Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Aghakhanloo, M

Limit on Supernova Emission in the Brightest Gamma-ray Burst, GRB 221009A

Authors: Manisha Shrestha, David J. Sand, Kate D. Alexander, K. Azalee Bostroem, Griffin Hosseinzadeh, Jeniveve Pearson, Mojgan Aghakhanloo, József Vinkó, Jennifer E. Andrews, Jacob E. Jencson, M. J. Lundquist, Samuel Wyatt, D. Andrew Howell, Curtis McCully, Estefania Padilla Gonzalez, Craig Pellegrino, Giacomo Terreran, Daichi Hiramatsu, Megan Newsome, Joseph Farah, Saurabh W. Jha, Nathan Smith, J. Craig Wheeler, Clara Martínez-Vázquez, Julio A. Carballo-Bello , et al. (8 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We present photometric and spectroscopic observations of the extraordinary gamma-ray burst (GRB) 221009A in search of an associated supernova. Some past GRBs have shown bumps in the optical light curve that coincide with the emergence of supernova spectral features, but we do not detect any significant light curve features in GRB~221009A, nor do we detect any clear sign of supernova spectral featu… ▽ More We present photometric and spectroscopic observations of the extraordinary gamma-ray burst (GRB) 221009A in search of an associated supernova. Some past GRBs have shown bumps in the optical light curve that coincide with the emergence of supernova spectral features, but we do not detect any significant light curve features in GRB~221009A, nor do we detect any clear sign of supernova spectral features. Using two well-studied GRB-associated supernovae (SN~2013dx, $M_{r,max} = -19.54$; SN~2016jca, $M_{r,max} = -19.04$) at a similar redshift as GRB~221009A ($z=0.151$), we modeled how the emergence of a supernova would affect the light curve. If we assume the GRB afterglow to decay at the same rate as the X-ray data, the combination of afterglow and a supernova component is fainter than the observed GRB brightness. For the case where we assume the best-fit power law to the optical data as the GRB afterglow component, a supernova contribution should have created a clear bump in the light curve, assuming only extinction from the Milky Way. If we assume a higher extinction of $E(B-V)$=$1.74$ mag (as has been suggested elsewhere), the supernova contribution would have been hard to detect, with a limit on the associated supernova of $M_{r,max} \approx-$19.54. We do not observe any clear supernova features in our spectra, which were taken around the time of expected maximum light. The lack of a bright supernova associated with GRB~221009A may indicate that the energy from the explosion is mostly concentrated in the jet, leaving a lower energy budget available for the supernova. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2023; v1 submitted 7 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: 19 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables, accepted for publication in ApJL

Recurring outbursts of the supernova impostor AT 2016blu in NGC 4559

Authors: Mojgan Aghakhanloo, Nathan Smith, Peter Milne, Jennifer E. Andrews, Schuyler D. Van Dyk, Alexei V. Filippenko, Jacob E. Jencson, Ryan M. Lau, David J. Sand, Samuel Wyatt, WeiKang Zheng

Abstract: We present the first photometric analysis of the supernova (SN) impostor AT 2016blu in NGC 4559. This transient was discovered by the Lick Observatory Supernova Search in 2012 and has continued its outbursts since then. Optical and infrared photometry of AT 2016blu reveals at least 19 outbursts in 2012-2022. Similar photometry from 1999-2009 shows no outbursts, indicating that the star was relativ… ▽ More We present the first photometric analysis of the supernova (SN) impostor AT 2016blu in NGC 4559. This transient was discovered by the Lick Observatory Supernova Search in 2012 and has continued its outbursts since then. Optical and infrared photometry of AT 2016blu reveals at least 19 outbursts in 2012-2022. Similar photometry from 1999-2009 shows no outbursts, indicating that the star was relatively stable in the decade before discovery. Archival {\it Hubble Space Telescope} observations suggest that the progenitor had a minimum initial mass of $M >= 33$ M$_{\odot}$ and a luminosity of $L >= 10^{5.7}$ L$_{\odot}$. AT 2016blu's outbursts show irregular variability with multiple closely spaced peaks having typical amplitudes of 1-2 mag and durations of 1-4 weeks. While individual outbursts have irregular light curves, concentrations of these peaks recur with a period of $\sim 113 \pm 2$ d. Based on this period, we predict times for upcoming outbursts in 2023 and 2024. AT 2016blu shares similarities with SN 2000ch in NGC 3432, where outbursts may arise from periastron encounters in an eccentric binary containing a luminous blue variable (LBV). We propose that AT 2016blu's outbursts are also driven by interactions that intensify around periastron in an eccentric system. Intrinsic variability of the LBV-like primary star may cause different intensity and duration of binary interaction at each periastron passage. AT 2016blu also resembles the periastron encounters of $η$ Carinae prior to its Great Eruption and the erratic pre-SN eruptions of SN 2009ip. This similarity and the onset of eruptions in the past decade hint that AT 2016blu may also be headed for a catastrophe, making it a target of great interest. △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2023; v1 submitted 19 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: 18 pages, 14 figures, 6 tables, MNRAS Accepted

Repeating periodic eruptions of the supernova impostor SN 2000ch

Authors: Mojgan Aghakhanloo, Nathan Smith, Peter Milne, Jennifer E. Andrews, Alexei V. Filippenko, Jacob E. Jencson, David J. Sand, Schuyler D. Van Dyk, Samuel Wyatt, WeiKang Zheng

Abstract: We analyse photometric observations of the supernova (SN) impostor SN 2000ch in NGC 3432 covering the time since its discovery. This source was previously observed to have four outbursts in 2000-2010. Observations now reveal at least three additional outbursts in 2004-2007, and sixteen outbursts in 2010-2022. Outburst light curves are irregular and multipeaked, exhibiting a wide variety of peak ma… ▽ More We analyse photometric observations of the supernova (SN) impostor SN 2000ch in NGC 3432 covering the time since its discovery. This source was previously observed to have four outbursts in 2000-2010. Observations now reveal at least three additional outbursts in 2004-2007, and sixteen outbursts in 2010-2022. Outburst light curves are irregular and multipeaked, exhibiting a wide variety of peak magnitude, duration, and shape. The outbursts after 2008 repeat with a period of 200.7$\pm{2}$ d, while the outburst in 2000 seems to match with a shorter period. The next outburst should occur around January/February 2023. We propose that these periodic eruptions arise from violent interaction around times of periastron in an eccentric binary system, similar to the periastron encounters of $η$ Carinae leading up to its Great Eruption, and resembling the erratic pre-SN eruptions of SN 2009ip. We attribute the irregularity of the eruptions to the interplay between the orbit and the variability of the luminous blue variable (LBV) primary star, wherein each successive periastron pass may have a different intensity or duration due to the changing radius and mass-loss rate of the LBV-like primary. Such outbursts may occasionally be weak or undetectable if the LBV is relatively quiescent at periastron, but can be much more extreme when the LBV is active. The observed change in orbital period may be a consequence of mass lost in outbursts. Given the similarity to the progenitor of SN 2009ip, SN 2000ch deserves continued attention in the event it is headed for a stellar merger or a SN-like explosion. △ Less

Submitted 28 February, 2023; v1 submitted 30 November, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: 18 pages, 13 figures, 4 tables, MNRAS accepted

Hubble Space Telescope Imaging Reveals That SN 2015bh Is Much Fainter than Its Progenitor

Authors: Jacob E. Jencson, David J. Sand, Jennifer E. Andrews, Nathan Smith, Jay Strader, Mojgan Aghakhanloo, Jeniveve Pearson, Stefano Valenti

Abstract: We present Hubble Space Telescope (HST) imaging of the site of SN 2015bh in the nearby spiral galaxy NGC 2770 taken between 2017 and 2019, nearly four years after the peak of the explosion. In 2017-2018, the transient fades steadily in optical filters before declining more slowly to $F814W = -7.1$ mag in 2019, $\approx$4 mag below the level of its eruptive luminous blue variable (LBV) progenitor o… ▽ More We present Hubble Space Telescope (HST) imaging of the site of SN 2015bh in the nearby spiral galaxy NGC 2770 taken between 2017 and 2019, nearly four years after the peak of the explosion. In 2017-2018, the transient fades steadily in optical filters before declining more slowly to $F814W = -7.1$ mag in 2019, $\approx$4 mag below the level of its eruptive luminous blue variable (LBV) progenitor observed with HST in 2008-2009. The source fades at a constant color of $F555W - F814W = 0.4$ mag until 2018, similar to SN 2009ip and consistent with a spectrum dominated by interaction of the ejecta with circumstellar material (CSM). A deep optical spectrum obtained in 2021 lacks signatures of ongoing interaction ($L_{\mathrm{H}α} \lesssim 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$ for broadened emission $\lesssim$2000 km s$^{-1}$), but indicates the presence of a nearby H II region ($\lesssim$300 pc). The color evolution of the fading source makes it unlikely that emission from a scattered-light echo or binary OB companion of the progenitor contributes significantly to the flattening of the late-time light curve. The remaining emission in 2019 may plausibly be attributed an evolved/inflated companion or an unresolved ($\lesssim$3 pc), young stellar cluster. Importantly, the color evolution of SN 2015bh rules out scenarios in which the surviving progenitor is obscured by nascent dust and does not clearly indicate a transition to a hotter, optically faint state. The simplest explanation is that the massive progenitor did not survive. SN 2015bh likely represents a remarkable example of the terminal explosion of a massive star preceded by decades of end-stage eruptive variability. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2022; v1 submitted 6 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: 15 pages, 5 figures, published in ApJL. Replacement with revisions to match published article

Journal ref: ApJL, 935, L33 (2022)

Kinematics of Luminous Blue Variables in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Authors: Mojgan Aghakhanloo, Nathan Smith, Jennifer Andrews, Knut Olsen, Gurtina Besla, Yumi Choi

Abstract: We study the kinematics of luminous blue variables (LBVs) in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). Using high-resolution spectra, we measure the systemic radial velocities for a sample of 16 LBVs and LBV candidates. In order to measure the net motion of LBVs compared to their local environments, we subtract the projected line-of-sight velocity at the same location derived from the rotation curve model… ▽ More We study the kinematics of luminous blue variables (LBVs) in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). Using high-resolution spectra, we measure the systemic radial velocities for a sample of 16 LBVs and LBV candidates. In order to measure the net motion of LBVs compared to their local environments, we subtract the projected line-of-sight velocity at the same location derived from the rotation curve model of the LMC. Using nebular and wind emission lines, we infer a velocity dispersion for LBVs of $40.0^{+9.9}_{-6.6}$ km s$^{-1}$. To put LBVs in context with other evolved massive stars, we compare this to red supergiants (RSGs) in the LMC, which have a significantly smaller velocity dispersion of $16.5^{+0.4}_{-0.6}$ km s$^{-1}$. Moreover, 33% of LBVs have radial velocities of more than 25 km s$^{-1}$, while only 9% of RSG have such high velocities. This suggests that LBVs include more runaways than the population of stars that evolves to become RSGs, indicating that LBVs are preferentially kicked by a companion's supernova explosion as compared to other evolved massive stars. Our investigation reveals other interesting clues about LBVs in the LMC as well. We find that radial velocities and widths of emission lines for each target remain constant over several epochs, whereas measured absorption lines exhibit highly variable radial velocities for R110, R81, S Dor, Sk-69$^\circ$142a, and Sk-69$^\circ$279. These five LBVs probably have a binary companion. Additionally, we find that Sk-69$^\circ$142a experienced its second outburst in 2019 September, shifting its status from candidate to confirmed LBV. △ Less

Submitted 10 August, 2022; v1 submitted 14 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: 19 pages, 27 figures, 6 tables, MNRAS accepted

Gaia EDR3 confirms that Westerlund 1 is closer and older than previously thought

Authors: Mojgan Aghakhanloo, Jeremiah W. Murphy, Nathan Smith, John Parejko, Mariangelly Díaz-Rodríguez, Maria R. Drout, Jose H. Groh, Joseph Guzman, Keivan G. Stassun

Abstract: Using {\it Gaia} Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) parallaxes and Bayesian inference, we infer a parallax of the Westerlund 1 (Wd1) cluster. We find a parallax of $0.34\pm{0.05}$ mas corresponding to a distance of $2.8^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ kpc. The new {\it Gaia} EDR3 distance is consistent with our previous result using {\it Gaia} DR2 parallaxes. This confirms that Wd1 is less massive and older than previous… ▽ More Using {\it Gaia} Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) parallaxes and Bayesian inference, we infer a parallax of the Westerlund 1 (Wd1) cluster. We find a parallax of $0.34\pm{0.05}$ mas corresponding to a distance of $2.8^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ kpc. The new {\it Gaia} EDR3 distance is consistent with our previous result using {\it Gaia} DR2 parallaxes. This confirms that Wd1 is less massive and older than previously assumed. Compared to DR2, the EDR3 individual parallax uncertainties for each star decreased by 30\%. However, the aggregate parallax uncertainty for the cluster remained the same. This suggests that the uncertainty is dominated by systematics, which is possibly due to crowding, motions within the cluster, or motions due to binary orbits. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Comments: 3 pages, 1 figure

Inferring the parallax of Westerlund 1 from Gaia DR2

Authors: Mojgan Aghakhanloo, Jeremiah W. Murphy, Nathan Smith, John Parejko, Mariangelly Díaz-Rodríguez, Maria R. Drout, Jose H. Groh, Joseph Guzman, Keivan G. Stassun

Abstract: Westerlund 1 (Wd1) is potentially the largest star cluster in the Galaxy. That designation critically depends upon the distance to the cluster, yet the cluster is highly obscured, making luminosity-based distance estimates difficult. Using {\it Gaia} Data Release 2 (DR2) parallaxes and Bayesian inference, we infer a parallax of $0.35^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ mas corresponding to a distance of… ▽ More Westerlund 1 (Wd1) is potentially the largest star cluster in the Galaxy. That designation critically depends upon the distance to the cluster, yet the cluster is highly obscured, making luminosity-based distance estimates difficult. Using {\it Gaia} Data Release 2 (DR2) parallaxes and Bayesian inference, we infer a parallax of $0.35^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ mas corresponding to a distance of $2.6^{+0.6}_{-0.4}$ kpc. To leverage the combined statistics of all stars in the direction of Wd1, we derive the Bayesian model for a cluster of stars hidden among Galactic field stars; this model includes the parallax zero-point. Previous estimates for the distance to Wd1 ranged from 1.0 to 5.5 kpc, although values around 5 kpc have usually been adopted. The {\it Gaia} DR2 parallaxes reduce the uncertainty from a factor of 3 to 18\% and rules out the most often quoted value of 5 kpc with 99\% confidence. This new distance allows for more accurate mass and age determinations for the stars in Wd1. For example, the previously inferred initial mass at the main-sequence turn-off was around 40 M$_{\odot}$; the new {\it Gaia} DR2 distance shifts this down to about 22 M$_{\odot}$. This has important implications for our understanding of the late stages of stellar evolution, including the initial mass of the magnetar and the LBV in Wd1. Similarly, the new distance suggests that the total cluster mass is about four times lower than previously calculated. △ Less

Submitted 31 March, 2020; v1 submitted 19 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Comments: 14 pages, 10 figures

Journal ref: 2020MNRAS.492.2497A

On the Gaia DR2 distances for Galactic Luminous Blue Variables

Authors: Nathan Smith, Mojgan Aghakhanloo, Jeremiah W. Murphy, Maria R. Drout, Keivan G. Stassun, Jose H. Groh

Abstract: We examine parallaxes and distances for Galactic luminous blue variables (LBVs) in Gaia DR2. The sample includes 11 LBVs and 14 LBV candidates. For about half of the sample, DR2 distances are either similar to commonly adopted literature values, or the DR2 values have large uncertainties. For the rest, reliable DR2 distances differ significantly from values in the literature, and in most cases the… ▽ More We examine parallaxes and distances for Galactic luminous blue variables (LBVs) in Gaia DR2. The sample includes 11 LBVs and 14 LBV candidates. For about half of the sample, DR2 distances are either similar to commonly adopted literature values, or the DR2 values have large uncertainties. For the rest, reliable DR2 distances differ significantly from values in the literature, and in most cases the Gaia DR2 distance is smaller. Two key results are that the S Doradus instability strip may not be as clearly defined as previously thought, and that there exists a population of LBVs at relatively low luminosities. LBVs seem to occupy a wide swath from the end of the main sequence at the blue edge to 8000 K at the red side, with a spread in luminosity reaching as low as log(L/Lsun)=4.5. The lower-luminosity group corresponds to effective single-star initial masses of 10-25 Msun, and includes objects that have been considered as confirmed LBVs. We discuss implications for LBVs including (1) their instability and origin in binary evolution, (2) connections to some supernova (SN) impostors such as the class of SN 2008S-like objects, and (3) LBVs that may be progenitors of SNe with dense circumstellar material across a wide initial mass range. Although some of the Gaia DR2 distances for LBVs have large uncertainty, this represents the most direct and consistent set of Galactic LBV distance estimates available in the literature. △ Less

Submitted 8 July, 2019; v1 submitted 8 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Comments: 20 pages, 5 figures, MNRAS accepted. Updated inclusion of excess astrometric noise and discussion of literature distances

Modelling Luminous-Blue-Variable Isolation

Authors: Mojgan Aghakhanloo, Jeremiah W. Murphy, Nathan Smith, Renée Hložek

Abstract: Observations show that luminous blue variables (LBVs) are far more dispersed than massive O-type stars, and Smith & Tombleson suggested that these large separations are inconsistent with a single-star evolution model of LBVs. Instead, they suggested that the large distances are most consistent with binary evolution scenarios. To test these suggestions, we modelled young stellar clusters and their… ▽ More Observations show that luminous blue variables (LBVs) are far more dispersed than massive O-type stars, and Smith & Tombleson suggested that these large separations are inconsistent with a single-star evolution model of LBVs. Instead, they suggested that the large distances are most consistent with binary evolution scenarios. To test these suggestions, we modelled young stellar clusters and their passive dissolution, and we find that, indeed, the standard single-star evolution model is mostly inconsistent with the observed LBV environments. If LBVs are single stars, then the lifetimes inferred from their luminosity and mass are far too short to be consistent with their extreme isolation. This implies that there is either an inconsistency in the luminosity- to-mass map** or the mass-to-age map**. In this paper, we explore binary solutions that modify the mass-to-age map** and are consistent with the isolation of LBVs. For the binary scenarios, our crude models suggest that LBVs are rejuvenated stars. They are either the result of mergers or they are mass gainers and received a kick when the primary star exploded. In the merger scenario, if the primary is about 19 solar masses, then the binary has enough time to wander far afield, merge and form a rejuvenated star. In the mass-gainer and kick scenario, we find that LBV isolation is consistent with a wide range of kick velocities, anywhere from 0 to ~ 105 km/s. In either scenario, binarity seems to play a major role in the isolation of LBVs. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2017; v1 submitted 19 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: 15 pages, 10 figures, 2 tables

Journal ref: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 472, Issue 1, 21 November 2017, Pages 591-603