Appendix

Proof of Lemma 1

.

(a) For any feasible mechanism $\Gamma=(a,p)$, if the bidder whose true type is $\theta_{i}^{t}=(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t})$ reports its type as $\hat{\theta}_{i}^{t}=(\hat{v}_{i}^{t},\hat{q}_{i}^{t})$, the seller will allocate the goods less than the reported demand, i.e., $a_{i}^{t}((\hat{v}_{i}^{t},\hat{q}_{i}^{t}),\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})\leq\hat{q}_{i}^{t}$.

Then, if the bidder reports its demand truthfully, i.e., $\hat{q}_{i}^{t}=q_{i}^{t}$, we can rewrite the interim utility of the bidder as

$$U_{i}^{t}((\hat{v}_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}) |(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}),q^{t})$$

$$=\mathbb{E}_{\theta_{-i}^{t}}[v_{i}^{t}\min\{q_{i}^{t},a_{i}^{t}((\hat{v}_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}),\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})\}-p_{i}^{t}((\hat{v}_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}),\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})]$$

$$=\mathbb{E}_{\theta_{-i}^{t}}[v_{i}^{t}a_{i}^{t}((\hat{v}_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}),\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})-p_{i}^{t}((\hat{v}_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}),\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})]$$

$$=v_{i}^{t}A_{i}^{t}(\hat{v}_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-P_{i}^{t}(\hat{v}_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t}).$$

Meanwhile, since $\Gamma=(a,p)$ is incentive compatible, truth-telling maximizes the interim utility of the bidder and we have

$$U_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t}) =v_{i}^{t}A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-P_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})$$

$$=\underset{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}\in[\underline{v},\bar{v}]}{\sup}v_{i}^{t}A_{i}^{t}(\hat{v}_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-P_{i}^{t}(\hat{v}_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t}).$$ (1)

Then, let $v_{i}^{t}=\alpha v_{1}+(1-\alpha)v_{2}$ where $v_{1}$, $v_{2}\in[\underline{v},\bar{v}]$ and $\alpha\in[0,1]$ are given. Then the following holds.

$$U_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t}) =v_{i}^{t}A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-P_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})$$

$$=\{\alpha v_{1}+(1-\alpha)v_{2}\}A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-P_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})$$

$$=\alpha\{v_{1}A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-P_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})\}$$

$$\qquad+(1-\alpha)\{v_{2}A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-P_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})\}$$

$$\leq\alpha U_{i}^{t}(v_{1},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})+(1-\alpha)U_{i}^{t}(v_{2},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t}).$$

The last inequality holds due to (2).

(b) We only prove the left part of the inequality. The right part of the inequality is omitted and can be proved similarly. For any $(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t})\in\Theta$ and $\varepsilon>0$, we have

$$U_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t}-\varepsilon,q_{i}^{t}|q^{t}) \geq U_{i}^{t}((v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t})|(v_{i}^{t}-\varepsilon,q_{i}^{t}),q^{t})$$

$$=(v_{i}^{t}-\varepsilon)A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-P_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})$$

$$=v_{i}^{t}A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-P_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-\varepsilon A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})$$

$$=U_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-\varepsilon A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t}),$$

which is equal to $U_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-U_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t}-\varepsilon,q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})\leq\varepsilon A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})$.

∎

Proof of Theorem 2

.

From (b) of Theorem 1, under an incentive compatible and feasible mechanism, the expected payment can be written as

$$P_{i}^{t}(\theta^{t}_{i}|q^{t})=v_{i}^{t}A_{i}^{t}(\theta^{t}_{i}|q^{t})-\int_{\underline{v}}^{v_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}(\tau,q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})d\tau-U_{i}^{t}(\underline{v},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t}).$$

If we substitute it into the ex-ante payment of bidder $i$, $\mathbb{E}_{\theta^{t}}\left[p_{i}^{t}(\theta^{t}|q^{t})\right]$ equals

$$\mathbb{E}_{\theta^{t}_{i}}\left[P_{i}^{t}(\theta^{t}_{i}|q^{t})\right]$$

$$=\int_{\underline{q}}^{\bar{q}}\int_{\underline{v}}^{\bar{v}}\left(v_{i}^{t}A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-\int_{\underline{v}}^{v_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}(\tau,q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})d\tau-U_{i}^{t}(\underline{v},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})\right)f(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t})dv_{i}^{t}dq_{i}^{t}$$

$$=\int_{\underline{q}}^{\bar{q}}\int_{\underline{v}}^{\bar{v}}\left\{\left(v_{i}^{t}-\dfrac{1-F_{i}(v_{i}^{t}\rvert q_{i}^{t})}{f_{i}(v_{i}^{t}\rvert q_{i}^{t})}\right)A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})-U_{i}^{t}(\underline{v},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})\right\}f(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t})dv_{i}^{t}dq_{i}^{t}$$

$$=\mathbb{E}_{\theta^{t}}\left[\left(v_{i}^{t}-\dfrac{1-F_{i}(v_{i}^{t}\rvert q_{i}^{t})}{f_{i}(v_{i}^{t}\rvert q_{i}^{t})}\right)a_{i}^{t}(\theta^{t}|q^{t})-U_{i}^{t}(\underline{v},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})\right].$$

We can show the third equality by changing the order of integration, which can be computed as

$$\int_{\underline{q}}^{\bar{q}}\int_{\underline{v}}^{\bar{v}}\int_{\underline{v}}^{v_{i}^{t}} A_{i}^{t}(\tau,q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})d\tau f(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t})dv_{i}^{t}dq_{i}^{t}$$

$$=\int_{\underline{q}}^{\bar{q}}\int_{\underline{v}}^{\bar{v}}\int_{\tau}^{\bar{v}}f(v_{i}^{t}|q_{i}^{t})dv_{i}^{t}A_{i}^{t}(\tau,q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})f(q_{i}^{t})d\tau dq_{i}^{t}$$

$$=\int_{\underline{q}}^{\bar{q}}\int_{\underline{v}}^{\bar{v}}\left(1-F(v_{i}^{t}|q_{i}^{t})\right)A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})f(q_{i}^{t})dv_{i}^{t}dq_{i}^{t}$$

$$=\int_{\underline{q}}^{\bar{q}}\int_{\underline{v}}^{\bar{v}}\left(\frac{1-F(v_{i}^{t}|q_{i}^{t})}{f(v_{i}^{t}|q_{i}^{t})}\right)A_{i}^{t}(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})f(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t})dv_{i}^{t}dq_{i}^{t}.$$

Therefore, we can transform the objective function as follows.

$$\sum_{t=1}^{T}\delta^{t-1} \mathbb{E}_{n^{t},\theta^{t}}\left[\sum_{i=1}^{n^{t}}p_{i}^{t}(\theta^{t}|q^{t})\right]$$

$$=\mathbb{E}_{n^{t},\theta^{t}}\left[\sum_{t=1}^{T}\sum_{i=1}^{n^{t}}{\delta^{t-1}\left(v_{i}^{t}-\dfrac{1-F_{i}(v_{i}^{t}\rvert q_{i}^{t})}{f_{i}(v_{i}^{t}\rvert q_{i}^{t})}\right)a_{i}^{t}(\theta^{t}|q^{t})}-U_{i}^{t}(\underline{v},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})\right].$$

Furthermore, as a profit maximizer, the seller can set $U_{i}^{t}(\underline{v},q_{i}^{t}|q^{t})=0$ for any $q_{i}^{t}\in[\underline{q},\bar{q}]$ by adjusting a proper payment rule.

∎

Proof of Lemma 2

.

(a) Recall that $R(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)=\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}(x-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}q_{[j]}^{t})$. Let $x<y$, then it is clear that $i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)\leq i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)$.

If $i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)=i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)$,

$$R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x) =\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}(x-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}q_{[j]}^{t})$$

$$<\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}(y-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}q_{[j]}^{t})$$

$$=R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},y).$$

If $i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)<i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)$, it follows that $i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1\leq i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)$, and thus

$$R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x) =\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}(x-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}q_{[j]}^{t})$$

$$<\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1}\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}$$

$$\leq R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},y).$$

(b) Let $x<y$ and $\alpha\in(0,1)$. Denote $z=\alpha x+(1-\alpha)y$. Then, since $x<z<y$, it follows that $i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)\leq i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)\leq i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)$. Then,

$$R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},z)= \sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}}+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t}\left\{\alpha x+(1-\alpha)y-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right\}$$

$$= \alpha\left\{\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}}+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t}\left(x-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)\right\}$$

$$+(1-\alpha)\left\{\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}}+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t}\left(y-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)\right\}.$$

Since $i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)\leq i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)$, we can show that

$$\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}}+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t}\left(x-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)-R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)$$

$$=\sum_{j=i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}}$$

$$\qquad+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t}\left(x-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)-\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}^{t}\left(x-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)$$

$$=\sum_{j=i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{(\phi_{[j]}^{t}-\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t})q_{[j]}^{t}}$$

$$\qquad+(\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t}-\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}^{t})\left(x-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)$$

$$=\sum_{j=i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+2}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{(\phi_{[j]}^{t}-\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t})q_{[j]}^{t}}$$

$$\qquad+(\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}^{t}-\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t})\left\{q_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}^{t}-\left(x-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)\right\}$$

$$\geq 0.$$

Similarly, since $i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)\leq i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)$,

$$\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}}+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t}\left(y-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)-R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},y)$$

$$=\sum_{j=i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)}{\phi_{[j]}^{t}q_{[j]}^{t}}$$

$$\qquad+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t}\left(y-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)-\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)+1]}^{t}\left(y-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)$$

$$=\sum_{j=i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)}{(\phi_{[j]}^{t}+\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)+1]}^{t})q_{[j]}^{t}}$$

$$\qquad+(\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)+1]}^{t}-\phi_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},y)+1]}^{t})\left(y-\sum_{j=1}^{i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},z)}{q_{[j]}^{t}}\right)$$

$$\geq 0.$$

Therefore, $R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},z)\geq\alpha R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)+(1-\alpha)R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},y)$, which completes the proof.

(c) Let $x\leq Q$, $y\leq R$, and $\alpha\in(0,1)$ be given. Without loss of generality, suppose $Q<R$. Then,

$$R^{t}(\theta^{t},\alpha Q+(1-\alpha)R,\alpha x+(1-\alpha)y) =R(\theta^{t},R,\alpha x+(1-\alpha)y)$$

$$\geq\alpha R(\theta^{t},R,x)+(1-\alpha)R(\theta^{t},R,y)$$

$$=\alpha R(\theta^{t},Q,x)+(1-\alpha)R(\theta^{t},R,y).$$

∎

Proof of Lemma 3

.

(a) We will prove the Lemma 3 using mathematical induction. Denote the optimal solution as $x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$.

At the end of the study period, i.e., $t=T$, let $q^{T}_{1}<q^{T}_{2}$, then

$$V^{T}(\theta^{T},q_{1}^{T}) =R^{T}(\theta^{T},q_{1}^{T},x^{\ast}(\theta^{T},q^{T}_{1}))=R^{T}(\theta^{T},q_{2}^{T},x^{\ast}(\theta^{T},q^{T}_{1}))$$

$$\leq R^{T}(\theta^{T},q_{2}^{T},x^{\ast}(\theta^{T},q^{T}_{2}))=V^{T}(\theta^{T},q_{2}^{T}).$$

The inequality holds because the feasible set of $x$ in $q^{T}_{1}$ is included to $q^{T}_{2}$.

Then, let’s assume that the statement holds in the case of $t+1$. Then, for $q^{t}_{1}<q^{t}_{2}$,

$$V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1}) =R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1},x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1}))+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}_{1}-x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1}))]$$

$$\leq R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2},x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1}))+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}_{2}-x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1}))]$$

$$\leq R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2},x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2}))+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}_{2}-x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2}))]$$

$$=V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2}).$$

The first inequality holds by the assumption and the second inequality holds because of the optimality of $x^{\ast}$.

(b) Mathematical induction is applied again. For $t=T$,

$$V^{T}(\theta^{T},q^{T})=R^{T}(\theta^{T},q^{T},x^{\ast}(\theta^{T},q^{T})).$$

Without loss of generality, assume that $\phi_{i}^{T}>0$ for every buyer $(i,T)$. Then, $V^{T}(\theta^{T},q^{T})=R^{T}(\theta^{T},q^{T},q^{T})$. Then, from (c) of Lemma 2, $V^{T}(\theta^{T},q^{T})$ is concave with respect to $q^{T}$.

Then, assume that the statement holds in the case of $t+1$. Then, let $q^{t}_{1}$, $q^{t}_{2}$, and $\alpha\in(0,1)$ be given. For $x_{1}\in[0,q^{t}_{1}]$ and $x_{2}\in[0,q^{t}_{2}]$, define $x$ and $q$ as

$$x=\alpha x_{1}+(1-\alpha)x_{2}\mbox{ and }q=\alpha q^{t}_{1}+(1-\alpha)q^{t}_{2}.$$

Since $V^{t+1}(\theta^{t},q^{t+1})$ is concave with respect to $q^{t+1}$,

$$V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q-x) =V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},\alpha(q^{t}_{1}-x_{1})+(1-\alpha)(q^{t}_{2}-x_{2}))$$

$$\geq\alpha V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}_{1}-x_{1})+(1-\alpha)V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}_{2}-x_{2}).$$

It implies that

$$\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q-x)]\geq \alpha\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}_{1}-x_{1})]$$

$$+(1-\alpha)\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}_{2}-x_{2})].$$

Furthermore, since $R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)$ is concave with respect to $(q^{t},x)$, we also have

$$R^{t}(\theta^{t},q,x)\geq\alpha R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1},x_{1})+(1-\alpha)R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2},x_{2}).$$

Adding up these two inequalities, we have

$$V^{t}(\theta^{t},q) =\underset{0\leq x^{\prime}\leq q}{\sup}R(\theta^{t},q,x^{\prime})+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q-x^{\prime})]$$

$$\geq R^{t}(\theta^{t},q,x)+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q-x)]$$

$$\geq\alpha\left\{R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1},x_{1})+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}_{1}-x_{1})]\right\}$$

$$\quad+(1-\alpha)\left\{R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2},x_{2})+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}_{2}-x_{2})]\right\}.$$

Then, taking the supremum over $x_{1}\in[0,q^{t}_{1}]$ and $x_{2}\in[0,q^{t}_{2}]$, we have

$$V^{t}(\theta^{t},q)\geq\alpha V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1})+(1-\alpha)V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2}),$$

which completes the proof.

(c) Recall that

$$\mathbb{E}_{n^{t},\theta^{t}}[V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t})]=\sum_{n=1}^{N}g(n)\int_{\Theta^{N}}V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t})f(\theta^{t})d\theta^{t}.$$

Let $q_{1}^{t}<q_{2}^{t}$. For given $\theta^{t}$, since $V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1})\leq V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2})$ by (a) of Lemma 3, we have

$$\sum_{n=1}^{N}g(n)\int_{\Theta^{N}}V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1})f(\theta^{t})d\theta^{t}\leq\sum_{n=1}^{N}g(n)\int_{\Theta^{N}}V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2})f(\theta^{t})d\theta^{t},$$

which proves the monotonicity. Furthermore, let $\alpha\in(0,1)$ be given. Then, by (b) of Lemma 3,

$$V^{t}(\theta^{t},\alpha q^{t}_{1}+(1-\alpha)q^{t}_{2})\geq\alpha V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1})+(1-\alpha)V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2}).$$

So, it also follows that

$$\sum_{n=1}^{N}g(n)\int_{\Theta^{N}}V^{t}(\theta^{t},\alpha q^{t}_{1}+(1-\alpha)q^{t}_{2})f(\theta^{t})d\theta^{t}$$

$$\geq\alpha\sum_{n=1}^{N}g(n)\int_{\Theta^{N}}V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{1})f(\theta^{t})d\theta^{t}+(1-\alpha)\sum_{n=1}^{N}g(n)\int_{\Theta^{N}}V^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t}_{2})f(\theta^{t})d\theta^{t},$$

which proves the concavity.

∎

Proof of Theorem 5

Remark.

Consider any two type vector $\theta^{t}$ and $\tilde{\theta}^{t}$, where $\theta^{t}=(\theta^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i})$ and $\tilde{\theta}^{t}=(\tilde{\theta}^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i})$. Assume that the corresponding virtual value of $\theta^{t}_{i}$ is smaller than that of $\tilde{\theta}^{t}_{i}$, i.e., $\phi_{i}^{t}=v_{i}^{t}-\frac{1-F(v^{t}_{i}|q^{t}_{i})}{f(v^{t}_{i}|q^{t}_{i})}<\tilde{\phi}_{i}^{t}=\tilde{v}_{i}^{t}-\frac{1-F(\tilde{v}^{t}_{i}|\tilde{q}^{t}_{i})}{f(\tilde{v}^{t}_{i}|\tilde{q}^{t}_{i})}$. Then, the following statement holds.

$$x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})\leq x^{\ast}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t}).$$

 

Proof of Remark.

 

We first show that $MV^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)\leq MV^{t}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t},x)$ for every $x\in[0,q^{t}]$. Consider the marginal values of state $(\theta^{t},q^{t})$ and $(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t})$:

$$MV^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x) =\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left\{R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}-x)]\right\},$$

$$MV^{t}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t},x) =\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left\{R^{t}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t},x)+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{t+1},\theta^{t+1}}[V^{t+1}(\theta^{t+1},q^{t}-x)]\right\}.$$

Therefore, what we have to show is $\frac{\partial}{\partial x}R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)\leq\frac{\partial}{\partial x}R^{t}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t},x)$. Denote the virtual values of $\theta^{t}$ as $\phi^{t}=(\phi^{t}_{1},\cdots,\phi^{t}_{n^{t}})$ and the virtual values of $\tilde{\theta}^{t}$ as $\tilde{\phi}^{t}=(\tilde{\phi}^{t}_{1},\cdots,\tilde{\phi}^{t}_{n^{t}})$. Then, we have $\phi^{t}_{i}<\tilde{\phi}^{t}_{i}$ and $\phi^{t}_{j}=\tilde{\phi}^{t}_{j}$ for $(j,t)\neq(i,t)$.

If $\tilde{\phi}_{i}^{t}<\phi^{t}_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}$, the priority of the allocated buyers are unchanged, so

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial x}R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)=\phi^{t}_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}=\frac{\partial}{\partial x}R^{t}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t},x).$$

If $\tilde{\phi}_{i}^{t}\geq\phi^{t}_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}$, there is a chance for the buyer $(i,t)$ to push out the existing winners, and it implies that $\tilde{\phi}^{t}_{[i^{\ast}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},x)+1]}\geq\phi^{t}_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}$. Therefore,

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial x}R^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)=\phi^{t}_{[i^{\ast}(\theta^{t},x)+1]}\leq\tilde{\phi}^{t}_{[i^{\ast}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},x)+1]}=\frac{\partial}{\partial x}R^{t}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t},x),$$

which proves $MV^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)\leq MV^{t}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t},x)$ for every $x\in[0,q^{t}]$.

Then, by Lemma 5, since both $MV^{t}(\theta^{t},q^{t},x)$ and $MV^{t}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t},x)$ is non-increasing with respect to $x$, it is obvious that $X^{-}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t})\subseteq X^{-}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$. Also, if both sets are non-empty, $\inf X^{-}(\theta^{t},q^{t})\leq\inf X^{-}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t})$. So, by the definition of $x^{\ast}$, we have $x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})\leq x^{\ast}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t})$.

∎

.

(a) Consider the two types of bidder $(i,t)$: $\theta^{t}_{i}=(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t})$ and $\tilde{\theta}^{t}_{i}=(\tilde{v}_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t})$ where $v_{i}^{t}<\tilde{v}_{i}^{t}$. Under the regularity condition, the corresponding virtual values satisfy $\phi_{i}^{t}<\tilde{\phi}_{i}^{t}$. Since the virtual values of the other bidders are unchanged, the priority of bidder $(i,t)$ with type $\tilde{\theta}^{t}_{i}$ is higher than with type $\theta^{t}_{i}$. On the other hand, by the preceding Remark, $x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})\leq x^{\ast}(\tilde{\theta}^{t},q^{t})$. Therefore, we can conclude that $(a_{i}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})\leq(a_{i}^{t})^{\ast}(\tilde{\theta}^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})$. Integrating both sides of the inequality, we obtain $(A_{i}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t}_{i}|q^{t})\leq(A_{i}^{t})^{\ast}(\tilde{\theta}^{t}_{i}|q^{t})$. In other words, the expectations for $\theta^{t}_{-i}$ still satisfy the inequality.

(b) The proof of (b) is omitted because it is analogous to (a)

∎

Proof of Theorem 6

.

Step 1: $\Gamma^{\ast}=(a^{\ast},p^{\ast})$ with the penalty scheme $\rho$ is incentive compatible.

Let $\theta^{t}$ and $q^{t}$ is given. Consider an arbitrary bidder $(i,t)$. When the bidder has a true type of $\theta^{t}_{i}=(v_{i}^{t},q_{i}^{t})$ and reports $\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i}=(\hat{v}_{i}^{t},\hat{q}_{i}^{t})$, there are two possibilities of the reported demand: $\hat{q}_{i}^{t}\leq q_{i}^{t}$ or $\hat{q}_{i}^{t}>q_{i}^{t}$.

Consider the case where $\hat{q}_{i}^{t}\leq q_{i}^{t}$. Then, the bidder does not have to consider the activation of the penalty scheme, thus the expected utility can be written as

$$U_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i}|\theta^{t}_{i}) =\mathbb{E}_{\theta^{t}_{-i}}[v_{i}^{t}a_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})-p_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})]$$

$$=v_{i}^{t}A_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i}|q^{t})-\left(\hat{v}_{i}^{t}A_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i}|q^{t})-\int_{0}^{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du\right)$$

$$=(v_{i}^{t}-\hat{v}_{i}^{t})A_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i}|q^{t})+\int_{0}^{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du.$$

If $v_{i}^{t}\leq\hat{v}_{i}^{t}$,

$$(v_{i}^{t}-\hat{v}_{i}^{t})A_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i}|q^{t})+\int_{0}^{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du$$

$$=-\int_{v_{i}^{t}}^{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((\hat{v}_{i}^{t},\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du+\int_{0}^{v_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du+\int_{v_{i}^{t}}^{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du$$

$$\leq\int_{0}^{v_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du.$$

The last inequality holds since $A_{i}^{t}((v,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})$ is non-decreasing with respect to $v$. Similarly, if $v_{i}^{t}>\hat{v}_{i}^{t}$,

$$(v_{i}^{t}-\hat{v}_{i}^{t})A_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i}|q^{t})+\int_{0}^{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du$$

$$=\int_{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}}^{v_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((\hat{v}_{i}^{t},\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du+\int_{0}^{v_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du-\int_{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}}^{v_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du$$

$$\leq\int_{0}^{v_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du.$$

Since $\int_{0}^{v_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du=U_{i}^{t}((v_{i}^{t},\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})$, every bidder has no reason to misreport the marginal value $\hat{v}_{i}^{t}\neq v_{i}^{t}$. Furthermore, since $A_{i}^{t}((v_{i}^{t},q)|q^{t})$ is non-decreasing with respect to $q$, the bidder’s expected utility is maximized when $\hat{q}_{i}^{t}=q_{i}^{t}$.

Then, consider the case where $\hat{q}_{i}^{t}>q_{i}^{t}$. Then, the bidder has to consider the activation of the penalty scheme if the goods are over-allocated. Then, the bidder’s expected utility satisfies the following.

$$U_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i}|\theta^{t}_{i}) =\mathbb{E}_{\theta^{t}_{-i}}[v_{i}^{t}\min\{q_{i}^{t},a_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})\}-p_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})-\rho_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})]$$

$$\leq\mathbb{E}_{\theta^{t}_{-i}}[v_{i}^{t}a_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})-p_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})-\rho_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})]$$

$$=(v_{i}^{t}-\hat{v}_{i}^{t})A_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i}|q^{t})+\int_{0}^{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})$$

$$\qquad-\int_{(a^{t}_{i})^{\ast,-1}((q_{i}^{t},\infty))}\frac{\bar{v}\hat{q}_{i}^{t}}{\mathcal{P}_{\theta^{t}_{-i}}(((a_{i}^{t})^{-1}(\{\hat{q}_{i}^{t}\}))}d\mathcal{P}_{\theta^{t}_{-i}}$$

$$\leq(v_{i}^{t}-\hat{v}_{i}^{t})A_{i}^{t}(\hat{\theta}^{t}_{i}|q^{t})+\int_{0}^{\hat{v}_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})-\bar{v}\hat{q}_{i}^{t}$$

$$\leq 0.$$

The second inequality holds since $\frac{\mathcal{P}_{\theta^{t}_{-i}}((a_{i}^{t})^{-1}((q_{i}^{t},\infty))}{\mathcal{P}_{\theta^{t}_{-i}}(((a_{i}^{t})^{-1}(\{\hat{q}_{i}^{t}\}))}\geq 1$, and the last inequality holds since $0\leq A_{i}^{t}((v,\hat{q}_{i}^{t})|q^{t})\leq\hat{q}_{i}^{t}$ for every $0\leq v\leq\bar{v}$. Then, the bidder has no reason to overbid the demand regardless of the reported value $\hat{v}_{i}^{t}$, which completes the proof of incentive compatibility.

 

Step 2: $\Gamma^{\ast}=(a^{\ast},p^{\ast})$ with the penalty scheme $\rho$ is individually rational.

For any given state $(\theta^{t},q^{t})$, consider an arbitrary bidder $(i,t)$. Then, for $\theta^{t}_{-i}\in\Theta^{n^{t}-1}$, $a_{i}^{t}(\theta^{t}_{i},\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})\geq 0$. It follows that $A_{i}^{t}(\theta^{t}_{i}|q^{t})\geq 0$. Also, $a_{i}^{t}((0,q_{i}^{t}),\theta^{t}_{-i},q^{t})=0$. Therefore,

$$U_{i}^{t}(\theta^{t}_{i}|q^{t})=\int_{0}^{v_{i}^{t}}A_{i}^{t}((u,q_{i}^{t})|q^{t})du\geq 0.$$

 

Step 3: $\Gamma^{\ast}=(a^{\ast},p^{\ast})$ with the penalty scheme $\rho$ maximizes the seller’s expected revenue.

Consider the case where $T=2$. Then, by the revelation principle, any mechanism can be replicated by an incentive compatible, feasible direct mechanism. So, consider a direct mechanism $\hat{\Gamma}=((\hat{a}^{1},\hat{p}^{1}),(\hat{a}^{2},\hat{p}^{2}))$. Since it is incentive compatible, individually rational, and feasible, the expected revenue of the seller who determines to sell $x$ units in the first period is

$$\Pi(\hat{\Gamma}) =\mathbb{E}_{n^{1},\theta^{1}}\left[\sum_{i=1}^{n^{1}}\phi_{i}^{1}\hat{a}_{i}^{1}(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q})-\sum_{i=1}^{n^{1}}U_{i}^{1}((0,q_{i}^{1})|q^{t})\right]$$

$$+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{2},\theta^{2}}\left[\sum_{i=1}^{n^{2}}\phi_{i}^{2}\hat{a}_{i}^{2}(\theta^{2},\tilde{Q}-x)-\sum_{i=1}^{n^{2}}U_{i}^{2}((0,q_{i}^{2})\right]$$

Then, for given state $(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q})$ and for any $x\in[0,\tilde{Q}]$, we have

$$\sum_{i=1}^{n^{1}}\phi_{i}^{1}\hat{a}_{i}^{1}(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q})-\sum_{i=1}^{n^{1}}U_{i}^{1}((0,q_{i}^{1})|q^{t})$$

$$\qquad+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{2},\theta^{2}}\left[\sum_{i=1}^{n^{2}}\phi_{i}^{2}\hat{a}_{i}^{2}(\theta^{2},\tilde{Q}-x)-\sum_{i=1}^{n^{2}}U_{i}^{2}((0,q_{i}^{2})\right]$$

$$\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n^{1}}\phi_{i}^{1}\hat{a}_{i}^{1}(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q})+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{2},\theta^{2}}\left[\sum_{i=1}^{n^{2}}\phi_{i}^{2}\hat{a}_{i}^{2}(\theta^{2},\tilde{Q}-x)\right]$$

$$\leq R^{1}(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q},x)+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{2},\theta^{2}}\left[R^{2}(\theta^{2},\tilde{Q}-x,y)\right]$$

$$\leq R^{1}(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q},x)+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{2},\theta^{2}}\left[V^{2}(\theta^{2},\tilde{Q}-x)\right]$$

$$\leq\underset{0\leq x\leq\tilde{Q}}{\sup}R^{1}(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q},x)+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{2},\theta^{2}}\left[V^{2}(\theta^{2},\tilde{Q}-x)\right]$$

Therefore, we can conclude that $\Pi(\hat{\Gamma})\leq\Pi(\Gamma^{\ast})$ when $T=2$.

Then, suppose that the statement holds in the case of $T=\tau$. That is, $\Gamma^{\ast}=(a^{t},p^{t})_{t=1}^{\tau}$ is a revenue-maximizing mechanism when the study period is $\tau$. Claim that $\Gamma^{\ast}=(a^{t},p^{t})_{t=1}^{\tau+1}$ is also a revenue-maximizing mechanism when the study period is $\tau+1$. For this purpose, consider an arbitrary incentive compatible mechanism $\hat{\Gamma}=(\hat{a}^{t},\hat{p}^{t})_{t=1}^{\tau+1}$. For $x\in[0,\tilde{Q}]$, define sub-mechanism $\Gamma^{\ast}_{2}=(a^{t},p^{t})_{t=2}^{\tau+1}$ and $\hat{\Gamma}_{2}=(\hat{a}^{t},\hat{p}^{t})_{t=2}^{\tau+1}$. That is, each sub-mechanism starts at $t=2$ with $\tilde{Q}-x$ units of the goods. By the assumption, we have $\Pi(\hat{\Gamma}_{2})\leq\Pi(\Gamma^{\ast}_{2})$. So, when the seller determines to sell $x$ units at state $(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q})$,

$$\sum_{i=1}^{n^{1}}\phi_{i}^{1}\hat{a}_{i}^{1}(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q})-\sum_{i=1}^{n^{1}}U_{i}^{1}((0,q_{i}^{1})|q^{t})+\delta\Pi(\hat{\Gamma}_{2})$$

$$\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n^{1}}\phi_{i}^{1}\hat{a}_{i}^{1}(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q})+\delta\Pi(\Gamma^{\ast}_{2})$$

$$\leq R^{1}(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q},x)+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{2},\theta^{2}}[V^{2}(\theta^{t},\tilde{Q}-x)]$$

$$\leq\underset{0\leq x\leq\tilde{Q}}{\sup}R^{1}(\theta^{1},\tilde{Q},x)+\delta\mathbb{E}_{n^{2},\theta^{2}}\left[V^{2}(\theta^{2},\tilde{Q}-x)\right]\$$

Therefore, we can conclude that $\Pi(\hat{\Gamma})\leq\Pi(\Gamma^{\ast})$ when $T=\tau+1$, which completes the proof. ∎

Allocation algorithm

Algorithm 1 Allocation rule for given $x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$

Input: $\theta^{t}$, $q^{t}$, $x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$

1:  for $1\leq i\leq n^{t}$ do

2:     Compute $\phi_{i}^{t}=v_{i}^{t}-\frac{1-F(v_{i}^{t}|q_{i}^{t})}{f(v_{i}^{t}|q_{i}^{t})}$

3:  end for

4:  Reorder buyers: $\phi^{t}_{[1]}>\cdots>\phi^{t}_{[n^{t}]}$

5:  for $1\leq i\leq n^{t}$ do

6:     $(a_{[i]}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})=\min\{x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t}),q_{[i]}^{t}\}$

7:     $x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})\leftarrow x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})-(a_{[i]}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$

8:  end for

9:  return $(a_{i}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$ for $1\leq i\leq n^{t}$

Payment algorithm

Algorithm 2 Payment rule for given $x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$

Input: $\theta^{t}$, $q^{t}$, $x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$, $(a^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$

1:  for $1\leq i\leq n^{t}$ do

2:     if $(a_{i}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})=0$ then

3:        $(p_{i}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})=0$

4:     else

5:        Compute $(a^{t})^{\ast\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$, defined as the optimal allocation with $x^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})-(a_{i}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$ units

6:        $d_{-i}=(a_{-i}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})-(a_{-i}^{t})^{\ast\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$

7:        $(p_{i}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})=\sum_{j\neq i}\min\{\underline{v},(\phi_{i}^{t})^{-1}(\phi_{j}^{t}(\theta_{j}^{t}))\}d_{j}$

8:     end if

9:  end for

10:  return $(p_{i}^{t})^{\ast}(\theta^{t},q^{t})$ for $1\leq i\leq n^{t}$