Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Albert, L A

Evaluating diversion and treatment policies for opioid use disorder

Authors: Veronica M. White, Laura A. Albert

Abstract: The United States opioid crisis contributed to 80,411 fatalities in 2021. It has strained hospitals, treatment facilities, and law enforcement agencies due to the enormous resources and procedures needed to respond to the crisis. As a result, many individuals who use opioids never receive or finish the treatment they need and instead have many interactions with hospitals or the criminal justice sy… ▽ More The United States opioid crisis contributed to 80,411 fatalities in 2021. It has strained hospitals, treatment facilities, and law enforcement agencies due to the enormous resources and procedures needed to respond to the crisis. As a result, many individuals who use opioids never receive or finish the treatment they need and instead have many interactions with hospitals or the criminal justice system. This paper introduces a discrete event simulation model that evaluates three opioid use disorder treatment policies: arrest diversion, re-entry case management, and overdose diversion. Publicly available data from 2011 to 2019 in Dane County, Wisconsin, was used to forecast opioid-related outcomes through 2032. Through analyzing a variety of policy-mix implementations, the study offers a versatile framework for evaluating policies at various implementation levels. The results demonstrate that treatment policies that create new pathways and programming by utilizing treatment services and successfully divert at least 20% of eligible individuals can lead to more opioid-resilient communities. The benefits increase when more policies are enacted and/or are offered to more individuals. We assume communities invest in increasing treatment capacity to meet increased treatment demand. In policy-mixes where societal savings from decreased opioid use, hospital encounters, and opioid-related arrests outweigh the costs of opioid use disorder treatment, the 2032 total savings range from $7.04 to $29.73 million. To reverse the opioid crisis within a community, treatment policies may need to be combined with other strategies, such as harm reduction, supply reduction, and use prevention. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2023; v1 submitted 8 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Interdicting attack plans with boundedly-rational players and multiple attackers: An adversarial risk analysis approach

Authors: Eric B. DuBois, Ashley Peper, Laura A. Albert

Abstract: Cybersecurity planning supports the selection of and implementation of security controls in resource-constrained settings to manage risk. Doing so requires considering adaptive adversaries with different levels of strategic sophistication in modeling efforts to support risk management. However, most models in the literature only consider rational or non-strategic adversaries. Therefore, we study h… ▽ More Cybersecurity planning supports the selection of and implementation of security controls in resource-constrained settings to manage risk. Doing so requires considering adaptive adversaries with different levels of strategic sophistication in modeling efforts to support risk management. However, most models in the literature only consider rational or non-strategic adversaries. Therefore, we study how to inform defensive decision-making to mitigate the risk from boundedly rational players, with a particular focus on making integrated, interdependent planning decisions. To achieve this goal, we introduce a modeling framework for selecting a portfolio of security mitigations that interdict adversarial attack plans that uses a structured approach for risk analysis. Our approach adapts adversarial risk analysis and cognitive hierarchy theory to consider a maximum reliability path interdiction problem with a single defender and multiple attackers who have different goals and levels of strategic sophistication. Instead of enumerating all possible attacks and defenses, we introduce a solution technique based on integer programming and approximation algorithms to iteratively solve the defender's and attackers' problems. A case study illustrates the proposed models and provides insights into defensive planning. △ Less

Submitted 3 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Locating ballot drop boxes

Authors: Adam P. Schmidt, Laura A. Albert

Abstract: For decades, voting-by-mail and the use of ballot drop boxes has substantially grown, and in response, many election officials have added new drop boxes to their voting infrastructure. However, existing guidance for locating drop boxes is limited. In this paper, we introduce an integer programming model, the drop box location problem (DBLP), to locate drop boxes. The DBLP considers criteria of cos… ▽ More For decades, voting-by-mail and the use of ballot drop boxes has substantially grown, and in response, many election officials have added new drop boxes to their voting infrastructure. However, existing guidance for locating drop boxes is limited. In this paper, we introduce an integer programming model, the drop box location problem (DBLP), to locate drop boxes. The DBLP considers criteria of cost, voter access, and risk. The cost of the drop box system is determined by the fixed cost of adding drop boxes and the operational cost of a collection tour by a bipartisan team who regularly collects ballots from selected locations. The DBLP utilizes covering sets to ensure each voter is in close proximity to a drop box and incorporates a novel measure of access to measure the ability to use multiple voting pathways to vote. The DBLP is shown to be NP-Hard, and we introduce a heuristic to generate a large number of feasible solutions for policy makers to select from a posteriori. Using a real-world case study of Milwaukee, WI, we study the benefit of the DBLP. The results demonstrate that the proposed optimization model identifies drop box locations that perform well across multiple criteria. The results also demonstrate that the trade-off between cost, access, and risk is non-trivial, which supports the use of the proposed optimization-based approach to select drop box locations. △ Less

Submitted 24 August, 2022; v1 submitted 21 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

A mixed-integer programming model for identifying intuitive ambulance dispatching policies

Authors: Laura A. Albert

Abstract: Markov decision process models and algorithms can be used to identify optimal policies for dispatching ambulances to spatially distributed customers, where the optimal policies indicate the ambulance to dispatch to each customer type in each state. Since the optimal solutions are dependent on Markov state variables, they may not always correspond to a simple set of rules when implementing the poli… ▽ More Markov decision process models and algorithms can be used to identify optimal policies for dispatching ambulances to spatially distributed customers, where the optimal policies indicate the ambulance to dispatch to each customer type in each state. Since the optimal solutions are dependent on Markov state variables, they may not always correspond to a simple set of rules when implementing the policies in practice. Restricted policies that conform to a priority list for each type of customer may be desirable for use in practice, since such policies are transparent, explainable, and easy to implement. A priority list policy is an ordered list of ambulances that indicates the preferred order to dispatch the ambulances to a customer type subject to ambulance availability. This paper proposes a constrained Markov decision process model for identifying optimal priority list policies that is formulated as a mixed integer programming model, does not extend the Markov state space, and can be solved using standard algorithms. A series of computational examples illustrate the benefit of intuitive policies. The optimal mixed integer programming solutions to the computational examples have objective function values that are close to those of the unrestricted model and are superior to those of heuristics. △ Less

Submitted 11 October, 2022; v1 submitted 18 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Jump balls, rating falls, and elite status: A sensitivity analysis of three quarterback rating statistics

Authors: Laura A. Albert, John N. Angelis

Abstract: Quarterback performance can be difficult to rank, and much effort has been spent in creating new rating systems. However, the input statistics for such ratings are subject to randomness and factors outside the quarterback's control. To investigate this variance, we perform a sensitivity analysis of three quarterback rating statistics: the Traditional 1971 rating by Smith, the Burke, and the Wages… ▽ More Quarterback performance can be difficult to rank, and much effort has been spent in creating new rating systems. However, the input statistics for such ratings are subject to randomness and factors outside the quarterback's control. To investigate this variance, we perform a sensitivity analysis of three quarterback rating statistics: the Traditional 1971 rating by Smith, the Burke, and the Wages of Wins ratings. The comparisons are made at the team level for the 32 NFL teams from 2002-2015, thus giving each case an even 16 games. We compute quarterback ratings for each offense with 1-5 additional touchdowns, 1-5 fewer interceptions, 1-5 additional sacks, and a 1-5 percent increase in the passing completion rate. Our sensitivity analysis provides insight into whether an elite passing team could seem mediocre or vice versa based on random outcomes. The results indicate that the Traditional rating is the most sensitive statistic with respect to touchdowns, interceptions, and completions, whereas the Burke rating is most sensitive to sacks. The analysis suggests that team passing offense rankings are highly sensitive to aspects of football that are out of the quarterback's hands (e.g., deflected passes that lead to interceptions). Thus, on the margins, we show arguments about whether a specific quarterback has entered the elite or remains mediocre are irrelevant. △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.