-
Training Custom Light Curve Models of SN Ia Sub-Populations Selected According to Host Galaxy Properties
Authors:
G. Taylor,
C. Lidman,
B. Popovic,
H. Abbot
Abstract:
Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) cosmology analyses include a luminosity step function in their distance standardization process to account for an observed yet unexplained difference in the post-standardization luminosities of SNe Ia originating from different host galaxy populations (e.g., high-mass ($M \gtrsim 10^{10} M_{\odot}$) versus low-mass galaxies). We present a novel method for including host-m…
▽ More
Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) cosmology analyses include a luminosity step function in their distance standardization process to account for an observed yet unexplained difference in the post-standardization luminosities of SNe Ia originating from different host galaxy populations (e.g., high-mass ($M \gtrsim 10^{10} M_{\odot}$) versus low-mass galaxies). We present a novel method for including host-mass correlations in the SALT3 light curve model used for standardising SN Ia distances. We split the SALT3 training sample according to host-mass, training independent models for the low- and high-host-mass samples. Our models indicate that there are different average Si II spectral feature strengths between the two populations, and that the average SED of SNe from low-mass galaxies is bluer than the high-mass counterpart. We then use our trained models to perform a SN cosmology analysis on the 3-year spectroscopically confirmed Dark Energy Survey SN sample, treating SNe from low- and high-mass host galaxies as separate populations throughout. We find that our mass-split models reduce the Hubble residual scatter in the sample, albeit at a low statistical significance. We do find a reduction in the mass-correlated luminosity step but conclude that this arises from the model-dependent re-definition of the fiducial SN absolute magnitude rather than the models themselves. Our results stress the importance of adopting a standard definition of the SN parameters ($x_0, x_1, c$) in order to extract the most value out of the light curve modelling tools that are currently available and to correctly interpret results that are fit with different models.
△ Less
Submitted 14 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Progenitor, environment, and modelling of the interacting transient, AT 2016jbu (Gaia16cfr)
Authors:
S. J. Brennan,
M. Fraser,
J. Johansson,
A. Pastorello,
R. Kotak,
H. F. Stevance,
T. -W. Chen,
J. J. Eldridge,
S. Bose,
P. J. Brown,
E. Callis,
R. Cartier,
M. Dennefeld,
Subo Dong,
P. Duffy,
N. Elias-Rosa,
G. Hosseinzadeh,
E. Hsiao,
H. Kuncarayakti,
A. Martin-Carrillo,
B. Monard,
G. Pignata,
D. Sand,
B. J. Shappee,
S. J. Smartt
, et al. (45 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the bolometric lightcurve, identification and analysis of the progenitor candidate, and preliminary modelling of AT2016jbu (Gaia16cfr). We find a progenitor consistent with a $\sim$22--25~$M_{\odot}$ yellow hypergiant surrounded by a dusty circumstellar shell, in agreement with what has been previously reported. We see evidence for significant photometric variability in the progenitor,…
▽ More
We present the bolometric lightcurve, identification and analysis of the progenitor candidate, and preliminary modelling of AT2016jbu (Gaia16cfr). We find a progenitor consistent with a $\sim$22--25~$M_{\odot}$ yellow hypergiant surrounded by a dusty circumstellar shell, in agreement with what has been previously reported. We see evidence for significant photometric variability in the progenitor, as well as strong H$α$ emission consistent with pre-existing circumstellar material. The age of the environment as well as the resolved stellar population surrounding AT2016jbu, support a progenitor age of $>$10 Myr, consistent with a progenitor mass of $\sim$22~$M_{\odot}$. A joint analysis of the velocity evolution of AT2016jbu, and the photospheric radius inferred from the bolometric lightcurve shows the transient is consistent with two successive outbursts/explosions. The first outburst ejected material with velocity $\sim$650$kms^{-1}$, while the second, more energetic event, ejected material at $\sim$4500$kms^{-1}$. Whether the latter is the core-collapse of the progenitor remains uncertain. We place a limit on the ejected $^{56}$Ni mass of $<$0.016$M_{\odot}$. Using the BPASS code, we explore a wide range of possible progenitor systems, and find that the majority of these are in binaries, some of which are undergoing mass transfer or common envelope evolution immediately prior to explosion. Finally, we use the SNEC code to demonstrate that the low-energy explosion within some of these binary systems, together with sufficient CSM, can reproduce the overall morphology of the lightcurve of AT2016jbu.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2022; v1 submitted 18 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Photometric and spectroscopic evolution of the interacting transient AT 2016jbu (Gaia16cfr)
Authors:
S. J. Brennan,
M. Fraser,
J. Johansson,
A. Pastorello,
R. Kotak,
H. F. Stevance,
T. -W. Chen,
J. J. Eldridge,
S. Bose,
P. J. Brown,
E. Callis,
R. Cartier,
M. Dennefeld,
Subo Dong,
P. Duffy,
N. Elias-Rosa,
G. Hosseinzadeh,
E. Hsiao,
H. Kuncarayakti,
A. Martin-Carrillo,
B. Monard,
A. Nyholm,
G. Pignata,
D. Sand,
B. J. Shappee
, et al. (46 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the results from a high cadence, multi-wavelength observation campaign of AT 2016jbu (aka Gaia16cfr), an interacting transient. This dataset complements the current literature by adding higher cadence as well as extended coverage of the lightcurve evolution and late-time spectroscopic evolution. Photometric coverage reveals that AT 2016jbu underwent significant photometric variability f…
▽ More
We present the results from a high cadence, multi-wavelength observation campaign of AT 2016jbu (aka Gaia16cfr), an interacting transient. This dataset complements the current literature by adding higher cadence as well as extended coverage of the lightcurve evolution and late-time spectroscopic evolution. Photometric coverage reveals that AT 2016jbu underwent significant photometric variability followed by two luminous events, the latter of which reached an absolute magnitude of M$_V\sim$-18.5 mag. This is similar to the transient SN 2009ip whose nature is still debated. Spectra are dominated by narrow emission lines and show a blue continuum during the peak of the second event. AT 2016jbu shows signatures of a complex, non-homogeneous circumstellar material (CSM). We see slowly evolving asymmetric hydrogen line profiles, with velocities of 500km$s^{-1}$ seen in narrow emission features from a slow moving CSM, and up to 10,000km$s^{-1}$ seen in broad absorption from some high velocity material. Late-time spectra ($\sim$+1 year) show a lack of forbidden emission lines expected from a core-collapse supernova and are dominated by strong emission from H, He i and Ca ii. Strong asymmetric emission features, a bumpy lightcurve, and continually evolving spectra suggest an inhibit nebular phase. We compare the evolution of H$α$ among SN 2009ip-like transients and find possible evidence for orientation angle effects. The light-curve evolution of AT 2016jbu suggests similar, but not identical, circumstellar environments to other SN 2009ip-like transients.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2022; v1 submitted 18 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Characterisation of 92 Southern TESS Candidate Planet Hosts and a New Photometric [Fe/H] Relation for Cool Dwarfs
Authors:
Adam D. Rains,
Maruša Žerjal,
Michael J. Ireland,
Thomas Nordlander,
Michael S. Bessell,
Luca Casagrande,
Christopher A. Onken,
Meridith Joyce,
Jens Kammerer,
Harrison Abbot
Abstract:
We present the results of a medium resolution optical spectroscopic survey of 92 cool ($3,000 \lesssim T_{\rm eff} \lesssim 4,500\,$K) southern TESS candidate planet hosts, and describe our spectral fitting methodology used to recover stellar parameters. We quantify model deficiencies at predicting optical fluxes, and while our technique works well for $T_{\rm eff}$, further improvements are neede…
▽ More
We present the results of a medium resolution optical spectroscopic survey of 92 cool ($3,000 \lesssim T_{\rm eff} \lesssim 4,500\,$K) southern TESS candidate planet hosts, and describe our spectral fitting methodology used to recover stellar parameters. We quantify model deficiencies at predicting optical fluxes, and while our technique works well for $T_{\rm eff}$, further improvements are needed for [Fe/H]. To this end, we developed an updated photometric [Fe/H] calibration for isolated main sequence stars built upon a calibration sample of 69 cool dwarfs in binary systems, precise to $\pm0.19\,$dex, from super-solar to metal poor, over $1.51 < {\rm Gaia}~(B_P-R_P) < 3.3$. Our fitted $T_{\rm eff}$ and $R_\star$ have median precisions of 0.8% and 1.7%, respectively and are consistent with our sample of standard stars. We use these to model the transit light curves and determine exoplanet radii for 100 candidate planets to 3.5% precision and see evidence that the planet-radius gap is also present for cool dwarfs. Our results are consistent with the sample of confirmed TESS planets, with this survey representing one of the largest uniform analyses of cool TESS candidate planet hosts to date.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2021; v1 submitted 16 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
A spectroscopically confirmed Gaia-selected sample of 318 new young stars within $\sim$200 pc
Authors:
Maruša Žerjal,
Adam D. Rains,
Michael J. Ireland,
George Zhou,
Jens Kammerer,
Alex Wallace,
Brendan Orenstein,
Thomas Nordlander,
Harrison Abbot,
Seo-Won Chang
Abstract:
In the Gaia era, the majority of stars in the Solar neighbourhood have parallaxes and proper motions precisely determined while spectroscopic age indicators are still missing for a large fraction of low-mass young stars. In this work we select 756 overluminous late K and early M young star candidates in the southern sky and observe them over 64 nights with the ANU 2.3m Telescope at Siding Spring O…
▽ More
In the Gaia era, the majority of stars in the Solar neighbourhood have parallaxes and proper motions precisely determined while spectroscopic age indicators are still missing for a large fraction of low-mass young stars. In this work we select 756 overluminous late K and early M young star candidates in the southern sky and observe them over 64 nights with the ANU 2.3m Telescope at Siding Spring Observatory using the Echelle (R=24,000) and Wide Field spectrographs (WiFeS, R=3000-7000). Our selection is kinematically unbiased to minimize the preference against low-mass members of stellar associations that dissipate first, and to include potential members of diffuse components. We provide measurements of H$α$ and calcium H&K emission, as well as lithium absorption line, that enable identification of stars as young as $\sim$10-30 Myr which is a typical age of a stellar association. We report on 346 stars showing a detectable lithium line, 318 of which are not found in the known catalogs of young stars. We also report 126 additional stars in our sample which have no detectable lithium but signs of stellar activity indicating youth. Radial velocities are determined for WiFeS spectra with a precision of 3.2 $\mathrm{km\;s^{-1}}$ and 1.5 $\mathrm{km\;s^{-1}}$ for the Echelle sample.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
An outflow powers the optical rise of the nearby, fast-evolving tidal disruption event AT2019qiz
Authors:
M. Nicholl,
T. Wevers,
S. R. Oates,
K. D. Alexander,
G. Leloudas,
F. Onori,
A. Jerkstrand,
S. Gomez,
S. Campana,
I. Arcavi,
P. Charalampopoulos,
M. Gromadzki,
N. Ihanec,
P. G. Jonker,
A. Lawrence,
I. Mandel,
S. Schulze,
P. Short,
J. Burke,
C. McCully,
D. Hiramatsu,
D. A. Howell,
C. Pellegrino,
H. Abbot,
J. P. Anderson
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
At 66 Mpc, AT2019qiz is the closest optical tidal disruption event (TDE) to date, with a luminosity intermediate between the bulk of the population and iPTF16fnl. Its proximity allowed a very early detection and triggering of multiwavelength and spectroscopic follow-up well before maximum light. The velocity dispersion of the host galaxy and fits to the TDE light curve indicate a black hole mass…
▽ More
At 66 Mpc, AT2019qiz is the closest optical tidal disruption event (TDE) to date, with a luminosity intermediate between the bulk of the population and iPTF16fnl. Its proximity allowed a very early detection and triggering of multiwavelength and spectroscopic follow-up well before maximum light. The velocity dispersion of the host galaxy and fits to the TDE light curve indicate a black hole mass $\approx 10^6$ M$_\odot$, disrupting a star of $\approx 1$ M$_\odot$. Comprehensive UV, optical and X-ray data shows that the early optical emission is dominated by an outflow, with a luminosity evolution $L \propto t^2$, consistent with a photosphere expanding at constant velocity ($\gtrsim 2000$ km s$^{-1}$), and a line-forming region producing initially blueshifted H and He II profiles with $v=3000-10000$ km s$^{-1}$. The fastest optical ejecta approach the velocity inferred from radio detections (modelled in a forthcoming companion paper from K.~D.~Alexander et al.), thus the same outflow may be responsible for both the fast optical rise and the radio emission -- the first time this connection has been observed in a TDE. The light curve rise begins $29 \pm 2$ days before maximum light, peaking when the photosphere reaches the radius where optical photons can escape. The photosphere then undergoes a sudden transition, first cooling at constant radius then contracting at constant temperature. At the same time, the blueshifts disappear from the spectrum and Bowen fluorescence lines (N III) become prominent, implying a source of far-UV photons, while the X-ray light curve peaks at $\approx 10^{41}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Assuming that these X-rays are from prompt accretion, the size and mass of the outflow are consistent with the reprocessing layer needed to explain the large optical to X-ray ratio in this and other optical TDEs, possibly favouring accretion-powered over collision-powered outflow models.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2020; v1 submitted 3 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
