Showing 1–41 of 41 results for author: Accattoli, B

IMELL Cut Elimination with Linear Overhead

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen

Abstract: Recently, Accattoli introduced the Exponential Substitution Calculus (ESC) given by untyped proof terms for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (IMELL), endowed with rewriting rules at-a-distance for cut elimination. He also introduced a new cut elimination strategy, dubbed the good strategy, and showed that its number of steps is a time cost model with polynomial overhead for t… ▽ More Recently, Accattoli introduced the Exponential Substitution Calculus (ESC) given by untyped proof terms for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (IMELL), endowed with rewriting rules at-a-distance for cut elimination. He also introduced a new cut elimination strategy, dubbed the good strategy, and showed that its number of steps is a time cost model with polynomial overhead for the ESC/IMELL, and the first such one. Here, we refine Accattoli's result by introducing an abstract machine for ESC and proving that it implements the good strategy and computes cut-free terms/proofs within a linear overhead. △ Less

Submitted 14 May, 2024; v1 submitted 6 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Version with proofs of the FSCD 2024 paper with the same title

Mirroring Call-by-Need, or Values Acting Silly

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Adrienne Lancelot

Abstract: Call-by-need evaluation for the lambda-calculus can be seen as merging the best of call-by-name and call-by-value, namely the wise erasing behaviour of the former and the wise duplicating behaviour of the latter. To better understand how duplication and erasure can be combined, we design a degenerated calculus, dubbed call-by-silly, that is symmetric to call-by-need in that it merges the worst of… ▽ More Call-by-need evaluation for the lambda-calculus can be seen as merging the best of call-by-name and call-by-value, namely the wise erasing behaviour of the former and the wise duplicating behaviour of the latter. To better understand how duplication and erasure can be combined, we design a degenerated calculus, dubbed call-by-silly, that is symmetric to call-by-need in that it merges the worst of call-by-name and call-by-value, namely silly duplications by-name and silly erasures by-value. We validate the design of the call-by-silly calculus via rewriting properties and multi types. In particular, we mirror the main theorem about call-by-need -- that is, its operational equivalence with call-by-name -- showing that call-by-silly and call-by-value induce the same contextual equivalence. This fact shows the blindness with respect to efficiency of call-by-value contextual equivalence. We also define a call-by-silly strategy and measure its length via tight multi types. Lastly, we prove that the call-by-silly strategy computes evaluation sequences of maximal length in the calculus. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2024; v1 submitted 19 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: To be published in FSCD24

Semantic Bound and Multi Types, Revisited

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli

Abstract: Intersection types are a standard tool in operational and semantical studies of the lambda calculus. De Carvalho showed how multi types, a quantitative variant of intersection types providing a handy presentation of the relational denotational model, allows one to extract precise bounds on the number of $β$-steps and the size of normal forms. In the last few years, de Carvalho's work has been ex… ▽ More Intersection types are a standard tool in operational and semantical studies of the lambda calculus. De Carvalho showed how multi types, a quantitative variant of intersection types providing a handy presentation of the relational denotational model, allows one to extract precise bounds on the number of $β$-steps and the size of normal forms. In the last few years, de Carvalho's work has been extended and adapted to a number of lambda calculi, evaluation strategies, and abstract machines. These works, however, only adapt the first part of his work, that extracts bounds from multi type derivations, while never consider the second part, which deals with extracting bounds from the multi types themselves. The reason is that this second part is more technical, and requires to reason up to type substitutions. It is however also the most interesting, because it shows that the bounding power is inherent to the relational model (which is induced by the types, without the derivations), independently of its presentation as a type system. Here we dissect and clarify the second part of de Carvalho's work, establishing a link with principal multi types, and isolating a key property independent of type substitutions. △ Less

Submitted 4 December, 2023; v1 submitted 29 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: CSL 2024 paper with Appendix. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2104.13979

A Diamond Machine For Strong Evaluation

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Pablo Barenbaum

Abstract: Abstract machines for strong evaluation of the $λ$-calculus enter into arguments and have a set of transitions for backtracking out of an evaluated argument. We study a new abstract machine which avoids backtracking by splitting the run of the machine in smaller jobs, one for argument, and that jumps directly to the next job once one is finished. Usually, machines are also deterministic and impl… ▽ More Abstract machines for strong evaluation of the $λ$-calculus enter into arguments and have a set of transitions for backtracking out of an evaluated argument. We study a new abstract machine which avoids backtracking by splitting the run of the machine in smaller jobs, one for argument, and that jumps directly to the next job once one is finished. Usually, machines are also deterministic and implement deterministic strategies. Here we weaken this aspect and consider a light form of non-determinism, namely the diamond property, for both the machine and the strategy. For the machine, this introduces a modular management of jobs, parametric in a scheduling policy. We then show how to obtain various strategies, among which leftmost-outermost evaluation. △ Less

Submitted 1 October, 2023; v1 submitted 21 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Strong Call-by-Value and Multi Types

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri, Maico Leberle

Abstract: This paper provides foundations for strong (that is, possibly under abstraction) call-by-value evaluation for the lambda-calculus. Recently, Accattoli et al. proposed a form of call-by-value strong evaluation for the lambda-calculus, the external strategy, and proved it reasonable for time. Here, we study the external strategy using a semantical tool, namely Ehrhard's call-by-value multi types, a… ▽ More This paper provides foundations for strong (that is, possibly under abstraction) call-by-value evaluation for the lambda-calculus. Recently, Accattoli et al. proposed a form of call-by-value strong evaluation for the lambda-calculus, the external strategy, and proved it reasonable for time. Here, we study the external strategy using a semantical tool, namely Ehrhard's call-by-value multi types, a variant of intersection types. We show that the external strategy terminates exactly when a term is typable with so-called shrinking multi types, mimicking similar results for strong call-by-name. Additionally, the external strategy is normalizing in the untyped setting, that is, it reaches the normal form whenever it exists. We also consider the call-by-extended-value approach to strong evaluation shown reasonable for time by Biernacka et al. The two approaches turn out to not be equivalent: terms may be externally divergent but terminating for call-by-extended-value. △ Less

Submitted 21 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2104.13979; text overlap with arXiv:2202.03079

ACM Class: F.3.2; D.3.1

Normal Form Bisimulations By Value

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Adrienne Lancelot, Claudia Faggian

Abstract: Normal form bisimilarities are a natural form of program equivalence resting on open terms, first introduced by Sangiorgi in call-by-name. The literature contains a normal form bisimilarity for Plotkin's call-by-value $λ$-calculus, Lassen's \emph{enf bisimilarity}, which validates all of Moggi's monadic laws and can be extended to validate $η$. It does not validate, however, other relevant princip… ▽ More Normal form bisimilarities are a natural form of program equivalence resting on open terms, first introduced by Sangiorgi in call-by-name. The literature contains a normal form bisimilarity for Plotkin's call-by-value $λ$-calculus, Lassen's \emph{enf bisimilarity}, which validates all of Moggi's monadic laws and can be extended to validate $η$. It does not validate, however, other relevant principles, such as the identification of meaningless terms -- validated instead by Sangiorgi's bisimilarity -- or the commutation of $\letexp$s. These shortcomings are due to issues with open terms of Plotkin's calculus. We introduce a new call-by-value normal form bisimilarity, deemed \emph{net bisimilarity}, closer in spirit to Sangiorgi's and satisfying the additional principles. We develop it on top of an existing formalism designed for dealing with open terms in call-by-value. It turns out that enf and net bisimilarities are \emph{incomparable}, as net bisimilarity does not validate Moggi's laws nor $η$. Moreover, there is no easy way to merge them. To better understand the situation, we provide an analysis of the rich range of possible call-by-value normal form bisimilarities, relating them to Ehrhard's relational model. △ Less

Submitted 5 September, 2023; v1 submitted 14 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: Rewritten version (deleted toy similarity and explained proof method on naive similarity) -- Submitted to POPL24

A Log-Sensitive Encoding of Turing Machines in the $λ$-Calculus

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Ugo Dal Lago, Gabriele Vanoni

Abstract: This note modifies the reference encoding of Turing machines in the $λ$-calculus by Dal Lago and Accattoli, which is tuned for time efficiency, as to accommodate logarithmic space. There are two main changes: Turing machines now have *two* tapes, an input tape and a work tape, and the input tape is encoded differently, because the reference encoding comes with a linear space overhead for managing… ▽ More This note modifies the reference encoding of Turing machines in the $λ$-calculus by Dal Lago and Accattoli, which is tuned for time efficiency, as to accommodate logarithmic space. There are two main changes: Turing machines now have *two* tapes, an input tape and a work tape, and the input tape is encoded differently, because the reference encoding comes with a linear space overhead for managing tapes, which is excessive for studying logarithmic space. △ Less

Submitted 29 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2203.00362

Multi Types and Reasonable Space (Long Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Ugo Dal Lago, Gabriele Vanoni

Abstract: Accattoli, Dal Lago, and Vanoni have recently proved that the space used by the Space KAM, a variant of the Krivine abstract machine, is a reasonable space cost model for the lambda-calculus accounting for logarithmic space, solving a longstanding open problem. In this paper, we provide a new system of multi types (a variant of intersection types) and extract from multi type derivations the space… ▽ More Accattoli, Dal Lago, and Vanoni have recently proved that the space used by the Space KAM, a variant of the Krivine abstract machine, is a reasonable space cost model for the lambda-calculus accounting for logarithmic space, solving a longstanding open problem. In this paper, we provide a new system of multi types (a variant of intersection types) and extract from multi type derivations the space used by the Space KAM, capturing into a type system the space complexity of the abstract machine. Additionally, we show how to capture also the time of the Space KAM, which is a reasonable time cost model, via minor changes to the type system. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

The Theory of Call-by-Value Solvability (long version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: The denotational semantics of the untyped lambda-calculus is a well developed field built around the concept of solvable terms, which are elegantly characterized in many different ways. In particular, unsolvable terms provide a consistent notion of meaningless term. The semantics of the untyped call-by-value lambda-calculus (CbV) is instead still in its infancy, because of some inherent difficulti… ▽ More The denotational semantics of the untyped lambda-calculus is a well developed field built around the concept of solvable terms, which are elegantly characterized in many different ways. In particular, unsolvable terms provide a consistent notion of meaningless term. The semantics of the untyped call-by-value lambda-calculus (CbV) is instead still in its infancy, because of some inherent difficulties but also because CbV solvable terms are less studied and understood than in call-by-name. On the one hand, we show that a carefully crafted presentation of CbV allows us to recover many of the properties that solvability has in call-by-name, in particular qualitative and quantitative characterizations via multi types. On the other hand, we stress that, in CbV, solvability plays a different role: identifying unsolvable terms as meaningless induces an inconsistent theory. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: Long version of a paper accepted at ICFP 2022. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2202.03079

ACM Class: F.3.2; D.3.1; F.4.1

Exponentials as Substitutions and the Cost of Cut Elimination in Linear Logic

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli

Abstract: This paper introduces the exponential substitution calculus (ESC), a new presentation of cut elimination for IMELL, based on proof terms and building on the idea that exponentials can be seen as explicit substitutions. The idea in itself is not new, but here it is pushed to a new level, inspired by Accattoli and Kesner's linear substitution calculus (LSC). One of the key properties of the LSC is t… ▽ More This paper introduces the exponential substitution calculus (ESC), a new presentation of cut elimination for IMELL, based on proof terms and building on the idea that exponentials can be seen as explicit substitutions. The idea in itself is not new, but here it is pushed to a new level, inspired by Accattoli and Kesner's linear substitution calculus (LSC). One of the key properties of the LSC is that it naturally models the sub-term property of abstract machines, that is the key ingredient for the study of reasonable time cost models for the $λ$-calculus. The new ESC is then used to design a cut elimination strategy with the sub-term property, providing the first polynomial cost model for cut elimination with unconstrained exponentials. For the ESC, we also prove untyped confluence and typed strong normalization, showing that it is an alternative to proof nets for an advanced study of cut elimination. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2023; v1 submitted 30 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 19, Issue 4 (December 14, 2023) lmcs:10888

Reasonable Space for the $λ$-Calculus, Logarithmically

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Ugo Dal Lago, Gabriele Vanoni

Abstract: Can the $λ$-calculus be considered a reasonable computational model? Can we use it for measuring the time $\textit{and}$ space consumption of algorithms? While the literature contains positive answers about time, much less is known about space. This paper presents a new reasonable space cost model for the $λ$-calculus, based on a variant over the Krivine abstract machine. For the first time, this… ▽ More Can the $λ$-calculus be considered a reasonable computational model? Can we use it for measuring the time $\textit{and}$ space consumption of algorithms? While the literature contains positive answers about time, much less is known about space. This paper presents a new reasonable space cost model for the $λ$-calculus, based on a variant over the Krivine abstract machine. For the first time, this cost model is able to accommodate logarithmic space. Moreover, we study the time behavior of our machine and show how to transport our results to the call-by-value $λ$-calculus. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2024; v1 submitted 1 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Call-by-Value Solvability and Multi Types

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: This paper provides a characterization of call-by-value solvability using call-by-value multi types. Our work is based on Accattoli and Paolini's characterization of call-by-value solvable terms as those terminating with respect to the solving strategy of the value substitution calculus, a refinement of Plotkin's call-by-value $λ$-calculus. Here we show that the solving strategy terminates on a te… ▽ More This paper provides a characterization of call-by-value solvability using call-by-value multi types. Our work is based on Accattoli and Paolini's characterization of call-by-value solvable terms as those terminating with respect to the solving strategy of the value substitution calculus, a refinement of Plotkin's call-by-value $λ$-calculus. Here we show that the solving strategy terminates on a term $t$ if and only if $t$ is typable in a certain way in the multi type system induced by Ehrhard's call-by-value relational semantics. Moreover, we show how to extract from the type system exact bounds on the length of the solving evaluation and on the size of its normal form, adapting de Carvalho's technique for call-by-name. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2104.13979

Useful Open Call-by-Need

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Maico Leberle

Abstract: This paper studies useful sharing, which is a sophisticated optimization for lambda-calculi, in the context of call-by-need evaluation in presence of open terms. Useful sharing turns out to be harder in call-by-need than in call-by-name or call-by-value, because call-by-need evaluates inside environments, making it harder to specify when a substitution step is useful. We isolate the key involved c… ▽ More This paper studies useful sharing, which is a sophisticated optimization for lambda-calculi, in the context of call-by-need evaluation in presence of open terms. Useful sharing turns out to be harder in call-by-need than in call-by-name or call-by-value, because call-by-need evaluates inside environments, making it harder to specify when a substitution step is useful. We isolate the key involved concepts and prove the correctness and the completeness of useful sharing in this setting. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2021; v1 submitted 14 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: This is the version with proofs of the paper with the same title and authors in the proceedings of CSL 2022

Semantic Bounds and Strong Call-by-Value Normalization

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri, Maico Leberle

Abstract: This paper explores two topics at once: the use of denotational semantics to bound the evaluation length of functional programs, and the semantics of strong (that is, possibly under abstractions) call-by-value evaluation. About the first, we analyze de Carvalho's seminal use of relational semantics for bounding the evaluation length of lambda-terms, starting from the presentation of the semantic… ▽ More This paper explores two topics at once: the use of denotational semantics to bound the evaluation length of functional programs, and the semantics of strong (that is, possibly under abstractions) call-by-value evaluation. About the first, we analyze de Carvalho's seminal use of relational semantics for bounding the evaluation length of lambda-terms, starting from the presentation of the semantics as an intersection types system. We focus on the part of his work which is usually neglected in its many recent adaptations, despite being probably the conceptually deeper one: how to transfer the bounding power from the type system to the relational semantics itself. We dissect this result and re-understand it via the isolation of a simpler size representation property. About the second, we use relational semantics to develop a semantical study of strong call-by-value evaluation, which is both a delicate and neglected topic. We give a semantic characterization of terms normalizable with respect to strong evaluation, providing in particular the first result of adequacy with respect to strong call-by-value. Moreover, we extract bounds about strong evaluation from both the type systems and the relational semantics. Essentially, we use strong call-by-value to revisit de Carvalho's semantic bounds, and de Carvalho's technique to provide semantical foundations for strong call-by-value. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2023; v1 submitted 28 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

The Space of Interaction (long version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Ugo Dal Lago, Gabriele Vanoni

Abstract: The space complexity of functional programs is not well understood. In particular, traditional implementation techniques are tailored to time efficiency, and space efficiency induces time inefficiencies, as it prefers re-computing to saving. Girard's geometry of interaction underlies an alternative approach based on the interaction abstract machine (IAM), claimed as space efficient in the literatu… ▽ More The space complexity of functional programs is not well understood. In particular, traditional implementation techniques are tailored to time efficiency, and space efficiency induces time inefficiencies, as it prefers re-computing to saving. Girard's geometry of interaction underlies an alternative approach based on the interaction abstract machine (IAM), claimed as space efficient in the literature. It has also been conjectured to provide a reasonable notion of space for the lambda-calculus, but such an important result seems to be elusive. In this paper we introduce a new intersection type system precisely measuring the space consumption of the IAM on the typed term. Intersection types have been repeatedly used to measure time, which they achieve by drop** idempotency, turning intersections into multisets. Here we show that the space consumption of the IAM is connected to a further structural modification, turning multisets into trees. Tree intersection types lead to a finer understanding of some space complexity results from the literature. They also shed new light on the conjecture about reasonable space: we show that the usual way of encoding Turing machines into the lambda calculus cannot be used to prove that the space of the IAM is a reasonable cost model. △ Less

Submitted 28 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Strong Call-by-Value is Reasonable, Implosively

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Andrea Condoluci, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen

Abstract: Whether the number of beta-steps in the lambda-calculus can be taken as a reasonable time cost model (that is, polynomially related to the one of Turing machines) is a delicate problem, which depends on the notion of evaluation strategy. Since the nineties, it is known that weak (that is, out of abstractions) call-by-value evaluation is a reasonable strategy while Lévy's optimal parallel strategy,… ▽ More Whether the number of beta-steps in the lambda-calculus can be taken as a reasonable time cost model (that is, polynomially related to the one of Turing machines) is a delicate problem, which depends on the notion of evaluation strategy. Since the nineties, it is known that weak (that is, out of abstractions) call-by-value evaluation is a reasonable strategy while Lévy's optimal parallel strategy, which is strong (that is, it reduces everywhere), is not. The strong case turned out to be subtler than the weak one. In 2014 Accattoli and Dal Lago have shown that strong call-by-name is reasonable, by introducing a new form of useful sharing and, later, an abstract machine with an overhead quadratic in the number of beta-steps. Here we show that also strong call-by-value evaluation is reasonable for time, via a new abstract machine realizing useful sharing and having a linear overhead. Moreover, our machine uses a new mix of sharing techniques, adding on top of useful sharing a form of implosive sharing, which on some terms brings an exponential speed-up. We give examples of families that the machine executes in time logarithmic in the number of beta-steps. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2021; v1 submitted 13 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: Technical report associated to a LICS 2021 paper

The (In)Efficiency of Interaction

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Ugo Dal Lago, Gabriele Vanoni

Abstract: Evaluating higher-order functional programs through abstract machines inspired by the geometry of the interaction is known to induce $\textit{space}$ efficiencies, the price being $\textit{time}$ performances often poorer than those obtainable with traditional, environment-based, abstract machines. Although families of lambda-terms for which the former is exponentially less efficient than the latt… ▽ More Evaluating higher-order functional programs through abstract machines inspired by the geometry of the interaction is known to induce $\textit{space}$ efficiencies, the price being $\textit{time}$ performances often poorer than those obtainable with traditional, environment-based, abstract machines. Although families of lambda-terms for which the former is exponentially less efficient than the latter do exist, it is currently unknown how \emph{general} this phenomenon is, and how far the inefficiencies can go, in the worst case. We answer these questions formulating four different well-known abstract machines inside a common definitional framework, this way being able to give sharp results about the relative time efficiencies. We also prove that non-idempotent intersection type theories are able to precisely reflect the time performances of the interactive abstract machine, this way showing that its time-inefficiency ultimately descends from the presence of higher-order types. △ Less

Submitted 24 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Factorize Factorization

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Claudia Faggian, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: Factorization -- a simple form of standardization -- is concerned with reduction strategies, i.e. how a result is computed. We present a new technique for proving factorization theorems for compound rewriting systems in a modular way, which is inspired by the Hindley-Rosen technique for confluence. Specifically, our technique is well adapted to deal with extensions of the call-by-name and call-by-… ▽ More Factorization -- a simple form of standardization -- is concerned with reduction strategies, i.e. how a result is computed. We present a new technique for proving factorization theorems for compound rewriting systems in a modular way, which is inspired by the Hindley-Rosen technique for confluence. Specifically, our technique is well adapted to deal with extensions of the call-by-name and call-by-value lambda-calculi. The technique is first developed abstractly. We isolate a sufficient condition (called linear swap) for lifting factorization from components to the compound system, and which is compatible with beta-reduction. We then closely analyze some common factorization schemas for the lambda-calculus. Concretely, we apply our technique to diverse extensions of the lambda-calculus, among which de' Liguoro and Piperno's non-deterministic lambda-calculus and -- for call-by-value -- Carraro and Guerrieri's shuffling calculus. For both calculi the literature contains factorization theorems. In both cases, we give a new proof which is neat, simpler than the original, and strikingly shorter. △ Less

Submitted 26 December, 2020; v1 submitted 4 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: 29th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2021)

Functional Pearl: The Distributive $λ$-Calculus

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Alejandro Díaz-Caro

Abstract: We introduce a simple extension of the $λ$-calculus with pairs---called the distributive $λ$-calculus---obtained by adding a computational interpretation of the valid distributivity isomorphism $A \Rightarrow (B\wedge C)\ \ \equiv\ \ (A\Rightarrow B) \wedge (A\Rightarrow C)$ of simple types. We study the calculus both as an untyped and as a simply typed setting. Key features of the untyped calculu… ▽ More We introduce a simple extension of the $λ$-calculus with pairs---called the distributive $λ$-calculus---obtained by adding a computational interpretation of the valid distributivity isomorphism $A \Rightarrow (B\wedge C)\ \ \equiv\ \ (A\Rightarrow B) \wedge (A\Rightarrow C)$ of simple types. We study the calculus both as an untyped and as a simply typed setting. Key features of the untyped calculus are confluence, the absence of clashes of constructs, that is, evaluation never gets stuck, and a leftmost-outermost normalization theorem, obtained with straightforward proofs. With respect to simple types, we show that the new rules satisfy subject reduction if types are considered up to the distributivity isomorphism. The main result is strong normalization for simple types up to distributivity. The proof is a smooth variation over the one for the $λ$-calculus with pairs and simple types. △ Less

Submitted 29 July, 2020; v1 submitted 18 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: 17 pages. Accepted at FLOPS 2020

Journal ref: LNCS 12073:13-32, 2020

The Abstract Machinery of Interaction (Long Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Ugo Dal Lago, Gabriele Vanoni

Abstract: This paper revisits the Interaction Abstract Machine (IAM), a machine based on Girard's Geometry of Interaction, introduced by Mackie and Danos & Regnier. It is an unusual machine, not relying on environments, presented on linear logic proof nets, and whose soundness proof is convoluted and passes through various other formalisms. Here we provide a new direct proof of its correctness, based on a v… ▽ More This paper revisits the Interaction Abstract Machine (IAM), a machine based on Girard's Geometry of Interaction, introduced by Mackie and Danos & Regnier. It is an unusual machine, not relying on environments, presented on linear logic proof nets, and whose soundness proof is convoluted and passes through various other formalisms. Here we provide a new direct proof of its correctness, based on a variant of Sands's improvements, a natural notion of bisimulation. Moreover, our proof is carried out on a new presentation of the IAM, defined as a machine acting directly on $λ$-terms, rather than on linear logic proof nets. △ Less

Submitted 9 July, 2020; v1 submitted 13 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: Accepted at PPDP 2020

Factorization and Normalization, Essentially

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Claudia Faggian, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: Lambda-calculi come with no fixed evaluation strategy. Different strategies may then be considered, and it is important that they satisfy some abstract rewriting property, such as factorization or normalization theorems. In this paper we provide simple proof techniques for these theorems. Our starting point is a revisitation of Takahashi's technique to prove factorization for head reduction. Our… ▽ More Lambda-calculi come with no fixed evaluation strategy. Different strategies may then be considered, and it is important that they satisfy some abstract rewriting property, such as factorization or normalization theorems. In this paper we provide simple proof techniques for these theorems. Our starting point is a revisitation of Takahashi's technique to prove factorization for head reduction. Our technique is both simpler and more powerful, as it works in cases where Takahishi's does not. We then pair factorization with two other abstract properties, defining \emph{essential systems}, and show that normalization follows. Concretely, we apply the technique to four case studies, two classic ones, head and the leftmost-outermost reductions, and two less classic ones, non-deterministic weak call-by-value and least-level reductions. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2019; v1 submitted 29 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Sharing Equality is Linear

Authors: Andrea Condoluci, Beniamino Accattoli, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen

Abstract: The $λ$-calculus is a handy formalism to specify the evaluation of higher-order programs. It is not very handy, however, when one interprets the specification as an execution mechanism, because terms can grow exponentially with the number of $β$-steps. This is why implementations of functional languages and proof assistants always rely on some form of sharing of subterms. These frameworks however… ▽ More The $λ$-calculus is a handy formalism to specify the evaluation of higher-order programs. It is not very handy, however, when one interprets the specification as an execution mechanism, because terms can grow exponentially with the number of $β$-steps. This is why implementations of functional languages and proof assistants always rely on some form of sharing of subterms. These frameworks however do not only evaluate $λ$-terms, they also have to compare them for equality. In presence of sharing, one is actually interested in the equality---or more precisely $α$-conversion---of the underlying unshared $λ$-terms. The literature contains algorithms for such a sharing equality, that are polynomial in the sizes of the shared terms. This paper improves the bounds in the literature by presenting the first linear time algorithm. As others before us, we are inspired by Paterson and Wegman's algorithm for first-order unification, itself based on representing terms with sharing as DAGs, and sharing equality as bisimulation of DAGs. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Crumbling Abstract Machines

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Andrea Condoluci, Giulio Guerrieri, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen

Abstract: Extending the lambda-calculus with a construct for sharing, such as let expressions, enables a special representation of terms: iterated applications are decomposed by introducing sharing points in between any two of them, reducing to the case where applications have only values as immediate subterms. This work studies how such a crumbled representation of terms impacts on the design and the eff… ▽ More Extending the lambda-calculus with a construct for sharing, such as let expressions, enables a special representation of terms: iterated applications are decomposed by introducing sharing points in between any two of them, reducing to the case where applications have only values as immediate subterms. This work studies how such a crumbled representation of terms impacts on the design and the efficiency of abstract machines for call-by-value evaluation. About the design, it removes the need for data structures encoding the evaluation context, such as the applicative stack and the dump, that get encoded in the environment. About efficiency, we show that there is no slowdown, clarifying in particular a point raised by Kennedy, about the potential inefficiency of such a representation. Moreover, we prove that everything smoothly scales up to the delicate case of open terms, needed to implement proof assistants. Along the way, we also point out that continuation-passing style transformations--that may be alternatives to our representation--do not scale up to the open case. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

MSC Class: 03B70; 68N18; 03B40

Types by Need (Extended Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri, Maico Leberle

Abstract: A cornerstone of the theory of lambda-calculus is that intersection types characterise termination properties. They are a flexible tool that can be adapted to various notions of termination, and that also induces adequate denotational models. Since the seminal work of de Carvalho in 2007, it is known that multi types (i.e. non-idempotent intersection types) refine intersection types with quantit… ▽ More A cornerstone of the theory of lambda-calculus is that intersection types characterise termination properties. They are a flexible tool that can be adapted to various notions of termination, and that also induces adequate denotational models. Since the seminal work of de Carvalho in 2007, it is known that multi types (i.e. non-idempotent intersection types) refine intersection types with quantitative information and a strong connection to linear logic. Typically, type derivations provide bounds for evaluation lengths, and minimal type derivations provide exact bounds. De Carvalho studied call-by-name evaluation, and Kesner used his system to show the termination equivalence of call-by-need and call-by-name. De Carvalho's system, however, cannot provide exact bounds on call-by-need evaluation lengths. In this paper we develop a new multi type system for call-by-need. Our system produces exact bounds and induces a denotational model of call-by-need, providing the first tight quantitative semantics of call-by-need. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

MSC Class: 03B40; 68N18; 68N15; 03B47

Types of Fireballs (Extended Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: The good properties of Plotkin's call-by-value lambda-calculus crucially rely on the restriction to weak evaluation and closed terms. Open call-by-value is the more general setting where evaluation is weak but terms may be open. Such an extension is delicate, and the literature contains a number of proposals. Recently, Accattoli and Guerrieri provided detailed operational and implementative studie… ▽ More The good properties of Plotkin's call-by-value lambda-calculus crucially rely on the restriction to weak evaluation and closed terms. Open call-by-value is the more general setting where evaluation is weak but terms may be open. Such an extension is delicate, and the literature contains a number of proposals. Recently, Accattoli and Guerrieri provided detailed operational and implementative studies of these proposals, showing that they are equivalent from the point of view of termination, and also at the level of time cost models. This paper explores the denotational semantics of open call-by-value, adapting de Carvalho's analysis of call-by-name via multi types (aka non-idempotent intersection types). Our type system characterises normalisation and thus provides an adequate relational semantics. Moreover, type derivations carry quantitative information about the cost of evaluation: their size bounds the number of evaluation steps and the size of the normal form, and we also characterise derivations giving exact bounds. The study crucially relies on a new, refined presentation of the fireball calculus, the simplest proposal for open call-by-value, that is more apt to denotational investigations. △ Less

Submitted 29 October, 2018; v1 submitted 30 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

MSC Class: 03B47; 03B70; 03B40; 68N18; 03B15;

Proof Nets and the Linear Substitution Calculus

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli

Abstract: Since the very beginning of the theory of linear logic it is known how to represent the $λ$-calculus as linear logic proof nets. The two systems however have different granularities, in particular proof nets have an explicit notion of sharing---the exponentials---and a micro-step operational semantics, while the $λ$-calculus has no sharing and a small-step operational semantics. Here we show that… ▽ More Since the very beginning of the theory of linear logic it is known how to represent the $λ$-calculus as linear logic proof nets. The two systems however have different granularities, in particular proof nets have an explicit notion of sharing---the exponentials---and a micro-step operational semantics, while the $λ$-calculus has no sharing and a small-step operational semantics. Here we show that the \emph{linear substitution calculus}, a simple refinement of the $λ$-calculus with sharing, is isomorphic to proof nets at the operational level. Nonetheless, two different terms with sharing can still have the same proof nets representation---a further result is the characterisation of the equality induced by proof nets over terms with sharing. Finally, such a detailed analysis of the relationship between terms and proof nets, suggests a new, abstract notion of proof net, based on rewriting considerations and not necessarily of a graphical nature. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

Tight Ty**s and Split Bounds

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Stéphane Graham-Lengrand, Delia Kesner

Abstract: Multi types---aka non-idempotent intersection types---have been used to obtain quantitative bounds on higher-order programs, as pioneered by de Carvalho. Notably, they bound at the same time the number of evaluation steps and the size of the result. Recent results show that the number of steps can be taken as a reasonable time complexity measure. At the same time, however, these results suggest th… ▽ More Multi types---aka non-idempotent intersection types---have been used to obtain quantitative bounds on higher-order programs, as pioneered by de Carvalho. Notably, they bound at the same time the number of evaluation steps and the size of the result. Recent results show that the number of steps can be taken as a reasonable time complexity measure. At the same time, however, these results suggest that multi types provide quite lax complexity bounds, because the size of the result can be exponentially bigger than the number of steps. Starting from this observation, we refine and generalise a technique introduced by Bernadet & Graham-Lengrand to provide exact bounds for the maximal strategy. Our ty** judgements carry two counters, one measuring evaluation lengths and the other measuring result sizes. In order to emphasise the modularity of the approach, we provide exact bounds for four evaluation strategies, both in the lambda-calculus (head, leftmost-outermost, and maximal evaluation) and in the linear substitution calculus (linear head evaluation). Our work aims at both capturing the results in the literature and extending them with new outcomes. Concerning the literature, it unifies de Carvalho and Bernadet & Graham-Lengrand via a uniform technique and a complexity-based perspective. The two main novelties are exact split bounds for the leftmost strategy---the only known strategy that evaluates terms to full normal forms and provides a reasonable complexity measure---and the observation that the computing device hidden behind multi types is the notion of substitution at a distance, as implemented by the linear substitution calculus. △ Less

Submitted 6 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

The Maximal MAM, a Reasonable Implementation of the Maximal Strategy

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli

Abstract: This note is about a reasonable abstract machine, called Maximal MAM, implementing the maximal strategy of the lambda-calculus, that is, the strategy that always produces a longest evaluation sequence. This note is about a reasonable abstract machine, called Maximal MAM, implementing the maximal strategy of the lambda-calculus, that is, the strategy that always produces a longest evaluation sequence. △ Less

Submitted 28 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Encoding Turing Machines into the Deterministic Lambda-Calculus

Authors: Ugo Dal Lago, Beniamino Accattoli

Abstract: This note is about encoding Turing machines into the lambda-calculus. This note is about encoding Turing machines into the lambda-calculus. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Implementing Open Call-by-Value (Extended Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: The theory of the call-by-value lambda-calculus relies on weak evaluation and closed terms, that are natural hypotheses in the study of programming languages. To model proof assistants, however, strong evaluation and open terms are required. Open call-by-value is the intermediate setting of weak evaluation with open terms, on top of which Grégoire and Leroy designed the abstract machine of Coq. Th… ▽ More The theory of the call-by-value lambda-calculus relies on weak evaluation and closed terms, that are natural hypotheses in the study of programming languages. To model proof assistants, however, strong evaluation and open terms are required. Open call-by-value is the intermediate setting of weak evaluation with open terms, on top of which Grégoire and Leroy designed the abstract machine of Coq. This paper provides a theory of abstract machines for open call-by-value. The literature contains machines that are either simple but inefficient, as they have an exponential overhead, or efficient but heavy, as they rely on a labelling of environments and a technical optimization. We introduce a machine that is simple and efficient: it does not use labels and it implements open call-by-value within a bilinear overhead. Moreover, we provide a new fine understanding of how different optimizations impact on the complexity of the overhead. △ Less

Submitted 1 February, 2017; v1 submitted 27 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

ACM Class: D.3.1; F.3.1; F.3.2; F.4.1; F.1.1

The Complexity of Abstract Machines

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli

Abstract: The lambda-calculus is a peculiar computational model whose definition does not come with a notion of machine. Unsurprisingly, implementations of the lambda-calculus have been studied for decades. Abstract machines are implementations schema for fixed evaluation strategies that are a compromise between theory and practice: they are concrete enough to provide a notion of machine and abstract enough… ▽ More The lambda-calculus is a peculiar computational model whose definition does not come with a notion of machine. Unsurprisingly, implementations of the lambda-calculus have been studied for decades. Abstract machines are implementations schema for fixed evaluation strategies that are a compromise between theory and practice: they are concrete enough to provide a notion of machine and abstract enough to avoid the many intricacies of actual implementations. There is an extensive literature about abstract machines for the lambda-calculus, and yet-quite mysteriously-the efficiency of these machines with respect to the strategy that they implement has almost never been studied. This paper provides an unusual introduction to abstract machines, based on the complexity of their overhead with respect to the length of the implemented strategies. It is conceived to be a tutorial, focusing on the case study of implementing the weak head (call-by-name) strategy, and yet it is an original re-elaboration of known results. Moreover, some of the observation contained here never appeared in print before. △ Less

Submitted 3 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: In Proceedings WPTE 2016, arXiv:1701.00233

Journal ref: EPTCS 235, 2017, pp. 1-15

Open Call-by-Value (Extended Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: The elegant theory of the call-by-value lambda-calculus relies on weak evaluation and closed terms, that are natural hypotheses in the study of programming languages. To model proof assistants, however, strong evaluation and open terms are required, and it is well known that the operational semantics of call-by-value becomes problematic in this case. Here we study the intermediate setting -- that… ▽ More The elegant theory of the call-by-value lambda-calculus relies on weak evaluation and closed terms, that are natural hypotheses in the study of programming languages. To model proof assistants, however, strong evaluation and open terms are required, and it is well known that the operational semantics of call-by-value becomes problematic in this case. Here we study the intermediate setting -- that we call Open Call-by-Value -- of weak evaluation with open terms, on top of which Grégoire and Leroy designed the abstract machine of Coq. Various calculi for Open Call-by-Value already exist, each one with its pros and cons. This paper presents a detailed comparative study of the operational semantics of four of them, coming from different areas such as the study of abstract machines, denotational semantics, linear logic proof nets, and sequent calculus. We show that these calculi are all equivalent from a termination point of view, justifying the slogan Open Call-by-Value. △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2016; v1 submitted 1 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

ACM Class: F.4.1; D.3.1; F.3.2

(Leftmost-Outermost) Beta Reduction is Invariant, Indeed

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Ugo Dal Lago

Abstract: Slot and van Emde Boas' weak invariance thesis states that reasonable machines can simulate each other within a polynomially overhead in time. Is lambda-calculus a reasonable machine? Is there a way to measure the computational complexity of a lambda-term? This paper presents the first complete positive answer to this long-standing problem. Moreover, our answer is completely machine-independent a… ▽ More Slot and van Emde Boas' weak invariance thesis states that reasonable machines can simulate each other within a polynomially overhead in time. Is lambda-calculus a reasonable machine? Is there a way to measure the computational complexity of a lambda-term? This paper presents the first complete positive answer to this long-standing problem. Moreover, our answer is completely machine-independent and based over a standard notion in the theory of lambda-calculus: the length of a leftmost-outermost derivation to normal form is an invariant cost model. Such a theorem cannot be proved by directly relating lambda-calculus with Turing machines or random access machines, because of the size explosion problem: there are terms that in a linear number of steps produce an exponentially long output. The first step towards the solution is to shift to a notion of evaluation for which the length and the size of the output are linearly related. This is done by adopting the linear substitution calculus (LSC), a calculus of explicit substitutions modeled after linear logic proof nets and admitting a decomposition of leftmost-outermost derivations with the desired property. Thus, the LSC is invariant with respect to, say, random access machines. The second step is to show that LSC is invariant with respect to the lambda-calculus. The size explosion problem seems to imply that this is not possible: having the same notions of normal form, evaluation in the LSC is exponentially longer than in the lambda-calculus. We solve such an impasse by introducing a new form of shared normal form and shared reduction, deemed useful. Useful evaluation avoids those steps that only unshare the output without contributing to beta-redexes, i.e. the steps that cause the blow-up in size. The main technical contribution of the paper is indeed the definition of useful reductions and the thorough analysis of their properties. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2016; v1 submitted 6 January, 2016; originally announced January 2016.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1405.3311

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 12, Issue 1 (March 9, 2016) lmcs:1627

A Strong Distillery

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Pablo Barenbaum, Damiano Mazza

Abstract: Abstract machines for the strong evaluation of lambda-terms (that is, under abstractions) are a mostly neglected topic, despite their use in the implementation of proof assistants and higher-order logic programming languages. This paper introduces a machine for the simplest form of strong evaluation, leftmost-outermost (call-by-name) evaluation to normal form, proving it correct, complete, and bou… ▽ More Abstract machines for the strong evaluation of lambda-terms (that is, under abstractions) are a mostly neglected topic, despite their use in the implementation of proof assistants and higher-order logic programming languages. This paper introduces a machine for the simplest form of strong evaluation, leftmost-outermost (call-by-name) evaluation to normal form, proving it correct, complete, and bounding its overhead. Such a machine, deemed Strong Milner Abstract Machine, is a variant of the KAM computing normal forms and using just one global environment. Its properties are studied via a special form of decoding, called a distillation, into the Linear Substitution Calculus, neatly reformulating the machine as a standard micro-step strategy for explicit substitutions, namely linear leftmost-outermost reduction, i.e., the extension to normal form of linear head reduction. Additionally, the overhead of the machine is shown to be linear both in the number of steps and in the size of the initial term, validating its design. The study highlights two distinguished features of strong machines, namely backtracking phases and their interactions with abstractions and environments. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2016; v1 submitted 3 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Comments: Accepted at APLAS 2015

On the Relative Usefulness of Fireballs

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen

Abstract: In CSL-LICS 2014, Accattoli and Dal Lago showed that there is an implementation of the ordinary (i.e. strong, pure, call-by-name) $λ$-calculus into models like RAM machines which is polynomial in the number of $β$-steps, answering a long-standing question. The key ingredient was the use of a calculus with useful sharing, a new notion whose complexity was shown to be polynomial, but whose implement… ▽ More In CSL-LICS 2014, Accattoli and Dal Lago showed that there is an implementation of the ordinary (i.e. strong, pure, call-by-name) $λ$-calculus into models like RAM machines which is polynomial in the number of $β$-steps, answering a long-standing question. The key ingredient was the use of a calculus with useful sharing, a new notion whose complexity was shown to be polynomial, but whose implementation was not explored. This paper, meant to be complementary, studies useful sharing in a call-by-value scenario and from a practical point of view. We introduce the Fireball Calculus, a natural extension of call-by-value to open terms for which the problem is as hard as for the ordinary lambda-calculus. We present three results. First, we adapt the solution of Accattoli and Dal Lago, improving the meta-theory of useful sharing. Then, we refine the picture by introducing the GLAMoUr, a simple abstract machine implementing the Fireball Calculus extended with useful sharing. Its key feature is that usefulness of a step is tested---surprisingly---in constant time. Third, we provide a further optimization that leads to an implementation having only a linear overhead with respect to the number of $β$-steps. △ Less

Submitted 14 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Comments: Technical report for the LICS 2015 submission with the same title

Distilling Abstract Machines (Long Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Pablo Barenbaum, Damiano Mazza

Abstract: It is well-known that many environment-based abstract machines can be seen as strategies in lambda calculi with explicit substitutions (ES). Recently, graphical syntaxes and linear logic led to the linear substitution calculus (LSC), a new approach to ES that is halfway between big-step calculi and traditional calculi with ES. This paper studies the relationship between the LSC and environment-bas… ▽ More It is well-known that many environment-based abstract machines can be seen as strategies in lambda calculi with explicit substitutions (ES). Recently, graphical syntaxes and linear logic led to the linear substitution calculus (LSC), a new approach to ES that is halfway between big-step calculi and traditional calculi with ES. This paper studies the relationship between the LSC and environment-based abstract machines. While traditional calculi with ES simulate abstract machines, the LSC rather distills them: some transitions are simulated while others vanish, as they map to a notion of structural congruence. The distillation process unveils that abstract machines in fact implement weak linear head reduction, a notion of evaluation having a central role in the theory of linear logic. We show that such a pattern applies uniformly in call-by-name, call-by-value, and call-by-need, catching many machines in the literature. We start by distilling the KAM, the CEK, and the ZINC, and then provide simplified versions of the SECD, the lazy KAM, and Sestoft's machine. Along the way we also introduce some new machines with global environments. Moreover, we show that distillation preserves the time complexity of the executions, i.e. the LSC is a complexity-preserving abstraction of abstract machines. △ Less

Submitted 9 June, 2014; originally announced June 2014.

Comments: 63 pages

Beta Reduction is Invariant, Indeed (Long Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Ugo Dal Lago

Abstract: Slot and van Emde Boas' weak invariance thesis states that reasonable machines can simulate each other within a polynomially overhead in time. Is $λ$-calculus a reasonable machine? Is there a way to measure the computational complexity of a $λ$-term? This paper presents the first complete positive answer to this long-standing problem. Moreover, our answer is completely machine-independent and base… ▽ More Slot and van Emde Boas' weak invariance thesis states that reasonable machines can simulate each other within a polynomially overhead in time. Is $λ$-calculus a reasonable machine? Is there a way to measure the computational complexity of a $λ$-term? This paper presents the first complete positive answer to this long-standing problem. Moreover, our answer is completely machine-independent and based over a standard notion in the theory of $λ$-calculus: the length of a leftmost-outermost derivation to normal form is an invariant cost model. Such a theorem cannot be proved by directly relating $λ$-calculus with Turing machines or random access machines, because of the size explosion problem: there are terms that in a linear number of steps produce an exponentially long output. The first step towards the solution is to shift to a notion of evaluation for which the length and the size of the output are linearly related. This is done by adopting the linear substitution calculus (LSC), a calculus of explicit substitutions modelled after linear logic and proof-nets and admitting a decomposition of leftmost-outermost derivations with the desired property. Thus, the LSC is invariant with respect to, say, random access machines. The second step is to show that LSC is invariant with respect to the $λ$-calculus. The size explosion problem seems to imply that this is not possible: having the same notions of normal form, evaluation in the LSC is exponentially longer than in the $λ$-calculus. We solve such an impasse by introducing a new form of shared normal form and shared reduction, deemed useful. Useful evaluation avoids those steps that only unshare the output without contributing to $β$-redexes, i.e., the steps that cause the blow-up in size. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2014; originally announced May 2014.

Comments: 29 pages

ACM Class: F.3.2; F.4.1

Proof nets and the call-by-value lambda-calculus

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli

Abstract: This paper gives a detailed account of the relationship between (a variant of) the call-by-value lambda calculus and linear logic proof nets. The presentation is carefully tuned in order to realize a strong bisimulation between the two systems: every single rewriting step on the calculus maps to a single step on the nets, and viceversa. In this way, we obtain an algebraic reformulation of proof ne… ▽ More This paper gives a detailed account of the relationship between (a variant of) the call-by-value lambda calculus and linear logic proof nets. The presentation is carefully tuned in order to realize a strong bisimulation between the two systems: every single rewriting step on the calculus maps to a single step on the nets, and viceversa. In this way, we obtain an algebraic reformulation of proof nets. Moreover, we provide a simple correctness criterion for our proof nets, which employ boxes in an unusual way. △ Less

Submitted 29 March, 2013; originally announced March 2013.

Comments: In Proceedings LSFA 2012, arXiv:1303.7136

Journal ref: EPTCS 113, 2013, pp. 11-26

Evaluating functions as processes

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli

Abstract: A famous result by Milner is that the lambda-calculus can be simulated inside the pi-calculus. This simulation, however, holds only modulo strong bisimilarity on processes, i.e. there is a slight mismatch between beta-reduction and how it is simulated in the pi-calculus. The idea is that evaluating a lambda-term in the pi-calculus is like running an environment-based abstract machine, rather than… ▽ More A famous result by Milner is that the lambda-calculus can be simulated inside the pi-calculus. This simulation, however, holds only modulo strong bisimilarity on processes, i.e. there is a slight mismatch between beta-reduction and how it is simulated in the pi-calculus. The idea is that evaluating a lambda-term in the pi-calculus is like running an environment-based abstract machine, rather than applying ordinary beta-reduction. In this paper we show that such an abstract-machine evaluation corresponds to linear weak head reduction, a strategy arising from the representation of lambda-terms as linear logic proof nets, and that the relation between the two is as tight as it can be. The study is also smoothly rephrased in the call-by-value case, introducing a call-by-value analogous of linear weak head reduction. △ Less

Submitted 26 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: In Proceedings TERMGRAPH 2013, arXiv:1302.5997

Journal ref: EPTCS 110, 2013, pp. 41-55

Preservation of Strong Normalisation modulo permutations for the structural lambda-calculus

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Delia Kesner

Abstract: Inspired by a recent graphical formalism for lambda-calculus based on linear logic technology, we introduce an untyped structural lambda-calculus, called lambda j, which combines actions at a distance with exponential rules decomposing the substitution by means of weakening, contraction and derelicition. First, we prove some fundamental properties of lambda j such as confluence and preservation o… ▽ More Inspired by a recent graphical formalism for lambda-calculus based on linear logic technology, we introduce an untyped structural lambda-calculus, called lambda j, which combines actions at a distance with exponential rules decomposing the substitution by means of weakening, contraction and derelicition. First, we prove some fundamental properties of lambda j such as confluence and preservation of beta-strong normalisation. Second, we add a strong bisimulation to lambda j by means of an equational theory which captures in particular Regnier's sigma-equivalence. We then complete this bisimulation with two more equations for (de)composition of substitutions and we prove that the resulting calculus still preserves beta-strong normalization. Finally, we discuss some consequences of our results. △ Less

Submitted 23 March, 2012; v1 submitted 3 March, 2012; originally announced March 2012.

ACM Class: F.3.2, D.1.1, F.4.1

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 8, Issue 1 (March 27, 2012) lmcs:847

On the Invariance of the Unitary Cost Model for Head Reduction (Long Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Ugo Dal Lago

Abstract: The lambda calculus is a widely accepted computational model of higher-order functional pro- grams, yet there is not any direct and universally accepted cost model for it. As a consequence, the computational difficulty of reducing lambda terms to their normal form is typically studied by reasoning on concrete implementation algorithms. In this paper, we show that when head reduction is the underly… ▽ More The lambda calculus is a widely accepted computational model of higher-order functional pro- grams, yet there is not any direct and universally accepted cost model for it. As a consequence, the computational difficulty of reducing lambda terms to their normal form is typically studied by reasoning on concrete implementation algorithms. In this paper, we show that when head reduction is the underlying dynamics, the unitary cost model is indeed invariant. This improves on known results, which only deal with weak (call-by-value or call-by-name) reduction. Invariance is proved by way of a linear calculus of explicit substitutions, which allows to nicely decompose any head reduction step in the lambda calculus into more elementary substitution steps, thus making the combinatorics of head-reduction easier to reason about. The technique is also a promising tool to attack what we see as the main open problem, namely understanding for which normalizing strategies derivation complexity is an invariant cost model, if any. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2012; originally announced February 2012.

Comments: 22 pages

ACM Class: F.1.1; F.4.1