-
Constructing a control-ready model of EEG signal during general anesthesia in humans
Authors:
John H. Abel,
Marcus A. Badgeley,
Taylor E. Baum,
Sourish Chakravarty,
Patrick L. Purdon,
Emery N. Brown
Abstract:
Significant effort toward the automation of general anesthesia has been made in the past decade. One open challenge is in the development of control-ready patient models for closed-loop anesthesia delivery. Standard depth-of-anesthesia tracking does not readily capture inter-individual differences in response to anesthetics, especially those due to age, and does not aim to predict a relationship b…
▽ More
Significant effort toward the automation of general anesthesia has been made in the past decade. One open challenge is in the development of control-ready patient models for closed-loop anesthesia delivery. Standard depth-of-anesthesia tracking does not readily capture inter-individual differences in response to anesthetics, especially those due to age, and does not aim to predict a relationship between a control input (infused anesthetic dose) and system state (commonly, a function of electroencephalography (EEG) signal). In this work, we developed a control-ready patient model for closed-loop propofol-induced anesthesia using data recorded during a clinical study of EEG during general anesthesia in ten healthy volunteers. We used principal component analysis to identify the low-dimensional state-space in which EEG signal evolves during anesthesia delivery. We parameterized the response of the EEG signal to changes in propofol target-site concentration using logistic models. We note that inter-individual differences in anesthetic sensitivity may be captured by varying a constant cofactor of the predicted effect-site concentration. We linked the EEG dose-response with the control input using a pharmacokinetic model. Finally, we present a simple nonlinear model predictive control in silico demonstration of how such a closed-loop system would work.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
A simulation-based comparative analysis of PID and LQG control for closed-loop anesthesia delivery
Authors:
Sourish Chakravarty,
Ayan S. Waite,
John H. Abel,
Emery N. Brown
Abstract:
Closed loop anesthesia delivery (CLAD) systems can help anesthesiologists efficiently achieve and maintain desired anesthetic depth over an extended period of time. A typical CLAD system would use an anesthetic marker, calculated from physiological signals, as real-time feedback to adjust anesthetic dosage towards achieving a desired set-point of the marker. Since control strategies for CLAD vary…
▽ More
Closed loop anesthesia delivery (CLAD) systems can help anesthesiologists efficiently achieve and maintain desired anesthetic depth over an extended period of time. A typical CLAD system would use an anesthetic marker, calculated from physiological signals, as real-time feedback to adjust anesthetic dosage towards achieving a desired set-point of the marker. Since control strategies for CLAD vary across the systems reported in recent literature, a comparative analysis of common control strategies can be useful. For a nonlinear plant model based on well-established models of compartmental pharmacokinetics and sigmoid-Emax pharmacodynamics, we numerically analyze the set-point tracking performance of three output-feedback linear control strategies: proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control, linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control, and an LQG with integral action (ILQG). Specifically, we numerically simulate multiple CLAD sessions for the scenario where the plant model parameters are unavailable for a patient and the controller is designed based on a nominal model and controller gains are held constant throughout a session. Based on the numerical analyses performed here, conditioned on our choice of model and controllers, we infer that in terms of accuracy and bias PID control performs better than ILQG which in turn performs better than LQG. In the case of noisy observations, ILQG can be tuned to provide a smoother infusion rate while achieving comparable steady-state response with respect to PID. The numerical analyses framework and findings, reported here, can help CLAD developers in their choice of control strategies. This paper may also serve as a tutorial paper for teaching control theory for CLAD.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2020; v1 submitted 13 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
A Coupled Stochastic Model Explains Differences in Circadian Behavior of Cry1 and Cry2 Knockouts
Authors:
John H. Abel,
Lukas A. Widmer,
Peter C. St. John,
Jörg Stelling,
Francis J. Doyle III
Abstract:
In the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), a population of noisy cell-autonomous oscillators synchronizes to generate robust circadian rhythms at the organism-level. Within these cells two isoforms of Cryptochrome, Cry1 and Cry2, participate in a negative feedback loop driving circadian rhythmicity. Previous work has shown that single, dissociated SCN neurons respond differently to Cry1 and C…
▽ More
In the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), a population of noisy cell-autonomous oscillators synchronizes to generate robust circadian rhythms at the organism-level. Within these cells two isoforms of Cryptochrome, Cry1 and Cry2, participate in a negative feedback loop driving circadian rhythmicity. Previous work has shown that single, dissociated SCN neurons respond differently to Cry1 and Cry2 knockouts: Cry1 knockouts are arrhythmic while Cry2 knockouts display more regular rhythms. These differences have led to speculation that CRY1 and CRY2 may play different functional roles in the oscillator. To address this proposition, we have developed a new coupled, stochastic model focused on the Period (Per) and Cry feedback loop, and incorporating intercellular coupling via vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). Due to the stochastic nature of molecular oscillations, we demonstrate that single-cell Cry1 knockout oscillations display partially rhythmic behavior, and cannot be classified as simply rhythmic or arrhythmic. Our model demonstrates that intrinsic molecular noise and differences in relative abundance, rather than differing functions, are sufficient to explain the range of rhythmicity encountered in Cry knockouts in the SCN. Our results further highlight the essential role of stochastic behavior in understanding and accurately modeling the circadian network and its response to perturbation.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2015; v1 submitted 17 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
