen, Cindy Yang

Abstract: As we reach the apex of the COVID-19 pandemic, the most pressing question facing us is: can we even partially reopen the economy without risking a second wave? We first need to understand if shutting down the economy helped. And if it did, is it possible to achieve similar gains in the war against the pandemic while partially opening up the economy? To do so, it is critical to understand the effec… ▽ More As we reach the apex of the COVID-19 pandemic, the most pressing question facing us is: can we even partially reopen the economy without risking a second wave? We first need to understand if shutting down the economy helped. And if it did, is it possible to achieve similar gains in the war against the pandemic while partially opening up the economy? To do so, it is critical to understand the effects of the various interventions that can be put into place and their corresponding health and economic implications. Since many interventions exist, the key challenge facing policy makers is understanding the potential trade-offs between them, and choosing the particular set of interventions that works best for their circumstance. In this memo, we provide an overview of Synthetic Interventions (a natural generalization of Synthetic Control), a data-driven and statistically principled method to perform what-if scenario planning, i.e., for policy makers to understand the trade-offs between different interventions before having to actually enact them. In essence, the method leverages information from different interventions that have already been enacted across the world and fits it to a policy maker's setting of interest, e.g., to estimate the effect of mobility-restricting interventions on the U.S., we use daily death data from countries that enforced severe mobility restrictions to create a "synthetic low mobility U.S." and predict the counterfactual trajectory of the U.S. if it had indeed applied a similar intervention. Using Synthetic Interventions, we find that lifting severe mobility restrictions and only retaining moderate mobility restrictions (at retail and transit locations), seems to effectively flatten the curve. We hope this provides guidance on weighing the trade-offs between the safety of the population, strain on the healthcare system, and impact on the economy. △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2020; v1 submitted 30 April, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Do Design Metrics Capture Developers Perception of Quality? An Empirical Study on Self-Affirmed Refactoring Activities

Authors: Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Ali Ouni, Marouane Kessentini

Abstract: Background. Refactoring is a critical task in software maintenance and is generally performed to enforce the best design and implementation practices or to cope with design defects. Several studies attempted to detect refactoring activities through mining software repositories allowing to collect, analyze and get actionable data-driven insights about refactoring practices within software projects.… ▽ More Background. Refactoring is a critical task in software maintenance and is generally performed to enforce the best design and implementation practices or to cope with design defects. Several studies attempted to detect refactoring activities through mining software repositories allowing to collect, analyze and get actionable data-driven insights about refactoring practices within software projects. Aim. We aim at identifying, among the various quality models presented in the literature, the ones that are more in-line with the developer's vision of quality optimization, when they explicitly mention that they are refactoring to improve them. Method. We extract a large corpus of design-related refactoring activities that are applied and documented by developers during their daily changes from 3,795 curated open source Java projects. In particular, we extract a large-scale corpus of structural metrics and anti-pattern enhancement changes, from which we identify 1,245 quality improvement commits with their corresponding refactoring operations, as perceived by software engineers. Thereafter, we empirically analyze the impact of these refactoring operations on a set of common state-of-the-art design quality metrics. Results. The statistical analysis of the obtained results shows that (i) a few state-of-the-art metrics are more popular than others; and (ii) some metrics are being more emphasized than others. Conclusions. We verify that there are a variety of structural metrics that can represent the internal quality attributes with different degrees of improvement and degradation of software quality. Most of the metrics that are mapped to the main quality attributes do capture developer intentions of quality improvement reported in the commit messages. △ Less

Submitted 10 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: technical paper accepted in 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)

Journal ref: 2019 {ACM/IEEE} International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, {ESEM} 2019, Porto de Galinhas, Recife, Brazil, September 19-20, 2019

tspDB: Time Series Predict DB

Authors: Anish Agarwal, Abdullah Alomar, Devavrat Shah

Abstract: A major bottleneck of the current Machine Learning (ML) workflow is the time consuming, error prone engineering required to get data from a datastore or a database (DB) to the point an ML algorithm can be applied to it. Hence, we explore the feasibility of directly integrating prediction functionality on top of a data store or DB. Such a system ideally: (i) provides an intuitive prediction query i… ▽ More A major bottleneck of the current Machine Learning (ML) workflow is the time consuming, error prone engineering required to get data from a datastore or a database (DB) to the point an ML algorithm can be applied to it. Hence, we explore the feasibility of directly integrating prediction functionality on top of a data store or DB. Such a system ideally: (i) provides an intuitive prediction query interface which alleviates the unwieldy data engineering; (ii) provides state-of-the-art statistical accuracy while ensuring incremental model update, low model training time and low latency for making predictions. As the main contribution we explicitly instantiate a proof-of-concept, tspDB, which directly integrates with PostgreSQL. We rigorously test tspDB's statistical and computational performance against the state-of-the-art time series algorithms, including a Long-Short-Term-Memory (LSTM) neural network and DeepAR (industry standard deep learning library by Amazon). Statistically, on standard time series benchmarks, tspDB outperforms LSTM and DeepAR with 1.1-1.3x higher relative accuracy. Computationally, tspDB is 59-62x and 94-95x faster compared to LSTM and DeepAR in terms of median ML model training time and prediction query latency, respectively. Further, compared to PostgreSQL's bulk insert time and its SELECT query latency, tspDB is slower only by 1.3x and 2.6x respectively. That is, tspDB is a real-time prediction system in that its model training / prediction query time is similar to just inserting / reading data from a DB. As an algorithmic contribution, we introduce an incremental multivariate matrix factorization based time series method, which tspDB is built off. We show this method also allows one to produce reliable prediction intervals by accurately estimating the time-varying variance of a time series, thereby addressing an important problem in time series analysis. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2021; v1 submitted 17 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.