HTML conversions sometimes display errors due to content that did not convert correctly from the source. This paper uses the following packages that are not yet supported by the HTML conversion tool. Feedback on these issues are not necessary; they are known and are being worked on.

  • failed: MnSymbol
  • failed: blkarray

Authors: achieve the best HTML results from your LaTeX submissions by following these best practices.

License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:2401.00071v1 [math.PR] 29 Dec 2023

Shifted Composition II: Shift Harnack Inequalities
and Curvature Upper Bounds

Jason M. Altschuler
UPenn
[email protected]
   Sinho Chewi
IAS
[email protected]
Abstract

We apply the shifted composition rule—an information-theoretic principle introduced in our earlier work [scr1]—to establish shift Harnack inequalities for the Langevin diffusion. We obtain sharp constants for these inequalities for the first time, allowing us to investigate their relationship with other properties of the diffusion. Namely, we show that they are equivalent to a sharp “local gradient-entropy” bound, and that they imply curvature upper bounds in a compelling reflection of the Bakry–Émery theory of curvature lower bounds. Finally, we show that the local gradient-entropy inequality implies optimal concentration of the score, a.k.a. the logarithmic gradient of the density.

1 Introduction

This paper is a sequel to our earlier work [scr1], in which we introduced an information-theoretic principle called the shifted composition rule. Briefly, this principle allows for bounding information-theoretic divergences, such as the Kullback–Leibler (KL) or Rényi divergence, between the marginal laws of two stochastic processes through the introduction of a third, auxiliary process. In that paper, we applied the shifted composition rule to provide, among other results, information-theoretic proofs of F.-Y. Wang’s celebrated dimension-free Harnack inequalities for diffusions [Wang1997LSINoncompact] via their dual formulation as a certain family of reverse transport inequalities.

The Harnack inequalities therein encode regularity for Kolmogorov’s backward equation. The aim of the present paper is to apply our information-theoretic framework to the dual problem of regularity for Kolmogorov’s forward equation, i.e., the Fokker–Planck equation. To describe the problem setting and our results, we introduce some basic concepts.

Harnack and shift Harnack inequalities.

For concreteness, let V::𝑉V:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}italic_V : roman_ℝ → roman_ℝ be a smooth potential and consider the Langevin diffusion

dXt=V(Xt)dt+2dBt,dsubscript𝑋𝑡𝑉subscript𝑋𝑡d𝑡2dsubscript𝐵𝑡\displaystyle\mathrm{d}X_{t}=-\nabla V(X_{t})\,\mathrm{d}t+\sqrt{2}\,\mathrm{d% }B_{t}\,,roman_d italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - ∇ italic_V ( italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) roman_d italic_t + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG roman_d italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (1.1)

where (Bt)t\geqslant0subscriptsubscript𝐵𝑡𝑡\geqslant0{(B_{t})}_{t\geqslant 0}( italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a standard Brownian motion on \mathbb{R}roman_ℝ. Following the storied tradition of functional analysis, we study the regularity of this process through its Markov semigroup (Pt)t\geqslant0subscriptsubscript𝑃𝑡𝑡\geqslant0{(P_{t})}_{t\geqslant 0}( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which acts on any (reasonable) function f::𝑓f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}italic_f : roman_ℝ → roman_ℝ via Ptf(x)𝔼^𝕏𝕏~subscript𝑃𝑡𝑓𝑥conditional𝔼^subscript𝕏subscript𝕏~P_{t}f(x)\coloneqq\mathbb{E}[f(X_{t})\mid X_{0}=x]italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f ( italic_x ) ≔ roman_𝔼 ^ ℧ ⊊ roman_𝕏 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊋ ∣ roman_𝕏 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊬ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ↮ ↶ ~. Classically, under a curvature lower bound of the form 2VαIsucceeds-or-equalssuperscript2𝑉𝛼𝐼\nabla^{2}V\succeq\alpha I∇ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_V ⪰ italic_α italic_I, α𝛼\alpha\in\mathbb{R}italic_α ∈ roman_ℝ (also called the curvature-dimension condition, or the Bakry–Émery criterion), one obtains Harnack inequalities of the form

Ptf(x)p\leqslantC(p,t,x,y)Pt(fp)(y),for allx,yand\geqslantsubscript𝑃𝑡𝑓superscript𝑥𝑝\leqslant𝐶𝑝𝑡𝑥𝑦subscript𝑃𝑡superscript𝑓𝑝𝑦for all𝑥𝑦andsubscript\geqslant\displaystyle{P_{t}f(x)}^{p}\leqslant C(p,t,x,y)\,P_{t}(f^{p})(y)\,,\qquad% \text{for all}~{}x,y\in\mathbb{R}\,,\,t>0\,,~{}\text{and}~{}f:\mathbb{R}\to% \mathbb{R}_{\geqslant 0}\,.italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f ( italic_x ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_p , italic_t , italic_x , italic_y ) italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_f start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_y ) , for all italic_x , italic_y ∈ roman_ℝ ∦ ≈ ⋇ ⊬ ∦ and ℧ ⇍ roman_ℝ → roman_ℝ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊬ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∤ (1.2)

Here, p>1𝑝1p>1italic_p > 1 and C(p,t,x,y)>0𝐶𝑝𝑡𝑥𝑦0C(p,t,x,y)>0italic_C ( italic_p , italic_t , italic_x , italic_y ) > 0 is an appropriate constant. Such inequalities witness the regularizing effect of the semigroup: they imply that for every t>0𝑡0t>0italic_t > 0, the semigroup Ptsubscript𝑃𝑡P_{t}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT maps bounded functions into differentiable ones. If the semigroup is described by transition densities (t,x,y)pt(x,y)maps-to𝑡𝑥𝑦subscript𝑝𝑡𝑥𝑦(t,x,y)\mapsto p_{t}(x,y)( italic_t , italic_x , italic_y ) ↦ italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x , italic_y ), then this amounts to regularity properties with respect to the backward variable x𝑥xitalic_x, i.e., with respect to perturbations to the initial condition of the diffusion. Moreover, the sharp Harnack inequalities imply back the curvature lower bound 2VαIsucceeds-or-equalssuperscript2𝑉𝛼𝐼\nabla^{2}V\succeq\alpha I∇ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_V ⪰ italic_α italic_I; see [Wang04EquivHarnack, Wang10HarnackBoundary, bakry2014analysis, Wang14Diffusion] or [scr1, §6] for further discussion.

To address the regularity of Kolmogorov’s forward equation, the seminal work of F.-Y. Wang in [Wang14ShiftHarnack] introduced the family of shift Harnack inequalities, written

Pt(f(+v))p\leqslantC(p,t,v)Pt(fp),for allvand\geqslant\displaystyle{P_{t}(f(\cdot+v))}^{p}\leqslant C(p,t,v)\,P_{t}(f^{p})\,,\qquad% \text{for all}~{}v\in\mathbb{R},\,t>0\,,~{}\text{and}~{}f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb% {R}_{\geqslant 0}\,.italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_f ( ⋅ + italic_v ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_p , italic_t , italic_v ) italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_f start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , for all italic_v ∈ roman_ℝ ∦ ≈ ⋇ ⊬ ∦ and ℧ ⇍ roman_ℝ → roman_ℝ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊬ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∤ (1.3)

Shift Harnack inequalities imply, for example, the existence of the transition densities (pt)t\geqslant0subscriptsubscript𝑝𝑡𝑡\geqslant0{(p_{t})}_{t\geqslant 0}( italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with respect to the Lebesgue measure, and they also entail gradient bounds for the Lebesgue density pt(x,y)subscript𝑝𝑡𝑥𝑦p_{t}(x,y)italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x , italic_y ) with respect to the forward variable y𝑦yitalic_y (a.k.a. the terminal condition for the diffusion). See §LABEL:sec:shift_harnack_bg for further background and discussion. Note that the Harnack (1.2) and shift Harnack (1.3) inequalities differ because the Langevin semigroup does not commute with convolutions.

In his original paper [Wang14ShiftHarnack], F.-Y. Wang established a number of applications and equivalences for shift Harnack inequalities. (See also his monographs [Wang13HarnackSPDE, Wang14Diffusion] for comprehensive expositions and further applications.) Through the use of coupling arguments, he then established integration by parts formulas and shift Harnack inequalities for (degenerate) stochastic Hamiltonian systems and some SPDEs. Subsequent work extended his techniques to an abundance of settings, including SDEs driven by fractional Brownian motion [Fan15FBM], SDEs driven by jump processes [Wang16IBPJumps], other examples of SPDEs [Zhang16ShiftHarnack, LvHua21HarnackSPDEs], McKean–Vlasov equations [Wang18Landau, HuaWan19DistDepSingular], and SDEs with irregular coefficients [Huang19HarnackIntegrable, HuaWan19DistDepSingular, LvHua21HarnackSPDEs].

Our starting point is the equivalent reformulation of the shift Harnack inequality (1.3), via Hölder duality, in the form of a reverse transport inequality:

𝖱q(δxPt*δvδxPt)subscript𝖱𝑞subscript𝛿𝑥subscript𝑃𝑡subscript𝛿𝑣subscript𝛿𝑥subscript𝑃𝑡\displaystyle\mathsf{R}_{q}(\delta_{x}P_{t}*\delta_{v}\mathbin{\|}\delta_{x}P_% {t})sansserif_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT * italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) \leqslantC(p,t,v),for allx\leqslantsuperscript𝐶𝑝𝑡𝑣for all𝑥\displaystyle\leqslant C^{\prime}(p,t,v)\,,\qquad\text{for all}~{}x\in\mathbb{% R}\,,t>0\,,italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_p , italic_t , italic_v ) , for all italic_x ∈ roman_ℝ ∦ ≈ ⋇ ⊬ ∦ (1.4)

see §LABEL:ssec:prelim:duality. Here, 𝖱qsubscript𝖱𝑞\mathsf{R}_{q}sansserif_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Rényi divergence of order qpp1𝑞𝑝𝑝1q\coloneqq\tfrac{p}{p-1}italic_q ≔ divide start_ARG italic_p end_ARG start_ARG italic_p - 1 end_ARG (see §LABEL:ssec:prelim:info for information-theoretic preliminaries). We apply the shifted composition rule to provide information-theoretic arguments, in discrete time, to establish (1.4) and hence (1.3). In this respect, our development parallels our earlier work [scr1] at least at a syntactic level, and we organize our paper accordingly to emphasize these similarities. However, despite the syntactic similarity, the problem of forward regularity is substantially different from that of backward regularity, and the latter is far less well-understood.

Relationship with curvature upper bounds.

Indeed, whereas F.-Y. Wang’s original Harnack inequalities and the celebrated web of equivalences around the curvature-dimension condition have been well-understood for at least two decades, the understanding of shift Harnack inequalities is relatively nascent.111See, for example, [Wang14ShiftHarnack] for a discussion of the greater challenges faced in the forward regularity setting. A significant point of departure is that the optimal constants C(p,t,v)𝐶𝑝𝑡𝑣C(p,t,v)italic_C ( italic_p , italic_t , italic_v ) in (1.3) are not sharply characterized. In fact, the bounds established in the literature involve constants C(p,t,v)𝐶𝑝𝑡𝑣C(p,t,v)italic_C ( italic_p , italic_t , italic_v ) which diverge to infinity as t𝑡t\to\inftyitalic_t → ∞. Consequently, such bounds do not yield meaningful information about the regularity of the stationary distribution.

One of the primary contributions of this paper is to prove shift Harnack inequalities with optimal constants. With these sharp inequalities in hand, we are then in a position to investigate the possibility of develo** equivalences for the shift Harnack inequalities. Towards this end, we prove the following chain of implications.

Theorem 1.1.

Let (Pt)t\geqslant0subscriptsubscript𝑃𝑡𝑡\geqslant0{(P_{t})}_{t\geqslant 0}( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denote the Markov semigroup corresponding to the Langevin diffusion with potential V𝑉Vitalic_V. Let β>0𝛽0\beta>0italic_β > 0 and p,q>1𝑝𝑞1p,q>1italic_p , italic_q > 1. Consider the following properties.

  1. (𝖢𝗎𝗋𝗏𝖡𝖽𝖽)𝖢𝗎𝗋𝗏𝖡𝖽𝖽(\mathsf{CurvBdd})( sansserif_CurvBdd )

    The two-sided curvature bound βI2VβIprecedes-or-equals𝛽𝐼superscript2𝑉precedes-or-equals𝛽𝐼-\beta I\preceq\nabla^{2}V\preceq\beta I- italic_β italic_I ⪯ ∇ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_V ⪯ italic_β italic_I holds.

  2. (𝖫𝖦𝖤)𝖫𝖦𝖤(\mathsf{LGE})( sansserif_LGE )

    The local gradient-entropy bound

    Ptf2Ptf\leqslant2β1exp(2βt){Pt(flogf)PtflogPtf}superscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑃𝑡𝑓2subscript𝑃𝑡𝑓\leqslant2𝛽12𝛽𝑡subscript𝑃𝑡𝑓𝑓subscript𝑃𝑡𝑓subscript𝑃𝑡𝑓\displaystyle\frac{\lVert{P_{t}\nabla f}\rVert^{2}}{P_{t}f}\leqslant\frac{2% \beta}{1-\exp(-2\beta t)}\,\{P_{t}(f\log f)-P_{t}f\log P_{t}f\}divide start_ARG ∥ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∇ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_ARG divide start_ARG 2 italic_β end_ARG start_ARG 1 - roman_exp ( - 2 italic_β italic_t ) end_ARG { italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_f roman_log italic_f ) - italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f roman_log italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f }

    holds for all t>0𝑡0t>0italic_t > 0 and all smooth f::𝑓subscriptf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}_{>0}italic_f : roman_ℝ → roman_ℝ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋇ ⊬ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

  3. (𝖲𝖧p)subscript𝖲𝖧𝑝(\mathsf{SH}_{p})( sansserif_SH start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )

    The shift Harnack inequality

    Pt(f(+v))p\displaystyle{P_{t}(f(\cdot+v))}^{p}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_f ( ⋅ + italic_v ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT \leqslantexp(βpv22(p1)(1exp(2βt)))Pt(fp)\leqslant𝛽𝑝superscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑣22𝑝112𝛽𝑡subscript𝑃𝑡superscript𝑓𝑝\displaystyle\leqslant\exp\Bigl{(}\frac{\beta p\,\lVert{v}\rVert^{2}}{2\,(p-1)% \,(1-\exp(-2\beta t))}\Bigr{)}\,P_{t}(f^{p})roman_exp ( divide start_ARG italic_β italic_p ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 ( italic_p - 1 ) ( 1 - roman_exp ( - 2 italic_β italic_t ) ) end_ARG ) italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_f start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )

    holds for all v𝑣v\in\mathbb{R}italic_v ∈ roman_ℝ, all t>0𝑡0t>0italic_t > 0, and all f::𝑓subscriptf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}_{>0}italic_f : roman_ℝ → roman_ℝ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋇ ⊬ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

  4. (𝖲𝖱𝖳q)subscript𝖲𝖱𝖳𝑞(\mathsf{SRT}_{q})( sansserif_SRT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )

    The shift reverse transport inequality

    𝖱q(δxPt*δvδxPt)subscript𝖱𝑞subscript𝛿𝑥subscript𝑃𝑡subscript𝛿𝑣subscript𝛿𝑥subscript𝑃𝑡\displaystyle\mathsf{R}_{q}(\delta_{x}P_{t}*\delta_{v}\mathbin{\|}\delta_{x}P_% {t})sansserif_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT * italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) \leqslantβqv22(1exp(2βt))\leqslant𝛽𝑞superscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑣2212𝛽𝑡\displaystyle\leqslant\frac{\beta q\,\lVert{v}\rVert^{2}}{2\,(1-\exp(-2\beta t% ))}divide start_ARG italic_β italic_q ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 ( 1 - roman_exp ( - 2 italic_β italic_t ) ) end_ARG

    holds for all x,v𝑥𝑣x,v\in\mathbb{R}italic_x , italic_v ∈ roman_ℝ and all t>0𝑡0t>0italic_t > 0.

  5. (𝖲𝖧log)subscript𝖲𝖧log(\mathsf{SH}_{\rm log})( sansserif_SH start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_log end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )

    The shift log-Harnack inequality

    Pt(f(+v))\displaystyle P_{t}(f(\cdot+v))italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_f ( ⋅ + italic_v ) ) \leqslantlogPt(expf)+βv22(1exp(2βt))\leqslantsubscript𝑃𝑡𝑓𝛽superscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑣2212𝛽𝑡\displaystyle\leqslant\log P_{t}(\exp f)+\frac{\beta\,\lVert{v}\rVert^{2}}{2\,% (1-\exp(-2\beta t))}roman_log italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_exp italic_f ) + divide start_ARG italic_β ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 ( 1 - roman_exp ( - 2 italic_β italic_t ) ) end_ARG

    holds for all v𝑣v\in\mathbb{R}italic_v ∈ roman_ℝ, all t>0𝑡0t>0italic_t > 0, and all f::𝑓subscriptf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}_{>0}italic_f : roman_ℝ → roman_ℝ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋇ ⊬ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

  6. (𝖲𝖱𝖳1)subscript𝖲𝖱𝖳1(\mathsf{SRT}_{1})( sansserif_SRT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )

    The shift reverse transport inequality

    𝖪𝖫(δxPt*δvδxPt)𝖪𝖫subscript𝛿𝑥subscript𝑃𝑡subscript𝛿𝑣subscript𝛿𝑥subscript𝑃𝑡\displaystyle\mathsf{KL}(\delta_{x}P_{t}*\delta_{v}\mathbin{\|}\delta_{x}P_{t})sansserif_KL ( italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT * italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) \leqslantβv22(1exp(2βt))\leqslant𝛽superscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑣2212𝛽𝑡\displaystyle\leqslant\frac{\beta\,\lVert{v}\rVert^{2}}{2\,(1-\exp(-2\beta t))}divide start_ARG italic_β ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 ( 1 - roman_exp ( - 2 italic_β italic_t ) ) end_ARG

    holds for all x,v𝑥𝑣x,v\in\mathbb{R}italic_x , italic_v ∈ roman_ℝ and all t>0𝑡0t>0italic_t > 0.

  7. (𝖢𝗎𝗋𝗏𝖴𝖡)𝖢𝗎𝗋𝗏𝖴𝖡(\mathsf{CurvUB})( sansserif_CurvUB )

    The curvature upper bound 2VβIprecedes-or-equalssuperscript2𝑉𝛽𝐼\nabla^{2}V\preceq\beta I∇ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_V ⪯ italic_β italic_I holds.

Then, the following implications hold.