-
Digital Forensics Domain and Metamodeling Development Approaches
Authors:
Omair Ameerbakhsh,
Fahad M Ghabban,
Ibrahim Alfadli,
Amer Nizar AbuAli,
Arafat Al-Dhaqm,
Mahmoud Ahmad Al-Khasawneh
Abstract:
Metamodeling is used as a general technique for integrating and defining models from different domains. This technique can be used in diverse application domains, especially for purposes of standardization. Also, this process mainly has a focus on the identification of general concepts that exist in various problem domain and their relations and to solve complexity, interoperability, and heterogen…
▽ More
Metamodeling is used as a general technique for integrating and defining models from different domains. This technique can be used in diverse application domains, especially for purposes of standardization. Also, this process mainly has a focus on the identification of general concepts that exist in various problem domain and their relations and to solve complexity, interoperability, and heterogeneity aspects of different domains. Several diverse metamodeling development approaches have been proposed in the literature to develop metamodels. Each metamodeling development process has some advantages and disadvantages too. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of existing metamodeling development approaches and conduct a comparative study among them-eventually selecting the best approach for metamodel development in the perspective of digital forensics.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Comparative Analysis of Network Forensic Tools and Network Forensics Processes
Authors:
Fahad M Ghabban,
Ibrahim Alfadli,
Omair Ameerbakhsh,
Amer Nizar AbuAli,
Arafat Al-Dhaqm,
Mahmoud Ahmad Al-Khasawneh
Abstract:
Network Forensics (NFs) is a branch of digital forensics which used to detect and capture potential digital crimes over computer networked environments crime. Network Forensic Tools (NFTs) and Network Forensic Processes (NFPs) have abilities to examine networks, collect all normal and abnormal traffic/data, help in network incident analysis, and assist in creating an appropriate incident detection…
▽ More
Network Forensics (NFs) is a branch of digital forensics which used to detect and capture potential digital crimes over computer networked environments crime. Network Forensic Tools (NFTs) and Network Forensic Processes (NFPs) have abilities to examine networks, collect all normal and abnormal traffic/data, help in network incident analysis, and assist in creating an appropriate incident detection and reaction and also create a forensic hypothesis that can be used in a court of law. Also, it assists in examining the internal incidents and exploitation of assets, attack goals, executes threat evaluation, also by evaluating network performance. According to existing literature, there exist quite a number of NFTs and NTPs that are used for identification, collection, reconstruction, and analysing the chain of incidents that happen on networks. However, they were vary and differ in their roles and functionalities. The main objective of this paper, therefore, is to assess and see the distinction that exist between Network Forensic Tools (NFTs) and Network Forensic Processes (NFPs). Precisely, this paper focuses on comparing among four famous NFTs: Xplico, OmniPeek, NetDetector, and NetIetercept. The outputs of this paper show that the Xplico tool has abilities to identify, collect, reconstruct, and analyse the chain of incidents that happen on networks than other NF tools.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Common Investigation Process Model for Internet of Things Forensics
Authors:
Muhammed Ahmed Saleh,
Siti Hajar Othman,
Arafat Al-Dhaqm,
Mahmoud Ahmad Al-Khasawneh
Abstract:
Internet of Things Forensics (IoTFs) is a new discipline in digital forensics science used in the detection, acquisition, preservation, rebuilding, analyzing, and the presentation of evidence from IoT environments. IoTFs discipline still suffers from several issues and challenges that have in the recent past been documented. For example, heterogeneity of IoT infrastructures has mainly been a key c…
▽ More
Internet of Things Forensics (IoTFs) is a new discipline in digital forensics science used in the detection, acquisition, preservation, rebuilding, analyzing, and the presentation of evidence from IoT environments. IoTFs discipline still suffers from several issues and challenges that have in the recent past been documented. For example, heterogeneity of IoT infrastructures has mainly been a key challenge. The heterogeneity of the IoT infrastructures makes the IoTFs very complex, and ambiguous among various forensic domain. This paper aims to propose a common investigation processes for IoTFs using the metamodeling method called Common Investigation Process Model (CIPM) for IoTFs. The proposed CIPM consists of four common investigation processes: i) preparation process, ii) collection process, iii) analysis process and iv) final report process. The proposed CIPM can assist IoTFs users to facilitate, manage, and organize the investigation tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
CIPM: Common Identification Process Model for Database Forensics Field
Authors:
Ibrahim Alfadli,
Fahad M Ghabban,
Omair Ameerbakhsh,
Amer Nizar AbuAli,
Arafat Al-Dhaqm,
Mahmoud Ahmad Al-Khasawneh
Abstract:
Database Forensics (DBF) domain is a branch of digital forensics, concerned with the identification, collection, reconstruction, analysis, and documentation of database crimes. Different researchers have introduced several identification models to handle database crimes. Majority of proposed models are not specific and are redundant, which makes these models a problem because of the multidimension…
▽ More
Database Forensics (DBF) domain is a branch of digital forensics, concerned with the identification, collection, reconstruction, analysis, and documentation of database crimes. Different researchers have introduced several identification models to handle database crimes. Majority of proposed models are not specific and are redundant, which makes these models a problem because of the multidimensional nature and high diversity of database systems. Accordingly, using the metamodeling approach, the current study is aimed at proposing a unified identification model applicable to the database forensic field. The model integrates and harmonizes all exiting identification processes into a single abstract model, called Common Identification Process Model (CIPM). The model comprises six phases: 1) notifying an incident, 2) responding to the incident, 3) identification of the incident source, 4) verification of the incident, 5) isolation of the database server and 6) provision of an investigation environment. CIMP was found capable of hel** the practitioners and newcomers to the forensics domain to control database crimes.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
