-
Longitudinal Deep Truck: Deep learning and deep reinforcement learning for modeling and control of longitudinal dynamics of heavy duty trucks
Authors:
Saleh Albeaik,
Trevor Wu,
Ganeshnikhil Vurimi,
Xiao-Yun Lu,
Alexandre M. Bayen
Abstract:
Heavy duty truck mechanical configuration is often tailor designed and built for specific truck mission requirements. This renders the precise derivation of analytical dynamical models and controls for these trucks from first principles challenging, tedious, and often requires several theoretical and applied areas of expertise to carry through. This article investigates deep learning and deep rein…
▽ More
Heavy duty truck mechanical configuration is often tailor designed and built for specific truck mission requirements. This renders the precise derivation of analytical dynamical models and controls for these trucks from first principles challenging, tedious, and often requires several theoretical and applied areas of expertise to carry through. This article investigates deep learning and deep reinforcement learning as truck-configuration-agnostic longitudinal modeling and control approaches for heavy duty trucks. The article outlines a process to develop and validate such models and controllers and highlights relevant practical considerations. The process is applied to simulation and real-full size trucks for validation and experimental performance evaluation. The results presented demonstrate applicability of this approach to trucks of multiple configurations; models generated were accurate for control development purposes both in simulation and the field.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Limitations and Improvements of the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM)
Authors:
Saleh Albeaik,
Alexandre Bayen,
Maria Teresa Chiri,
Xiaoqian Gong,
Amaury Hayat,
Nicolas Kardous,
Alexander Keimer,
Sean T. McQuade,
Benedetto Piccoli,
Yiling You
Abstract:
This contribution analyzes the widely used and well-known "intelligent driver model (briefly IDM), which is a second order car-following model governed by a system of ordinary differential equations. Although this model was intensively studied in recent years for properly capturing traffic phenomena and driver braking behavior, a rigorous study of the well-posedness has, to our knowledge, never be…
▽ More
This contribution analyzes the widely used and well-known "intelligent driver model (briefly IDM), which is a second order car-following model governed by a system of ordinary differential equations. Although this model was intensively studied in recent years for properly capturing traffic phenomena and driver braking behavior, a rigorous study of the well-posedness has, to our knowledge, never been performed. First it is shown that, for a specific class of initial data, the vehicles' velocities become negative or even diverge to $-\infty$ in finite time, both undesirable properties for a car-following model. Various modifications of the IDM are then proposed in order to avoid such ill-posedness. The theoretical remediation of the model, rather than post facto by ad-hoc modification of code implementations, allows a more sound numerical implementation and preservation of the model features. Indeed, to avoid inconsistencies and ensure dynamics close to the one of the original model, one may need to inspect and clean large input data, which may result in practically impossible scenarios for large-scale simulations. Although well-posedness issues occur only for specific initial data, this may happen frequently when different traffic scenarios are analyzed, and especially in presence of lane-changing, on ramps and other network components as it is the case for most commonly used micro-simulators. On the other side, it is shown that well-posedness can be guaranteed by straight-forward improvements, such as those obtained by slightly changing the acceleration to prevent the velocity from becoming negative.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2022; v1 submitted 2 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
729 new measures of economic complexity (Addendum to Improving the Economic Complexity Index)
Authors:
Saleh Albeaik,
Mary Kaltenberg,
Mansour Alsaleh,
César A. Hidalgo
Abstract:
Recently we uploaded to the arxiv a paper entitled: Improving the Economic Complexity Index. There, we compared three metrics of the knowledge intensity of an economy, the original metric we published in 2009 (the Economic Complexity Index or ECI), a variation of the metric proposed in 2012, and a variation we called ECI+. It was brought to our attention that the definition of ECI+ was equivalent…
▽ More
Recently we uploaded to the arxiv a paper entitled: Improving the Economic Complexity Index. There, we compared three metrics of the knowledge intensity of an economy, the original metric we published in 2009 (the Economic Complexity Index or ECI), a variation of the metric proposed in 2012, and a variation we called ECI+. It was brought to our attention that the definition of ECI+ was equivalent to the variation of the metric proposed in 2012. We have verified this claim, and found that while the equations are not exactly the same, they are similar enough to be our own oversight. More importantly, we now ask: how many variations of the original ECI work? In this paper we provide a simple unifying framework to explore multiple variations of ECI, including both the original 2009 ECI and the 2012 variation. We found that a large fraction of variations have a similar predictive power, indicating that the chance of finding a variation of ECI that works, after the seminal 2009 measure, are surprisingly high. In fact, more than 28 percent of these variations have a predictive power that is within 90 percent of the maximum for any variation. These findings show that, once the idea of measuring economic complexity was out, creating a variation with a similar predictive power (like the ones proposed in 2012) was trivial (a 1 in 3 shot). More importantly, the result show that using exports data to measure the knowledge intensity of an economy is a robust phenomenon that works for multiple functional forms. Moreover, the fact that multiple variations of the 2009 ECI perform close to the maximum, tells us that no variation of ECI will have a performance that is substantially better. This suggests that research efforts should focus on uncovering the mechanisms that contribute to the diffusion and accumulation of productive knowledge instead of on exploring small variations to existing measures.
△ Less
Submitted 9 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Improving the Economic Complexity Index
Authors:
Saleh Albeaik,
Mary Kaltenberg,
Mansour Alsaleh,
Cesar A. Hidalgo
Abstract:
How much knowledge is there in an economy? In recent years, data on the mix of products that countries export has been used to construct measures of economic complexity that estimate the knowledge available in an economy and predict future economic growth. Here we introduce a new and simpler metric of economic complexity (ECI+) that measures the total exports of an economy corrected by how difficu…
▽ More
How much knowledge is there in an economy? In recent years, data on the mix of products that countries export has been used to construct measures of economic complexity that estimate the knowledge available in an economy and predict future economic growth. Here we introduce a new and simpler metric of economic complexity (ECI+) that measures the total exports of an economy corrected by how difficult it is to export each product. We use data from 1973 to 2013 to compare the ability of ECI+, the Economic Complexity Index (ECI), and Fitness complexity, to predict future economic growth using 5, 10, and 20-year panels in a pooled OLS, a random effects model, and a fixed effects model. We find that ECI+ outperforms ECI and Fitness in its ability to predict economic growth and in the consistency of its estimators across most econometric specifications. On average, one standard deviation increase in ECI+ is associated with an increase in annualized growth of about 4% to 5%. We then combine ECI+ with measures of physical capital, human capital, and institutions, to find a robust model of economic growth. The ability of ECI+ to predict growth, and the value of its coefficient, is robust to these controls. Also, we find that human capital, political stability, and control of corruption; are positively associated with future economic growth, and that income is negatively associated with growth, in agreement with the traditional growth literature. Finally, we use ECI+ to generate economic growth predictions for the next 20 years and compare these predictions with the ones obtained using ECI and Fitness. These findings improve the methods available to estimate the knowledge intensity of economies and predict future economic growth.
△ Less
Submitted 24 July, 2017; v1 submitted 18 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
