Second T = 3/2 state in $^9$B and the isobaric multiplet mass equation
Authors:
N. J. Mukwevho,
B. M. Rebeiro,
D. J. Marín-Lámbarri,
S. Triambak,
P. Adsley,
N. Y. Kheswa,
R. Neveling,
L. Pellegri,
V. Pesudo,
F. D. Smit,
E. H. Akakpo,
J. W. Brümmer,
S. Jongile,
M. Kamil,
P. Z. Mabika,
F. Nemulodi,
J. N. Orce,
P. Papka,
G. F. Steyn,
W. Yahia-Cherif
Abstract:
Recent high-precision mass measurements and shell model calculations~[Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 108}, 212501 (2012)] have challenged a longstanding explanation for the requirement of a cubic isobaric multiplet mass equation for the lowest $A = 9$ isospin quartet. The conclusions relied upon the choice of the excitation energy for the second $T = 3/2$ state in $^9$B, which had two conflicting measureme…
▽ More
Recent high-precision mass measurements and shell model calculations~[Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 108}, 212501 (2012)] have challenged a longstanding explanation for the requirement of a cubic isobaric multiplet mass equation for the lowest $A = 9$ isospin quartet. The conclusions relied upon the choice of the excitation energy for the second $T = 3/2$ state in $^9$B, which had two conflicting measurements prior to this work. We remeasured the energy of the state using the $^9{\rm Be}(^3{\rm He},t)$ reaction and significantly disagree with the most recent measurement. Our result supports the contention that continuum coupling in the most proton-rich member of the quartet is not the predominant reason for the large cubic term required for $A = 9$ nuclei.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
